What's new

Uttarakhand: Man assaults Muslim praying near temple in Rudrapur, booked

Bhaag Viru Bhaag

T20I Star
Joined
Aug 20, 2013
Runs
32,286

The incident took place around 2pm on Tuesday near the Atriya Temple and the victim was allowed to leave only after being forced to chant “Jai Shri Ram”.​


The Uttarakhand Police have registered a first information report (FIR) against a named accused and unidentified persons for allegedly assaulting a Muslim man while he was offering namaz on a vacant plot near a temple in Rudrapur in Udham Singh Nagar district

A-video-of-the-incident-has-gone-viral-on-social-m_1772012165179.png


A video of the incident, which occurred on Tuesday afternoon, has gone viral on social media, wherein the footage shows a man approaching the victim during namaz, grabbing him by the neck and throwing him to the ground. The accused is then seen kicking and slapping the man, verbally abusing him and forcing him to chant “Jai Shri Ram”.

In the video, the accused can be heard asking, “How could you offer namaz near the temple?” The victim was allowed to leave only after being forced to chant “Jai Shri Ram”. The authenticity of the video, however, could not be independently verified.

The victim, Mohammad Shahid (44), a resident of Resham Bari area, had gone to Jagatpura for daily wage work. The incident took place around 2pm near the Atriya Temple.

 

The incident took place around 2pm on Tuesday near the Atriya Temple and the victim was allowed to leave only after being forced to chant “Jai Shri Ram”.​


The Uttarakhand Police have registered a first information report (FIR) against a named accused and unidentified persons for allegedly assaulting a Muslim man while he was offering namaz on a vacant plot near a temple in Rudrapur in Udham Singh Nagar district

A-video-of-the-incident-has-gone-viral-on-social-m_1772012165179.png


A video of the incident, which occurred on Tuesday afternoon, has gone viral on social media, wherein the footage shows a man approaching the victim during namaz, grabbing him by the neck and throwing him to the ground. The accused is then seen kicking and slapping the man, verbally abusing him and forcing him to chant “Jai Shri Ram”.

In the video, the accused can be heard asking, “How could you offer namaz near the temple?” The victim was allowed to leave only after being forced to chant “Jai Shri Ram”. The authenticity of the video, however, could not be independently verified.

The victim, Mohammad Shahid (44), a resident of Resham Bari area, had gone to Jagatpura for daily wage work. The incident took place around 2pm near the Atriya Temple.

why are the sanghis so quiet:


@Rajdeep @cricketjoshila @Champ_Pal @Devadwal @uppercut @straighttalk @Vikram1989 @Romali_rotti @Bhaijaan @Cover Drive Six @rickroll @RexRex @rpant_gabba, @kron @globetrotter @Hitman @jnaveen1980 @Local.Dada @CrIc_Mystique @Van_Sri @nish_mate @SportsWarrior @kaayal @saimayubera @JaDed @Prince of Dorne @Crying Out Loud
 
Absolute disgrace. So called worlds biggest democracy. Ridiculous stuffs. Its far too common under the hindutva government of Modi.
 
If he was doing this at a Hindu property, the n its the muslim man's mistake entirely.

Given hindus cannot do hindu rituals at Muslim properties, same rules apply vice versa. This is religious encroachment which is a sensitive matter in nations of ancient civilixations from aprotectionist point of view.
 
If he was doing this at a Hindu property, the n its the muslim man's mistake entirely.

Given hindus cannot do hindu rituals at Muslim properties, same rules apply vice versa. This is religious encroachment which is a sensitive matter in nations of ancient civilixations from aprotectionist point of view.

It says "near the temple". Not at the temple.

I don't think the guy was at the hindu property. Here is from the article ---> The Uttarakhand Police have registered a first information report (FIR) against a named accused and unidentified persons for allegedly assaulting a Muslim man while he was offering namaz on a vacant plot near a temple in Rudrapur in Udham Singh Nagar district.

Instead of making excuses for this assault, you should condemn it.
 
It says "near the temple". Not at the temple.

I don't think the guy was at the hindu property. Here is from the article ---> The Uttarakhand Police have registered a first information report (FIR) against a named accused and unidentified persons for allegedly assaulting a Muslim man while he was offering namaz on a vacant plot near a temple in Rudrapur in Udham Singh Nagar district.

Instead of making excuses for this assault, you should condemn it.

India is facing a huge illegal muslim encroachment issue and Uttarakhand is one of the infected states.
This is a sensitivie topic. When muslims have many mosques then why they have to encroach hindu property to do Islamic rituals?

Its all a matter of intentions.
Today its one person, tomorrow dozen, day after 100 muslims will come there and make a mazar there and call Waqf board to decalre that property Islamic. Its a serious and sensitivie issue in India.
 
