What's new

The positive out of this fallout is that the Army / Military is no longer a sacred cow!

PTI have atleast exposed the influence of Establishment , yet they went on with that silly press release the other day, they need to take a back seat and listen to public they are hurting their own damn image.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1685134

PTI leader and former human rights minister Shireen Mazari on Friday said that former prime minister Imran Khan had not approached the military to help find a solution to the "political deadlock" in the country after a no-confidence motion was submitted against him.

It was the military that sought the meeting through then defence minister Pervez Khattak, Mazari said, adding that it was the military that put forward the three proposals – of the premier either facing the no-trust vote, resigning from his post or the opposition withdrawing the no-trust move and holding of fresh election thereafter.

Who gives a rat's what they want? Who do they think they are to give proposals and ultimatums?

Pakistanis really have to look into the mirror and introspect how they got to this stage where the inmates are running the asylum.

It should be the people/government giving orders to the army: Don't lose half the country, don't allow foreign powers to drone our towns and villages etc and not the other way around.
 
Who gives a rat's what they want? Who do they think they are to give proposals and ultimatums?

Pakistanis really have to look into the mirror and introspect how they got to this stage where the inmates are running the asylum.

It should be the people/government giving orders to the army: Don't lose half the country, don't allow foreign powers to drone our towns and villages etc and not the other way around.

Pakistan squandered a golden opportunity to restore civil-military balance after the 1971 War. The military dictatorships of Ayub and Yahya and their bigoted attitudes towards East Pakistan, and the loss of half the country meant the military had seriously lost credibility.

In a normal country where each institutions are checked and balanced - there would've been an independent inquiry, findings fully published to learn the lessons and people held to account after such a debacle.

What happened instead was the Hamoodur Rahman Commission which was apparently scathing of the military high command. Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto never released the report to avoid demoralising the military (who showed their gratitude by overthrowing and executing him). Only a supplementary has been released.

Your guess as to where that report is today is as good as mine.
 
Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Qamar Javed Bajwa has stressed that misinformation and propaganda threatened state’s integrity and required timely and unified response to effectively counter speculations and rumours.

He said this while visiting the Lahore Garrison over the weekend, military’s media wing, the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), said in a statement on Sunday.

The army chief maintained that the military drew its strength from people and any effort to create wedge between military and population will not be tolerated. “The hostile forces are trying this for a long time but they won’t succeed, Insha Allah,” he was quoted as saying as he interacted with garrison officers and veterans in two separate interactive sessions.

Opon his arrival at the garrison, the COAS was received by Corps Commander Lieutenant General Muhammad Abdul Aziz.

During the visit, the army chief appreciated Lahore Corps for maintaining high standards of operational preparedness and training.

The statement comes days after the country's top military brass took serious notice of the recent propaganda campaign by some quarters to malign Pakistan Army and create a division between the institution and society.

According to ISPR, General Qamar Bajwa on April 12 chaired the 79th Formation Commanders’ Conference held at General Headquarters (GHQ) in Rawalpindi, where the forum expressed complete confidence in the leadership’s well-considered stance to uphold the Constitution and the rule of law at all costs.

The meeting took place two days after the joint opposition ousted former prime minister Imran Khan through a vote of no confidence in the National Assembly. The opposition managed to bag 174 votes, two more than requirement, in the 342-strong house. Imran had claimed that there was a foreign conspiracy for regime change in Pakistan.

According to ISPR, Gen Qamar also visited Combined Military Hospital Lahore (CMH) today and inquired about the well-being of Major Haris, who was manhandled and injured in a road rage incident recently.

The COAS said that law will take its course, adding that perpetrators, who are under arrest, will be brought to justice. “No one can be allowed to take law into their hands,” the COAS assured the injured officer.

Last week, Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) leaders Khwaja Salman Rafique and Hafiz Nauman were arrested by Punjab Police after they offered voluntary arrests following an incident allegedly involving their security guards.

The security personnel of the political leaders were reported to have beaten up and tortured an army official.

The two Punjab Assembly members were arrested when they went to the Garden Town police station to join the investigation of the case lodged against four suspected attackers and offered arrest in the case.

Express Tribune
 
Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Qamar Javed Bajwa has stressed that misinformation and propaganda threatened state’s integrity and required timely and unified response to effectively counter speculations and rumours.

He said this while visiting the Lahore Garrison over the weekend, military’s media wing, the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), said in a statement on Sunday.

The army chief maintained that the military drew its strength from people and any effort to create wedge between military and population will not be tolerated. “The hostile forces are trying this for a long time but they won’t succeed, Insha Allah,” he was quoted as saying as he interacted with garrison officers and veterans in two separate interactive sessions.

Opon his arrival at the garrison, the COAS was received by Corps Commander Lieutenant General Muhammad Abdul Aziz.

During the visit, the army chief appreciated Lahore Corps for maintaining high standards of operational preparedness and training.

The statement comes days after the country's top military brass took serious notice of the recent propaganda campaign by some quarters to malign Pakistan Army and create a division between the institution and society.

According to ISPR, General Qamar Bajwa on April 12 chaired the 79th Formation Commanders’ Conference held at General Headquarters (GHQ) in Rawalpindi, where the forum expressed complete confidence in the leadership’s well-considered stance to uphold the Constitution and the rule of law at all costs.

The meeting took place two days after the joint opposition ousted former prime minister Imran Khan through a vote of no confidence in the National Assembly. The opposition managed to bag 174 votes, two more than requirement, in the 342-strong house. Imran had claimed that there was a foreign conspiracy for regime change in Pakistan.

According to ISPR, Gen Qamar also visited Combined Military Hospital Lahore (CMH) today and inquired about the well-being of Major Haris, who was manhandled and injured in a road rage incident recently.

The COAS said that law will take its course, adding that perpetrators, who are under arrest, will be brought to justice. “No one can be allowed to take law into their hands,” the COAS assured the injured officer.

Last week, Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) leaders Khwaja Salman Rafique and Hafiz Nauman were arrested by Punjab Police after they offered voluntary arrests following an incident allegedly involving their security guards.

The security personnel of the political leaders were reported to have beaten up and tortured an army official.

The two Punjab Assembly members were arrested when they went to the Garden Town police station to join the investigation of the case lodged against four suspected attackers and offered arrest in the case.

Express Tribune


The snippets coming out of that meeting are alarming.

Bajwa CLEARLY confessed that army has a say in what PM does or does not do.

Why in the world, a democratically elected PM needs an approval or disapproval of a CM or governor from Bajwa?

Bajwa's job is to turn around and focus on India Afghanistan and Iran borders to protect the country, and NOT to indulge in the internal politics to tell the PM as to who should be the governor and/or CM.
 
The snippets coming out of that meeting are alarming.

Bajwa CLEARLY confessed that army has a say in what PM does or does not do.

Why in the world, a democratically elected PM needs an approval or disapproval of a CM or governor from Bajwa?

Bajwa's job is to turn around and focus on India Afghanistan and Iran borders to protect the country, and NOT to indulge in the internal politics to tell the PM as to who should be the governor and/or CM.

And IK wasn't simply a yes man.

I'm just glad IK unfolded all the mess and intricacies of state of Pakistan in front of the citizens.
 
“Misinformation and propaganda threatens state integrity requiring timely and unified response to effectively counter speculations and rumours,” said the army chief.

Gen Bajwa said that the army’s strength comes from the people and “any effort to create wedge between army and population won’t be tolerated”.

“The hostile forces are trying this for a long time but they won’t succeed,” said the army chief, per the statement.

Geo news

Pretty clear what’s playing out. Imran’s only chance is anarchic revolution that challenges the establishment or splits it right across. With the prevailing establishment, he will be sidelined if not politically muted.
 
The snippets coming out of that meeting are alarming.

Bajwa CLEARLY confessed that army has a say in what PM does or does not do.

Why in the world, a democratically elected PM needs an approval or disapproval of a CM or governor from Bajwa?

Bajwa's job is to turn around and focus on India Afghanistan and Iran borders to protect the country, and NOT to indulge in the internal politics to tell the PM as to who should be the governor and/or CM.

But PTI supporters used to downplay the involvement of military in politics, called it anti-military propaganda.

Foot in the mouth situation for Imran and his supporters, not the first or the last time though.
 
And IK wasn't simply a yes man.

I'm just glad IK unfolded all the mess and intricacies of state of Pakistan in front of the citizens.

Imran did not do anything except get humiliated and become the first PM in Pakistan’s history to be booted out in this fashion.

Everyone with any knowledge of Pakistan political history has always been aware of the involvement bad the influence of the military apparatus in the political landscape.

It dates all the way back to 1948 when the death of Quaid-e-Azam before the formalization of the constitution created a power vaccum which was quickly filled by the military establishment.

Since then, they have always dictated terms. Every politician, including Imran Khan, is a yes man because you cannot be a yes man and form a federal government.

