ahanank
Local Club Star
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2015
- Runs
- 2,113
That's your comeback ? Since when do averages not matter?
Seems like 'comebacks' have more value here than just stating your opinion.
If you want comebacks, go watch a comedian or something.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's your comeback ? Since when do averages not matter?
Both things are interconnected. if avg is not the issue you might as well send anyone to open and that had be fine.
Didn't know averaging 30 was the new benchmark.
) You're the same guy who is a Shehzad fanboy. Talk about double standards.Don't try to change the point.
I was strictly talking about the style of play.
Never mentioned averages.
I was talking about ODIs.An average of 20+ isn't good in t20, then?
I was talking about ODIs.
I'm not a blind fan nor a teenager. I have seen enough cricket to know about the limitations of our system. Our system doesn't allow us to produce good openers never has. Weave produced only one good opener that is Saeef anwar, rest has been way below par, worse than AS. AS is not the best but by our standard he is quite good and would only get better.) You're the same guy who is a Shehzad fanboy. Talk about double standards.
He's changing the point because he don't have any argument. Shehzad is the worst of the lot, averaging early 30s at close to 60s strike rate, yet supports him.
Umar has a lot better average+strike rate, Shehzad can't even dream of achieving that SR - yet the guy is targeting Umar because he don't like him.
People have favorites and biases.
I'm not a blind fan nor a teenager. I have seen enough cricket to know about the limitations of our system. Our system doesn't allow us to produce good openers never has. Weave produced only one good opener that is Saeef anwar, rest has been way below par, worse than AS. AS is not the best but by our standard he is quite good and would only get better.
UA is a slogger. Only shot he can play is clear his left leg and slog. Play him as an opener he would be averaging around 15.
And you should be the last person to be calling other biased.
I'm not a blind fan nor a teenager. I have seen enough cricket to know about the limitations of our system. Our system doesn't allow us to produce good openers never has. Weave produced only one good opener that is Saeef anwar, rest has been way below par, worse than AS. AS is not the best but by our standard he is quite good and would only get better.
UA is a slogger. Only shot he can play is clear his left leg and slog. Play him as an opener he would be averaging around 15.
And you should be the last person to be calling other biased.
) You're the same guy who is a Shehzad fanboy. Talk about double standards.
He's changing the point because he don't have any argument. Shehzad is the worst of the lot, averaging early 30s at close to 60s strike rate, yet supports him.
Umar has a lot better average+strike rate, Shehzad can't even dream of achieving that SR - yet the guy is targeting Umar because he don't like him.
People have favorites and biases.
Don't you do the same thing??
You're now shifting the argument again from 'average' to your 'personal' views. Funny how you used 'average' against Umar, but not even going close to 'average' when it coems to Shehzad.
You can't do this to protect your favorite guy.
Umar is regarded by everyone as a superior, much superior talent. You seem to think Umar can only play one shot -- shows how little cricket you watch. He's ONE guy, who can play not only all shots from the book, but also improvise: ABD-esque.
All this at a much better average+strike rate than your guy Shehzad. Interesting you ran away from this average/strike rate argument when I brought in Shehzad.
Umar isn't an opener, shouldn't open, but if he does, Shehzad is very easy to overtake. Farhat-like record is not hard to beat.
I think our major problem is our fixation with specialist ODI openers. They have no place in modern day cricket anymore.
In fact, the best ODI opener of all time (Tendulkar) wasn't a specialist either, and neither were the likes of Jayasuriya, Ganguly etc. A specialist opener opens in Test cricket, most of them were specialist no 3 or no 4 in Test cricket. (Jayasuriya opened in Tests but he started his career as a middle-order batsman, like Dilshan).
The likes of Amla are not specialist openers either.
90% of PPers thought Azhar would be a grandiose failure in ODIs as well. My point is that we need to be a little more flexible when it comes to ODI openers. Its the easiest position to bat in this era, thanks to two new balls, fast outfields, big bats and field restrictions.
There is no reason why we cannot try someone like Umar Akmal as an opener.
In fact, someone like Sarfraz has done much better at the top compared to the lower order.