India is facing a huge illegal muslim encroachment issue and Uttarakhand is one of the infected states.
This is a sensitivie topic. When muslims have many mosques then why they have to encroach hindu property to do Islamic rituals?

Its all a matter of intentions.
Today its one person, tomorrow dozen, day after 100 muslims will come there and make a mazar there and call Waqf board to decalre that property Islamic. Its a serious and sensitivie issue in India.

The Muslim was a daily wage worker. Maybe there was no mosque nearby or he was running out of time. There can be many reasons.

Why is praying in a vacant space an issue? It shouldn't be anyone's business. It was not a hindu property.

As expected, you are not condemning the attacker.
 
The Muslim was a daily wage worker. Maybe there was no mosque nearby or he was running out of time. There can be many reasons.

Why is praying in a vacant space an issue?

I have once prayed at a parking lot because mosque was far and I was running out of time. Nobody told me anything. I guess that's the difference between Canada and India.

Canada and India are not the same.
In Canada, the indigenous civiliation has already gone through a genocide and Europeans took over.

We cannot let the same happen in India.
Hence you must respect the extreme protectionist sentiment in India. It comes froma place called mistrust and insecurity. We were betrayed by muslims historically many times. We cannot afford to be naive.
 
Open the gates of Mecca for Hindu rituals, allow us to restore Shiva idol worshipping there as was the norm before Islamic invasions. If you do that, then we would allow these trespassers to perform muslim rituals on our lands.

Don't preach what you cannot practice yourselves.
 
- The Muslim man (a daily wage worker) prayed at a vacant spot. He wasn't bothering anybody.
- The jungli sanghi assaulted him. Completely unprovoked. Muslim man was not praying at a mandir or anything.

Any decent person should condemn it without any if and but. Sanghis will probably make excuses for the attack I guess.
 
India is facing a huge illegal muslim encroachment issue and Uttarakhand is one of the infected states.
This is a sensitivie topic. When muslims have many mosques then why they have to encroach hindu property to do Islamic rituals?

Its all a matter of intentions.
Today its one person, tomorrow dozen, day after 100 muslims will come there and make a mazar there and call Waqf board to decalre that property Islamic. Its a serious and sensitivie issue in India.

I see the mask is slipping again
 
If he was doing this at a Hindu property, the n its the muslim man's mistake entirely.

Given hindus cannot do hindu rituals at Muslim properties, same rules apply vice versa. This is religious encroachment which is a sensitive matter in nations of ancient civilixations from aprotectionist point of view.

I agree with you partially. Everyone should stay in their lane, especially religious folk. The reaction was criminal and he deserves to be booked though. But the same should apply to those who chant Hindu slogans outside mosques, even if the nitpickers will argue it's on a public road. Treat all flaunting of religious pride equally.
 
I agree with you partially. Everyone should stay in their lane, especially religious folk. The reaction was criminal and he deserves to be booked though. But the same should apply to those who chant Hindu slogans outside mosques, even if the nitpickers will argue it's on a public road. Treat all flaunting of religious pride equally.

Glad someone understood the point.
I know what i said sounds extreme to a genuinely nice person like @sweep_shot but this is how protectionism works, everywhere, especially for those combating a very active and serious threat to their civilizational continuity.
 
Even if that man is wrong to perform Muslim rituals on Hindu property , what is the justification for this violence committed against this poor man ?

Sorry but there is no justification whatsoever for this.

Violence against minorities and flimsy justifications have become the norm across large parts of India.

It's become completely normalised.

North Indian Sanatanis are just weak, insecure men these days .
 
Even if that man is wrong to perform Muslim rituals on Hindu property , what is the justification for this violence committed against this poor man ?

Sorry but there is no justification whatsoever for this.

Violence against minorities and flimsy justifications have become the norm across large parts of India.

It's become completely normalised.

North Indian Sanatanis are just weak, insecure men these days .

I agree violence wasn't needed here.
They should have just called the police. But sadly due to the forced secularism, police also doesn't always take strict action against religious encroachers.
 
Sad and pathetic way to handle this. Too comfortable with having your favorite uncles in power so you feel like you can get away with things like this.

It looks like an open area in the picture.

“Vacant plot near a temple” and “in a temple” are two entirely different things.

This is is India after all, so ofc there’s always gonna be a temple nearby, and perhaps there wasn’t a mosque near him.

But the article clearly says it’s an empty plot. I don’t see him praying at the steps of a temple let alone inside one.
 
One has to have no spirituality if you are exiting a temple and start assaulting someone.

Been in North India for last couple of months and I miss South Indian temples and Hinduism so different hopefully they haven’t changed .

