Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It can be a blessing in disguise. Though I wish Gill to get well soon but it may finally give KL Rahul the opportunity to open. Once Gill comes back, he can bat at no.3.
If anything, Kohli tries to play it early by standing a foot outside the batting crease. Lately, Gill too has been bitten by this bug of playing it early rather than late, a technique adjustment which is so important in English conditions.I have no hope from our batting, especially the openers. We just dont follow the right template to bat in swinging/seaming conditions.
Our rockstars, want to get that stride in to counter the movement but that had failed again and again that its shocking that we haven't even thought of rectifying that .
The best batsmen always see it early and play it late either square or behind square of the wicket.
Forget the likes of Smith and Root, let's just look at Shan Masood's innings of 156 in England. He showed immense discipline by using the depth of his crease and playing as late as possible. More than 60 % of his runs were behind square and around 87% runs were not in the V.
Even the likes of Babar and Rizwan got out trying to play straight but Shan didnt and could notch up that big ton which , with better bowling, should have won that match.
We simply dont have batsmen capable of even doing what Shan did in England.
It can be a blessing in disguise. Though I wish Gill to get well soon but it may finally give KL Rahul the opportunity to open. Once Gill comes back, he can bat at no.3.

LMAO you are talking as if he has never got an opportunity to open. May be you are not aware but KL played all 5 tests in England last time, got exposed and was one of the main reason for India losing that series. He should represent India only in LOI's. I would like to know from you what special inning has he played in test cricket to deserve an opening spot again? He has a test average of 34.![]()
So just because he failed on 1 England tour...he cant be successful in future? Kohli failed in 2014....didnt he make amends in 2018? Btw, Rahul had a century on that England tour which you keep referring to in every post albeit in a dead rubber.
Rahul was our best test batsman when Australia toured India in 2018. On those tricky pitches when every Indian batsman struggled, Rahul is the only batsman who looked good. Then mid way of our tour to Australia he was dropped as an opener and never given chance again. He is basically a 48+ avg test opener but not getting any chance.
Rahul
Rohit
Gill
Kohli
Rahane
Pant
Pandya (if he is bowling)
The above should be our batting line up and WTC finals 2023 is all ours.

If you understand the game, you know very well that KL Rahul is a better batsman for overseas conditions than Mayank or Shaw. England conditions are not easy for openers, even Rohit has failed only in overseas conditions.
Furthermore, Rahul is seen as the next Indian captain. We do not know how things are stacked for Gill or Shaw in coming future and Pant has a baby voice which is not suitable for captaincy and also his workload will be high as he also keep wickets.

Surely you can't differentiate between Kohli and KL. Kohli learnt from his mistakes, made adjustments to his batting and improved his stats in England. You still haven't answered what has KL Rahul done in test cricket to deserve an opening spot? Any special test inning? Only you can glorify a test hundred in a dead rubber which we lost. Shows your standard. Just like Pandya he should concentrate on LOI's only.![]()
Oh trust me I can very well differentiate between Kohli and Rahul. Infact I was not drawing a parallel among them but was just rebutting your bogus logic that just bcoz Rahul failed in one series in Eng, he cant be a successful opener.
You are asking me to give any special test innings by him but have you seen him bat when Australia toured India in 2018? Steve Smith and Lokesh Rahul were best bats on those tricky pitches. Now you will say why giving example of 3 years ago...that is because he has not played any test cricket since 2018 for us to judge.
Since then India has tried Mayank, Rohit, Shaw, Gill, Vihari everyone as opener. My point is...why not give Rahul another chance? What is the harm in trying?
There is something called eye to spot a talent and by God's of grace I have that in plenty. Remember I told you how Pandya and Pant will be MVP for us before our tour to Australia and how you used to bring their semi final failure again and again?
Similarly I have seen something in Rahul (wont reveal what) which makes me firmly believe that he will be a top class test opener...atleast better than the ones we are playing now. Its just a case of when Rajdeep speaks...you listen thats all.
Anyway, you dont have to worry about it much for now because Rahul wont be opening this series thanks to our clueless captain. It will be Mayank-Rohit with Eswaran as backup. So chill.

