My arguments are not all over the place, i may not have expressed myself clearly so here goes.
Any batsman can play all the technical shots against low calibre bowlers and/ or on flat pitches. But at the highest level you have to be able to play these shots against the best bowlers in the world and on the toughest pitches, only then can you be called a top batsman who has all the shots. Babars main shot is the off drive and he can play it against anyone, anywhere, thats why i said he has perfected this shot and is the best in the world at it. I said he can play the straight drive and the on drive but no where as proficiently as the off drive. He pulls mostly spinners or poor deliveries from pacers.
He doesnt square drive or play horizontal shots. He doesnt hook bouncers or sweep spinners. He has no power game, he relies on timing only. He has no stamina, so he wont score double centuries or even big daddy centuries which were required in these last two tests. Etc.
To be the best you have to show up against the best, at their. den and show your skills, babar has got out 2 out of 4 times for virtually nothing., he also has a century and 97, but got out when he needed to go on. He is also quite selfish and does not protect the tail by farming the strike, he is only interested in scoring his own personal milestone of a century and not about the team or match situation.
Thats my take on babar azam, you can disagree if you like, but you would be wrong to do so.
Rabada is not a low calibre bowler. Neither is Steyn, though he may have been past his best. Olivier is a one-trick pony but still had a lot of pace and was bowling bouncers, which Babar handled just fine. Gasp, yes, he played pull-shots too.
Babar's innings of 71 was the highest score in the match and the highest team total was 223. These are not typical scores on a pancake flat pitch.
How do you determine whether he has perfected other shots besides the off-drive
Blatant lie to say he doesn't play horizontal bat shots, for anyone blessed with the gift of eyesight. Evidence is the video above. I can get more evidence if you want it.
You say 'he relies on timing' as though it's a negative thing. Why are we discussing power game in the context of Test cricket?
"2 out of 4 times for virtually nothing" You do realise that's how batting works. Batsmen fail more often than they succeed. That's the nature of cricket. If you make big scores in half of your innings in a series, you've done a good job. The only thing is that the scores should be bigger.
-----------------------------
See, there's a difference between just making up stuff on the spot and actual proper critiquing. Babar has plenty in his game that he needs to work on, there's always room for improvement. He has gotten out in the 90s five times over the last 14 months, he needs to figure that out. He has to improve his concentration levels, in order to be able to play those long innings like the best batsmen in the world do. Amongst other things.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Mark Nicholas during Babar Azam's innings "This is batting of the highest quality, it could be Kohli or it could be de Villiers, such is the command" <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/SAvPAK?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#SAvPAK</a></p>— Saj Sadiq (@Saj_PakPassion) <a href="https://twitter.com/Saj_PakPassion/status/1077901212983480320?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 26, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Babar has almost nothing to prove in terms of strokeplay. Unless we're talking about scoops, switch hits and unorthodox T20 style shots.