What's new

Should Quinton de Kock give up the gloves and bat up the order in Tests?

Hasan123

Test Star
Joined
Mar 25, 2016
Runs
38,432
Quinton De Kock - should he keep the gloves in Tests or not?

De kock is fantastic odi player and is now showing his talent in the test match arena. In LO he is opening whilst in tests he is batting at 7. I personally think he is wasted at 7, whilst he can do damage there he often could find himself running out of partners as South Africas tail isn't long. I think if he was batting at 4 or 5 and to bat a couple of sessions he could take the game away from the opposition. At number 7 he may not be allowed this chance.

So the debate is should South Africa play him as a specialist bat in tests or keep him at 7 with the gloves?
 
[MENTION=134473]Haroon786[/MENTION], anyone who follows SA domestic cricket can help
 
Only keeper i know of is dane villas.

Not a good enough batsmen currently and SA don't have that many luxury in their batting line up to play De Kock as a specialist batsmen.They are many things to be looked at if this happens.

Actually De kock keeping is helping their cause more.They can play extra batsmen which was a much needed requirement.

Then you have to resolve quota iissues and this idea isn't really going to help the cause.

De kock should bat at 7 and make sure he stops any kind of batting collapse if happens on any particular day.

Do what Bairstow is doing for England.
 
Last edited:
He will keep wickets for sure,me too have the same feeling that he is wasted at 7

But it is too much for a test wicket keeper to open the inngs

Once AB returns the middle is packed with hm amla,faf n duminy so realistically only spot for him is 7 atleast for some years
 
Elgar,Cook,Bavuma, De Kock are 4 good odi players SA have found.Three of them are young and have solid potential.

Then you have AB and Amla.

One spot is there for Faf or Duminy.

Why would you go for some other keeper and make this side a little weaker?

Fifth bowling option is the problem anyways and can't be ignored either..
 
Not a good enough batsmen currently and SA don't have that many luxury in their batting line up to play De Kock as a specialist batsmen.They are many things to be looked at if this happens.

Actually De kock keeping is helping their cause more.They can play extra batsmen which was a much needed requirement.

Then you have to resolve quota iissues and this idea isn't really going to help the cause.

De kock should bat at 7 and make sure he stops any kind of batting collapse if happens on any particular day.

Do what Bairstow is doing for England.


Think hes wasted at 7 but understand why they keep him there. Don't think JP is a long term option in tests and AB could retire from tests soon, so there may be space for him.
 
Has to keep, no other viable option - no 7 is a spot too low for him atm, should be at 6 IMO.
 
Think hes wasted at 7 but understand why they keep him there. Don't think JP is a long term option in tests and AB could retire from tests soon, so there may be space for him.

You can't assume this simply on basis of just one comment made and that also on which the clarification was also given.He is currently the official test captain.So such statements have no authority.

When seniors retire,younger ones would move up the order undoubtedly but that is still some way to go.

SA might well go into another downward phase when AB,Amla, Steyn calls it off.These younger guys do have to adjust quickly to their roles.
 
You can't assume this simply on basis of just one comment made and that also on which the clarification was also given.He is currently the official test captain.So such statements have no authority.

When seniors retire,younger ones would move up the order undoubtedly but that is still some way to go.

SA might well go into another downward phase when AB,Amla, Steyn calls it off.These younger guys do have to adjust quickly to their roles.


That statement doesn't give confidence that he in it for the long haul when it comes to test cricket. He wants to play at the 2019 world cup and also take part in T20 leagues as well. So retirement from tests isn't out of the question.

Yes he is the captain in tests but Faf is doing a good job I would personally stick with him. Hope SA do but that another topic.

You think they might, I think there will be a period of struggle when Ab,Steyn,Amla, and Faf retire from tests but with de kock,Rabada, and Elgar SA should remain strong in tests. Want to see what young batting talent they have.
 
That statement doesn't give confidence that he in it for the long haul when it comes to test cricket. He wants to play at the 2019 world cup and also take part in T20 leagues as well. So retirement from tests isn't out of the question.

Yes he is the captain in tests but Faf is doing a good job I would personally stick with him. Hope SA do but that another topic.

You think they might, I think there will be a period of struggle when Ab,Steyn,Amla, and Faf retire from tests but with de kock,Rabada, and Elgar SA should remain strong in tests. Want to see what young batting talent they have.

Yeah, these three have to take the responsibilty and lead the team post the retirement of those guys..
 
Yeah, these three have to take the responsibilty and lead the team post the retirement of those guys..

Hope that faf sticks around for a bit longer as he seems a good leader of men and very good tactically.
 
Why is a thread regarding his batting position titled whether he'll keep or not?

Regarding his position, he's fine at #7 for now, he'll get an opening once one of the top order retires. He's only 23 so he has a lot of time to get a shot in the top. Plus, he does a good job of playing at a decent SR in the lower order, gives the team a little boost.
 
Why is a thread regarding his batting position titled whether he'll keep or not?

Regarding his position, he's fine at #7 for now, he'll get an opening once one of the top order retires. He's only 23 so he has a lot of time to get a shot in the top. Plus, he does a good job of playing at a decent SR in the lower order, gives the team a little boost.