If we continue to fixate on specialist openers, then Shehzad has indeed done better than his competition.
He was looking very very good today. All ground shots one big calculated hit a 96 meters six.
Was playing absolute correct cricket unlike his brain.
Sohaib sold him a dummy.
This is sad.
He was on his way to score a ton. Looked the BEST batsman out there, so much class.
Maqsood, what a retarded act by him. He can't slog us to a win here.
No, he wasn't on his way to a ton. He was gonna get out any minute. Please stop overrating this guy. He is nothing special.
If you watch him bat and you still don't think he's special, then I can't stop myself from saying that your eye for batting talent is quite weak.
How come you can ignore his class today. Just compare with the other 'batsmen' we have.
I couldn't care less about his class or talent. Something called brain is also important and he doesn't have that unfortunately. He looked decent today like he always does at the start of the innings but threw it away as always. And the run out wasn't just Maqsood's fault.
He was looking very very good today. All ground shots one big calculated hit a 96 meters six.
Was playing absolute correct cricket unlike his brain.
Sohaib sold him a dummy.
Indeed. Looked totally a class apart from all the other "so called batsmen".
He truly is a gifted talent. Retarded running by Maqsood cost us this match. He himself can't play proper cricketing shots, just slog, and wanted to be not out by sacrificing Umar.
I'm sure if Umar was in team Aus/SA, they would've *made* him into a world class bat by now. Just like SA did with AB.
Umar Akmal looked the best Pakistani LOI batsman today. No hacking, slogging or lucky shots, all pure cricketing shots until he was sold out by his partner.
He just hit two shots, one four and one six.

He just hit two shots, one four and one six.
He was playing very well today. His partner sold him out.
What exactly happened? I never watched it live just saw Umar and Maqsood trying to get back in the crease at non strikers end. And yeah in T20's he has always been brilliant and am glad he's in the team despite all the rubbish that has happened in his personal life
It was an easy run for them and Maqsood seemed too scared to take it and ran back to his end when Umar would have gotten and he selfishly saved himself and did nothing later in the match.
kick that idiot out the team please, maqsood is a hack anyway; Akmal is a gun player for us in T20's.Oh mykick that idiot out the team please, maqsood is a hack anyway; Akmal is a gun player for us in T20's.
llotelliIt's Umar's day today.
Hopefully he would be kicked out of the t20 team. Rafatullah has scored more runs then him in both games
Hopefully he would be kicked out of the t20 team. Rafatullah has scored more runs then him in both games
have you watched the game
both dismissals are hardly his fault
Hopefully he would be kicked out of the t20 team. Rafatullah has scored more runs then him in both games
Hard for many people to accept but Umar Akmal's talent is undeniable. Still remember those sixes to MALLINGA in 2009.
Is he more talented than Rohit?
No freaking way. He is a brute. Rohit Sharma is more like Inzy.
Terrific knock under the circumstances.
And to think he's the only guy who can play suck knocks in our team!
And to think he's the only guy who can play suck knocks in our team!
Correctly said by you. He does that more often than not.
) Just noticed. Was I high there or something? 
)Rameez forgot how to speak.
Alan Wilkins wit all his vocabulary couldn't describe it)
This is it guys. This is the Rohit Sharma type transformation we needed. Our #3 has arrived. Expect tons and double hun'eds from here.
Mark this date on your calendars. The day the qalandar Umar went through metamorphosis.
He plays such innings once every 3-4 months so no biggie. Pak fans shouldn't get super excited for no reason because only disappointment is coming our way in regards to this.
Shehzad, Akmal, Jamshed etc are all inconsistent clowns of varying degrees and that much has been established long time back.
Make him open and you'll see a lot more of these innings.
He plays such innings once every 3-4 months so no biggie. Pak fans shouldn't get super excited for no reason because only disappointment is coming our way in regards to this.
Shehzad, Akmal, Jamshed etc are all inconsistent clowns of varying degrees and that much has been established long time back.
Do you have any idea where that thread of 2010 2011 is ?
The one which has title like who is more talented umar akmal , kohli , rahane , Barath, Joe Root, sharma ?
The thread where you posted Umar Akmal's six of morne Morkel?