Age : 29
Matches : 36
Average : 34
Surely he got more than enough chances to prove his doubters wrong? He was supposed to be the next Kohli in tests.![]()
If anything, Kohli tries to play it early by standing a foot outside the batting crease. Lately, Gill too has been bitten by this bug of playing it early rather than late, a technique adjustment which is so important in English conditions.
Yeah, I've seen Tendulkar batting well outside his batting crease during his career. However he didn't overdo it.The entire lineup tries to play like that. Unfortunately, this a bigger issue and I've seen a lot of people in India support this. In fact, I believe even Kohli said it was on tendulkar"s advice that he started looking to play the ball early.
Averages alone is not enough to discard a player. KL Rahul has a test century in Australia, England, West Indies and Sri Lanka. He is 29 year old.
Rohit Sharma has zero test hundred outside India. He is 36 years old.
I would rather lose a test match overseas with a talented 29 year old than a 36 year old.

At this point, the limited overs leg is more important for Shaw than just being a part of 20 man squad for England test tour.
If he can be sent to England after finishing the Sri Lanka tour, then he should be considered. I think in that case, he can join the England tour from 3rd test onwards. However, for England conditions, he is not a good choice to have.
With Gill's absence, I would fall on Vihari as Rohit's opening partner because I don't see KL as test opener either.
Rohit
Vihari
Pujara
Kohli
Rahane
Pant(wkt)
Jadeja
Ashwin/ Shardul
Siraj
Ishant
Bumrah/Shami
Other options:-
KL Rahul
Washington
This is the best 15- man choice we have got. Rest will be there for just filling numbers.

LMAO you are talking as if you knew India will win the series after getting all out for 36. Half of you ran away from here and only came back in third test lol. Pant was lucky that he didn't play in that 36 all out game and Saha, Shaw were made the scapegoat for that loss. Indian series win also had to do with Rahane captaining and Australia(particularly Paine) dropping catches.Shaw doesn't have the game to perform in England conditions. Vihari is a better option as opener for England.
Rahul is good enough to bat at 5 but don't think Rahane will be dropped, so he will have to wait.
Last time around in Adelaide after 36 all-out, I got it absolutely right as I asked for inclusion of Gill and Pant over Shaw and Saha and Indian fans were rewarded with a 2-1 India series win in Australia, especially the memorable win in Gabba.
In comparison, the deluded guy had to bear some of the toughest times in next few months just like how Tim Paine had to dealt with one from the Australian cricket board and their fans after the "Can't want to see you at GABBA, Ash" fiasco.

www.indiatoday.in/amp/sports/cricke...-other-guys-along-with-him-1823372-2021-07-03
What a pathetic loser this KLR has become.
First strike rate is overrated nonsense while playing match losing knocks one after another...
And now this.
Sad to see him go this route.
If only he develops a spine and focuses on achievong his immense potential.

How many more tests are you willing to give him in England this time? He played all 5 tests last time. [MENTION=152021]Rajdeep[/MENTION] wants him to open again whereas [MENTION=139595]Ab Fan[/MENTION] won't even mind losing a test match if KL Rahul is picked ahead of Rohit Sharma.![]()
Lowest Batting Average in Tests since 2020:-
[min. 300 runs]
20.1: John Campbell
21.4: R Ashwin
24.6: Virat Kohli*
26.4: Cheteshwar Pujara*
26.4: Joshua Da Silva
27.3: Tom Blundell
27.8: Jason Holder
28.2: Ajinkya Rahane*
Our batsmen are pathetic, Ashwin doing better than main batsmen.
Man, this Indian test team has become a mess too.
Damn.
Just when you look forward to a marquee series, you have captaincy issues, team issues, confusion, etc.....
I sure hope I am proven wrong but at this point, England have to play awful for us to win.
We need a complete overhaul of the system.

