What's new

Should Mawlid (Eid Milad-un-Nabi) be celebrated?

While growing up in India even we non-muslims welcomed it, as it gave us a holiday from the tyrannical school teachers. I haven't seen any of my muslim friends celebrate it in anyway, like they do at the end of Ramadan. Always wondered why.
Eid ul Adha and Eid ul Fitr were celebrations that were told to us by Allah.

Eid ul Fitr is the eid we have after ramadan, and basically God commanded us to celebrate the end of the fasting month.
Eid ul Adha has two things associated, one its the day before the Hajj has finally been completed (the main pilgrimage of Muslims in the holy Kabah that takes place once an year), thus a sacrifice of an animal is done. Another thing associated is that Hazrat Ibrahim (ancestors of Prophet Muhammad) was commanded to sacrifice his son by Allah, which he obeyed and as he tried to do so, Allah replaced the his son with a sheep.

These days were celebrated as Eid as commanded by the prophet.

Now rest of the holidays associated by Muslims are just man made. There is nothing wrong in it as long as its not some very stupid concept.

People like to celebrate the Prophets birthday which is nothing wrong. What is wrong is that there is a month of Muharram where society doesnt allow people to have any marriage for 30 days because during Muharram Hazrat Hussain (Prophets Grandson) was killed. THis month is known as the month of mourning. This happened after Prophet's death, the prophet did not make this a month of mourning or came up with rules that you cant married during this month.
 
well no reference has been found yet.
There exists no reference at all , it was started about 600 years after death of prophet. Celebration of birth is not any event in Islam. Otherwise Allah swt would have said something about date of births of certain prophets or even Muhammad SAW would have mentioned something about births of other prophets. The whole thing is farce.

If anything existed in Deen which could give us rewards , prophet would have himself done that and told us. Why will he himself not practice that ? This is why prophets are sent for. They themselves show us by practical examples.
 
Eid ul Adha and Eid ul Fitr were celebrations that were told to us by Allah.

Eid ul Fitr is the eid we have after ramadan, and basically God commanded us to celebrate the end of the fasting month.
Eid ul Adha has two things associated, one its the day before the Hajj has finally been completed (the main pilgrimage of Muslims in the holy Kabah that takes place once an year), thus a sacrifice of an animal is done. Another thing associated is that Hazrat Ibrahim (ancestors of Prophet Muhammad) was commanded to sacrifice his son by Allah, which he obeyed and as he tried to do so, Allah replaced the his son with a sheep.

These days were celebrated as Eid as commanded by the prophet.

Now rest of the holidays associated by Muslims are just man made. There is nothing wrong in it as long as its not some very stupid concept.

People like to celebrate the Prophets birthday which is nothing wrong. What is wrong is that there is a month of Muharram where society doesnt allow people to have any marriage for 30 days because during Muharram Hazrat Hussain (Prophets Grandson) was killed. THis month is known as the month of mourning. This happened after Prophet's death, the prophet did not make this a month of mourning or came up with rules that you cant married during this month.

Practically marriage is allowed in any month there is No restrictions.

People do not do that because prophet was disturbed and sad because of that incident. Prophet was sad when he foretold about that incidence when he was alive in hadeeth. Also after the incidence of karbala , prophet came in dream of Ibn Abbas and he was collecting blood. An Incident which made prophet sad should not make us happy , thus people avoid marrying in that month.

If anyone does shirk things during Muharrum that is wrong , there is NO doubt about that.
 
I have no problem either way. If it gets people to come Masjids, learn a Hadith or Ayat, or get reminded of something they have forgotten or neglected, no one loses. If in the name of the beloved Prophet SAW, we give a little more charity, even better. I don't see the celebration as an article of faith, but it spreads good within Islamic parameters, so I celebrate.
 
I have no problem either way. If it gets people to come Masjids, learn a Hadith or Ayat, or get reminded of something they have forgotten or neglected, no one loses. If in the name of the beloved Prophet SAW, we give a little more charity, even better. I don't see the celebration as an article of faith, but it spreads good within Islamic parameters, so I celebrate.
The problem is it not within parameters of Islam. Parameters of Islam is defined by quran and actions of Prophet and his companions, not with out own intellects.

For example if tomorrow I say we will give azan for Eid salah because it brings in more people , these very deviant scholars will disagree and the reason they will give is that it was not done by the prophet or companions , there you go.
 
The problem is it not within parameters of Islam. Parameters of Islam is defined by quran and actions of Prophet and his companions, not with out own intellects.

For example if tomorrow I say we will give azan for Eid salah because it brings in more people , these very deviant scholars will disagree and the reason they will give is that it was not done by the prophet or companions , there you go.
How is giving charity or getting people into masjids( which is practically how its celebrated) bad for anyone or Islam. If it is then i am guilty of this sin. Let me answer for my sins.
 
How is giving charity or getting people into masjids( which is practically how its celebrated) bad for anyone or Islam. If it is then i am guilty of this sin. Let me answer for my sins.
Brother , what is done in Milad is not hidden , it is available on youtube. Those who are doing that are not hindus or christians or salafis , we all know who they are. The issue is not with charity , they issue is making processions , using flags , cutting cakes in the name of prophet.

People gathering in Masjid is not an issue , people gather for something that prophet did is good. That is for salah and zikr , but you can see what is been done inside masjids , it is again the same group.

Yes , you and we all are answerable for our sins, but when something will be done publicaly , we have right to refute , and that is what we are doing. If the others want to answer us from quran and hadeeth they are welcome , we will accept if they give evidence , because in islam what matters is evidence , not emotional rants
 
Brother , what is done in Milad is not hidden , it is available on youtube. Those who are doing that are not hindus or christians or salafis , we all know who they are. The issue is not with charity , they issue is making processions , using flags , cutting cakes in the name of prophet.

People gathering in Masjid is not an issue , people gather for something that prophet did is good. That is for salah and zikr , but you can see what is been done inside masjids , it is again the same group.

Yes , you and we all are answerable for our sins, but when something will be done publicaly , we have right to refute , and that is what we are doing. If the others want to answer us from quran and hadeeth they are welcome , we will accept if they give evidence , because in islam what matters is evidence , not emotional rants
I have no problems with you refuting. Do all the refuting but I have no problem with what I have experienced and if its not for you, then that is all good.
 
Its becoming a nuisance now in the UK.

Green turbans are doing parades in every major city causing a nuisance wherever they go.

I dont celebrate it but have stopped debating it with others because its just not worth it.

However, if you think walking down a road with a loudspeaker and a cardboard kaaba then cutting a cake for the greatest man who ever lived is a food thing you really need to have your head tested.
 
I have no problems with you refuting. Do all the refuting but I have no problem with what I have experienced and if its not for you, then that is all good.

It is not my view , this is the evidence we get from quran and hadeeth. As I said Islam is not based on my or a scholars opinion but on evidence. Anyone who navigates this thread will see Nil evidence. Only own philosophy and emotions.
 
Its becoming a nuisance now in the UK.

Green turbans are doing parades in every major city causing a nuisance wherever they go.

I dont celebrate it but have stopped debating it with others because its just not worth it.

However, if you think walking down a road with a loudspeaker and a cardboard kaaba then cutting a cake for the greatest man who ever lived is a food thing you really need to have your head tested.
The companions did not know this is how we should celebrate Milad , but these 14th century fanatics know. Sufis have done greatest harm to Islam and unfortunately people do not realize how big sin innovation is.
 
The companions did not know this is how we should celebrate Milad , but these 14th century fanatics know. Sufis have done greatest harm to Islam and unfortunately people do not realize how big sin innovation is.
La hawla wa la quwwata illa billah! Such an ignorant post. What harm have sufis done? You keep spreading your hate in these threads, it's amazing.

No one is forcing you to celebrate Mawlid, but you can not stop others from rejoicing in the blessing and gift from Allah SWT that is our beloved Messanger of Allah (peace and blessings upon him and his folk).

The Prophet (pbuh) celbrated the day of the week in which he was born by fasting on Mondays - so why would celebrating the date of his birth, in permitted and sound ways, be wrong?

I know exactly where you are coming from and you think only Barelvi celebrate this and that this started rececently. You need to go to Jordan, Yemen, Syria, Morocco, Türkiye, Libiya, Egypt etc to see how they celebrate this beautiful day.

Again, if someone doesnt feel comortable with that, it's fine, but condemning a mainstream action approved by mainstream islamic Scholarship is the basis of division, and contrary to established principles.

Anyways, I tried to avoid posting in this thread, but just could not digest reading that Sufis have done greatest harm to Islam. Take off your wahhabi glasses for a minute and try to see the bigger picture here. Sufis existed long before Muhammad ibn Abd Al-Wahhab.