Even the Texas ones are maintained by South Indians and are peaceful ,
 
Open the gates of Mecca for Hindu rituals, allow us to restore Shiva idol worshipping there as was the norm before Islamic invasions. If you do that, then we would allow these trespassers to perform muslim rituals on our lands.

Don't preach what you cannot practice yourselves.

This is a wrong take. Hindus are not Muslims so why would you use Islamic standards as your own yardstick?

Islamic rules are for Muslim countries. Hindu rules should take their inspiration from Hindu texts and not try to ape Sharia. If you really admire Islamic structures so much, then better just to accept Islam and call for Sharia instead.
 
One has to have no spirituality if you are exiting a temple and start assaulting someone.

Been in North India for last couple of months and I miss South Indian temples and Hinduism so different hopefully they haven’t changed .

Even the Texas ones are maintained by South Indians and are peaceful ,
Different in the sense of comparing Sanatan Dharma with Dengue & Malaria?

Gotcha

1772108461780.png
 
This is a wrong take. Hindus are not Muslims so why would you use Islamic standards as your own yardstick?

Islamic rules are for Muslim countries. Hindu rules should take their inspiration from Hindu texts and not try to ape Sharia. If you really admire Islamic structures so much, then better just to accept Islam and call for Sharia instead.
Is there a specific text where non-Muslims are not allowed?
I agree on your overall point though this is why Golden temple is amazing everyone is allowed
 
Says a guy that cant string a sentence without dissing North Indians and trying to create a divide between North & South
Bro you support UK’s flag and country that ruled over India.. i wouldn’t talk about division, I’m a Panjabi i can critic the way i want it.
 
Is there a specific text where non-Muslims are not allowed?
I agree on your overall point thoug,h this is why Golden temple is amazing everyone is allowed

I am not really sure about specific prohibitions on non-Muslims. My reply was more aimed at Bhaijaan attempting to use Islamic injunctures to model Hindu laws which I feel is wrong. Hindus need not look outside to implement their own beliefs.
 
India is facing a huge illegal muslim encroachment issue and Uttarakhand is one of the infected states.
This is a sensitivie topic. When muslims have many mosques then why they have to encroach hindu property to do Islamic rituals?

Its all a matter of intentions.
Today its one person, tomorrow dozen, day after 100 muslims will come there and make a mazar there and call Waqf board to decalre that property Islamic. Its a serious and sensitivie issue in India.
The people here just go by news bites. No real ground info.

Many Bangladeshis and Rohingyas have settled in Uttarakhand and they formed their villages there and do not let any Hindus there.

That man could pray anywhere. But chooses to pray near the temple knowing very well the situation is tense.
 
The people here just go by news bites. No real ground info.

Many Bangladeshis and Rohingyas have settled in Uttarakhand and they formed their villages there and do not let any Hindus there.

That man could pray anywhere. But chooses to pray near the temple knowing very well the situation is tense.

That’s what I tried to explain to people here but it’s not unusual that Pakistanis here who see world with tinted Islamist viewpoint would call it an extremist view.

They do not know what protectionism is and how Muslims are literally the only religion other communities are always concerned of because of the pure reputation they carry for being religious Pacmen devouring every indigenous culture they set foot on. It’s a historical fact.
 
I cant imagine anything more humuliating than being made to chant jai shri ram.
Condolences to the victim.
 
That was after the Hindu preacher got death threats and the double tounged BJP government did nothing.

Anyways. Here is the video a few days earlier when Islamic mobs shouted Allahuakbar and declared jihad on Hindus and India. Enjoy it.



This is just a video of Muslims chanting takbir to the glory of Allah, there is nothing to link it to jihad on Hindus.
 
One has to have no spirituality if you are exiting a temple and start assaulting someone.

Been in North India for last couple of months and I miss South Indian temples and Hinduism so different hopefully they haven’t changed .

Even the Texas ones are maintained by South Indians and are peaceful ,
I have yet to meet any South Indians who were not peaceful or who displayed hatred toward other religions.
 
I cant imagine anything more humuliating than being made to chant jai shri ram.
Condolences to the victim.
What this rat / genitalia idol worshipper did to a man just minding his own business and quietly praying in an open area is far more humiliating.

If the man was doing some sets of pushups instead, the guy wouldn’t have cared.

Those with a sense of conscience condemn it. The closet violence mongers who jump at the first instance of a Muslim committing a crime are defending their cowardly Hindoo brethren here to no one’s surprise. Whataboutism must be an idol they worship as well.
 
I can concur. Every South Indian I have ever met was so friendly and chill compared to those from closer to home.
Punjabis are usually warm and respectful, but some extremist Hindutva supporters from certain parts of India carry so much hate that it shows in how they act and present themselves, it’s hard not to notice.
 
Back
Top