What's new

The 'biggest-ever' white English child sex abuse ring as they are jailed for 145 years

KingKhanWC

Test Captain
Joined
Jan 2, 2010
Runs
49,499
The paedophiles behind 'biggest-ever' child sex abuse ring as they are jailed for 145 years

A total of 21 people have been convicted of a string of sex offences committed against seven children

The evil criminals involved in the biggest-ever child sex abuse ring in the West Midlands have been jailed for more than 145 years. A total of 21 people have been convicted of sickening crimes against seven children up to the age of 12.

The 'abhorrent and cruel' offences stretched over almost a decade in the Walsall and Wolverhampton areas. A huge six-year probe into the abuse was launched by West Midlands Police after one of the victims went to hospital in 2017.

https://www.manchestereveningnews.c...951Uh13hkKqEBkaGBA1TAO4S-Igppx0mujuqAh1fduRXU

WhiteEnglish.jpg
 
There have been many huge white English peado rings and paedophiles, inc many celebs. Heck even Prince Andrew is accused of child abuse but still seen in an official position.

Is there an issue in this community?
 
There have been many huge white English peado rings and paedophiles, inc many celebs. Heck even Prince Andrew is accused of child abuse but still seen in an official position.

Is there an issue in this community?

They are the master race, the British Raj for many who post here, so would be sacrilege to raise a question against their Anglo pedigree. That is the only issue m'lud.
 
They are the master race, the British Raj for many who post here, so would be sacrilege to raise a question against their Anglo pedigree. That is the only issue m'lud.

Child abuse seems almost normalised in this community. From world leaders being suspected, Royals, TV hosts, singers, actors. Even the BBC decided to cancel an investigation into abuse by Saville.

Having incident photos of children in the UK, is a slap on the wrist, rarerly sent to prison for years.
 
Yes but they might be Pakistanis..maybe..erm even though a report says the majority are white but Pakistanis can create false reports from the homeoffice.
 
Yes but they might be Pakistanis..maybe..erm even though a report says the majority are white but Pakistanis can create false reports from the homeoffice.

On a serious note, where are all the white people in the UK not standing up to condemn this? Surely they should be shouting , not in our name and not in the name of our Royal Family!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Its really sad that as soon as you see the word paedophiles, the first question that pops in our mind is whether they are brown or white.
 
Two things
1: British Pakistanis still represent bigger proportion, once you take in percentage of the population. Thats the worrying part and showed be addressed. They over represent in this scenario.
2 I haver the capacity to condemn both groups white or British Pakistani or whatever else.

Should not be point scoring. But look at the ground realities and address the issues
 
Its really sad that as soon as you see the word paedophiles, the first question that pops in our mind is whether they are brown or white.

Yes, sad times indeed. Ive always believed this just an evil act , background is no relevent but makes you wonder.

Phillip Schofield immediately distances himself from his paedophile sibling as he is found guilty of sexually abusing teenage boy

Phillip Schofield's brother has been found guilty of sexually abusing a teenage boy over a period of three years.

Timothy Schofield was convicted of 11 sexual offences involving a child between October 2016 and October 2019, including two of sexual activity with a child, following a trial at Exeter Crown Court.

The 54-year-old, a civilian police worker from Bath, told the jury while giving evidence that he had watched pornography with the boy, whom he insisted was over the age of 16 at that time, and they had masturbated while sitting apart, but denied performing sexual acts on the teenager.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...r-54-guilty-sexually-abusing-teenage-boy.html
 
Two things
1: British Pakistanis still represent bigger proportion, once you take in percentage of the population. Thats the worrying part and showed be addressed. They over represent in this scenario.
2 I haver the capacity to condemn both groups white or British Pakistani or whatever else.

Should not be point scoring. But look at the ground realities and address the issues

Its not point scoring at all, its listing huge news here in the UK. Only someone whose agenda is not helping would suggest such rubbish.

You failed to condemn these people.
 