Anyways I am out of this thread and again Mawlid mubarak to all! :)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_ibn_Abd_al-Wahhab

 
It is not my view , this is the evidence we get from quran and hadeeth. As I said Islam is not based on my or a scholars opinion but on evidence. Anyone who navigates this thread will see Nil evidence. Only own philosophy and emotions.
You to yours and me to mine. As I said if its a sin, let me worry about my punishment. You are better off worrying about yourself
 
The companions did not know this is how we should celebrate Milad , but these 14th century fanatics know. Sufis have done greatest harm to Islam and unfortunately people do not realize how big sin innovation is.
Sufis don't advocate violence and have spread Islam to Millions. Although they do go over the top. The damage to Islam has been done by guys that have no Islamic spirit and we know who they belong to and who funds them.
 
It’s a bid’ah plain and simple. An innovation that is prohibited.

If you get offended at this statement as a Muslim, perhaps do some research on your faith rather than doing whatever “feels” good.

Because it’s not me or any poster on here or any Muslim in the world currently that decides this.

It’s the person you are supposedly celebrating with this bid’ah who communicated this to his nation (all of us) as per the commands of Allah. And here you are in disobedience.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sufis don't advocate violence and have spread Islam to Millions. Although they do go over the top. The damage to Islam has been done by guys that have no Islamic spirit and we know who they belong to and who funds them.
Wahabis and Saudis?
 
How is giving charity or getting people into masjids( which is practically how its celebrated) bad for anyone or Islam. If it is then i am guilty of this sin. Let me answer for my sins.
Are you reading what I wrote , your needle is stuck with same sentences

Giving charity and calling people to masjid.

No one is saying that is wrong.

Firstly giving charity and people coming to masjid is not wrong but it is encouraged , throughout the year NOT on one day.
Secondly issue is taking out procession , flying of flags , blocking roads , cutting cakes . If you say these are not done , then you can check the evidence available online.

Now , can you show these activities were done by the companions in the name of love for prophet as part of deen.

Evidence please !
 
You to yours and me to mine. As I said if its a sin, let me worry about my punishment. You are better off worrying about yourself
I no where said you to change , I am just refuting the points you made , that is my right. People need to see that there is no evidence but emotional rants.
 
Sufis don't advocate violence and have spread Islam to Millions. Although they do go over the top. The damage to Islam has been done by guys that have no Islamic spirit and we know who they belong to and who funds them.
Damage is both physical and spiritual , do you understand that ?
 
La hawla wa la quwwata illa billah! Such an ignorant post. What harm have sufis done? You keep spreading your hate in these threads, it's amazing.

No one is forcing you to celebrate Mawlid, but you can not stop others from rejoicing in the blessing and gift from Allah SWT that is our beloved Messanger of Allah (peace and blessings upon him and his folk).

The Prophet (pbuh) celbrated the day of the week in which he was born by fasting on Mondays - so why would celebrating the date of his birth, in permitted and sound ways, be wrong?

I know exactly where you are coming from and you think only Barelvi celebrate this and that this started rececently. You need to go to Jordan, Yemen, Syria, Morocco, Türkiye, Libiya, Egypt etc to see how they celebrate this beautiful day.

Again, if someone doesnt feel comortable with that, it's fine, but condemning a mainstream action approved by mainstream islamic Scholarship is the basis of division, and contrary to established principles.

Anyways, I tried to avoid posting in this thread, but just could not digest reading that Sufis have done greatest harm to Islam. Take off your wahhabi glasses for a minute and try to see the bigger picture here. Sufis existed long before Muhammad ibn Abd Al-Wahhab.

Anyways I am out of this thread and again Mawlid mubarak to all! :)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_ibn_Abd_al-Wahhab

Sufis have started the majority of innovations in Islam. Sufism is not part of Islam at all. There is Nothing called sufism.

Innovation is a big sin because those who do innovation are saying that either the prophet knew something is good and rewarding but he hid it from us or the prophet himself did not know that but these so-called sufis know it.
If you have a third angle, mention it.

Also , there is NO spreading of hatred , when you speak facts people will get offended. There is no solution to that. When you say La Ilaha Illlah , it means there is NO God Except Allah , that also offends many other religion people , so will you stop saying that ? In one sentence you are rejecting all Gods !!

Yes , I know no one can stop innovators from innovating in Deen , but prophet said if you see something wrong stop that with hands or by speech or at least have in your heart that it is wrong , we are following prophet and using speech to expose the innovation.
Moving on you said you are this day is gift from Allah swt, so the companions did not know that or did your sufis know more than the companions ? Kindly answer this point

Prophet said he fasts on Mondays because he was born and he received his first revelation. If you follow that logic , he fasted every week , so milad should be celebrated every week. You not even following that hadith !!!!!

And fasting is celebrating , in what parlance you equate them????

Whether Barelvi celebrates it or Sufi celebrates , or deobandi celebrates or salafi celebrates , it makes NO difference , an innovation is an innovation ! Its NOT about sects , its about the act.

Islam is not based on what I or you or scholars says , it is based on evidence my dear friend.

Here I give you a hadith for my point.

Salim bin Abdullah narrated that :
he had heard a man from Ash-Sham asking Abdullah bin Umar about Tamattu after Umrah until Hajj, so Abdullah bin Umar said: "It is lawful." The man from Ash-Sham said: "But your father prohibited it." So Abdullah bin Umar said: "Is the order to follow my father or is the order (to follow) for the Messenger of Allah?" The man said: "Rather it is for the Messenger of Allah." So he said: "Indeed the Messenger of Allah did it."

https://sunnah.com/tirmidhi:824

Here someone asked Ibn Umar ( son of Umar ) about Tamattu after Umra. Ibn Umar said it was allowed. Then someone asked , but your father ( Umar ) prohibited it. Ibn Umar said that we are supposed to follow Muhammad SAW not Umar.

Do you know who Umar was? He was sabiqoon companion , part of badr , he was khulafa E rasheed , one of ashra Mubashra and yet his son saying that we need to follow the prophet , not Umar RA .

If Umar RA actions will be judged on quran and hadith , who are these scholars you are talking about !!!!!

Any more questions regarding this you are welcome.
 
Damage is both physical and spiritual , do you understand that ?
No, but I do now you "Jannati" guys feel that you have a monopoly on Islam although the guys that have spread your version were created to divide Islam, the price of which we are paying today. It was you that aligned with British, not the Sufis. The house of Saud is one of the most corrupt families on this earth. And I also know that the Saudi backed Nut jobs have caused Chaos in the Muslim World
 
I no where said you to change , I am just refuting the points you made , that is my right. People need to see that there is no evidence but emotional rants.
And I make no apologies. If you don't want to then, then don't. I have only experienced good from this and IA, I contribute more
 
No, but I do now you "Jannati" guys feel that you have a monopoly on Islam although the guys that have spread your version were created to divide Islam, the price of which we are paying today. It was you that aligned with British, not the Sufis. The house of Saud is one of the most corrupt families on this earth. And I also know that the Saudi backed Nut jobs have caused Chaos in the Muslim World
Who are jannati guys ? I never heard of anyone like that.

No one but Quran and hadeeth have monopoly over Islam.

You think I am a salafi ? Brother problem with you and many people is that they have put certain labels to identify certain sects. I am completely against making sects as Allah swt has clearly mentioned in Quran. If someone speaks about Tauheed he is wahabi , if he speaks about love for prophet he is barelvi , if about ahle bayat he is shia !

All these different aspects are necessary in Islam but within boundaries of Islam. For example I cannot claim to love prophet and do things which were not done by him or express love for ahle bayat and start worshiping them.

Now as far as Saudi Monarchy is concerned , I am the only one who has dared to speak against the first Monarch , which was Muawiyah , how many barelvis have spoken against him live ? They all are busy abusing Yazeed , but never talk about the one who made Yazeed the ruler through sword and bribe. Yazeed was part of the system , who invented that ?

I nowhere support this Monarchy system. But that does not mean everything they have done is wrong.

Prophet had said that Allah swt uses even a fasiq to do deeds for deen.

Now , its a humble request if you have any points , you are welcome.
 
Sufis have started the majority of innovations in Islam. Sufism is not part of Islam at all. There is Nothing called sufism.

Innovation is a big sin because those who do innovation are saying that either the prophet knew something is good and rewarding but he hid it from us or the prophet himself did not know that but these so-called sufis know it.
If you have a third angle, mention it.

Also , there is NO spreading of hatred , when you speak facts people will get offended. There is no solution to that. When you say La Ilaha Illlah , it means there is NO God Except Allah , that also offends many other religion people , so will you stop saying that ? In one sentence you are rejecting all Gods !!

Yes , I know no one can stop innovators from innovating in Deen , but prophet said if you see something wrong stop that with hands or by speech or at least have in your heart that it is wrong , we are following prophet and using speech to expose the innovation.
Moving on you said you are this day is gift from Allah swt, so the companions did not know that or did your sufis know more than the companions ? Kindly answer this point

Prophet said he fasts on Mondays because he was born and he received his first revelation. If you follow that logic , he fasted every week , so milad should be celebrated every week. You not even following that hadith !!!!!