Ollie Pope has been ruled out until England's Test series against India after suffering a left thigh muscle injury.
Pope sustained the injury while batting during Surrey's Vitality Blast match against Kent Spitfires on July 2.
"The ECB and Surrey fitness teams will work together to deliver Pope's rehabilitation with a focus for him to be available to return for the first Test against India," read an ECB statement.
Pope now faces a race against time to be fit for the five-match Test series against India, which begins at Trent Bridge on August 4.
SKY
has been ruled out or not?Conflicting statement.
has been ruled out or not?Conflicting statement.
Don't think this needs hand-wringing. This is just a case of an opener being replaced.
anyway India is not overly dependent upon Gill.
This Indian team management is pretty funny lol. They want Prithvi Shaw who was kicked out after just one match(36 all out) by the same team management? This also shows they have no confidence in other openers and will most probably blame selectors if we lose this series.![]()
Ollie Pope has been ruled out until England's Test series against India after suffering a left thigh muscle injury.

Good chance for Haseeb Hameed to impress.County Select XI squad: Will Rhodes (Warwickshire - captain), Rehan Ahmed (Leicestershire), Tom Aspinwell (Lancashire), Ethan Bamber (Middlesex), James Bracey (Gloucestershire), Jack Carson (Sussex), Zak Chappell (Nottinghamshire), Haseeb Hameed (Nottinghamshire), Lyndon James (Nottinghamshire), Jake Libby (Worcestershire), Craig Miles (Warwickshire), Liam Patterson-White (Nottinghamshire), James Rew (Somerset), Rob Yates (Warwickshire).
If both Saha and Pant misses out first test since they tested positive, can KL Rahul play as a wicker keeper?

Thanks for letting us knowLive from Durham Cricket YouTube channel.
Why Avesh and Sundar are listed for County Select X11.. lol where are the local county players.

I think from the day we remove Kohli as Captain we are gonna win three four consecutive icc trophies, I know that he isn't the most tactically accomplished captain but that dude is damn unlucky too.<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">What a time to be an Indian cricket fan! There are 24 players playing for India in an ODI and a FC game right now. And Kohli, Rahane, Ashwin, Ishant, Shami aren't in those 24. The depth is insane!<br>PS: We have so many players that two are even playing for the opposition�� <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/SLvIND?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#SLvIND</a></p>— Wasim Jaffer (@WasimJaffer14) <a href="https://twitter.com/WasimJaffer14/status/1417448767679205378?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 20, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
We are getting whooped by a county Z level bowling attack on a flat pitch.
Barely doing well against SL A team.
I get where he is coming from....but this is some pathetic cheerleading.
Ek trophy win karne ka aukaat nahi hai but we keep gloating about depth. lol.
dunno if I am right or wrong but it just feels like it.I think from the day we remove Kohli as Captain we are gonna win three four consecutive icc trophies, I know that he isn't the most tactically accomplished captain but that dude is damn unlucky too.
I now think removing him from captaincy is the solution to every problem in Indian cricket.dunno if I am right or wrong but it just feels like it.

Why Avesh and Sundar are listed for County Select X11.. lol where are the local county players.

I expected your post after KL 50![]()

Haha....the rot goes deeper than Kohli.
But yeah removing him will be a start.
And a huge step.
Any reason why Kohli and Rahane aren't playing today's game?
Isn't this our only tour game?
Haha....the rot goes deeper than Kohli.
But yeah removing him will be a start.
And a huge step.
Any reason why Kohli and Rahane aren't playing today's game?
Isn't this our only tour game?
In test cricket, Kohli should continue as captain. He is a fine test captain. Rahane doesn't merit a selection and there aren't other options. 3-4 years later, Kohli can pass the banton of test captaincy to KL Rahul.
It is in limited overs where I think Rohit would do much better as captain than Kohli and after giving up captaincy, Kohli can focus on his batting skills more.
Kohli shouldn't be tha captain in any format anymore, he set up a pace bowling culture in India and that's his biggest contribution which will never be forgotten but now its time to hang the boots, even his batting is getting affected, he needs to concentrate specifically on improving his batting.In test cricket, Kohli should continue as captain. He is a fine test captain. Rahane doesn't merit a selection and there aren't other options. 3-4 years later, Kohli can pass the banton of test captaincy to KL Rahul.
It is in limited overs where I think Rohit would do much better as captain than Kohli and after giving up captaincy, Kohli can focus on his batting skills more.