Two things
1: British Pakistanis still represent bigger proportion, once you take in percentage of the population. Thats the worrying part and showed be addressed. They over represent in this scenario.
2 I haver the capacity to condemn both groups white or British Pakistani or whatever else.

Should not be point scoring. But look at the ground realities and address the issues

Whether it's PK gangs or White gangs it's evil and long prison sentences should be given. PK gangs have targeted under age girls but they aren't pedos, in the strictest sense, while these guys are pedos and are even more evil. It's interesting that when the evil white guys do it,it's not an ethnicity issue but when evil PKs do it, it's a cultural issue. Let's call these criminals what they are evil and stop using it as a political football
 
Maybe he has sympathy for them for being white

Its tragic and makes me very angry if any children are abused, regardless of the background of the evil people.

They made a big point of listing identify of brown people but nothing to see here.
 
Two things
1: British Pakistanis still represent bigger proportion, once you take in percentage of the population. Thats the worrying part and showed be addressed. They over represent in this scenario.
2 I haver the capacity to condemn both groups white or British Pakistani or whatever else.

Should not be point scoring. But look at the ground realities and address the issues

This is not true. That's the point. They don't represent a bigger proportion. They represent a proportion.
 
Its really sad that as soon as you see the word paedophiles, the first question that pops in our mind is whether they are brown or white.

We have our lead from the top, Indian ethnic Brits like Priti Patel are leading the way, so now of course we must also question her own role as a fudge brownie. Ask yourself if her or Suella, both of Indian origin would ever dare to express in front of a white audience the opinion that there must be some link between white British racial group and paedophilia. Why not? This is the path they have chosen so conclusions should be drawn.
 
No they over represent if you take they are 2.7 percent t of the general population. That’s the whole point.

The homeoffices own report says there is no evidence. Where is your evidence other than unsourced statements?
 
What a surprise on 2 fronts.

A white grooming gang doesn't make it on the front page news of MSM, and the usual PPers who are ashamed to be even associated with Pakistan/Islam, are no where to be seen on this thread.

This proves the critics are not interested in the crimes, just the race of the perpetrators.
 
Its tragic and makes me very angry if any children are abused, regardless of the background of the evil people.

They made a big point of listing identify of brown people but nothing to see here.

The majority do not understand how the media works. Gone are the days when the media reported on the news, now the MSM create the news.

There's an old saying - out of sight, out of mind. The MSM are the antithesis of this, in sight, in mind, meaning the media creates the perception and the majority accept perception as reality.
 
No they over represent if you take they are 2.7 percent t of the general population. That’s the whole point.

The highest percentage of pedos belong to an ethnic group that you dare not mention and they don't even do it in the UK. Who is this group and where do they commit these crimes? Any ideas
 
The majority do not understand how the media works. Gone are the days when the media reported on the news, now the MSM create the news.

There's an old saying - out of sight, out of mind. The MSM are the antithesis of this, in sight, in mind, meaning the media creates the perception and the majority accept perception as reality.

MSM are designed to promote elite , government propaganda. After demonising brown people so their governments could bomb children into 1000 pieces, it would be difficult for them to admit the truth is their own are worse.

See how they write the title? 145 years! Sounds a lot but if you break this down per person, its LESS THAN 7 YEARS! Such is the great justice system of the white man.
 
I have mentioned multiple times white. I think you don’t understand basic math. British Pakistanis are 2.7 percent of the population. But are over represented in the crime we are discussing. Is this that hard to understand. Did you go to school?

No, I don't think you understand basic maths either. If underage sex is criminal, which it is and no one gets prosecuted which they don't, then those stats don't show up. So tell me will the proportions stay the same? You do the maths

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopula...lityrates/bulletins/conceptionstatistics/2019
 
I have mentioned multiple times white. I think you don’t understand basic math. British Pakistanis are 2.7 percent of the population. But are over represented in the crime we are discussing. Is this that hard to understand. Did you go to school?