Difficult to keep and open the batting especially as he keeps in LO. It's a lot to burden someone with.
 
He should not be keeping in all formats . In OD and 20 20 is fine , but should not be playing Test matches as WK. Need to give him some breathing space.
 
What's wrong with him batting at #7? If it was a good enough position for Gilchrist, it should be good enough for de Kock. A strong start to his career and people are thinking that he's a combination of Viv and Sachin.

Would be extremely silly to have three keepers in one team.
 
What's wrong with him batting at #7? If it was a good enough position for Gilchrist, it should be good enough for de Kock. A strong start to his career and people are thinking that he's a combination of Viv and Sachin.

Would be extremely silly to have three keepers in one team.

Gilchrist was part of an ATG team. de Kock is good enough (compared to the other SA batsmen) to bat up the order.
 
Gilchrist was part of an ATG team. de Kock is good enough (compared to the other SA batsmen) to bat up the order.

And Gilly was easily the third, if not second best batsman from that team but since he was a keeper, his position was #7. de Kock is not a better test batsman than Amla or de Villiers, can't open and Bavuma would be a passenger if he is dropped to #7.

All logic points to de Kock batting at #7 and keeping wickets.
 
Think ABCD should take gloves again. He doesn't have the same drive anymore as a test batsman and would rather play t20 IPL funfest cricket, so give him the easiest job batting wise. Let de Kock bat higher up as he's more committed.
 
My answer to Hasan123's hundredth thread of the week-De Kock should continue to keep and bat at 7.
 
My answer to Hasan123's hundredth thread of the week-De Kock should continue to keep and bat at 7.

You keeping count of my threads :yk2? Thank you very much!

If SA have a good keeper in domestic I would get him in and try to push de kock into the middle order.
 
You keeping count of my threads :yk2? Thank you very much!

If SA have a good keeper in domestic I would get him in and try to push de kock into the middle order.

Yeah he should. Good keepers in domestic are: Dane Vilas, Clyde Fortuin, Rudi Second, Zakir Kathrada, Kyle Verreynne, Mangaliso Mohsehle, Heinrich Klaasen, Brendon Louw and Lefa Mosena. SA is packed w/keepers.
 
He's fine as a keeper batsman because SA does not have another decent keeper batsman so he can't play as a specialist batsman until they find one.
 
Quinton de Kock should bat at 6 or 7 in tests and play as wicket-keeper. He can get quick runs too. And he is good as opener in ODIs

Even Adam Gilchrist batted at 7 in tests and opened in ODIs, so why can't Quinton de Kock do the same?

If Quinton de Kock has a average of 45+ with strike rate of 75+ in tests and plays as the wicket-keeper, he will have a succesful career and will even be called ATG
 
De Kock is clearly South Africa's best bat right now and one of the best in the world at the tender age of 24. Should he really be coming in at number 7 in Tests? I feel like he is being denied the chance to really shine with the bat by the current composition of the South African team.

Wouldn't it make a lot more sense for de Kock to bat in the top order and have someone like Kuhn or someone else keep wickets?
 
Yes he should. If he was to bat at 4 or 5 he could take the game away from the opposition earlier in the game.
 
He should open or bat at no. 3 and WK as well just like Sanga
 
Yes if they have a reliable gloveman to replace him. Could bat at 5 or 6.
 
Any other decent wicketkeeper bats coming up in SA?
 
De Kock is the only player in world cricket today who can turn the fab 4 into the fab 5.
 
Don't know if stopping keeping is necessary, but he should bat at 5, he's a good, dynamic player and he could do so much more there.

Although an advantage of being at 7 is, if the top order does decently, he comes into the game when bowlers have had a long time on the field, and he scores quick runs.
 
He should be SA,s Gilchrist, batting at #6, and keeper, team can afford to have 5 bowler in that case.
 
This is why he's not a top order batsman. He is not technically equipped to face lateral movement. Leave him at 7 and let him counterattack.
 
Bottled his promotion to 4 and 6 in this series.

Looks a great bat on flat, true surfaces against the white Kookaburra which doesn't swing an inch. However he doesn't have the compact technique necessary to play as a specialist batsman in Tests.
 
#7 is where he should bat at. South Africa need ABD or Faf at #4 and #6 should be used to blood in a new batsman or if AB does return, be Bavuma's fixed spot. The Saffers have a good batting lineup apart from a non-existent second opener.
 
He should keep only in one format , that is OD .

In Test there should be another WK , with him playing as a specialist batsman.
 
he is a quality keeper, definitely shouldn't give up the gloves.

Should be batting in the top 6 as others have said. Wouldn't push him too high unnecessarily. Good counterattacking batsman.
 
Not this early. He should do it after he become their main batsmen i.e. after retirement of seniors.

Him and Elgar will then become their main batsmen and will have more responsibility.
 
He could. But is there a non white wicket keeper? Remember, this is SA, color of skin before everything else.
 
Cannot be trusted at that middle order position any more.
 
Back
Top