But what do PTI burgers know about Pakistan’s political and strategic history? They did bhangra to ISPR songs.

Imran was a huge military critic before he was selected by the military as their next puppet after they fell out with Nawaz Sharif. As a result, he took a U-turn and started praising them.

Now that they have got rid of him because he ticked off the west which the military cannot afford, he has donned his anti-military hat again.
 
Imran did not do anything except get humiliated and become the first PM in Pakistan’s history to be booted out in this fashion.

Everyone with any knowledge of Pakistan political history has always been aware of the involvement bad the influence of the military apparatus in the political landscape.

It dates all the way back to 1948 when the death of Quaid-e-Azam before the formalization of the constitution created a power vaccum which was quickly filled by the military establishment.

Since then, they have always dictated terms. Every politician, including Imran Khan, is a yes man because you cannot be a yes man and form a federal government.

But what do PTI burgers know about Pakistan’s political and strategic history? They did bhangra to ISPR songs.

Imran was a huge military critic before he was selected by the military as their next puppet after they fell out with Nawaz Sharif. As a result, he took a U-turn and started praising them.

Now that they have got rid of him because he ticked off the west which the military cannot afford, he has donned his anti-military hat again.

Either Pti supporters are mummy daddy burgers or jobless folks on the streets you have to make up your mind first
 
Either Pti supporters are mummy daddy burgers or jobless folks on the streets you have to make up your mind first

They are both.

In fact they fall in three categories:

1. Overseas fake patriots who love their foreign passports more than they love Pakistan

2. Burger bachas who think it is cool to support PTI

3. Jobless, unproductive people who have nothing better to than attend these circus jalsas for time pass.
 
But PTI supporters used to downplay the involvement of military in politics, called it anti-military propaganda.

Foot in the mouth situation for Imran and his supporters, not the first or the last time though.

That "same page" servitude was hilarious. Looks like the pages turned or the entire book changed !!
 
But PTI supporters used to downplay the involvement of military in politics, called it anti-military propaganda.

Foot in the mouth situation for Imran and his supporters, not the first or the last time though.

hmmm ... so the PTI supporters were right or wrong?
If they were right, then your post doesn't make sense.

If PTI supporters were wrong, and now we know that army DOES interfere deeply in the state politics (as Bajwa confessed) then the current govt is installed by the Army. We simply don't have a democracy.

Make you pick, which one is it?
Can't have it both ways. :D
 
hmmm ... so the PTI supporters were right or wrong?
If they were right, then your post doesn't make sense.

If PTI supporters were wrong, and now we know that army DOES interfere deeply in the state politics (as Bajwa confessed) then the current govt is installed by the Army. We simply don't have a democracy.

Make you pick, which one is it?
Can't have it both ways. :D

I've already made this point. I.e their narrative keeps changing.
Good luck getting a reply.
 
Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Qamar Javed Bajwa called on Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Tuesday, a week after the latter became the 23rd prime minister of Pakistan by ousting PTI Chairman Imran Khan through a parliamentary vote of no-confidence.

During the meeting, professional matters, including national security issues, were discussed, said a brief statement issued in the evening.

Earlier in the day, the members of the federal cabinet were administered oaths by Senate Chairman Sadiq Sanjrani after the unavailability of President Arif Alvi.

The meeting came amid an increase in attacks on security forces along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border, resulting in the martyrdom of soldiers over the weeks.

In a strongly-worded statement, Pakistan had told the Afghan Taliban to put an end to cross-border attacks emanating from Afghan soil.

Similarly, the army is facing a smear campaign on social media following the removal of the PTI government. The army chief had recently said that efforts to create a "wedge between army and people won’t be tolerated".

"The hostile forces are trying this for a long time but they won’t succeed InshAllah,” the Inter-Service Public Relations quoted COAS Bajwa as saying.

Express Tribune
 
hmmm ... so the PTI supporters were right or wrong?
If they were right, then your post doesn't make sense.

If PTI supporters were wrong, and now we know that army DOES interfere deeply in the state politics (as Bajwa confessed) then the current govt is installed by the Army. We simply don't have a democracy.

Make you pick, which one is it?
Can't have it both ways. :D

Once you get into bed with the army, you need to pay the price.

So, they will now need to pay the price by being ousted by the army. In the future when they come to power, they should not do deals or rely on the army.
 
Pakistan on Wednesday sought an explanation from the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) authorities regarding a recent report about an “unpleasant” meeting between the former prime minister Imran Khan and Chief of the Army Staff (COAS) General Qamar Bajwa.

According to the news outlet, the meeting took place at the Prime Minister’s Office hours before Imran’s ouster through a successful no-trust vote at the Parliament.

Today, the BBC headquarters confirmed receiving of the communiqué by its director-general and it has reportedly begun reviewing the matter.

On April 10, the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) had termed "fake" the report by the BBC Urdu which claimed that Imran had removed Gen Bajwa as the army chief and was not expecting his visit to the PM’s Office along with an “extraordinary security routine”.

In its response, the military's media wing had said, “BBC Urdu story published today is totally baseless and a pack of lies. The typical propaganda story lacks any credible, authentic and relevant source and violates basic journalistic ethos."

It had further said, “There is no truth in the fake story whatsoever and clearly seems part of an organised disinformation campaign. The matter is being taken up with BBC authorities.”

As per sources, BBC has been propagating a “pack of lies” not only with regard to Pakistan but internationally as well. “In the past, there are so many incidents when BBC’s so-called ethical journalism proved to be fake, fabricated and without ethos of journalism,” they added.
 
According to rumours, when Bajwa faced heat from retired army officers in the meeting held with the ex service members body, he threatened to halt their pensions and medical benefits if they didn't tone down their criticism against him and the army for their role in the debacle.

Don't think any Army General has been this unpopular in the country since Yahya Khan.
 
For the first time after being ousted from the government, former information minister Fawad Chaudhry on Wednesday revealed that the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) would still be in power had the relations with the establishment remained well.

Fawad, a senior PTI leader, told Express News programme "To The Point" that ties with the establishment had been fragile for the past several months.

Nevertheless, he said his party made a lot of efforts to heal the rift, adding that the former premier had never thought about appointing Lt Gen Faiz Hameed as the army chief.


The PTI stalwart went on to say that Imran Khan doesn't plan for that long. "He isn't a conspirator nor he is capable of forging conspiracies."

The statement came minutes after the ousted prime minister said in his virtual address to his party workers and supports that the entire institutions were not corrupt but some elements in them indulge in "bad practices".

He was replying to a question regarding the role of the state institutions in the next general elections.

Also read: One person’s mistake doesn’t mean whole institution is at fault: Imran

Addressing live on social media, former PM Imran said, "If one person makes a mistake, this does not mean that the whole institution is at fault.”

“There are also humans [in institutions]... if one or two individuals do something wrong, the entire institution is not responsible for their actions," he added.

Responding to another question, Imran Khan urged followers not to say anything bad about the armed forces of Pakistan. "If there was no army, there will be no Pakistan... Pakistan needed army more than Imran Khan."

On April 10, Imran, the 22nd prime minister of Pakistan, became the first chief executive to be removed from office after losing a majority in the National Assembly.

Imran’s party, which governed the country for over three-and-a-half years, had been struggling to stay in power as its allies betrayed to join hands with the opposition parties that had joined forces against the government.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/235349...-ties-with-establishment-werent-fragile-fawad
 
According to rumours, when Bajwa faced heat from retired army officers in the meeting held with the ex service members body, he threatened to halt their pensions and medical benefits if they didn't tone down their criticism against him and the army for their role in the debacle.

Don't think any Army General has been this unpopular in the country since Yahya Khan.

won't be long before he joins their club. He'll probably be hearing about these threats and his bad attitude for the rest of his life
 
Last edited:
It's clear with recent disclosures that Imran has another backer from establishment. Perhaps his preferred ISI chief. Can't recall last time someone in Pakistan took up decidedly anti establishment position. Imran is challenging the status quo.
 
According to rumours, when Bajwa faced heat from retired army officers in the meeting held with the ex service members body, he threatened to halt their pensions and medical benefits if they didn't tone down their criticism against him and the army for their role in the debacle.

Don't think any Army General has been this unpopular in the country since Yahya Khan.

From what Najam Sethi was saying Bajwa when addressing the troops, he blamed IK for the ISI chief appointment. Saying that he had accepted the new appointment, and once ISPR made the announcements he said he was not consulted. And that IK kept on breaking promises he made. That he tried his best to help him, however IK was so arrogant that he lost his own coalition partners. Basically IK is responsible for his own downfall, and they were in fact neutral.
 
That "same page" servitude was hilarious. Looks like the pages turned or the entire book changed !!