And fasting is celebrating , in what parlance you equate them????

Whether Barelvi celebrates it or Sufi celebrates , or deobandi celebrates or salafi celebrates , it makes NO difference , an innovation is an innovation ! Its NOT about sects , its about the act.

Islam is not based on what I or you or scholars says , it is based on evidence my dear friend.

Here I give you a hadith for my point.

Salim bin Abdullah narrated that :
he had heard a man from Ash-Sham asking Abdullah bin Umar about Tamattu after Umrah until Hajj, so Abdullah bin Umar said: "It is lawful." The man from Ash-Sham said: "But your father prohibited it." So Abdullah bin Umar said: "Is the order to follow my father or is the order (to follow) for the Messenger of Allah?" The man said: "Rather it is for the Messenger of Allah." So he said: "Indeed the Messenger of Allah did it."

https://sunnah.com/tirmidhi:824

Here someone asked Ibn Umar ( son of Umar ) about Tamattu after Umra. Ibn Umar said it was allowed. Then someone asked , but your father ( Umar ) prohibited it. Ibn Umar said that we are supposed to follow Muhammad SAW not Umar.

Do you know who Umar was? He was sabiqoon companion , part of badr , he was khulafa E rasheed , one of ashra Mubashra and yet his son saying that we need to follow the prophet , not Umar RA .

If Umar RA actions will be judged on quran and hadith , who are these scholars you are talking about !!!!!

Any more questions regarding this you are welcome.
As I mentioned I avoid to type in these kind of threads as the discussions get longer and longer and we often start talking about other things than than the actual topic. And I simply don't have time to follow up all the posts because talking about deen is not like talking about cricket, here you have to be very careful, so this will be my last post in this thread.

Of course I am not comparing the scholars to Sayyiduna Umar (RA), you should also know that. But Scholars are the inheritors of prophets as it is mentioned in a famous Hadeeth (Related byTirmidhi, Abu Dawud, Nasa’i, Ibn Maja, Ahmad, Ibn Hibban, and others)

But you obviously have no clue about Sufism. Seems like you have seen random videos on YT from Pakistan where people are doing strange things and then come up with a conclusion on Sufism.

Sufism is not something new in Islam. Seems like you are more concerned about the name itself rather than understanding the actions. Sufism is a term later coined for a meaning that has alway been part of our religion. It refers to purifcation (tazkiya) and spiritual excellens (ihsan). Scholars define sufism as sicnert turning to Allah SWT.

Allah SWT says in Quran:

"Just as We have sent to you a Messenger from amongst yourselves, reciting to you Our verses, purifying you, teaching you the Book and the wisdom, and teaching you of that which you knew not.” [Qur’an; 02:151]

"By the soul and He who fashioned it. He then inspired it of its virtue and its vice. Successful indeed is the one who has purified it. And at loss indeed is the one who soiled it.” [Qur’an; 91:7-10]

The purification mentioned in these verses and many other verses are what is understood by the science of sufism. Thus the essence of sufism is directly from the Qur’an and Sunna of the Prophet (may Allah bless him and give him peace). However the word sufism was a term coined much later.

And like that you can write essays and books about this topic.

Coming back to Innovation and celebrating Mawlid; (Pasting directly writings from a realiable scholar):

The concept of “praiseworthy innovation” (bid`a hasana) is basically a specific form of applying a general sunna of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), in a manner not contrary to the principles of Prophetic guidance.

Thus, for example, having an annual conference or religious event on specific dates (for reasons of practicality, without deeming this specification religiously-expected) is a specific way of applying the general sunna of spreading religious guidance.

The same applies to approved-of forms of group dhikr (which is considered permitted or praiseworthy by a large body of mainstream scholarship): the general sunna of group dhikr (understood from a large number of Prophetic hadiths) is being applied in a specific way.

And so on.

However, the scholars look carefully at the soundness of the basis for such actions; the component parts; and the implications of the action, direct and indirect.

Celebrating the Birth of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him)

In terms of the celebrating the Prophet’s birth, the basis of this is of two types:

[1] specific, from the sunna itself: the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) celebrated the day of the week in which he was born by fasting on Mondays–so why would celebrating the date of his birth, in permitted & sound ways, be wrong?

[2] general, from the call in the Qur’an and Sunna to express thankfulness and rejoicing in the blessing and gift from Allah that is our Beloved Messenger of Allah (peace & blessings be upon him & his folk).

Again, if we follow the recourse that Allah Most High has given us: returning matters we’re not clear of to the people of knowledge, then we see that the mawlid, for example, has been carefully considered and generally approved of right across the four schools of mainstream Islamic law.

If someone doesn’t feel comfortable with that, it is fine, but condemning a mainstream action approved by mainstream Islamic scholarship is the basis of division, and contrary to established principles. “There is no condemnation in matters of genuine difference.” (la inkara fi masa’il al-khilaf)

So Alhamdulillah, our scholars from Ahle-Sunnah wa'aljamaa' have made things easy for us to follow, so I am satisfied with it.
 
@IAJ You made good points , In sha Allah I will answer them once I have opportunity . But quickly I would ask you a quick question. Since you believe that there is innovation , what acts do you think are innovations which have been condemned in hadeeth which people do these days? Can you mention here a couple of things which you consider as innovations.
 
Innovation is a big sin because those who do innovation are saying that either the prophet knew something is good and rewarding but he hid it from us or the prophet himself did not know that but these so-called sufis know it.
If you have a third angle, mention it.

Also , there is NO spreading of hatred , when you speak facts people will get offended. There is no solution to that. When you say La Ilaha Illlah , it means there is NO God Except Allah , that also offends many other religion people , so will you stop saying that ? In one sentence you are rejecting all Gods !!

Yes , I know no one can stop innovators from innovating in Deen , but prophet said if you see something wrong stop that with hands or by speech or at least have in your heart that it is wrong , we are following prophet and using speech to expose the innovation.
Moving on you said you are this day is gift from Allah swt, so the companions did not know that or did your sufis know more than the companions ? Kindly answer this point

Prophet said he fasts on Mondays because he was born and he received his first revelation. If you follow that logic , he fasted every week , so milad should be celebrated every week. You not even following that hadith !!!!!

And fasting is celebrating , in what parlance you equate them????

Whether Barelvi celebrates it or Sufi celebrates , or deobandi celebrates or salafi celebrates , it makes NO difference , an innovation is an innovation ! Its NOT about sects , its about the act.

Islam is not based on what I or you or scholars says , it is based on evidence my dear friend.

Here I give you a hadith for my point.

Salim bin Abdullah narrated that :
he had heard a man from Ash-Sham asking Abdullah bin Umar about Tamattu after Umrah until Hajj, so Abdullah bin Umar said: "It is lawful." The man from Ash-Sham said: "But your father prohibited it." So Abdullah bin Umar said: "Is the order to follow my father or is the order (to follow) for the Messenger of Allah?" The man said: "Rather it is for the Messenger of Allah." So he said: "Indeed the Messenger of Allah did it."

https://sunnah.com/tirmidhi:824

Here someone asked Ibn Umar ( son of Umar ) about Tamattu after Umra. Ibn Umar said it was allowed. Then someone asked , but your father ( Umar ) prohibited it. Ibn Umar said that we are supposed to follow Muhammad SAW not Umar.

Do you know who Umar was? He was sabiqoon companion , part of badr , he was khulafa E rasheed , one of ashra Mubashra and yet his son saying that we need to follow the prophet , not Umar RA .

If Umar RA actions will be judged on quran and hadith , who are these scholars you are talking about !!!!!

Any more questions regarding this you are welcome.
POTW. You summarized the answer to the question of the thread title beautifully.
 
As I mentioned I avoid to type in these kind of threads as the discussions get longer and longer and we often start talking about other things than than the actual topic. And I simply don't have time to follow up all the posts because talking about deen is not like talking about cricket, here you have to be very careful, so this will be my last post in this thread.

Of course I am not comparing the scholars to Sayyiduna Umar (RA), you should also know that. But Scholars are the inheritors of prophets as it is mentioned in a famous Hadeeth (Related byTirmidhi, Abu Dawud, Nasa’i, Ibn Maja, Ahmad, Ibn Hibban, and others)

But you obviously have no clue about Sufism. Seems like you have seen random videos on YT from Pakistan where people are doing strange things and then come up with a conclusion on Sufism.

Sufism is not something new in Islam. Seems like you are more concerned about the name itself rather than understanding the actions. Sufism is a term later coined for a meaning that has alway been part of our religion. It refers to purifcation (tazkiya) and spiritual excellens (ihsan). Scholars define sufism as sicnert turning to Allah SWT.

