Major
T20I Star
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2013
- Runs
- 32,113
- Post of the Week
- 7
ICC enforced cricket boards all around the world to make constitutions for the sport in the country, where the appointment of the chairman isn't on the basis of political govts.
This was done back in 2012, with much of the focus was on PCB and Ijazz Butt.
The statement that was given by ICC was, "the important principle of free elections and the independence"
Source: https://www.news18.com/cricketnext/news/icc-to-free-cricket-from-political-influence-575357.html
However, when PCB did indeed made its constitution, there was a loophole that was created most likely on purpose.
While the PCB constitution does make sure elections take place, but those elections are a façade, as the the PM's blue eye boy will always be elected.
The Loophole:
To be PCB chairman, it is important that you are a Board of Governor member in the PCB. Every city association (I assume) is represented by a BOG member. Anyone from the BOG member can stand for the PCB chairman election. Vote is casted by BOG members and the highest number of vote winner is made Chairman PCB.
The Loophole is that, anyone could be made BOG member or be removed as BOG member. The PM can give a name to the PCB that this is the guy I want as chairman, he would first be inducted as a BOG member. After that elections are held. To give it a transparent look, the PM can give two names to be added in BOG group where the one he wants is made sure is elected.
Any BOG member trying to stand against the PM's chosen boy could risk losing his job. While, I am pretty sure this can be challenged in the supreme court, but our BOG members would not want to go through the legal process and would quietly vote for who they are told.
The selection of Ehsan Mani and Rameez Raja happened in such familiar fashion.
Now to be honest, I dont mind having Rameez Raja as Chairman. But atleast the constitution of PCB needs to be strong enough that whoever becomes PM, the chairman of PCB doesnt end up losing his job. The chairman needs to be someone who has worked his way upto the BOG group than to Chairman.
Rameez was chairman for 6-8 months. After which, the opposition govt will bring in their own chairman who will be there for only 1 year. After which a care taker govt will come in, if the care taker pm is ambitious and stays for more than 2 months he aswell can bring in a new chairman. After elections are held and a new govt comes in place, we again will have a new chairman.
Thus, from Rameez Raja onwards, we are looking at minimum 2-3 PCB chairman's in the next 1.5 years. Basically in 2 years time, from 2021 till 2023, we will be having 5 new chairman's in total.
This only creates nuisance towards Pakistan cricket and the PSL investors.
This was done back in 2012, with much of the focus was on PCB and Ijazz Butt.
The statement that was given by ICC was, "the important principle of free elections and the independence"
Source: https://www.news18.com/cricketnext/news/icc-to-free-cricket-from-political-influence-575357.html
However, when PCB did indeed made its constitution, there was a loophole that was created most likely on purpose.
While the PCB constitution does make sure elections take place, but those elections are a façade, as the the PM's blue eye boy will always be elected.
The Loophole:
To be PCB chairman, it is important that you are a Board of Governor member in the PCB. Every city association (I assume) is represented by a BOG member. Anyone from the BOG member can stand for the PCB chairman election. Vote is casted by BOG members and the highest number of vote winner is made Chairman PCB.
The Loophole is that, anyone could be made BOG member or be removed as BOG member. The PM can give a name to the PCB that this is the guy I want as chairman, he would first be inducted as a BOG member. After that elections are held. To give it a transparent look, the PM can give two names to be added in BOG group where the one he wants is made sure is elected.
Any BOG member trying to stand against the PM's chosen boy could risk losing his job. While, I am pretty sure this can be challenged in the supreme court, but our BOG members would not want to go through the legal process and would quietly vote for who they are told.
The selection of Ehsan Mani and Rameez Raja happened in such familiar fashion.
Now to be honest, I dont mind having Rameez Raja as Chairman. But atleast the constitution of PCB needs to be strong enough that whoever becomes PM, the chairman of PCB doesnt end up losing his job. The chairman needs to be someone who has worked his way upto the BOG group than to Chairman.
Rameez was chairman for 6-8 months. After which, the opposition govt will bring in their own chairman who will be there for only 1 year. After which a care taker govt will come in, if the care taker pm is ambitious and stays for more than 2 months he aswell can bring in a new chairman. After elections are held and a new govt comes in place, we again will have a new chairman.
Thus, from Rameez Raja onwards, we are looking at minimum 2-3 PCB chairman's in the next 1.5 years. Basically in 2 years time, from 2021 till 2023, we will be having 5 new chairman's in total.
This only creates nuisance towards Pakistan cricket and the PSL investors.