Only if you single out sexual abuse as grooming. Sexual abuse is sexual abuse, its no condolence to the victims if its labelled as grooming. Most peados groom children, as Saville did but show me a headline from a major news source which suggests he was a groomer or Epstein etc. The British government and MSM have used this term to demonise, so the governments can continue bombing kids in Iraq or Syria without their public making a fuss. You are either very naïve an clueless how the world works or you are deliberately enjoying this demonistion. I think its a bit of both.

1 in 4 American girls are sexually abused. No community comes close to such a % but because of your love for Amreeka taking you in, you will ignore.

American grooming gangs of peados and grooming individuals outnumber any other nationality world wide.
 
I have mentioned multiple times white. I think you don’t understand basic math. British Pakistanis are 2.7 percent of the population. But are over represented in the crime we are discussing. Is this that hard to understand. Did you go to school?

What you mention in order to prove your own point is immaterial since you are doing it so you can back up your own purposes. If you can show me where white people themselves link their sexual perversions to their white race then I will hold my hands up and say Asians ( including Indians) must do the same.
 
So racism while abusing kids is the main issue for you?

Americans are the biggest abusers of children, please explain why its nothing to do with their nationality or culture?

Over 10 million Indian child girls are forced into prostitution, explain again why its nothing to do with their culture?

When you realise you lose arguments because you dont apply the same consistency ,you may grow up kid.


I’ve explained the outcry. You saying who has won carries no credibility on here.

Most people commit sexual rape because they are sickos. Pakistani men were in the media for being sickos and groomers but also using racist language towards white girls and saying the girls were their right as they are white. Understandably so this has created outrage amongst the uk public and I’m happy to clarify we aren’t all like these groomers.
 
Son when you learn to debate with facts you can accuse me of being immature. I have taught your friend a lesson about the statistics maybe I can teach you about how to debate facts.

You’re the man, lol. You taught somebody a lesson today on your keyboard with your buddies.
 
You’re not making sense.

Oh I am. Your points can easily found on any right wing website. The abuse isn't about ethnicity or religion, it's driven by losers trying to get sex from vulnerable kids, this is no different to any other group doing the same.
 
Oh I am. Your points can easily found on any right wing website. The abuse isn't about ethnicity or religion, it's driven by losers trying to get sex from vulnerable kids, this is no different to any other group doing the same.

So some Pakistani men didn’t use racism insults towards their victims then? If it annoyed edl, then does that make me an edl fan for stating a fact?
 
So some Pakistani men didn’t use racism insults towards their victims then? If it annoyed edl, then does that make me an edl fan for stating a fact?

They may have done but can you explain why we need to apologise for their racism. We can condemn all criminal behaviour but I am PK man, on what basis am I supposed to be apologising for the behaviour of these losers. Do all white people go around apologising for the behaviour of 1000s of white guys that have abused kids in the UK,Thailand, Sri Lanka, Philippines etc. Can you show me the apologies from the white community specifically mentioning white men from the UK, or did they do what we are doing which is condemning their criminality and asking for them to be dealt with in the harshest possible way.
 
They may have done but can you explain why we need to apologise for their racism. We can condemn all criminal behaviour but I am PK man, on what basis am I supposed to be apologising for the behaviour of these losers. Do all white people go around apologising for the behaviour of 1000s of white guys that have abused kids in the UK,Thailand, Sri Lanka, Philippines etc. Can you show me the apologies from the white community specifically mentioning white men from the UK, or did they do what we are doing which is condemning their criminality and asking for them to be dealt with in the harshest possible way.

Do you have comprehension issues? When have I said I apologise on their behalf?

I condemn their actions where appropriate.

I also don’t deflect like some window lickers on here who scream Epstein and MSM at every opportunity.
 
Do you have comprehension issues? When have I said I apologise on their behalf?

I condemn their actions where appropriate.

I also don’t deflect like some window lickers on here who scream Epstein and MSM at every opportunity.
"will where appropriate, condemn them as they are part of my community so the wider uk community knows we aren’t all like that"
You are not making any sense at all. At least make sense from post to post
 
I'm glad this made the headlines because it's a slap in the face to those who seem to think only Pakistani cases make the news.
 
