What's new

Sri Lanka vs Pakistan | 3rd ODI | 19th July, 2015 | Colombo | Pakistan Innings

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sakss

Test Debutant
Joined
Jun 22, 2009
Runs
14,207
Series level at 1-1.

Sri Lanka Team
MDKJ Perera, TM Dilshan, WU Tharanga, AD Mathews*, HDRL Thirimanne, LD Chandimal†, TAM Siriwardana, SS Pathirana, NLTC Perera, SL Malinga, N Pradeep
Pakistan Team
Azhar Ali*, Ahmed Shehzad, Mohammad Hafeez, Imad Wasim, Shoaib Malik, Mohammad Rizwan, Sarfraz Ahmed†, Anwar Ali, Yasir Shah, Rahat Ali, Mohammad Irfan
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You know what shehzad is capable of but you still dont drop him! Instead you drop babar. Im all in favour if immad but why not drop shehzad!
 
Sad to see an unfit player (For Modern day ODI) like Shehzad is playing and drop Babar.
 
Should have dropped Shehzad...
Hope Babar gets to play atleast one of the next two games.
 
If almost all posters here barring a few who dont know much about cricket are asking shehzad to be dropped why cant our management see it! Hopefully theyre giving him a last chance
 
No Shehzad is miles ahead of Babar, he didn't cash in on the opportunities provided to him, ideally I would want Asad Shafiq in his place who has been sitting on the side lines.
 
No Shehzad is miles ahead of Babar, he didn't cash in on the opportunities provided to him, ideally I would want Asad Shafiq in his place who has been sitting on the side lines.

Hahahaha he wants shafiq! Shehzad hasnt cashed in for 50 plus matches. People who still support shehzad dont know anything about odi cricket. Sorry it must be said :)
 
Imad is a very low quality cricketer. Saw the glimpses in ZIM series.

He'll weaken our batting, and his bowling is not extraordinary.
 
No Shehzad is miles ahead of Babar, he didn't cash in on the opportunities provided to him, ideally I would want Asad Shafiq in his place who has been sitting on the side lines.
Shafiq AND shehzad? Are you trying to make an odi world 11?
 
No Shehzad is miles ahead of Babar, he didn't cash in on the opportunities provided to him, ideally I would want Asad Shafiq in his place who has been sitting on the side lines.

He has played 3 ODIs and scored one fifty. Did you expect him to make a ton each game ?
 
Imad is a very low quality cricketer. Saw the glimpses in ZIM series.

He'll weaken our batting, and his bowling is not extraordinary.
He has more experience than bilal asif to be fair i dont hate the decision too much but they dropped the wrong guy
 
Hmm..SL unchanged, would have preferred to see Sena in for Siriwardana. Guess we are going with just two bowlers and a load of all rounders again
 
I can see Babar Azam, Immad Wasim and Asad Shafiq competing for one spot, and out of all three Asad Shafiq is head and shoulders above the former two interms of technical ability and discipline, if it were a better alternative, then I would have contemplated over who should play but among these three, Shafiq is the best bet.
 
1st they made mistake to drop Babar instead of him they should have dropped sahzad and select Bilal Asif as lower order hard hitter and spin bowling
 
He has more experience than bilal asif to be fair i dont hate the decision too much but they dropped the wrong guy

I've seen Bilal Asif play and he's very good. Imad I have no hopes from, when batting he'll be lucky to even put bat on ball, and his spin will be hit-and-miss.
 
Shehzad should have been replaced by Mukhtar and the hard hitting batsmen Bilal should have been dragged in instead of Imad
 
Is it my imagination or I saw Imad Wasim on the field in the second match and he looked like the Michellin man?

Shehzad being given as much confidence as possible. Hope he repays. Personally speaking, I dont think he can because he just doesnt have the game for it. There will always a be a 50 every few matches followed by a series 60 strike rate low scores.
 
Guys what do you think about team change ? Immad replacing babar, good choice?

Not in favor of chopping and changing the younger lot: messes with their confidence no matter how well explained the reasons.
Still I suppose it had to happen: they have to give enough chances to Shehzad and Hafeez before dropping them.
 
I've seen Bilal Asif play and he's very good. Imad I have no hopes from, when batting he'll be lucky to even put bat on ball, and his spin will be hit-and-miss.

Well Imad Wasim did well against Sri Lanka A and if domestic stats are anything to go by I am glad Imad Wasim was picked ahead of him. Playing a blinder in a substandard T-20 tournament is not exactly a testament to anyone's batting.
 
Pakistan lack seriously in bowling department. I
Batting is good enough for a late 90s match though.
 
I like this approach from Shehzzy boy, he looks good when he is aggressive but sometimes he gets reckless and throw his wicket away, hopefully not today.
 
I've seen Bilal Asif play and he's very good. Imad I have no hopes from, when batting he'll be lucky to even put bat on ball, and his spin will be hit-and-miss.

But at the same time gutted for Babar Azam the same way I was for Sami Aslam. I feel they should not drop youngsters but I guess seniors can get 50 matches in a row in Pakistan team despite horrendous results but a few innings is enough to call the curtains for a youngster
 
Selfie's initial runs in the first overs were a deception, he's gone back to his old self.
 
Shehzad things playing good shots without any result makes you a good batsman. Hes the worst opener in the world
 
This is why I believe that hacks are good batsmen in today's ODI game. People just love "tekneeq" :)))
 
Ahmad sehwag doing what he does best. Finding the fielders.
 
its just a matter of time before Shehzad plays a risky shot. These guys need to learn to rotate strike.
 
Imad is a very low quality cricketer. Saw the glimpses in ZIM series.

He'll weaken our batting, and his bowling is not extraordinary.

Yah he bowled 2 overs and batted 5 balls LOL

He averages 41 in FC, he is much better bat than Bilal asif, who is a better bowler. IMO Imad is justified pick if you look at recent A-team series
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top