What's new

Should there be a regional player quota in PSL teams?

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,977
I understand that this is a business at the end of the day and team names are more for marketing purposes but one of the stated aims of the PSL is to develop local talent so would it be a good idea to have one/two regional players in each regional team?

That would mean a team like Quetta would have Baloch players for sure

Not sure how practical this is but lets discuss.
 
The result would be you will get the likes of Faisal Iqbal selected on Karachi quota or Imran Farhat on LQ quota. Quota systems never work.
 
It’s nice if they do.
All teams should look to include atleast one player from their region, this allows fans to connect with team and certain players.
 
Only if they are emerging... otherwise not needed
Dont want to see Salman Butt and Faisal Iqbal bcz of this.
 
Hell no. They'd have to pick mediocre players for teams like Islamabad just to fill the quota and deserving players would miss out.
 
yes that will do good for small cities like quetta and peshawar and it will increase competition between the teams .
now not a single player from pesharwar plays in PZ team, same is the case with QG.

they should make regional quota like emerging. look if someone is playing from quetta then that will encourag other youngsters aswell. in first season of PSL when Bissmillah khan made 55 in his first match . people of quetta were so much happy for him. his pictures were on billbords and in news .
QG do talent hunts in quetta but they never select a single player from that hunts .
 
Yes, definitely.

Perhaps 2 or 3.

By doing so, the teams might be forced to "develop" or hunt a local talent through different programs, helping Pakistan cricket grow in the process
 
Isn't that what domestic cricket should be for? Why shove regionalism down the throats of franchise cricket...kind of defeats the purpose of the whole model intended to make $$$
 
Isn't that what domestic cricket should be for? Why shove regionalism down the throats of franchise cricket...kind of defeats the purpose of the whole model intended to make $$$

Why name the teams after different regions?

I think there should at least be one player from the local region this way at least the team names would make a bit sense and it would make it interesting. The player doesn't have to be in playing XI every match but at least the exposure would do him good and the other local players would have something to aim for.
 
Why name the teams after different regions?

I think there should at least be one player from the local region this way at least the team names would make a bit sense and it would make it interesting. The player doesn't have to be in playing XI every match but at least the exposure would do him good and the other local players would have something to aim for.

So basically teams should carry around players and pay them...just because they're from the region/city?

So lets say if you were to buy your own PSL team...would you as a owner go around rounding up local players because "the exposure would do them good and others will have something to aim for" or are you going to and try to win the tournament? I think it's very noble of you to think that way and Pakistan needs many people like you... but if I put my money on the line...I would only care about a team that can make me more money or actually win.
 
So basically teams should carry around players and pay them...just because they're from the region/city?

So lets say if you were to buy your own PSL team...would you as a owner go around rounding up local players because "the exposure would do them good and others will have something to aim for" or are you going to and try to win the tournament? I think it's very noble of you to think that way and Pakistan needs many people like you... but if I put my money on the line...I would only care about a team that can make me more money or actually win.

Definitely a 'jiss kee lathee uskee bhain' angle in this argument but to me naming a team after a city/region and not even carrying one person from that part of Pakistan is a little strange. Even from a marketing angle, a local boy can add so much to the team's image
 
It's not really needed. The franchise should be smart enough to know it's a good idea.

However I don't see much connection between Quetta and the team.
 
Definitely a 'jiss kee lathee uskee bhain' angle in this argument but to me naming a team after a city/region and not even carrying one person from that part of Pakistan is a little strange. Even from a marketing angle, a local boy can add so much to the team's image

I do agree with you on the marketing angle..I think Karachi Kings really missed out on not having a star player from the city in the first 2 editions but the signing of Afridi should change that.

There is still however the issue of forcing franchises to have these local players on their payroll...very few would actually agree to it and sorting through the issues of under represented cities like Quetta would be a headache. It's true that most of Pakistan's talent is found in South of Punjab and the FATA regions...giving those cities/regions a competitive advantage...

I think the current model does even out the playing field for the franchises and gives them a chance to go out on local 'talent hunts' which don't have to restricted to the region. This allows the teams to cast a wider net on the young talent pool available in the country.

If we were to impose selection of x number of players from the region...certain cities will have higher demand from team owners and other cities won't be a viable option for investment, creating a two tiered league.
 
So basically teams should carry around players and pay them...just because they're from the region/city?

So lets say if you were to buy your own PSL team...would you as a owner go around rounding up local players because "the exposure would do them good and others will have something to aim for" or are you going to and try to win the tournament? I think it's very noble of you to think that way and Pakistan needs many people like you... but if I put my money on the line...I would only care about a team that can make me more money or actually win.

It is not about giving away charity and being a nice human being. It's about doing the bare minimum to promote the sport which is letting them earn money.

