There is no doubt that what Steve Smith and the Australians did by tampering with the ball was wrong on every level.
However, we have all seen cricketers around the world do this and be caught - from Broad intentionally digging his spikes into the ball to Anderson intentionally picking the seam of the ball with his nails. Heck even Smith's opposite number, Faf, was caught on camera "changing the condition of the ball".
The difference between all the other incidents and this one however is simply this - Smith had the courage to own up to it. Meanwhile, despite blatantly clear evidence, guys like Broad, Anderson and Faf denied it like it never happened- in all those cases, no firm action was taken against the players despite just as clear evidence of ball tampering as we have now.
I have no issues with Cricket Australia and the ICC coming down like a ton of bricks on Smith. However, the same treatment must then also be dished out to all those players who, at the moment, get away with it simply by denying it ever happened. Surely that's even worse? It's very strange - no one would take a spot fixer's denial as evidence of their innocence, but with ball tampering, the opposite seems to be true.
This inconsistency in the way Smith and the others are treated means the only lesson which international cricketers will take from this is that, if you ball tamper, admitting to it is stupidity. Surely the lesson we want them to learn is don't ball tamper at all, because whether you admit it or not, you will be shown no mercy.
Does there need to be a radical re-think at the ICC, about how seriously the offence of ball tampering should be taken? Was Smith stupid for being so candid about what he and his team did?
However, we have all seen cricketers around the world do this and be caught - from Broad intentionally digging his spikes into the ball to Anderson intentionally picking the seam of the ball with his nails. Heck even Smith's opposite number, Faf, was caught on camera "changing the condition of the ball".
The difference between all the other incidents and this one however is simply this - Smith had the courage to own up to it. Meanwhile, despite blatantly clear evidence, guys like Broad, Anderson and Faf denied it like it never happened- in all those cases, no firm action was taken against the players despite just as clear evidence of ball tampering as we have now.
I have no issues with Cricket Australia and the ICC coming down like a ton of bricks on Smith. However, the same treatment must then also be dished out to all those players who, at the moment, get away with it simply by denying it ever happened. Surely that's even worse? It's very strange - no one would take a spot fixer's denial as evidence of their innocence, but with ball tampering, the opposite seems to be true.
This inconsistency in the way Smith and the others are treated means the only lesson which international cricketers will take from this is that, if you ball tamper, admitting to it is stupidity. Surely the lesson we want them to learn is don't ball tamper at all, because whether you admit it or not, you will be shown no mercy.
Does there need to be a radical re-think at the ICC, about how seriously the offence of ball tampering should be taken? Was Smith stupid for being so candid about what he and his team did?