Amazing, not a single word of condemnation from the usual Pakistani/Islam haters, because I can bet they are more upset about the OP since it disproves their stereotype towards British Pakistanis.
 
I’ve explained the outcry. You saying who has won carries no credibility on here.

Most people commit sexual rape because they are sickos. Pakistani men were in the media for being sickos and groomers but also using racist language towards white girls and saying the girls were their right as they are white. Understandably so this has created outrage amongst the uk public and I’m happy to clarify we aren’t all like these groomers.

Again, you're more upset about the language than the abuse, which is very strange.


Look I have no problem if you want to describe them Asian groomers , as long as you also describe others according to some identity, ie Police rapists, English peados, Celeb white child abusers etc.

Example, new news too.

Maryland attorney general releases report on decades of sex abuse by Catholic priests

https://www.npr.org/2023/04/05/1168...-archdiocese-report-sex-abuse-catholic-church
 
I'm glad this made the headlines because it's a slap in the face to those who seem to think only Pakistani cases make the news.

But there is no mention that this paedo ring is linked to the white ethnic group or culture in any of the news relating to this, so actually this is a massive slap in the face to anti-Pak trolls who are exposed as hypocrites and stand alongside Suella and Priti as a result of their choices.
 
A Labour frontbencher has defended a social media post used by the party which claims Rishi Sunak does not think child sex abusers should go to prison.

Shadow culture secretary Lucy Powell said the post was part of "political campaigning" but admitted: "It won't be to everybody's taste."

Asked whether she was "comfortable with pointing the finger at Rishi Sunak", Ms Powell told Sky News: "I'm comfortable with taking a sort of standardised graphic that the prime minister used himself many, many times in recent months and years, to highlight how one of his own policies isn't working."

Labour accused of 'gutter politics' - politics latest

She added: "It's political campaigning. I'm comfortable to be on your programme this morning defending what we're talking about, which is some really serious issues around the criminal justice system and how this country is just not dealing with that."

Labour has been accused of "gutter politics" and criticised by its own MPs after posting a message on its official Twitter account vowing to "lock up dangerous criminals".

The tweet pointed to data from the Ministry of Justice showing that 4,500 adults convicted of sex acts on children avoided a prison sentence since the Conservatives came to power in 2010.

It said: "Do you think adults convicted of sexually assaulting children should go to prison? Rishi Sunak doesn't."

The language has been widely criticised, with many drawing comparisons to Boris Johnson's false claim last year that Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer failed to prosecute Jimmy Savile when he was director of public prosecutions.

Veteran Labour MP John McDonnell said: "This is not the sort of politics a Labour Party, confident of its own values and preparing to govern, should be engaged in.

"I say to the people who have taken the decision to publish this ad, please withdraw it. We, the Labour Party, are better than this."

Conservative peer Baroness Sayeeda Warsi also condemned Labour's tweet while hitting out at her own party for triggering an "appalling fight into the gutter".

She said: "Dog whistle met by dog whistle.

"Disgraceful comments by Braverman over the weekend has triggered an appalling fight into the gutter.

"At what point are we going to talk about the victims? Where is the protection for the half million kids sexually exploited in our country every year."

Last week, Home Secretary Suella Braverman claimed Labour-run areas failed to stop child grooming gangs over fears they would be called "racist".

The row has renewed calls for tighter laws around political campaigning, as both main parties seek to sell themselves as strong on law and order ahead of the local elections.

SKY
 
Read these guidelines before posting again in this thread

A lot of demeaning posts calling each other kids etc - will not be allowed.

http://www.pakpassion.net/ppforum/s...for-posting-on-Time-Pass-and-Sports-Forum-***

In specific

4. Addressing other posters in a patronizing tone, make fun of their age, experience etc - Each poster is equally important, each poster's views regardless of their age have the same validity.

So calling other posters by names or referring to them as "kids, beta, uncle, chotay" etc are all things we do not want to see on our forums.
 