You can look at the problem entirely from a money making aspect. All you have to do is look at the team squads and you can see how much thought they have given into selecting the right players who will make them big money. Not very much. If I were a franchise owner I'd be looking to get the most quality for my bucks. Each player and especially those from the big categories will be scrutinized heavily.

While in reality the majority of the franchises are just throwing away money on "big" players or recognized players without putting in any thought. In my team players like Asad Shafiq and Anwar Ali would not be selected. If I were a franchise owner Moin Khan would get booted out for selecting his son.

For the most part money rules the world and there is no doubt about it. But if the league is going to use the name of Pakistan and the teams are going to use the name of different regions then as a Pakistani I demand that the least they can do is invest a little in promoting the sport in such regions. They are burning away enough money anyway by giving away useless coaching jobs such as spin bowling job for Saeed Ajmal. Otherwise the league is just taking advantage of the name "Pakistan" and the franchises are just taking advantage of the regional name.

There is so much money to be made by picking a local guy, promoting him and thus promoting your brand. So much money to be made by selling the brand's merchandise among the fans. You can only fool people for a certain amount of time. Perhaps the Quetta brand is popular among locals at the moment due to its past performances and perhaps the people are still buying the brand's merchandise. But if there is no real connection between the team and the city it's not going to take long for the people to get over the initial hype. PSL is only held once a year while if you were really business minded you could be making money all year round.

Of course the "local talent" category would have some constraints attached to it. Like the player has to be under a certain age limit, shouldn't have made international debut yet and only been in the domestics circuit since few years.

The teams have to pick 19 players and I am sure a local talent can find a place in there somewhere. Let's be specific the local guy Bismillah Khan wasn't too bad to be dropped. In the current QG squad there are a lot of "guests" who he could've easily replaced. The promotion of local talent is only going to lead to more promising youngsters coming through.

At the end of the day the combination of 11 players makes you win the the game and as I said before the "local guy" doesn't necessarily be have to part of the playing XI. There could be trade of where if you pick a local talent you only have to pick one emerging player instead of two. But there has to be some kind of a connection between the team and the region.

Ideally the franchises should be smart enough to pick a local guy themselves, since they aren't I do support the idea of making it a requirement. Otherwise if you are only looking for making money why would you support the idea of emerging player category or a limitation on the amount of foreign players you can field?
 
Definitely a 'jiss kee lathee uskee bhain' angle in this argument but to me naming a team after a city/region and not even carrying one person from that part of Pakistan is a little strange. Even from a marketing angle, a local boy can add so much to the team's image

Quite the opposite for me.

Pakistan has always been a divided nation. We love to hate karachiites and lahoris and mujahirs and pathans.

I find it extremely refreshing seeing players from Punjab representing Karachi and vice Versa
 
That will kill the very purpose of Psl, which is to give talented players the opportunity to shine on a big stage regardless of which city they belong to.
 
Mustafa Kamal unhappy with Quetta Gladiators

Quetta Gladiators may be one of the most liked teams in the Pakistan Super League but Quetta Cricket Association president Murad Ismail and Pak Sarzameen Party president Mustafa Kamal are unhappy with what they perceive to be the deliberate ignoring of Balochistan players by the franchise.

Neither Ismail nor Kamal minced their words and even called for the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) to take action against the Gladiators.

“If they don’t want to pick any player from Quetta or Balochistan then they should just change their name from Quetta Gladiators to Karachi Gladiators,” said Ismail. “I appeal to the PCB to take action against this team and hand over its management to someone who will work for players of Quetta.”

Kamal was similarly unimpressed. “It’s good that the third edition of the PSL is going to take place but the Gladiators team, which represents Quetta, doesn’t have any player from Balochistan.”

Quetta Gladiators owner Nadeem Omer said his side will be looking to amend this. “We will be picking their 21st player from Quetta; whoever is the best available player,” he said. “It can be an emerging youngster or an experienced senior but there will be one player from Quetta that will travel with the side in PSL3.”

Balochistan-based top-order batsman Bismillah Khan was part of the side in the opening two editions but was not retained for the third edition, with the management insisting that they did so since better players than him were available and they are not bound to pick players from the regions they represent.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/1559044/7-mustafa-kamal-unhappy-quetta-gladiators/
 
Countless North American teams are named after cities but don't have a single player from the area.

Quotas are rubbish.
 
It's pointless to think quota systems will work with franchises. Franchises are all about business and money, they don't care for developing local talent. This is the job of your domestic system. Just look at football clubs and American sports teams.
 
There should not be a quota for the PSL. After all this is a franchise league. However, the current National T20 should have a team from Quetta which includes all local players. This way players from Balochistan will get exposure and a chance to complete against top players and improve their game.
 
Back
Top