Allah SWT says in Quran:

"Just as We have sent to you a Messenger from amongst yourselves, reciting to you Our verses, purifying you, teaching you the Book and the wisdom, and teaching you of that which you knew not.” [Qur’an; 02:151]

"By the soul and He who fashioned it. He then inspired it of its virtue and its vice. Successful indeed is the one who has purified it. And at loss indeed is the one who soiled it.” [Qur’an; 91:7-10]

The purification mentioned in these verses and many other verses are what is understood by the science of sufism. Thus the essence of sufism is directly from the Qur’an and Sunna of the Prophet (may Allah bless him and give him peace). However the word sufism was a term coined much later.

And like that you can write essays and books about this topic.

Coming back to Innovation and celebrating Mawlid; (Pasting directly writings from a realiable scholar):

The concept of “praiseworthy innovation” (bid`a hasana) is basically a specific form of applying a general sunna of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), in a manner not contrary to the principles of Prophetic guidance.

Thus, for example, having an annual conference or religious event on specific dates (for reasons of practicality, without deeming this specification religiously-expected) is a specific way of applying the general sunna of spreading religious guidance.

The same applies to approved-of forms of group dhikr (which is considered permitted or praiseworthy by a large body of mainstream scholarship): the general sunna of group dhikr (understood from a large number of Prophetic hadiths) is being applied in a specific way.

And so on.

However, the scholars look carefully at the soundness of the basis for such actions; the component parts; and the implications of the action, direct and indirect.

Celebrating the Birth of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him)

In terms of the celebrating the Prophet’s birth, the basis of this is of two types:

[1] specific, from the sunna itself: the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) celebrated the day of the week in which he was born by fasting on Mondays–so why would celebrating the date of his birth, in permitted & sound ways, be wrong?

[2] general, from the call in the Qur’an and Sunna to express thankfulness and rejoicing in the blessing and gift from Allah that is our Beloved Messenger of Allah (peace & blessings be upon him & his folk).

Again, if we follow the recourse that Allah Most High has given us: returning matters we’re not clear of to the people of knowledge, then we see that the mawlid, for example, has been carefully considered and generally approved of right across the four schools of mainstream Islamic law.

If someone doesn’t feel comfortable with that, it is fine, but condemning a mainstream action approved by mainstream Islamic scholarship is the basis of division, and contrary to established principles. “There is no condemnation in matters of genuine difference.” (la inkara fi masa’il al-khilaf)

So Alhamdulillah, our scholars from Ahle-Sunnah wa'aljamaa' have made things easy for us to follow, so I am satisfied with it.
Longer discussions are never an issue my friend if you provide evidence. Not only here in this thread but in any forum you go , if you look into this topic , there will NEVER be a single evidence because there is not. Only emotional dramas. Islam is based on evidence NOT emotional dramas. We pray 2 units in Fajr salah because we have evidence, we cannot say we will pray 4 , because of love for God. We have to follow the deen is instructed by the prophet , not from our own whims and desires.


If you believe that scholars are inheritors to prophets what about the scholars who are against this ? Are they not inheritors?

Brother , scholars are inheritors of knowledge , but when there is a dispute Allah swt says to refer back to the prophet. And on this issue we find NOT a single instance of prophet celebrating his birth or any companions doing that.


Having collective zikr is proved from hadith , so that is not an innovation .

There is Nothing called bidah e hassna in Islam. Bidah is bidah. Prophet called all bidah as misguidance .

When Allah's Messenger (may peace he upon him) delivered the sermon, his eyes became red, his voice rose, and his anger increased so that he was like one giving a warning against the enemy and saying: "The enemy has made a morning attack on you and in the evening too." He would also say: "The Last Hour and I have been sent like these two." And he would join his forefinger and middle finger; and would further say: "The best of the speech is embodied in the Book of Allah, and the best of the guidance is the guidance given by Muhammad. And the most evil affairs are their innovations; and every innovation is error." He would further say:, I am more dear to a Muslim even than his self; and he who left behind property that is for his family; and he who dies under debt or leaves children (in helplessness), the responsibility (of paying his debt and bringing up his children) lies on me."

https://sunnah.com/muslim:867a

Now as far as the annual conference is concerned you have to be specific here , you have made a very general statement.


I answered your point regarding the hadith prophet fasted on Mondays in my previous post , but I will answer again hopefully you read this time.

The Prophet fasted for two reasons: his birth and he received his first revelation on that day.
Now can you tell me how one celebrates a day by fasting on that day ? Do you celebrate Eid by fasting ?

Secondly , He fasted every week , so was he celebrating his birthday every week?

Thirdly , prophet also fasted on thursday , whose birthday was he celebrating this time?

Fourthly , why did no companion follow this celebration and also act on that?

Fifthly , who are those people who fast on this particular day to celebrate the birthday ?


The companions did not know that they need to thank Allah swt for the special day ? Were they ignorant or lacked knowledge or lacked love for the prophet ?

There must be some reason for them not to do that , so ask your scholars to clarify this point.

The mainstream scholarship is supporting mainstream action , but that same mainstream scholarship cannot give a single evidence of there action from Quran and hadith , does that sound right ?

For example if I say I do rafa Yadain in salah , should I not be able to show from hadith why I do that ? Yes there are scholars like Imam hanbal , Imam shafi , etc who did that or told to do that , but behind that fatwa are the hadith of Muhammad SAW . It is the authority of the prophet that we follow , not acts of Imam hanbal or personal opinions of Imam Shafi.

PS : I did not touch sufism because that is not the topic of thread here. I will soon make a thread , and will ask all pro sufis to come and have discussions.

Thank You.

If you hear any scholar make any new point , you can put forward here , I will answer that in sha Allah.
 
The Central Ruet-e-Hilal Committee will hold a meeting today to sight the moon marking the beginning of Rabi-ul-Awwal 1446 Hijri.

The meeting will take place in Islamabad, chaired by committee chairman Maulana Abdul Khabir Azad.

According to an official statement, the meeting is scheduled for 5 PM at the Ministry of Religious Affairs Secretariat.

Representatives from the zonal committee of Islamabad, the Pakistan Space and Upper Atmosphere Research Commission (SUPARCO), the Meteorological Department, and the Ministry of Science and Technology will attend.

A formal announcement on the sighting of the Rabi-ul-Awwal moon will be made following the meeting.

Source: The Express Tribune
 

Govt declares public holiday on Sept 17 for Eid Milad-un-Nabi​


The federal government has declared September 17, Tuesday, a public holiday to observe Eid Milad-un-Nabi, marking the birth of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH).

A notification from the Cabinet Division confirmed that all schools, colleges, and public and private offices will remain closed on this day. The Punjab government has also announced a holiday on the same date for 12th Rabiul Awwal.

The Central Ruet-e-Hilal Committee, after meeting on Wednesday, confirmed that the moon for Rabiul Awwal was not sighted, declaring the 12th of the month will be celebrated on Tuesday, September 17.

Muslims globally commemorate the Prophet's birth on 12th Rabiul Awwal, also known as Mawlid al-Nabawi, the third month of the Islamic lunar calendar.

 
The decision to celebrate this occasion should be left to individuals

If someone truly wants to spread the message, they should begin with themselves—ensure they are 100% perfect in all matters and not just on milad topic. Then, focus on preaching to their family and relatives, making sure they are also 100% perfect and following the deen. After that, turn to their neighbors, then the people of their city, and so on. Only after all of this should they come to the internet to preach to the world.
 
Well, its that time again, what are your thoughts?
 
What do you think about the people who do participate?

I leave that to scholars of Islam.

If people want to celebrate, it is their choice. I personally stick to celebrating Eid-ul-Fitr and Eid-ul-Adha only.

Allah (SWT) knows best.
 
I leave that to scholars of Islam.

If people want to celebrate, it is their choice. I personally stick to celebrating Eid-ul-Fitr and Eid-ul-Adha only.

Allah (SWT) knows best.
Similar views here on my side.
 
Well, its that time again, what are your thoughts?
This issue has been there for ages . Till today there is Not a single evidence of it from Quran and hadeeth. Anyone can check who and when it was started. If we allow opinions of people to become part of deen , then Islam will no longer remain Islam.
 
Prophet Muhammad (Saw) is the best of the creation and sent by Allah SWT as a mercy to all the Worlds.

We express love, respect and rejoice. We have mehfils where people recite Quran, sing nasheeds and scholars tell about the Propthet's (pbuh) life and teachings.


And btw, celebrating Mawlid is not restricted to Subcontintent only as some think here, it's celbrated in many many countries, Turkey, Jordan, Yemen, Morocco to mention a few. Mawlid has been carefully considered and generally approved of right across the four schools of mainstream Islamic law.

If someone doesn’t feel comfortable with that, it is fine, but condemning a mainstream action approved by mainstream Islamic scholarship is the basis of division, and contrary to established principles. “There is no condemnation in matters of genuine difference.” (la inkara fi masa’il al-khilaf)

I will celebrate the Mawlid til my last breath and I teach same to my children In sha Allah.