Last edited:
Rotherham child abuse gang leader sentenced for further rape of young girl

The ringleader of a gang that sexually exploited children in Rotherham has been sentenced again, after a new victim came forward.

Mohammed Imran Ali Akhtar, 42, was charged as part of Operation Stovewood, a series of investigations carried out after a huge scale of child sexual exploitation was identified in the South Yorkshire town.

He was first jailed for 23 years in 2018 over sexual offences committed against three vulnerable victims between 1998 and 2005.

On Friday, Akhtar was sentenced again for the sexual abuse of a victim between 2001 and 2003. The victim was aged 13 to 14 at the time.

In October, he pleaded guilty to two counts of rape and two counts of indecent assault - one of each referring to multiple incidents in the two-year period.

He was sentenced to 12 years in prison, running concurrently with his existing sentence.

'Makes her feel sick'

Sheffield Crown Court heard the victim - who was a "very vulnerable girl living in difficult circumstances" at the time of the offences - came forward after Akhtar's 2018 conviction was reported in the news.

Judge Sarah Wright said Akhtar targeted the child in Rotherham. The court heard he called her to his car and gave her drugs and alcohol.

The girl had started going missing and staying away from her home.

Judge Wright told the court the girl engaged in sexual activity with him four or five times a week for about a year in his car and an apparently empty house in Rotherham.

She said on one occasion, Akhtar and another man had intimidated the girl and another "clearly distressed and unwilling" victim into sexual activity.

The court also heard the victim told police in her interview that "when she walks down the street and sees someone that vaguely resembles the defendant, it makes her feel sick".

Michael Collins, mitigating, said Akhtar carried out the offences before he married and had a child. He added Akhtar had mental health difficulties which were "making incarceration harder".

During sentencing, Judge Wright said: "I commend the bravery of the victim in coming forward after all this time.

"Her childhood and adolescence can never be reclaimed, the effect of [Akhtar's] offending on her cannot be overestimated."

SKY NEWS
 
Rotherham child abuse gang leader sentenced for further rape of young girl

The ringleader of a gang that sexually exploited children in Rotherham has been sentenced again, after a new victim came forward.

Mohammed Imran Ali Akhtar, 42, was charged as part of Operation Stovewood, a series of investigations carried out after a huge scale of child sexual exploitation was identified in the South Yorkshire town.

He was first jailed for 23 years in 2018 over sexual offences committed against three vulnerable victims between 1998 and 2005.

On Friday, Akhtar was sentenced again for the sexual abuse of a victim between 2001 and 2003. The victim was aged 13 to 14 at the time.

In October, he pleaded guilty to two counts of rape and two counts of indecent assault - one of each referring to multiple incidents in the two-year period.

He was sentenced to 12 years in prison, running concurrently with his existing sentence.

'Makes her feel sick'

Sheffield Crown Court heard the victim - who was a "very vulnerable girl living in difficult circumstances" at the time of the offences - came forward after Akhtar's 2018 conviction was reported in the news.

Judge Sarah Wright said Akhtar targeted the child in Rotherham. The court heard he called her to his car and gave her drugs and alcohol.

The girl had started going missing and staying away from her home.

Judge Wright told the court the girl engaged in sexual activity with him four or five times a week for about a year in his car and an apparently empty house in Rotherham.

She said on one occasion, Akhtar and another man had intimidated the girl and another "clearly distressed and unwilling" victim into sexual activity.

The court also heard the victim told police in her interview that "when she walks down the street and sees someone that vaguely resembles the defendant, it makes her feel sick".

Michael Collins, mitigating, said Akhtar carried out the offences before he married and had a child. He added Akhtar had mental health difficulties which were "making incarceration harder".

During sentencing, Judge Wright said: "I commend the bravery of the victim in coming forward after all this time.

"Her childhood and adolescence can never be reclaimed, the effect of [Akhtar's] offending on her cannot be overestimated."

SKY NEWS

Lock this peace of filth, and throw away the keys.
 
Back
Top