I Believe in the Teesra
Test Debutant
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2011
- Runs
- 13,628
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Afridi was more economical and was just as good. Also had the crucial catch dropped off him10-37-2.
4 runs when they are attacking. Haters are quiet.
has rain affected the pitch or ball anyway, SL is cruising...
"Am I the only one against how Ajmal's used? You can't use the majority of the arguably best spinner's overs (6 or more) in the completely defensive role of restricting death over runs. That's just not the way it should be. You want atleast 6 of Ajmal's overs to be bowled before the 30th over with a purely attacking mindset of looking for wickets." Ace, you are not the only one. I expressed my frustration at that earlier. He is your best bowler by your admission, you should use him to take wickets - Cric info.
Afridi was more economical and was just as good. Also had the crucial catch dropped off him
He may have taken another if that sitter was taken.The point is he bowled just as well.More economical? By 1 run? Dropped catch? How can that happen? Catches get dropped mate,nothing new.
2 wickets are two wickets. One drop is one drop.
More economical? By 1 run? Dropped catch? How can that happen? Catches get dropped mate,nothing new.
2 wickets are two wickets. One drop is one drop.
Afridi was more economical and was just as good. Also had the crucial catch dropped off him
Pak lacks a batsmen like Sanga who is very sensible, can take singles and also hit 4s and 6s when it matters.
We should have dropped YK today and played an extra bowler in the side.
we cant go into a game with just 5 bowlers.