It was a pragmatic policy based on the reality of Pakistan, not to mention the fact PTI needed coalition partners to get a narrow majority in parliament. Coalition members who were known to be stooges of the establishment.
 
It's clear with recent disclosures that Imran has another backer from establishment. Perhaps his preferred ISI chief. Can't recall last time someone in Pakistan took up decidedly anti establishment position. Imran is challenging the status quo.

Well Imran Khan has publicly stated that "Pakistan needs Army more than Imran Khan" and at all forums he's been advocating not to bash the army. Doesn't seem like an anti establishment position from him. If anything it's the army's own doing that they are facing public backlash
 
This reminds of the time when [MENTION=1269]Bewal Express[/MENTION] and other PTI supporters are defending and justifying the decision to amend the constitution and extent Bajwa’s tenure.

They took offense to the notion that Bajwa is desperately holding onto power and this will set a bad precedence.

We were told that Bajwa is an honest, patriotic man with Pakistan’s best interests at heart.

So what happened?

While clearly the extension was a mistake, PPP gave Kayani an extension. So you cant say PTI set the precedent.
 
PTI have atleast exposed the influence of Establishment , yet they went on with that silly press release the other day, they need to take a back seat and listen to public they are hurting their own damn image.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1685134

PTI leader and former human rights minister Shireen Mazari on Friday said that former prime minister Imran Khan had not approached the military to help find a solution to the "political deadlock" in the country after a no-confidence motion was submitted against him.

It was the military that sought the meeting through then defence minister Pervez Khattak, Mazari said, adding that it was the military that put forward the three proposals – of the premier either facing the no-trust vote, resigning from his post or the opposition withdrawing the no-trust move and holding of fresh election thereafter.

How is it hurting their image to say that it was the establishment who gave IK 3 options? She basically called the DG ISPR a liar because he said that IK approached the establishment. If what she is saying is the truth, then the public should know.
 
If Imran Khan's aim was to take on the army, then he did a poor job going about it.

No elected PM can take on the army in one term - its too powerful of an institution which understands the levers of power better than political governments. The top priority should be to stay in power for consecutive terms. Just the act of being in power outlasting the leaders in other institutions gives him tremendous leverage.

You can place your guys in low and mid level positions in the army and judiciary and other important institutions- no need to take on the high level position like the coas. Enough people at even mid level positions sympathetic to your cause are enough to feed back intelligence and steer the agenda. Sooner or later a malleable coas will be chosen who defers to the political establishment. And once the army builds a culture of staying out of politics, they don't try to go back in.

It's hard to judge IK's strategy without the benefit of hindsight but he gives an impression of being highly impulsive and mercurial - caring more about winning the battle even if it means losing the war.

How? The COAS is the only Army position that PM appoints. PM also chooses the DG ISI, and Joints Chiefs of Staff from Army, however in theory these positions can be from Navy/AirForce as well.


And once the army builds a culture of staying out of politics, they don't try to go back in.

That will take decades. Basically you need a generation of corp commanders who have never served in any military dictatorships. Currently all the Corp Commanders served under Zia and Musharraf.
 
Tell me how can such debauchery be white washed and these persons be hailed as heroes of islam?

I honestly want to know, why calling a Ghori or Ghazni or Tughlaq or Khilji or Babur or Aurangzeb or Jahangeer etc a bigoted tyrant and looter, insult of islam?

I have not insulted the prophet (pbuh) or Allah(swt)

Sorry I missed this earlier.

To answer your question its not an insult of Islam to call a Muslim King a bigot, tyrant, or looter. In fact I would agree with you as the monarchy was an awful system, and like Churchill I believe democracy to be better than every other form of government.

However, this is where it gets Islamophobic. When only Muslims are criticized for doing things that everyone else did. For instance:

All Kings lived lavish lives. They did so by looting the money of the public.
All King needed to be brutal to take the throne, or maintain their hold on the throne.
All Kings were tyrants. No one democratically elected them. They were not the yaar of their subjects. If anyone tried to overthrow them they would not get ladoos.

All Kings had to either conquer a land or one of their ancestors had to conquer a land. No one gave it to them out of goodwill.
All Kings when they expanded their Kingdom had to invade another Kingdom. The other Kingdom was not doing bhangra in joy when this invasion happened.

So basically the point is no one was Doodh ka Dhula. This idea what Hindus/Sikhs did was Halal, and what Muslims did was haram is nonsense.

Tell me how can such debauchery be white washed and these persons be hailed as heroes of islam?

People don't view Kings as hero's of Islam's. That applies to Sufis who spread the religion.

Kings are viewed positively for the culture they created. The subcontinent is a very big place, and every region is different.

So as an example, my ethnic group came from Delhi/UP/Bihar predominantly. The Nawabs, Mughals, and Sultans are viewed positively because of the architecture, cuisine, clothing, language, music, poetry, etc that was created in their era. Not because people believe they were pious Muslims.

We don't see them as foreigners. If you do, fine we have no objection. In fact a lot of Muslims resent it when non Muslims say that culture was also theirs.

However for us their is a difference between someone like Nadir Shah who looted the subcontinent and left, and the Nawabs of Awadh who were also from Iran, however stayed, assimilated, and viewed the land as their home.
 
The military establishment is very afraid of the PML-N. Despite enduring curses and abuses from the PML-N for the last five years, the military still sucks up to them and gave Nawaz, Maryam an NRO.

That's because PML N is a Punjab based party, and which is where the Army's core base is from.
 
How is it hurting their image to say that it was the establishment who gave IK 3 options? She basically called the DG ISPR a liar because he said that IK approached the establishment. If what she is saying is the truth, then the public should know.

I meant the Establishment hurting their own image.. not PTI.. PTI is having full support right now.

Establishment needs to take a backseat.
 
How is it hurting their image to say that it was the establishment who gave IK 3 options? She basically called the DG ISPR a liar because he said that IK approached the establishment. If what she is saying is the truth, then the public should know.

Who are the establishment to give 3 options? Is their job to guard the border or to play tic-tac-toe with domestic political parties?
 
ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Tuesday said that the appointment of a new Chief of Army Staff (COAS) is a constitutional right of the PM and it will be done in accordance with rules and regulations.

ARY
 
Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Tuesday said that the Constitution stipulated strict punishment for all those who maligned and conspired against the armed forces of the country and that the law would take its course in this regard.

“The appointment of the army chief, in accordance with the Constitution and rules and regulations, is the prerogative of the premier,” PM Shehbaz said while addressing media persons after an Iftar dinner.
The prime minister maintained that the appointment of next army chief would be made in accordance with the Constitution “when the time comes”.

“The appointment of next army chief is the requirement of the Constitution,” he said. “There is severe punishment in the Constitution for speaking and conspiring against the armed forces. The law will take its course [against those who malign institutions],” the PM said.

Shehbaz said that he would meet the Saudi leadership during his visit to the country, adding that he would also go to China soon. On the resignations by the PTI lawmakers from the National Assembly, the premier said he was told that many of the parliamentarians were “forced” to quit their offices.

“The issue of resignations is a legal one. We did not want the PTI legislators to resign.”
The premier lamented that President Alvi had not administered oath to the newly formed coalition members, saying: “He (president) did not act according to his position.”

On the Lettergate scandal, he said that the US conspiracy was not proved in the two National Security Committee meetings. “The (Lettergate) matter will also be taken up in the parliamentary security committee meeting. The formation of a commission can also be considered on the issue of foreign interference.”

The Lettergate dispute was triggered when then Premier Imran Khan brandished a letter, purportedly containing evidence of a foreign plot against his government, at his Islamabad rally on March 27.

Shehbaz said Pakistan wanted good relations with the US and would try to improve ties with the country.
Discussing the National Accountability Bureau, he noted that several bureaucrats and businessmen complained about the anti-graft watchdog, saying that his government would “mull over the future of NAB”.

The premier held the former government responsible for the prevailing energy crisis, saying that oil and LNG were not procured on time.

“A few months back, the LNG was available for $3 but that opportunity was lost,” he said, adding that relations with Saudi Arabia and Qatar deteriorated because of the “incompetence” of the previous government.

“Nobody will listen to us if we are economically weak. The Soviet Union collapsed because of its poor economy.” On Imran’s statement that Russia was offering wheat and oil at discounted rates of 30 per cent, Shehbaz said he was not aware of it, maintaining that he would verify the matter through the Foreign Office.

He said the next general polls would be held after the introduction of electoral reforms.

The premier said he had no objection to Imran’s call to stage a sit-in in Islamabad if it was held in a “democratic manner”.

“We will not allow people to suffer. We will not allow anyone to resort to violence in the streets.”
Shehbaz said that a few channels accused him of wrongdoing in the past which affected the relations with China.

He lamented Tuesday’s attack on Chinese nationals at the Karachi University, adding that he had directed Interior Minister Rana Sanullah to visit the metropolis on Wednesday (today).