Attention: Don't have time to get into discussions with anyone here. I refer to previous posts and to mainstream scholars of Ahle Sunna wal-Jamaa'
 
On Eid-i-Miladun Nabi, national leaders urge justice, tolerance to solve prevailing issues

As Eid-i-Miladun Nabi was being celebrated with religious zeal and fervour across the country on Tuesday, political leaders urged the nation to follow Holy Prophet Muhammad’s (PBUH) teachings of unity and tolerance.

The day — declared a public holiday — dawned with a 31-gun salute in Islamabad and 21-gun salutes in all provincial capitals, state-run Radio Pakistan stated.

President Asif Ali Zardari and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif extended their heartfelt congratulations to the country on the occasion of Eid-i-Miladun Nabi, Radio Pakistan reported.

Both leaders urged the public to follow the Holy Prophet’s teachings as a “guiding light to overcome prevailing challenges”.

President Zardari stressed the need to spread the message of love and compassion for humanity taught by the Holy Prophet.

He highlighted that the Holy Prophet established a just society where every individual, regardless of their wealth or social status, could live with dignity, the Associated Press of Pakistan reported.

President Zardari emphasised that Holy Prophet’s teachings encouraged his followers to speak out against oppression and support the marginalised as an integral part of their faith.

“Today, as the world faces division and oppression, it’s imperative to spread the message of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), which embodies love, tolerance, and human rights.

“He treated all individuals, regardless of their faith, with respect and dignity. Embracing this spirit, we must promote global brotherhood, justice, and love,” President Zardari remarked.

In his message, PM Shehbaz said the blessed life, noble character, and exemplary conduct of the Holy Prophet served as a beacon of light for entire humanity.

The premier also highlighted that the nation should also remember “our oppressed brothers and sisters in Palestine and [occupied] Kashmir, who are facing tyranny and oppression”.

“Every word and deed of the Prophet (PBUH) is a manifestation of how human beings could achieve prosperity by upholding the universal principles of love, tolerance, and justice,” PM Shehbaz said.

He further said the Holy Prophet “instilled in his followers the values of unity, love, and brotherhood, which are the principles that can make us overcome our social and economic challenges”.

The premier emphasised upon supporting the vulnerable, prioritising those struggling with poverty and hunger, and adopting a habit of helping others, APP said.

“Let us commit on this occasion to set aside our differences and work together for the progress and prosperity of our beloved,” the prime minister was quoted as saying.

Source: Dawn News
 
I am waiting still for someone to show me authentic evidence for this innovative celebration !!!

Some people just say that scholars have allowed that , and then they say that we do not want to discuss. It means that those posters have no evidence , they just want to run away because lack of evidence.

As far as scholars are concerned , None of them have given evidence , just emotional drama.

And then saying many people celebrate that , well more than 50 % of the people do shirk in the world , will that make it allowed in Islam ?

Its a surprising thing , that people come to a forum for discussion and then make a statement and run away saying I do not want to have discussion. The very idea of posting here is to have discussion.
 
This is the current state of muslims in the world today. Do we celebrate this, or that? How high are his pants from his ankles? What does that text say in his clothes? How many salaats has/does he read? He always talks and keeps company with non-muslims. Oh lord!
Always first to judge.

This happened nearby where i live, where children attend masjid and the women go To collect the children after classes end…An elderly lady invited women to attend a mawlid gathering whilst waiting for the children to come out, a younger girl, mid thirties proceeded to humiliate the older lady saying its not obligatory and why are you holding such a gathering, implying its shirk etc, in front of other older more mature women. The elderly lady felt belitted and humiliated. Thats our M.O. rather than taking her to the side and getting her version or opinion, No, straight up disrespectful.
I avoid such people, always right and correct.
Live and let live. Follow the basic necessary. Rest leave others alone.
 
On Eid-i-Miladun Nabi, national leaders urge justice, tolerance to solve prevailing issues

As Eid-i-Miladun Nabi was being celebrated with religious zeal and fervour across the country on Tuesday, political leaders urged the nation to follow Holy Prophet Muhammad’s (PBUH) teachings of unity and tolerance.

The day — declared a public holiday — dawned with a 31-gun salute in Islamabad and 21-gun salutes in all provincial capitals, state-run Radio Pakistan stated.

President Asif Ali Zardari and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif extended their heartfelt congratulations to the country on the occasion of Eid-i-Miladun Nabi, Radio Pakistan reported.

Both leaders urged the public to follow the Holy Prophet’s teachings as a “guiding light to overcome prevailing challenges”.

President Zardari stressed the need to spread the message of love and compassion for humanity taught by the Holy Prophet.

He highlighted that the Holy Prophet established a just society where every individual, regardless of their wealth or social status, could live with dignity, the Associated Press of Pakistan reported.

President Zardari emphasised that Holy Prophet’s teachings encouraged his followers to speak out against oppression and support the marginalised as an integral part of their faith.

“Today, as the world faces division and oppression, it’s imperative to spread the message of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), which embodies love, tolerance, and human rights.

“He treated all individuals, regardless of their faith, with respect and dignity. Embracing this spirit, we must promote global brotherhood, justice, and love,” President Zardari remarked.

In his message, PM Shehbaz said the blessed life, noble character, and exemplary conduct of the Holy Prophet served as a beacon of light for entire humanity.

The premier also highlighted that the nation should also remember “our oppressed brothers and sisters in Palestine and [occupied] Kashmir, who are facing tyranny and oppression”.

“Every word and deed of the Prophet (PBUH) is a manifestation of how human beings could achieve prosperity by upholding the universal principles of love, tolerance, and justice,” PM Shehbaz said.

He further said the Holy Prophet “instilled in his followers the values of unity, love, and brotherhood, which are the principles that can make us overcome our social and economic challenges”.

The premier emphasised upon supporting the vulnerable, prioritising those struggling with poverty and hunger, and adopting a habit of helping others, APP said.

“Let us commit on this occasion to set aside our differences and work together for the progress and prosperity of our beloved,” the prime minister was quoted as saying.

Source: Dawn News
Mr. Ten Percent is a source of islamic wisdom?!!
 
"
The concept of “praiseworthy innovation” (bid`a hasana) is basically a specific form of applying a general sunna of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), in a manner not contrary to the principles of Prophetic guidance.
"

Sounds, dodgy, this.

Worshipping deities runs contrary, init.
 
Think more people are interested in eating the chanay paturay than the religious significance of it.
 
Think more people are interested in eating the chanay paturay than the religious significance of it.
Yes it's called the Mullah belly. We've seen plenty of those in Pakistan.
 
This issue has been there for ages . Till today there is Not a single evidence of it from Quran and hadeeth. Anyone can check who and when it was started. If we allow opinions of people to become part of deen , then Islam will no longer remain Islam.

Your argument seems flawed. If we follow your reasoning, where in the Quran or Hadith does it say that using the internet or forums is permissible? We all are doing biddah???

Regarding Eid Milad un-Nabi, people are merely expressing their love for the Prophet (PBUH). It is not considered a religious obligation or part of the deen, as you're suggesting. As long as it doesn’t contradict the teachings of the Quran and Shariah, it doesn’t fall into the category of haram or forbidden.

The burden is on you to provide evidence from the Quran or Hadith that expressing love for the Prophet (PBUH) on this occasion is forbidden.
 
Your argument seems flawed. If we follow your reasoning, where in the Quran or Hadith does it say that using the internet or forums is permissible? We all are doing biddah???

Regarding Eid Milad un-Nabi, people are merely expressing their love for the Prophet (PBUH). It is not considered a religious obligation or part of the deen, as you're suggesting. As long as it doesn’t contradict the teachings of the Quran and Shariah, it doesn’t fall into the category of haram or forbidden.

The burden is on you to provide evidence from the Quran or Hadith that expressing love for the Prophet (PBUH) on this occasion is forbidden.
Brother , Have you read all my comments here ? Because I have answered all the tricks used by sufis and answered them all here.

Innovation is related to religion or social life ? Using Internet is merely a social activity part of technology , which along with Muslims , Hindus , Christians etc all use. Moreover says that using internet is adding to your good deeds , it is merely a worldly activity.

Does giving adhan for Eid salah contradict Quran and hadith ? If not why is it not allowed?
 
Brother , Have you read all my comments here ? Because I have answered all the tricks used by sufis and answered them all here.

Innovation is related to religion or social life ? Using Internet is merely a social activity part of technology , which along with Muslims , Hindus , Christians etc all use. Moreover says that using internet is adding to your good deeds , it is merely a worldly activity.

Does giving adhan for Eid salah contradict Quran and hadith ? If not why is it not allowed?
There are no tricks involved; it's simply your lack of understanding regarding what innovation (bid'ah) means in Islam, as well as a misunderstanding of the concept of Milad.

You can't just add 1+1 and call it 5.

Milad is not a part of the religion, and even those who celebrate it do not consider it a religious obligation. However, it is neither prohibited by the Qur'an nor the Hadith.