Express Tribune
 
Former interior minister Sheikh Rashid on Thursday said that people should not blame the Pakistan Army for the ouster of former premier Imran Khan from the government.

Rashid made the remarks during an interview in Islamabad with a private TV channel, wherein he asserted that the "army is the most prestigious and sensitive institution of the country".

"The plan of the international forces [to undermine Imran Khan] has turned on its heels and Imran has emerged as the most prominent leader," he said.

Rashid, who also heads the Awami Muslim League (AML), expressed fears of a potential civil war leading to bloodshed in the upcoming long march of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI).

On April 30, PTI Chairman Imran announced that his party would hold a long march to Islamabad in the last week of May against an “imported government” that was imposed on the country in cahoots with foreign powers.

"The long march could be frightening, alarming and serious. If the situation worsens, Imran Khan will not be able to stop it," the former minister warned. "People have now made it a matter of national honour and self-determination."

Read Imran distances himself from Masjid-e-Nabwi incident

He added that the current government was stuck in a hard place as it was brought into power with only a majority of two votes in its favour.

"If anyone from [the] MQM, BAP, GDA or any other group disassociates itself with this government, then it would end. It is a slave government that is lying on the floor. It will do as it is told," he said.

Rashid added that Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif is a 'boot licker'.

"Shehbaz in [the] 90s used to polish boots and is compromised. He has no prestige and value. I urge the whole nation to prepare for general elections," he said.

Rashid Shafiq's physical remand

Talking about his nephew, Rashid Shafiq, who was sent on a two-day physical remand by the district court in Attock on May 2, the former interior minister said that no one could prove that Shafiq was at the location at the time when the slogans were raised against the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) leadership in Saudi Arabia.

Shafiq was taken into custody on Sunday at the Islamabad Airport when an FIR was lodged against him and former ruling party PTI leaders in Faisalabad over the recent incident of pilgrims surrounding PM Shehbaz's delegation in Masjid-e-Nabwi and shouting slogans.

"The PML-N only registered an FIR against him [Shafiq] when they found out that he was proven innocent in a probe by Saudi authorities and after he had boarded the aircraft to return to Pakistan," he claimed.

Express Tribune
 
Never wanted to bring my own army chief, says Imran

Former prime minister and PTI Chairman Imran Khan said he never wanted to bring his own army chief and that he never meddled in Pakistan Army's affairs.

In a podcast with Junaid Akram, Muzamil Hasan and TCM Originals on Thursday night, he spoke on reports of a "disagreement" between him and Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Qamar Javed Bajwa, particularly related to the posting of the former chief of the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), Lt General Faiz Hameed.

He was responding to a question by one of the hosts, who asked him "what went wrong" with the former premier's relationship with the establishment.

"Up until a few months ago we were hearing the 'one page narrative'. So what happened all of a sudden. Was there an event that flipped things?" Talha Asad asked Imran.

"It is said that there was some unpleasantness over Gen Faiz's appointment and [they said] he wants to make Gen Faiz the army chief. This is where it started," Imran said.

Imran then went on to give the example of former premier Nawaz Sharif, who according to him, was controlling all institutions of the country and wanted to control the army as well by appointing his own army chief.

"I have never had an issue with army because I have never interfered [in their matters]. I never wanted to bring my own army chief. I always wanted to make the institutions of army, police and judiciary strong," Imran went on to say.

"I had only one problem. I got to know [last summers] that there was a possibility of a civil war in Afghanistan and I was afraid that if the US left Afghanistan, it would have repercussions for Pakistan," he said, revealing that he wanted Gen Faiz to stay during the "vulnerable winters" that followed.

The PTI chairman also said that he had started receiving news of PML-N's campaign against him last July which was another reason why he wanted to continue with the intelligence chief, who in difficult times is the "eyes and ears" of the government.

"To date, I have never done anything against merit," he said. "So I can't even think of going against merit for the [appointment of] the army chief."

Last year, reports had surfaced of an alleged standoff between the military and the government over the appointment of Lt Gen Nadeem Anjum as the new chief of the ISI.

The army had announced on Oct 6, 2021 that the former ISI chief, Lt Gen Faiz Hameed, had been appointed the Peshawar corps commander, while Lt Gen Anjum was appointed in his place. But the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) had not issued an official notification of Lt Gen Anjum's appointment until three weeks later, leading to frenzied speculation of strains in civil-military relations.

After delays, the PMO had eventually notified the appointment of Lt Gen Nadeem Anjum as the new ISI chief on Oct 26.

According to experts in defence matters, the procedure for appointment of the ISI director general is neither mentioned in the Constitution nor the Army Act, and all previous appointments were made as per traditions under which the army chief proposes three names to the prime minister who then makes the final decision.

'Independent foreign policy doesn't mean I'm anti-America'
The ex-premier, while talking about his ouster and events leading up to that, said that the sole reason behind the entire no-confidence saga was an independent foreign policy.

"But what is wrong in it? An independent foreign policy doesn't mean we are anti-America. In fact, I would say I am not even anti-Indian. I am against the racist policies and Kashmir policies of BJP and RSS. Even in America, I had good relations with the Trump administration."

The reason US turned "against me", Imran said, was that he was unwilling to compromise on the policies that benefitted the 22 billion people of Pakistan.

"They [the US] wanted us to cancel the Russia trip, stop trade with them, and limit [our] relationship with China. They are asking for bases here to stop international terrorism in Afghanistan," he continued, asserting that he would never let Pakistan sabotage itself in someone else's war.

"They thought they could use Pakistan like a tissue paper, like they did during the war on terror," the former PM said. "This is the number one reason why they conspired [against me] and then they found receptive people."

Separately, in response to a question, Imran also said that he believed Pakistan should never become a part of any bloc.

During the war on terror, he recalled, Pakistan earned so much disrespect, more than 80,000 people in the country died and yet the country was never valued. "I want us to have an independent foreign policy like India. It is a strategic ally of the US but at the same time maintains good relations with Russia," the PTI chief said.

"Why can Pakistan not do the same?" he questioned.

"America was never used to Pakistan standing up for itself so when we did, they hatched this conspiracy. And these stooges are now helping them in this."

Subsequently, Imran rejected the commission formed by the Shehbaz government to probe the cipher which he had claimed contained evidence of the foreign conspiracy against the PTI government.

"The only commission we will accept is that of the Supreme Court, headed by the Chief Justice of Pakistan. And the condition is that an open hearing should be held on what happened from the start to the end," he demanded.

Fallout with Jahangir Khan Tareen and Aleem Khan
The PTI chairman also revealed the reason for his fallout with PTI members Jahangir Khan Tareen and Aleem Khan.

"Both of them joined the party 11 years back and contributed greatly," he said. "But did they join politics for the same ideals as me? I came to politics for idealism, for change and to work for a new Pakistan, a welfare state. Unfortunately, they [Tareen and Aleem] came to power not for the ideals I had. And it is clear now because they are standing with people who I have been calling out from day one."

The differences with Tareen, Imran said, arose when the government started inquiring the sugar scandal. "Whereas Aleem Khan wanted to the legalise 300-acre land he had bought along the bed of the River Ravi, which was illegal."

The former prime minister added that both his former allies expected him to do the same things Nawaz Sharif and Asif Ali Zardari did when they came to power.

"So the differences started then. And now, the side they have taken clearly shows that corruption doesn't mean anything to them."

Majority government
Imran also revealed that he wanted to form a majority government if he won the elections.

"When you come to power with a majority, you can amend the laws that are saving these corrupt people. I am convinced that if I don't get majority, I won't want to come to power," he said, regretting that his government's "hands were tied this time".

"What I have learned in these 3.5 years is that majority is important. Until and unless you don't have that, you can't bring reforms. We had a coalition government and its biggest problem was that we were vulnerable and always worried about completing the numbers," the PTI chairman said.

Public mobilisation and future plans
Meanwhile, revisiting his ouster, Imran said that the feelings inside him were bittersweet. "I am sad but I am also happy because I have never seen the nation take to the streets like this. There were record rallies in three main cities within 10 days and I wasn't expecting it."

The people, the former premier pointed out, were angry because of three reasons: a foreign conspiracy was hatched to topple a democratically elected government, thieves were imposed on them, and defectors.

He claimed that the "conspirers" were not expecting the public to react in such a way. "They weren't expecting that the public would stand up and come out this way. They are in shock. They weren't even expecting that the people in the institutions will stand up like this."

"... I think when I will give the date of the Islamabad freedom march, this is my contention that record-breaking people, in the history of Pakistan, will take to the streets," Imran professed.

Sharing PTI's plans if it came to power again, the party chief said that foreign experts will be appointed for every ministry, party tickets would be given to committed and idealistic people, and a tighter crackdown would be imposed on the corrupt.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1688271/never-wanted-to-bring-my-own-army-chief-says-imran
 
Imran has fallen in line, I think Army has made their point to him, the elections can be held now.

Also India is not a strategic ally of US but that of Russia.. India is a trade ally of US for now.
 
Pakistan should take away all army related appointment rights from civilian government and assign them to army itself making army an autonomous institution same like how judiciary is.

Judiciary has its own system of who will become next chief justice and civilian government cannot interfere in the selection.

Army needs the same privilege so that they have their its own system of who will become next army chief and civilian government cannot interfere in the selection. Then army chief will decide other army related appointments like ISI chief etc.
This will remove a big point of confrontation between army and government.
 
PML-N Vice-president Maryam Nawaz on Thursday said that the army chief should be a person who had a "flawless reputation", free from any criticism or doubts.

Maryam made these remarks in a press conference outside the Islamabad High Court on Thursday while answering a question about Defence Minister Khawaja Asif's comments, wherein he had said that former Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) chief Lt Gen Faiz Hameed's name could be considered for the new army chief.

"If his name is on the seniority list, it will definitely be considered," Asif had said in an interview with the BBC.

The PML-N leader has been critical of Lt Gen Faiz Hameed, who served as the ISI chief from June 16, 2019, to Oct 19, 2021, and is currently posted as the Peshawar corps commander.

Addressing a rally last week in Fateh Jang, Maryam had criticised Gen Hameed while referring to Imran Khan's recent podcast appearance where he had said the intelligence chief was the "eyes and ears" of the government.

The PML-N leader had said: "We know that he wasn't your eyes and ears [rather] he was your hands through which you throttled your political opponents."

In her media talk today, she said that the army was a respectable institution for the country and its people. "The nation looks at the army for the unity and security of Pakistan. So it is important that the army chief is a person who worthy and stainless so that people salute the Pakistan Army."

Maryam added that it was a "good thing" that the armed forced had decided to stay away from politics and limit itself to its Constitutional role as this had been a struggle of politicians.

"But there's only man who has a problem with this ... Who has gotten used to cheating, who doesn't have feet of his own and needs support," she said. "And it suits him to drag institutions into politics and make them controversial. It's only one man and his name is Imran Khan."

'Imran Khan was prepared to ruin Pakistan'
The PML-N leader, recalling her conversation with Professor Israr and Hakeem Saeed in the 1990s, said that she now understood when people said Imran Khan was being prepared to "ruin Pakistan".

"The conspiracy that he hatched against Pakistan, even if all countries united, they couldn't have done it," she claimed, saying that the man who was primarily responsible for the country's economy today was blaming the PML-N government for inflation.

"But people know that you're to be blamed for this inflation and destruction," Maryam pointed out. "When you bring a player from cricket into power, he will do this, he doesn't know what an economy is. The way Imran ruined Pakistan's ties with other countries, it would have bad effects on our foreign policy. We will have to spend years to rectify it."

DAWN
 
Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) took exception to the "imprudent comments" made by the country's senior politicians about Peshawar Corps Commander Lt Gen Faiz Hameed, terming them "very inappropriate".

In a statement, the military's media affairs wing said the Peshawar Corps was an "illustrious formation" of the army and was spearheading the national war against terrorism for over two decades.

"One of the most competent and professional officers is entrusted with the responsibility to lead this prestigious formation. Imprudent comments made by important senior politicians recently about [the] Peshawar Corps commander are very inappropriate," the ISPR said.

It added that such statements undermined the honour and the morale of the institution and its leadership.


"It is expected that the senior political leadership of [the] country refrains from passing objectionable remarks against the institution, whose brave officers and men are constantly putting their lives on the line to guard the integrity and sovereignty of Pakistan," the statement concluded.

'Army showing tolerance, restraint'
Speaking to the media shortly after the press release was issued, ISPR Director General (DG) Major General Babar Iftikhar reiterated that "many statements" were made in the last few days by the country's politicians and termed them "highly inappropriate".

Maj Gen Iftikhar said that the institution was showing "tolerance and restraint and requesting that the army is not dragged into politics".

He said the army was fulfilling important responsibilities for ensuring security on the country's western, eastern, and northern borders, while also taking measures for internal security. "We as an institution have no interference in the political situation of the country," he said.

The army's spokesperson also said that the appointment of the next army chief should not be made "controversial" by making it a topic of debate. He said the procedure for the appointment of the army chief had been outlined in the Constitution, adding that it would take place in accordance with the law.

Recent statements
While the ISPR statement did not name any particular politician, it comes after PPP co-chair Asif Ali Zardari and PML-N's Maryam Nawaz made comments about Lt Gen Hameed, who served as the Inter-Services Intelligence chief from June 16, 2019 to Oct 19, 2021.

On Wednesday, Zardari had been asked about Lt Gen Hameed at a press conference in Karachi and had replied with: "The helpless Faiz Hameed has been sidelined." However, he had later issued a clarification that he had "unintentionally" uttered the sentence.

Meanwhile, Maryam told reporters outside the Islamabad High Court earlier today that that the army chief should be a person who had a "flawless reputation", free from any criticism or doubts.

The PML-N vice president made the remarks while answering a question about Defence Minister Khawaja Asif's comments, wherein he had said that Lt Gen Hameed's name could be considered for the new army chief.

In her media talk, she said that the army was a respectable institution for the country and its people. "The nation looks at the army for the unity and security of Pakistan. So it is important that the army chief is a person who is worthy and stainless so that people salute the Pakistan Army."

Addressing a rally last week in Fateh Jang, Maryam had also criticised Lt Gen Hameed while referring to Imran Khan's recent podcast appearance where he had said the intelligence chief was the "eyes and ears" of the government.

The PML-N leader had said: "We know that he wasn't your eyes and ears [rather] he was your hands through which you throttled your political opponents."

DAWN
 
PTI leader critical of Establishment’s role in politics
Not possible that generals, judges decide policies in closed rooms and we change the next day: Fawad
ISLAMABAD:
Senior Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leader Fawad Chaudhry criticised on Thursday the Establishment’s role in politics, saying that it would not be possible for the people to change overnight because a few generals and judges sit in closed rooms and take decisions.

Speaking at a news briefing, the former information minister emphasised that the political decisions about the country should be taken in the political arena. He stressed that the people’s right to take their own decisions must be restored.

The Establishment has big urge to take political decisions. The way policies are being made in Pakistan is a joke, Chaudhry said. “It is not possible some of our generals and judges sit in closed rooms and decide that this will be our policy from today and we change the next day.”

He said that the judges and generals had chosen their career paths, therefore, their decisions should be befitting to their status. “It is not for a judge or the one who has taken commission in the army to do politics,” he added.

Chaudhry’s press briefing came a day after the apex court issued detailed judgment in suo moto notice case on the ruling by the then deputy speaker of the National Assembly under Article 5 of the Constitution on the matter of the no-confidence motion against then prime minister.

A larger bench headed by Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial and comprising Justice Ijazul Ahsan, Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel, Justice Munib Akhtar and Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail had announced a short order on April 7, 2022 on the ruling passed on April 3, 2022.

The ruling said that the former deputy speaker in his ruling to dismiss the no-trust resolution against then prime minister Imran Khan failed to substantiate that regime was changed on account of a foreign country's interference.

It further said neither the deputy speaker's ruling nor his detailed reasons claim that the cypher showed any member of the opposition parties to have interacted with a foreign state to bring the resolution of no-confidence in order to oust the prime minister and his government.

Chaudhry said that the facts were not taken into account in the Supreme Court decision. He added that the cipher was repeatedly emphasised but the judges had said that it [the cipher] should not be talked about in detail.

Article 6

In the judgment, Justice Mazhar Alam Miankhel wrote an additional note, saying that the sacred trust of the exercise of authority was violated by President Arif Alvi, former prime minister Imran and other PTI leaders.

The judge urged parliament to initiate action under Article 6 of the Constitution [high treason] against President Alvi, former prime minister Imran, former speaker Asad Qaisar, deputy speaker Qasim Suri and then law minister Fawad Chaudhry.

However, at the presser, Chaudhry opposed any such move. “If Article 6 begins to apply … the way out options would be curtailed,” he said. “It must be decided how to take decisions: vote or like Sri Lanka,” he added, referring to the civil unrest in the island nation.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/2366053/pti-leader-critical-of-establishments-role-in-politics
 
Democracy requires moral, not military strength: Imran

• PTI chief urges generals to take ‘U-turn’ on support for PML-N govt • Says gulf between people, army will only weaken the institution • Claims he never ordered journalists’ abduction, curbs on media

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan on Saturday deplored the imbalance in civil-military relations, as he blamed previous PPP and PML-N governments for ceding space to the army to ‘save their skin’ in corruption cases.

The former prime minister made these remarks at a seminar on freedom of expression, a day ahead of crucial by-polls in Punjab, where his party is contesting on 20 Punjab Assembly seats across the province.