For example, there are five obligatory prayers (wajib). If someone were to introduce a sixth, that would be innovation because they are adding something to what was prescribed by the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him).

In the case of Milad, it’s similar to celebrating a your child's birthday. It’s neither recommended nor forbidden in the Qur'an or Hadith. Therefore, you're not adding anything to the religion because it wasn't something prescribed by the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) to begin with.

Unless you have something to state from the quran and hadeeth that the acts during milad are forbidden else you don't have an argument
 
Speaking of tricks, here's one made up by madani bros, which coerces simple minded fools of possible blessings and disparagement for not celebrating


Just look at their clownish acts on this day with their neon, crayon flags. Ignorance will only cost you further embarrasments.

 
There are no tricks involved; it's simply your lack of understanding regarding what innovation (bid'ah) means in Islam, as well as a misunderstanding of the concept of Milad.

You can't just add 1+1 and call it 5.

Milad is not a part of the religion, and even those who celebrate it do not consider it a religious obligation. However, it is neither prohibited by the Qur'an nor the Hadith.

For example, there are five obligatory prayers (wajib). If someone were to introduce a sixth, that would be innovation because they are adding something to what was prescribed by the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him).

In the case of Milad, it’s similar to celebrating a your child's birthday. It’s neither recommended nor forbidden in the Qur'an or Hadith. Therefore, you're not adding anything to the religion because it wasn't something prescribed by the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) to begin with.

Unless you have something to state from the quran and hadeeth that the acts during milad are forbidden else you don't have an argument

Celebrating birth of child is done by all religions , its not exclusive to Islam , and no one claims that by celebrating child's birthday you get blessings.

Anything that is done for rewards needs to have a evidence from Quran and Hadeeth. If celebration of birth of prophet is such a rewarding thing, why no one from first 3 generations did not do that?

There is a hadeeth which says there are two eids , so by adding another Eid , is that not innovation , you yourself said that adding to what prophet said is innovation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Celebrating birth of child is done by all religions , its not exclusive to Islam , and no one claims that by celebrating child's birthday you get blessings.

Anything that is done for rewards needs to have a evidence from Quran and Hadeeth. If celebration of birth of prophet is such a rewarding thing , why no one from first 3 generations did not do that?

There is a hadeeth which says there are two eids , so by adding another Eid , is that not innovation , you yourself said that adding to what prophet said is innovation.





You're going in circles, trying to prove a point that doesn't really exist. I've already mentioned in my last two posts that no one claims it's part of the religion, so people aren't expecting the kind of rewards you're suggesting.

As for Eid, you should study more hadiths. There are hadiths that mention Friday being considered an Eid for Muslims as well.

"Eid" is simply an Arabic word meaning "celebration," and it can be used in various contexts.
 
You're going in circles, trying to prove a point that doesn't really exist. I've already mentioned in my last two posts that no one claims it's part of the religion, so people aren't expecting the kind of rewards you're suggesting.

As for Eid, you should study more hadiths. There are hadiths that mention Friday being considered an Eid for Muslims as well.

"Eid" is simply an Arabic word meaning "celebration," and it can be used in various contexts.

I will discuss the first part first .
So you want to say that people who are celebrating it with no intention of any reward?
 
I am happy to say I celebrate Milad. I do however except that some of the celebrations are over the top and a chance for some Maulvis with good voices to make a killing. I try not to get too involved with those but endeavor to make my own contribution, however small.
 
I will discuss the first part first .
So you want to say that people who are celebrating it with no intention of any reward?


It's better if you discuss it step by step so that you can understand it fully, rather than making assumptions.

I don't want to say but to tell you that the wiladat or the birth of muhammed s.a.w is celebrated out of love for the s a.w not for any greed or rewards your assuming

But do you even know what happens in milad?
 
"
The concept of “praiseworthy innovation” (bid`a hasana) is basically a specific form of applying a general sunna of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), in a manner not contrary to the principles of Prophetic guidance.
"

Sounds, dodgy, this.

Worshipping deities runs contrary, init.
Is that you gabba?
 
There an incident from the life our prophet (saw) where a Jewish kid used to come sit in the company of our prophet (Saw).
All of a sudden he stopped coming.
So after a few days, the prophet (saw) asked the companions about the kid?
And it was replied that he is sick.

So the prophet (saw) visits the kid's home and finds him on his death bed.
The prophet (saw) asks him as to why he had stopped coming?

The kid replies: I was once on my way to you when I saw the door of a home ajar (slightly opened), and the Satan whispered into my ear, so I went ahead and peaked through the door, only to see a female taking a shower/bath.

It immediately stuck me and I went back home.

And from that day on, every time I wanted to come visit you, I asked myself, how can I face you? With what eyes can I look at you? I didn't have the courage to face you from that day on. So I couldn't come.

The prophet (saw) asked him to recite Kalima, which this kid, and he passed away.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In place like Pakistan, I think it's a height of hypocrisy to celebrate Eid milaad by many. Yes, there are some good people but come'on, who are we kidding?

We rank world # 2 in hajj attendance, but on the scale of honesty, we rank at # 120

I wonder with what face, our corrupt nation will face the prophet (saw) on the day of judgement?

We are not even qualified to call his (saw's) name with our dirty tongues. How can we lay SUCH A BIG CLAIM that "I am an Ashiq-e-rasool (saw)?

-----------------------------------------------------

In my personal opinion, if one really wants to "celebrate" the birth of the prophet (saw), then he/she should start by fasting on every Monday because that's the day of his (saw's) birth.

And on the day of his birthday, instead of this Christmas type light show to waste 100 and millions of rupees, the money should instead be quitely spent on, helping the poor and needy; without making any show off or drama.

On the birthday of our prophet (saw), instead of screaming on top of lungs to express our love with naaray baazi and slogans, we should open our wallets and generously give more charity, we should show a display of patience, forgiveness and generosity because THESE ARE THE TRAITS of our prophet's (saw) life.
We should show kindness to the poor labor who work at our homes, doing our dishes and dusting our furniture and mopping our floors.

IMO, These naaray baazi and light shows and screaming on loud speakers won't take us far.
Good points brother.

Have you seen the latest attendees to this forum. They are are really letting rip with the islamophobic hate.

Baluchistan bombing…bouncing around and cant contain their glee.. then a half arsed condolence.

Ranting why hindus should answer to Muslims and the very next thing passing derogatory inflammatory comments about Islam.

Mods caught sleeping and allowing them free pass..
 
It's better if you discuss it step by step so that you can understand it fully, rather than making assumptions.

I don't want to say but to tell you that the wiladat or the birth of muhammed s.a.w is celebrated out of love for the s a.w not for any greed or rewards your assuming

But do you even know what happens in milad?

Are you a barelwi or shia ?

I am asking this because shia hadeeth books and principles are different from sunnis.
 
I am not going to get into the religious merits or otherwise of the celebration of mawlid for the simple reason that I am ill-equipped for such a discussion. But I think some clarification around the concept of bid’a and why it leads to such heated debates might be useful.

Although on this thread it has been translated by many as merely ‘innovation’ it is better defined as “heretical innovation.” This is the definition that Sherali Tareen adopts in his book on Barelvi-Deobandi debates: Defending Muḥammad in Modernity. The point being that in the minds of those that deploy the term, it usually refers to non-obligatory practices and rituals which are confused with obligatory acts and carried out with an ardour that should be reserved for the normative order associated with the shari’a.

Many who have deployed the term have consider bid’a especially insidious as it is an often unwitting corruption from within which leads lay Muslims astray or as Tareen puts it, “bid’a does not signal outright unbelief. Perhaps even more dangerous, it presages a lurking threat that operates at the threshold of unbelief, always threatening to cross over but never explicitly doing so.”

It is also useful to remember that the term has become especially subject to attention in the modern period. Brannon Ingram in his book on the Deobandi movement (Revival from Below) notes that whilst bid’a “has premodern roots, Deobandis became focussed on bid’a - defining it, cataloguing it, combating it - to an extent that has few, if any, premodern antecedents.”

Why should this be the case? Loss of political sovereignty in the nineteenth century led to much questioning of how a Muslim society was to be sustained and an Islamic identity to be preserved in a land now ruled by a state, which did not define itself in Islamic terms. Many as a response worked to build a Muslim society from the bottom up; to mould the conscience of the believer. In Ingram’s words, “one had to reform the individual to reform society.” As Barbara Metcalf wrote in her book on the Deobandis, “the pervasive concern of pious ‘ulama to maintain Muslim culture and society was, in the late nineteenth century, to manifest itself in a new form, inward-looking and primarily concerned with the Islamic quality of individual lives.” Even in the case of the Barelvi movement, Tareen notes that “In the absence of Muslim political power, the focus of such a quest [of preserving the Indian Muslim identity] fell squarely on the realm of everyday rituals and practices.”