“Because of this imbalance, a situation has developed that [now] the establishment isn’t realising [the consequences of] the actions it is committing,” he said, while referring to a crackdown against his party following his ouster as a result of the no-confidence motion.

“We cannot afford a weak army... we have to protect it. If the distance between the army and the public keeps increasing, which it is, then it will eventually harm the army and Pakistan.”

According to Mr Khan, democracy depended on “moral strength” and not physical strength, which he said the Pakistani military possesses.

‘Take a U-turn’

The PTI chief also urged the establishment to take a U-turn on its support for the incumbent government. He said that Pakistan stood at a critical juncture and it was very important that the “right decisions” were made today.

Mr Khan said that reinforcing a “failed” government would further widen the gulf between the people and the establishment. He, however, added that the establishment should differentiate between constructive and damaging criticism.

The PTI chairman questioned whether the decision taken by the military establishment behind “closed doors” to support the incumbent regime was beneficial to Pakistan. “Who told them that the decision [to back PML-N] was a better option?” Mr Khan said that “U-turns are even important for generals” as no one could be absolutely right.

“The nation is looking towards the establishment because they have the power,” Mr Khan claimed and warned that the current set-up would destabilise Pakistan politically and economically.

‘Missing persons’

The former prime minister also spoke about enforced disappearances and a clampdown on journalists under his regime and said that his government had nothing to do with whisking people away or restrictions on media.

“I was never afraid of media… was the most criticised PM… [yet] I never tried to bribe journalists or take action against them,” the ex-PM added. He said “constructive criticism” was necessary.

“The trend of disappearing people started during the War on Terror. I was the first person to protest against this practice in 2003 after Aafia Siddiqui went missing. I did not know the point of view of the army till I came into power,” Mr Khan said, adding that he used to speak against these enforced disappearances because “there is nothing more painful” than seeing the relatives of missing persons coming to ask about their loved ones.

“We came in the government and got to know that often times people were picked up on [the pretext of] national security.”

Mr Khan said he spoke to Army Chief Gen Qamar Javed Bajwa when Gen Faiz Hamid was the chief of the ISI, which resulted in the release of many forcibly disappeared people.

“They [army] said the problem was regarding the judiciary,” he said, adding that the explanation provided to him was that it was difficult to prosecute a terrorist in court due to a lack of evidence or witnesses.

Nonetheless, he said, an agreement was reached and his government was working on a bill that would have, at least, kept the families of the missing persons in the loop.

Imran Khan also distanced his government from the abduction of journalists during the rule of the PTI government. “Shireen [Mazari] knows, it came up in cabinet three or four times that some journalist was picked up; no journalist was picked up on my instructions, [as] the problem was something else,” Mr Khan added.

‘Vile campaigns by PTI’

Disputing Mr Khan’s stance that there were no restrictions on the press during his tenure, Information Minister Marriyum Aurangzeb said there are reports about restrictions placed on press during the PTI era, adding that vile campaigns were launched on social media against journalists.

“Imran Khan is saying that during my government media was free, there was no restriction or censorship on the media,” she said while showing various clippings regarding censorship during the government of the PTI. These included reports by Reporters Without Borders, Human Rights Watch, and the Council of Pakistan Newspaper Editors (CPNE).

She also mentioned cases of online harassment, kidnappings and threats faced by media persons, including women journalists and restrictions on electronic and print media during the previous government.

Separately, former president and PPP leader Asif Zardari also reacted to Mr Khan’s statements.

In a statement, he said that Imran Khan should have realised the importance of a free press while he was ruling the country and termed the PTI government “the blackest phase” for press freedom in the country’s history Kalbe Ali in Islamabad also contributed to this report

DAWN
 
Mere tweets can’t incite mutiny in army: IHC

ISLAMABAD: A tweet can neither incite mutiny within the armed forces nor can create fear among the masses, the Islamabad High Court (IHC) said in an order on Saturday.

IHC Justice Babar Sattar also quashed the FIR against a citizen named Kashif Far*eed for allegedly ‘defa*ming the armed for*ces’ through a controversial tweet. The case was registered against Mr Fareed after he allegedly posted a tweet against COAS General Qamar Javed Bajwa and the army.

The FIR stated that the acc*used committed a crime under sections 500, 501 and 505 of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC).

The court, in its order, remarked that a tweet from an ‘insignificant’ Twitter account cannot incite mutiny within the army or the public.

“It is inconceivable how the publication of a tweet from an insignificant Twitter account can cause or incite officers of the military to mutiny or otherwise disregard their duties,” Justice Sattar remarked.

He added that it was “equally inconceivable” how a tweet could cause fear or alarm among the public, prompting them to commit an offence against the state or people.

Justice Sattar also noted the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) lacked the jurisdiction to take cognisance of any complaint registered under the Section 505 of the PPC.

Moreover, Section 500 deals with “printing an individual’s name in a matter known to be defamatory,” but the said tweet did not mention the name of any individual, he remarked.

“The petitioner denied ownership of Twitter handle adding,” the order said, adding that even if the said individual was the owner, the text in question could not be the basis to register an FIR under the said sections.

While calling the FIR “a breach of fundamental rights,” the order also said the action demonstrated “high-handedness” on part of the FIA.

Subsequently, the court quashed the FIR.

DAWN
 
Gen Bajwa hopes army to stay apolitical
In interview with Gulf News, COAS deems political intolerance, terrorism and economy biggest challenges for country

Outgoing Army chief General Qamar Javed Bajwa has said he was certain that the “political quarantine of the armed forces” will bode well for the country in the long term.

“Despite some criticism and undue vilification of the armed forces through mass propaganda and meticulously crafted false narratives, the institutional resolve to remain apolitical will remain steadfast. I am certain that this political quarantine of the armed forces will auger well for Pakistan in the long term by fostering political stability and strengthening the army-to-people bond,” he said in an exclusive interview with Gulf News.

General Bajwa admitted that “Pakistan Army has always remained a dominant player in national decision-making. Due to its historic role in the country’s politics, the military drew severe criticism from public and politicians alike”.

“We have restricted the army’s role to its constitutionally mandated task only by deciding to make it ‘apolitical’. This decision, though being viewed negatively by a segment of society and led to personal criticism, will facilitate reinvigorating and strengthening democratic culture, and assist in supporting state organs to effectively perform and deliver. Above all, this decision will help enhance the army’s prestige in the long term,” he stated.

“Pakistan Army has enjoyed unmatched respect and trust of the Pakistani Nation throughout our history. Army’s positive and constructive role in Pakistan’s National Security and development has always received unwavering public support,” the general added.

“I believe that public support and affinity towards the armed forces tend to erode when the military is seen to be involved in political affairs, and, therefore, I considered it prudent to shield Pakistan Army from the vagaries of politics in Pakistan,” he explained.

He urged the Pakistani youth to shield itself from “divisive propaganda and information warfare that seeks to polarise our society and erode mutual trust”.

General Bajwa who is due to retire on November 29, told Gulf News in an interview that “no nation is secure by virtue of its defence forces alone. While the armed forces of Pakistan are ready to sacrifice our lives for the motherland, we cannot succeed without the support of our people, especially the large, dynamic and industrious youth of Pakistan, which constitutes around 60 per cent of our total population.”

“Pakistan’s armed forces draw their strength and support from Pakistani nation and this support keeps us motivated in confronting the threats to Pakistan’s sovereignty, territorial integrity and internal security,” he said.

“My message to our young generation, the future of Pakistan, is to devote their time and energy towards education and skill development. Honest toil and selfless exertion are the basis of a progressive society,” he added stressing that the youth “must also ensure that they are shielded from divisive propaganda and information warfare that seeks to polarise our society and erode mutual trust. Pakistan should always come first — before any other marker of identity”.

The challenge ahead

Reflecting on the challenges the country presently faces, the COAS said that: “Streaks of political intolerance in our society is a worrisome new trend; we will keep striving for a society which is tolerant, rational and does not discriminate on the basis of political orientation, faith, ethnicity or creed.”

Responding to the interviewer, General Bajwa said that “on the internal front, Pakistan’s successful counter-terrorism campaign has turned the tide of terrorism. We continue to make meaningful efforts to overcome the menace of extremism and residue of terrorism.”

During the interview, the COAS also reflected on the nearly two-decade-long anti-terror campaign adding that “Operation Rudd-ul-Fassad, which, was aimed at elimination of terrorists and extremists groups, is the continuity of our phased drive against militancy, which commenced in 2017 and has helped achieve impressive gains against terrorists and their abettors.”

Calling the army’s strategy geared against terrorism as “a wholesome people-centric developmental approach with a focus on mainstreaming of our tribal areas” he said that “the emancipation of people of border areas remains top priority of Pakistan’s civil and military leadership”.