This was facilitated by the growth of the public sphere which was marked by the expansion of the printed word. Linked to these new opportunities was the fact that rather than seeking patronage of an elite, as they might have once done, many seeking a claim to religious leadership now looked to rally public opinion. Authority could be derived from public backing.

In concluding, I want to reiterate that I am not suggesting that the celebration of mawlid is or is not bid’a - I am only trying to explain why the application of term - understood as heretical innovation - to certain practices has generated and continues to generate heated emotions in the modern period.

In the end, wherever we stand on the issue, I think we can all do with being less certain of ourselves and less judgemental of others. We may take inspiration from Ibn Qutaybah (828-885):

“For the way to Allah is not one…on the contrary, the ways to Him are many and the doors of the good are wide.”

Or we may look to Rumi:

The paths
are many
The destination
is one

Do you not see?
There are many paths
to the Ka’ba
 
Are you sure worshipping a deity/celebrating his b'day will get your closer to Allah.

In this case, hindus are light years ahead of muslims.
 
Are you a barelwi or shia ?

I am asking this because shia hadeeth books and principles are different from sunnis.


Is there a separate Quran for different sects? Or are there different collections of hadiths for different sects? Do you even understand what hadith are?

You have an issue with celebrating Milad, yet you haven’t posted a single hadith from any sect or quoted any verse from the Quran that states Milad is forbidden.

It seems like you’re the kind of person who forms an opinion first without thoroughly studying the Quran and hadith, and then tries hard to justify your stance.

Come on, bro, you’re claiming that celebrating Milad is forbidden and a bid’ah. Show us which verse from the Quran or hadith you’ve read that says this.

Maybe people are just not aware that its forbidden so share your research and knowledge
 
Is there a separate Quran for different sects? Or are there different collections of hadiths for different sects? Do you even understand what hadith are?

You have an issue with celebrating Milad, yet you haven’t posted a single hadith from any sect or quoted any verse from the Quran that states Milad is forbidden.

It seems like you’re the kind of person who forms an opinion first without thoroughly studying the Quran and hadith, and then tries hard to justify your stance.

Come on, bro, you’re claiming that celebrating Milad is forbidden and a bid’ah. Show us which verse from the Quran or hadith you’ve read that says this.

Maybe people are just not aware that its forbidden so share your research and knowledge

Shias have different hadeeth collections and different method of authenticating them. They also have different Tafsir of Quran.

Now , if you want to discuss , you have to tell me which books are authority for you. If you believe in sunni hadeeth books , then we discuss according to that.

For example fatawas of Ahmad Raza are evidence for barelvi , for Ahle hadeeth or deobandi , they don't care about it
You need to tell me what is your believe , then only I can discuss.

Once you tell me , I will answer the points you have raised in this very post.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Shias have different hadeeth collections and different method of authenticating them. They also have different Tafsir of Quran.

Now , if you want to discuss , you have to tell me which books are authority for you. If you believe in sunni hadeeth books , then we discuss according to that.

For example fatawas of Ahmad Raza are evidence for barelvi , for Ahle hadeeth or deobandi , they don't care about it
You need to tell me what is your believe , then only I can discuss.

Once you tell me , I will answer the points you have raised in this very post.

I'm yet to wait for evidence from you to show me where in quran and what hadeeth says that milad is forbidden

I have asked you 3 times now if you can't prove it with quran and hadeeth please be quiet and stand in the corner. And refrain from making claims that you can't prove
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm yet to wait for evidence from you to show me where in quran and what hadeeth says that milad is forbidden

I have asked you 3 times now if you can't prove it with quran and hadeeth please be quiet and stand in the corner. And refrain from making claims that you can't prove

Something which has not been done by the prophet or his companions in the matter of religion does not need evidence to prove that thing is not allowed , to do that act evidence is required.

If we go by your logic , then can you give me evidence from Quran and Hadeeth that we cannot give adhan for Eid salat or we cannot pray 3 rakkats for Fajr salah ?

If we ask this question from the very scholars you follow , they would say that we cannot pray 3 rakkats for fajr because the prophet did not do that. They will not quote any ayat or show any hadeeth.
 
Something which has not been done by the prophet or his companions in the matter of religion does not need evidence to prove that thing is not allowed , to do that act evidence is required.

If we go by your logic , then can you give me evidence from Quran and Hadeeth that we cannot give adhan for Eid salat or we cannot pray 3 rakkats for Fajr salah ?

If we ask this question from the very scholars you follow , they would say that we cannot pray 3 rakkats for fajr because the prophet did not do that. They will not quote any ayat or show any hadeeth.

So what you're saying is that because it's not sunnah, it's considered haram (forbidden)?

By discussing religious matters on a forum, you're implying that you're heading towards hell, as this practice wasn't engaged in by the Prophet (s.a.w) or his companions. Therefore, it's not sunnah and is not permitted it's haram, my friend.

Your last paragraph is unclear; you're comparing salah, which is a wajib act, to milad? what your trying to say?

anything that is haram is clearly stated in Quran and hadith so tell me again where does it say in quran or hadith that milad is haram? not allowed or forbidden?

I don't want a scholar's opinion i want evidence from Quran or hadeeth
 
So what you're saying is that because it's not sunnah, it's considered haram (forbidden)?

By discussing religious matters on a forum, you're implying that you're heading towards hell, as this practice wasn't engaged in by the Prophet (s.a.w) or his companions. Therefore, it's not sunnah and is not permitted it's haram, my friend.

Your last paragraph is unclear; you're comparing salah, which is a wajib act, to milad? what your trying to say?

anything that is haram is clearly stated in Quran and hadith so tell me again where does it say in quran or hadith that milad is haram? not allowed or forbidden?

I don't want a scholar's opinion i want evidence from Quran or hadeeth

You may have different views , but the fact is that this act is done as part of religion. Any good thing associated with religion is done for blessings.

This is done by only Muslims , not any other religion followers. Thus this is exclusive to Muslims. So , any act needs to have evidence from Quran and hadeeth , if we do not have , that is innovation.

Discussing and debating was done by the companions also , I am surprised you are making such strawmen arguments. You want evidence ?

I am saying there are two rakkats salah in Fajr , tomorrow if I add one more and make it like Maghrib , will it be okay for you ? Can you show me from Quran or hadeeth why I cannot pray three rakkats fajr salah ? Did prophet prohibit from that ? If not what is the reason why it is not allowed?
 
You may have different views , but the fact is that this act is done as part of religion. Any good thing associated with religion is done for blessings.

This is done by only Muslims , not any other religion followers. Thus this is exclusive to Muslims. So , any act needs to have evidence from Quran and hadeeth , if we do not have , that is innovation.

Discussing and debating was done by the companions also , I am surprised you are making such strawmen arguments. You want evidence ?

I am saying there are two rakkats salah in Fajr , tomorrow if I add one more and make it like Maghrib , will it be okay for you ? Can you show me from Quran or hadeeth why I cannot pray three rakkats fajr salah ? Did prophet prohibit from that ? If not what is the reason why it is not allowed?

no mate its you making strawmen arguments without the proper knowledge of the deen and also assuming that Milad is celebrated because people think its part of the religion. that's the first thing you need to get out of your head.

on top of that your comparing salaat with milad, salaat is wajib its part of the deen nothing can be taken out of it or added into it. what a silly argument your making, milad isnt part of the deen and nobody consider it to be part of the religion
unless you want to lie to your self to make your self think your winning an argument.

Milad is just an annual get together commemorating the birth of Muhammad s.a.w, where people read poetry in praise of Muhammad s.a.w. some people fast, some read quran and this is purely done out of love by the lovers of the prophet s.a.w and in return they don't ask for any rewards or anything its pure out of love.

what's your issue with it? you don't like people praising Muhammad s.a.w. or people reading Quran, don't say its biddah because its not part of the religion just again to drill it in your head its done out of love for the prophet s.a.w no reward is expected and its not considered part of the religion.

now going back to the forbidden part your keep harping about, what is forbidden is already stated clearly in the Quran if its not in the Quran then its not forbidden if its not stated by the prophet s.a.w that its forbidden then its not forbidden its clear cut. any act that goes against the saying of the prophet s..a.w or quran is forbidden.

now show me Milad or anything similar to Milad forbidden in Quran or by the prophet s.a.w if you cant show me don't reply back to me with gibberish because i wont be replying back to you
 
no mate its you making strawmen arguments without the proper knowledge of the deen and also assuming that Milad is celebrated because people think its part of the religion. that's the first thing you need to get out of your head.

on top of that your comparing salaat with milad, salaat is wajib its part of the deen nothing can be taken out of it or added into it. what a silly argument your making, milad isnt part of the deen and nobody consider it to be part of the religion
unless you want to lie to your self to make your self think your winning an argument.

Milad is just an annual get together commemorating the birth of Muhammad s.a.w, where people read poetry in praise of Muhammad s.a.w. some people fast, some read quran and this is purely done out of love by the lovers of the prophet s.a.w and in return they don't ask for any rewards or anything its pure out of love.

what's your issue with it? you don't like people praising Muhammad s.a.w. or people reading Quran, don't say its biddah because its not part of the religion just again to drill it in your head its done out of love for the prophet s.a.w no reward is expected and its not considered part of the religion.

now going back to the forbidden part your keep harping about, what is forbidden is already stated clearly in the Quran if its not in the Quran then its not forbidden if its not stated by the prophet s.a.w that its forbidden then its not forbidden its clear cut. any act that goes against the saying of the prophet s..a.w or quran is forbidden.

now show me Milad or anything similar to Milad forbidden in Quran or by the prophet s.a.w if you cant show me don't reply back to me with gibberish because i wont be replying back to you

You again avoided my question. I asked If I pray three rakkats in Fajr salah , what is your opinion about that. Answer my question , then I will reply to other points made in the comment. So please answer what I asked.
 
You again avoided my question. I asked If I pray three rakkats in Fajr salah , what is your opinion about that. Answer my question , then I will reply to other points made in the comment. So please answer what I asked.
The answer is there do you even read my posts I answered about 3 times

do you want me to highlight it if your are having difficulty reading posts


Just incase you don't know salaat means namaaz, prayers, ie fajr which is a form of namaz/prayer/salaat
 
nomate its you making strawmen arguments without the proper knowledge of the deen and also assuming that Milad is celebrated because people think its part of the religion. that's the first thing you need to get out of your head.

on top of that your comparing salaat with milad, salaat is wajib its part of the deen nothing can be taken out of it or added into it. what a silly argument your making, milad isnt part of the deen and nobody consider it to be part of the religion
unless you want to lie to your self to make your self think your winning an argument.

Apart from Muslims who else celebrates Milad ?

Who told you people do this without expectation of rewards ? You want evidence of what Barelvi scholars think about this act ?

Love for prophet and ahle bayat is integral part of deen. It is proved through Quran and Hadeeth.

Do you disagree with my statements ?

Before also you made false claim that during the time of prophet companions never debated about religion , I offered to give evidence , even in this case I will provide evidence.
 
Apart from Muslims who else celebrates Milad ?

Who told you people do this without expectation of rewards ? You want evidence of what Barelvi scholars think about this act ?

Love for prophet and ahle bayat is integral part of deen. It is proved through Quran and Hadeeth.

Do you disagree with my statements ?

Before also you made false claim that during the time of prophet companions never debated about religion , I offered to give evidence , even in this case I will provide evidence.
Didn't really wanted to reply to your post but since you said I made a false claim I'm replying

I did not say that what I said was "during the time of the prophet nobody debated on forums"

Unless you can prove that the prophet or sahaba debated on forums then yes I made a false claim

Just like the example above your just picking bits and pieces out of my posts and changing the meaning of it and coming back to me

You seem so desperate to prove something you can't
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Didn't really wanted to reply to your post but since you said I made a false claim I'm replying

I did not say that what I said was "during the time of the prophet nobody debated on forums"

Unless you can prove that the prophet or sahaba debated on forums then yes I made a false claim

Just like the example above your just picking bits and pieces out of my posts and changing the meaning of it and coming back to me

You seem so desperate to prove something you can't

During the time of prophet there was no social media , but debate was there . Forum is merely a medium , debate can take place anywhere , the medium does not change the original debate.

For example I go for hajj on airplane or walking or on a camel etc , the mode of journey does not change the rituals of Hajj , it will remain same as was done by the prophet.

You also said we do Milad for the love of prophet and it is not part of religion , where as Quran and hadeeth says love for prophet is part of deen , so your statement was wrong.

And you yourself wrote above that adding something to religion is innovation.
 
I am not going to get into the religious merits or otherwise of the celebration of mawlid for the simple reason that I am ill-equipped for such a discussion. But I think some clarification around the concept of bid’a and why it leads to such heated debates might be useful.

Although on this thread it has been translated by many as merely ‘innovation’ it is better defined as “heretical innovation.” This is the definition that Sherali Tareen adopts in his book on Barelvi-Deobandi debates: Defending Muḥammad in Modernity. The point being that in the minds of those that deploy the term, it usually refers to non-obligatory practices and rituals which are confused with obligatory acts and carried out with an ardour that should be reserved for the normative order associated with the shari’a.

Many who have deployed the term have consider bid’a especially insidious as it is an often unwitting corruption from within which leads lay Muslims astray or as Tareen puts it, “bid’a does not signal outright unbelief. Perhaps even more dangerous, it presages a lurking threat that operates at the threshold of unbelief, always threatening to cross over but never explicitly doing so.”

It is also useful to remember that the term has become especially subject to attention in the modern period. Brannon Ingram in his book on the Deobandi movement (Revival from Below) notes that whilst bid’a “has premodern roots, Deobandis became focussed on bid’a - defining it, cataloguing it, combating it - to an extent that has few, if any, premodern antecedents.”

Why should this be the case? Loss of political sovereignty in the nineteenth century led to much questioning of how a Muslim society was to be sustained and an Islamic identity to be preserved in a land now ruled by a state, which did not define itself in Islamic terms. Many as a response worked to build a Muslim society from the bottom up; to mould the conscience of the believer. In Ingram’s words, “one had to reform the individual to reform society.” As Barbara Metcalf wrote in her book on the Deobandis, “the pervasive concern of pious ‘ulama to maintain Muslim culture and society was, in the late nineteenth century, to manifest itself in a new form, inward-looking and primarily concerned with the Islamic quality of individual lives.” Even in the case of the Barelvi movement, Tareen notes that “In the absence of Muslim political power, the focus of such a quest [of preserving the Indian Muslim identity] fell squarely on the realm of everyday rituals and practices.”

This was facilitated by the growth of the public sphere which was marked by the expansion of the printed word. Linked to these new opportunities was the fact that rather than seeking patronage of an elite, as they might have once done, many seeking a claim to religious leadership now looked to rally public opinion. Authority could be derived from public backing.

In concluding, I want to reiterate that I am not suggesting that the celebration of mawlid is or is not bid’a - I am only trying to explain why the application of term - understood as heretical innovation - to certain practices has generated and continues to generate heated emotions in the modern period.

In the end, wherever we stand on the issue, I think we can all do with being less certain of ourselves and less judgemental of others. We may take inspiration from Ibn Qutaybah (828-885):

“For the way to Allah is not one…on the contrary, the ways to Him are many and the doors of the good are wide.”

Or we may look to Rumi:

The paths
are many
The destination
is one

Do you not see?
There are many paths
to the Ka’ba

Rumi was a poet , a sufi , which is itself an innovation in Islam.

Yes , there are many paths to Kaba , but the rituals to be followed is one , and that we get from Muhammad SAW .

By the way I am hearing about sherail teeran for first time , I will try to find more about this person. The book you mentioned has interesting title.
 
Rumi was a poet , a sufi , which is itself an innovation in Islam.

Yes , there are many paths to Kaba , but the rituals to be followed is one , and that we get from Muhammad SAW .

By the way I am hearing about sherail teeran for first time , I will try to find more about this person. The book you mentioned has interesting title.

Sunni, Shia etc identified as various branches of Islam aren’t they. But your branch of the Wahabi I would argue is much closer to the Kuffar of Yahoodi’s given its existence and the politics it propagates is a bidah in itself given it’s always on the wrong side of Islamic history and sits beneath the foot of Israel/USA, it’s responsible for Islamist extremism and your vast interpretation of getting closer to your lord, generally involves putting some TNT up the backside and murdering innocent people in the process, that’s when the less mentally inclined are radicalised by the zealots who spread their Kuffar ideology.
 
Sunni, Shia etc identified as various branches of Islam aren’t they. But your branch of the Wahabi I would argue is much closer to the Kuffar of Yahoodi’s given its existence and the politics it propagates is a bidah in itself given it’s always on the wrong side of Islamic history and sits beneath the foot of Israel/USA, it’s responsible for Islamist extremism and your vast interpretation of getting closer to your lord, generally involves putting some TNT up the backside and murdering innocent people in the process, that’s when the less mentally inclined are radicalised by the zealots who spread their Kuffar ideology.
Wahabi is my branch ? I do not think you have read my comments in other threads . Brother , look at all my posts and comments , where did I present my argument from any so called wahabi books? Quran and Hadeeth are books of Islam. Wahabi books would something written by the so called sect scholars.

I have spoken strongly against Banu Ummayah rulers , including Muawiyah , which wahabi does that , leave Muawiyah alone , they praize Yazeed , which world are you living in?

Also , can you show me a single post where I said we should kill innocent people ?

Also , as far as Killing people and Takfir is concerned , your greatest scholar whom you people call Ala Hadhrat , Mr Ahmad Raza Khan , has made takfir of deobandi , salafi , shias . In fact he has called them murtad , which means they should be killed when you have opportunity. This is the peaceful fatwa issued by the scholar whom all barelvis do taqleed of.
 
Back
Top