“Another major concern is economic frailty, which tends to exacerbate other issues concerning human security such as health, education, access to food and clean water, and mitigating threats posed by climate change,” he added.

Meanwhile, the COAS also noted that on the international front “stability has remained elusive due to historical conflicts and unresolved disputes”.

“The region has been referred as the strategic chessboard due to its role in great power rivalries in the past — the recent being the two-decades-long war against terror led by US and the West in Afghanistan. Pakistan’s western border has therefore seen a great deal of instability due to the conflict in Afghanistan. Post-US withdrawal, a modicum of stability has been seen in the country with a reduction in violence. However, the situation remains volatile,” he said.

“Pakistan’s all-weather strategic partnership with China has endured the upheavals of the strategic environment through many decades. The ever-sharpening global power contestation, however, now places Pakistan in a delicate position with regard to balancing our relationship with China and the West. Pakistan is trying to steer itself prudently in this increasingly contested strategic environment and ensuring that we are not pulled into any future iteration of cold war,” General Bajwa continued.

“Our western neighbour Iran’s peculiar geo-strategic orientation has been a source of concern for the international community; however, Pakistan has always desired peaceful and friendly relations with our Muslim neighbour and tried to maintain a positive working relationship,” he noted.

During the interview, the general made special mention of the “fraternal ties” Pakistan enjoys with the Arab countries in the Middle East.

“Military diplomacy is complementary to Pakistan’s foreign policy and plays its due role in fostering Pakistan’s bilateral relations with other countries,” the COAS added.

Terming his four decades of military service “a profound privilege”, General Bajwa said that he has “witnessed Pakistan Army as a constantly evolving force, which has always orchestrated and synergised its response with the changing threat paradigm and rapidly transforming the character of war.”

Adding that the army has made efforts to “effectively align” itself with the “requirements of [the] future battlefield”, the outgoing army chief said that he foresaw the institution “as a cohesive, agile, adaptive and a modern force, which can complement other elements of national power by maintaining a credible deterrent capability to help foster a secure environment for national development and socio-economic well-being.”

It may be noted that the new army chief Lieutenant General Syed Asim Munir, will take charge on November 29 as the incumbent General Qamar Javed Bajwa would doff his uniform the same day after completing six years in office.

Express Tribune
 
The most unpopular general after Yahya Khan. Even Zia ul Haq and Musharrraf were not that hated or resented when they left office.

Don't think i will ever support the military involvement in politics ever again. Need to find a way to keep these guys permanently in the barracks and to bring the top echelons under the civil law and FBR and NAB.
 
In which country, army is immune from accountability, asks Supreme Court
The top court raised serious questions about the immunity from accountability granted to the armed forces personnel during their service period

The Supreme Court (SC) on Wednesday raised serious questions about the immunity from accountability granted to the armed forces personnel during their service period, and asked if there were other countries also where the army was immune from the accountability process.

A three-member SC bench, headed by Chief Justice Umer Ata Bandial, and comprising Justice Ijazul Ahsen and Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, heard a petition, filed by former prime minister and Chairman Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Imran Khan, challenging the amendments made by the coalition government to the National Accountability Ordinance (NAO) 1999.

Khawaja Haris, counsel for Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), while answering the court questions regarding exclusion of the armed forces personnel from the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) law ambit, submitted that the armed forces were not totally out of the NAB ambit, adding that the anti-graft body could take action against them after their retirement. He submitted that whatever the armed forces do during service, they could be made accountable only after their retirement.

Justice Mansoor Ali Shah asked whether the army officers could not be made accountable even if they were serving the federal or provincial organisations.

Justice Ijazul Ahsen, a member of the bench, observed that the army officers could be proceeded against under the Army Act, but not the NAB law. He observed that the army officers had been provided protection from the NAB law during their service under national security.

Justice Mansoor Ali observed that prime minister, president and chief minister have been provided immunity under Article 248 of the Constitution and are not answerable to any court for the exercise of powers and performance of functions of their respective offices. “But a question arises here, as to how the immunity available to prime minister and chief minister can be extended to the armed forces,” he asked. “And whether this immunity from accountability is available to the armed forces in other countries also, like in Pakistan,” Justice Shah questioned.

The judge questioned that civil servants also serve the country in different capacities, then why they were not given immunity under the National Accountability Ordinance (NAO) 1999. “If an army officer was involved in corruption, then whether we will wait for 40 years for his retirement for making him accountable,” Justice Mansoor questioned.

Again, Justice Ijazul Ahsen observed that after getting commission, the army officers remained in service for 18 years, adding that the army had its own internal control and management having the procedure of accountability. The judge further observed that punishment in the army under the Army Act was quite harsh than other general punishments.

However, Justice Mansoor Ali Shah remarked that the Army Act could not limit the ambit of the NAB law.

Earlier, the SC questioned as to how parliament could remain functional in the absence of the largest political party of the country. The chief justice remarked that it was a political decision of the PTI either to attend the National Assembly or not, but institutions have to be made functional. “How the Parliament could remain functional in the absence of the largest political party of the country, and this is an important question,” he added.

Khawaja Haris, while concluding his arguments, submitted that all lawmakers of the PTI had resigned from the membership of National Assembly, adding that by-elections had been held in some of the NA constituencies, which had been won by the PTI.

The counsel contended that the National Assembly speaker, through a political strategy, was not accepting the resignations of PTI legislators.

Justice Mansoor Ali Shah observed that although the PTI lawmakers were not going to the National Assembly, they were receiving their salaries. He observed that the Islamabad High Court (IHC) had asked the PTI legislators to appear before the NA speaker.

Justice Ijazul Ahsen, another member of the bench, however observed that there were PTI MNAs who did not appear before the NA speaker but their resignations had been accepted.

“Why the speaker did not accept en-bloc resignations of the PTI lawmakers?” Justice Ahsen asked, adding that if any of the members had any issue, he would raise objection on it.

Justice Mansoor observed that people elect their representatives after trusting them and send them to parliament. “Assembly could be left only when a member was not able physically to attend the proceedings,” the judge remarked adding that a member should raise his voice at the floor of the house.

Khawaja Haris, however, submitted that the incumbent government came to power as a result of corruption and breaching the trust of the public, adding that the present assembly was incomplete as it had breached the trust of the public. “It is the partial stance of the PTI that the present assembly is incomplete,” Justice Mansoor Ali observed, asking the learned counsel that if they did not like the present assembly, they should leave the seats also.

“But daily I am demanding fresh elections,” Kh Haris replied.

Justice Ijazul Ahsen observed that it’s a political debate and it should be held on political front. Justice Mansoor, however, observed that the question of resignations was not political but constitutional and asked the PTI counsel as to why they did not approach the courts when their resignations were not accepted.

Khawaja Haris submitted that political questions could not be answered in legal term. “My demand is for fresh elections, and what I could say more than it,” the PTI counsel submitted.

Justice Mansoor Ali Shah asked the counsel if the court directed the NA speaker to accept the PTI resignations within four days, whether the PTI was ready for it.

Kh Haris replied in affirmative, saying that the PTI was demanding fresh elections as the present government was formed as a result of corruption and breaching of the trust of the public.

Later, the court adjourned the hearing until the second week of January next year, when Makhdoom Ali Khan, counsel for the federal government, would commence his arguments.

The News PK
 
Serving army officer sues YouTuber in UK for defamation
A senior Pakistan military officer has sued a UK-based YouTuber and retired army officer for defamation and damages at the London High Court

A senior Pakistan military officer has sued a UK-based YouTuber and retired army officer for defamation and damages at the London High Court for running a defamatory campaign against him on YouTube and Twitter, making allegations of election rigging against Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI), doing horse-trading for Gen (retd) Bajwa, and holding secret meetings with Asif Ali Zardari to manipulate the Punjab by-elections.

According to the evidence seen by The News and Geo, the military officer, currently serving in Punjab, filed an unprecedented defamation action against Maj (retd) Adil Farooq Raja over nearly a dozen YouTube Vlogs and Twitter publications “carrying false and ludicrous allegations.”

According to court papers, Maj (retd) Adil Raja started his campaign against the senior serving military officer on June 14, 2022, when he alleged in a tweet that the latter “has taken complete occupation of the Lahore High Court” to rig the upcoming elections.

On June 19, 2022, Adil Raja alleged that “the officer had several meetings with Asif Ali Zardari during the latter’s stay at Lahore. Subject: Elections Manipulation,” and he went on to post a link to his YouTube video making further allegations.
...
https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/1027061-serving-army-officer-sues-youtuber-in-uk-for-defamation
 
PML-N leader and former prime minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi has voiced his support for an upcoming draft bill that would amend the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) and the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), and award up to five-year imprisonment to whoever scandalises, or ridicules the Pakistan Army and judiciary through any medium, Dawn.com has learnt.
 
PML-N leader and former prime minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi has voiced his support for an upcoming draft bill that would amend the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) and the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), and award up to five-year imprisonment to whoever scandalises, or ridicules the Pakistan Army and judiciary through any medium, Dawn.com has learnt.
[MENTION=135038]Major[/MENTION] imagine if this IK proposing this. On one of the few issues you was ever right was the proposed law by the PTI was poorly conceived. But this isnt IK, when are you starting the thread on this?
 
[MENTION=135038]Major[/MENTION] imagine if this IK proposing this. On one of the few issues you was ever right was the proposed law by the PTI was poorly conceived. But this isnt IK, when are you starting the thread on this?

Its wrong and poor, which shows no part is sincere with the country
 
Its wrong and poor, which shows no part is sincere with the country

But remember all the hype from the media, well you guys have 95% of the media , when are they going to speak up. I have no problems with laws that are genuinely there to prevent the scandalisation through lies of both institutions, but as both institutions have been exposed as nothing more than mafia run criminal fronts, this is an attempt to stop freedom and free speech.
 
But remember all the hype from the media, well you guys have 95% of the media , when are they going to speak up. I have no problems with laws that are genuinely there to prevent the scandalisation through lies of both institutions, but as both institutions have been exposed as nothing more than mafia run criminal fronts, this is an attempt to stop freedom and free speech.

DAWN speaks up about it. The same DAWN you guys used to hate because it didnt give psotive news about Pakistan....
 
DAWN speaks up about it. The same DAWN you guys used to hate because it didnt give psotive news about Pakistan....

Not really- it was a big part of the regime change. Now it fears that if it doesnt report these it will lose any credibility. This is called self preservation. You guys have nationalised all the media and bar BOL and ARY, they are mafia mouth pieces. This law like the law proposed under IK and now under these crooks will not stop millions telling us the Army and Judiciary are corrupt. Your mafia govt will go down as the worst govt probably anywhere in the World.
 
Not really- it was a big part of the regime change. Now it fears that if it doesnt report these it will lose any credibility. This is called self preservation. You guys have nationalised all the media and bar BOL and ARY, they are mafia mouth pieces. This law like the law proposed under IK and now under these crooks will not stop millions telling us the Army and Judiciary are corrupt. Your mafia govt will go down as the worst govt probably anywhere in the World.

It seems as if you started following dawn post 2018.
 
It seems as if you started following dawn post 2018.

Dawn has sold itself to Nanis media management bribes. It has little credibility as an unbiased source but still reports the news in English and that's the only reason it is still relevant. Once upon a time the Jang was also highly rated and today it has about as much cred as used toilet paper. The only thing mafia doesn't control is social media and hence the new laws. Soon you will see proposals to ban social media platforms like twitter as the panic attacks hit the Junta when the elections approach( if we ever get close to elections)
 
JI chief asks establishment to prove its apolitical stance
Siraj flays political leadership for getting rich at public’s expense

Jamaat-e-Islami (JI) chief Sirajul Haq has demanded from the establishment that they should never support one party against the other again and give practical proof of their apolitical stance.

Speaking in Rawalpindi, the JI chief said that “thieves” will not be able to compete with JI in the streets and neighbourhoods since ‘Clean and Green Pakistan’ is only possible only through them.

Addressing the Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM), he said that he wants to tell their leadership that there is no need for their speeches.

“Reduce the prices of flour, sugar, ghee, and rice by 50 percent,” he demanded.

He said that all the rulers – Asif Ali Zardari, Shehbaz Sharif, Nawaz Sharif, and Imran Khan – should sell their properties and pay the country’s debts.

He rejected the Rs170 billion inclusion in the tax collection target.

He called on the establishment to refrain from supporting “thieves”.

“These rulers failed not once but a hundred times,” the JI chief said. “Their domestic and offshore properties increased alongside the national debt.”

He said that elections are held hostage in this country, while the Pakistan People's Party (PPP) is sitting on the mandate of JI in Karachi.

The Election Commission of Pakistan did not conduct the election on eleven vacant seats, he said.

Siraj said that the people will no longer become the scapegoat of judges, bureaucrats, generals, and rulers.

“There is no justice in this country,” he said. “The courts and the whole system are in trouble.”

...
https://tribune.com.pk/story/2400887/ji-chief-asks-establishment-to-prove-its-apolitical-stance
 
Move in Senate against PM’s powers to retain retiring army chiefs

Seeking to take away prime minister’s powers to retain retiring services chiefs and chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, three separate bills — the Pakistan Army (Amendment) Bill, Pakistan Air Force (Amendment) Bill, and the Pakistan Navy (Amendment) Bill — were submitted to the senate secretariat on Monday.

An outspoken Jamaat-i-Islami senator Mushtaq Ahmad separately submitted notices in the office of senate secretary seeking to move amendments to the existing laws.

In January 2020, following unprecedented hitches to the proposed extension in the term of the then army chief Gen Qamar Javed Bajwa, the parliament had approved three bills that set a higher retirement age for the chiefs of the armed forces, allowing the prime minister to extend their terms at his discretion.

The Pakistan Army (Amendment) Bill seeks to amend the Pakistan Army Act, 1952 by omitting Sections 8B and 8E in the law. Similarly, the Pakistan Air Force (Amendment) Bill and Pakistan Navy (Amendment) Bill seek to amend the Pakistan Air Force Act, 1953 and Pakistan Navy Ordinance 1961 respectively by omitting different sections in these laws.

...
https://www.dawn.com/news/1742073/move-in-senate-against-pms-powers-to-retain-retiring-army-chiefs
 
https://www.dawn.com/news/1742652

The caretaker government of Punjab has signed an agreement to hand over at least 45,267 acres of land in three districts — Bhakkar, Khushab, and Sahiwal — of the province to the Pakistan Army for ‘Corporate Agriculture Farming’.


———-
Guess the deals are obvious.
 
https://www.dawn.com/news/1742652

The caretaker government of Punjab has signed an agreement to hand over at least 45,267 acres of land in three districts — Bhakkar, Khushab, and Sahiwal — of the province to the Pakistan Army for ‘Corporate Agriculture Farming’.


———-
Guess the deals are obvious.

Never heard the term corporate agriculture farming before. I know families from farming community turn into corporates in dairy and agriculture but never heard of outsourcing agriculture land.

Hope these are Pakistani companies and not Chinese. If they get access to land in Punjab it’s a bigger threat for India. Worst case scenario a Pakistani company will give some donation for the “Kashmir cause”. China can do a lot more damage with this access. Concern for us as well.
 
Task force proposed to ‘check’ anti-army campaign

The government is mulling forming a special task force to check social media campaigns against the army, an official source told Dawn on Thursday.

He explained that a summary to set up the task force has been moved but was still awaiting approval. “For now it is just a proposal.”

The proposed task force will comprise officers from the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), the Pak*istan Tele*communication Authority (PTA) and the National Database and Registration Authority (Nadra). The proposed task force will be assisted by the police and other law enforcement agencies and frame recommendations to check the misuse of social media.

The move came at a time when the government has accused the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf and its chairman, Imran Khan, of running a vilification campaign against the military.

As widening political polarisation in the country was also reflected in the digital world, several social media trends vilifying the army and its officers have been promoted in the recent past. In Aug 2022, the military expressed strong disapproval of “false propaganda and insensitive comments on social media” after six army officers were martyred in a helicopter crash in Balochistan. Later, the FIA constituted a team to trace and arrest those behind the campaigns.

An official of the interior ministry said eight TikTok accounts, 44 Twitter accounts and more than 50 Facebook accounts have been identified who were allegedly involved in running ‘anti army’ campaigns on social media.

...
https://www.dawn.com/news/1743924/task-force-proposed-to-check-anti-army-campaign
 
Veteran’s family breaks silence over civilian son’s court martial

The family of an army veteran on Tuesday made an impassioned plea to military and judicial authorities to ensure that justice is done in the case of Hasan Askree, a civilian who was court martialed after he wrote a critical letter to former army chief retired Gen Qamar Javed Bajwa.

According to a press release issued after the press conference, this was the first time Mr Askree’s family members — including his father retired Maj-Gen Syed Zaffar Mehdi Askree, mother Wasima and sister Zehra — had gone public with their ordeal.

They claimed that not only was Hasan unjustly tried in a Field General Court Martial (FGCM) and summarily sentenced without even being informed of the actual charges, they insisted that he had been incarcerated alongside hardened criminals and terrorists in a maximum security prison and had not been transferred to Adiala jail, despite a court order.

Hasan Askree was picked up from his home in Oct 2020 and transferred to military custody. He was convicted and sentenced to five years of rigorous imprisonment following an FGCM trial, although neither he nor his family members have received a copy of the charges or verdict, despite repeated requests.

...
https://www.dawn.com/news/1744752
 
Back
Top