Rani Padmavati who lead hundreds of Rajput women to commit jauhar/suicide to preserve their honour
So Jauhar /Johar meant suicide

How does one do Johar ? Is it some kind of Sati ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rani Padmavati who lead hundreds of Rajput women to commit jauhar/suicide to preserve their honour
I was actually one of those guys.
Earlier the problem was regarding a romantic dream scene shot between Ranvir and Deepika.I wasn't passing any judgment per se.
So Jauhar /Johar meant suicide, I had been thinking it was some sort of prayer or something, which they did for the rajput victory ..
How does one do Johar ? Is it some kind of Sati ?
From some random internet site:
Queen Padmini and all the other consorts of Raja Ratan Singh, along with wives of army men and every woman present in the state, walked down the secret tunnel passage linked from Chittor fort into the Jauhar Kund.
They wailed for their men, and san praises of their bravery and together they jumped into the fire it; Queen Padmini was the first one to jump into the Jauhar Kund. Entire palace was echoed by their cries. By the time, Khiliji and his army entered the fort to claim their authority on royal treasure and women; they were welcomed by eerie sounds coming from the Jauhar Kund.
View attachment 76748
SRK is done and dusted.His time in bwd is over.
Reminds me of that scene from Kamal Haasans "Indian" (Hindustani in Hindi ).
Wasn't the greatest of times back then to be women, rape/sexual slavery was pretty much THE preferred method of dealing with women of captured territories...
Padmavati is based on the story of Rani Padmini of Chittor, Rajasthan who was married to Maharawal Ratan Singh (played by Shahid Kapoor in the film). Deepika Padukone features as the protagonist, Rani Padmavati who lead hundreds of Rajput women to commit jauhar/suicide to preserve their honour and being captured by Alauddin Khilji, the turkic origin ruler of Delhi Sultanate (played by Ranveer Singh). Set up in 1300AD.
Keep believing that BZ prah ,doesnt change a thing.Its not like we are talking about antquity era , this only happened 700 years ago.Ample evidence available.Padmini, also known as Padmavati, never existed.
Actually it's my desire not to change anything...and facts should remain facts. And that's the reason historians reject the historcity of this lady.
You are impossible.Once a hater always a hater. Just because historians don't know something doesn't mean it didn't exist. These darbari historians are basically hagiographers peddling nehruvian interpretation of history. Denying our glorious past and lionising the barbarians who defiled our motherland. So does not matter what they think or what some random poster things about it. Doesn't change the FACTS.
There are 3 things here .So Jauhar /Johar meant suicide, I had been thinking it was some sort of prayer or something, which they did for the rajput victory ..
How does one do Johar ? Is it some kind of Sati ?
He has been pretty mediocre of late.Age is catching up with him.Fan was okayish at best.His greatest ever movie has been Swades imo.Now that was one heck of a performance.[MENTION=130700]TM Riddle[/MENTION] in the last 4-5 years only SRK movie I seen was Fan and it was pretty good, have not seen Raees but people have said that was a good movie as well
I remember you being rather very vocal and angry here on PP during that time.
If you were physically part of that mob , then that my friend does reflect poorly . . I don't think we as a civilized society should still resort to such behavior , this coming from a state which has mobs/protests and related shutdowns every alternate day of the week.
[MENTION=136588]CricketCartoons[/MENTION] enough with the usual nonsensical drivel.Have some shame fgs.
Banna..hukum karo. Will do as you say.
Keep believing that BZ prah ,doesnt change a thing.Its not like we are talking about antquity era , this only happened 700 years ago.Ample evidence available.
1. I am NOT believing.
2. I do not desire to change facts.
All this legend is based on a poem, which was written (by muslim) ~200 years after the death of Alauddin.
Ample "evidence", that's why historians are in agreement that this is piece of human imagination.
1) What does the fact that the poem was written by a muslim got to do with it?
2) All these stories are just stories...including Anarkali, Jodha Akbar, Heer Ranjha, Soni Mahiwal, Mirza Sahiba, etc. It's okay...I agree we should not interpret this movie as historically accurate, but these are popular romance stories, its okay for bollywood to make a film on them.
FYI, this is not a Padmani-Alloudin romantic story.
Little bit but not much...[MENTION=27435]Zahid87[/MENTION] [MENTION=42489]Black Zero[/MENTION]
Do they teach you our shared Subcontinent history in Pakistani schools? Like the Mauryan empire, The Delhi sultanate, Tughluq dynasty, Rajputs etc apart from the Mughals.
Little bit but not much...
IsLamictal studies and pakistan studies are two compulsory subjects upto undergrad.
In my time, focus was on following historical topics:
Little bit about mahanjo daro and Harapa.
Life of prophet of islam (only good events are taught )
Muhammad bin Qasim (712AD) attack on Sind (from winner's perspective)
Mahmood Ghaznavi (998 AD)
Haider Ali, Tipu and Sirajuddollah (focus on traitors)
Freedom/independence moment (sir syed, creation of muslim league, ali brothers, allama iqbal, MAJinnah, etc.etc.)
The courses were mainly designed to brain wash people.
Little bit but not much...
IsLamictal studies and pakistan studies are two compulsory subjects upto undergrad.
In my time, focus was on following historical topics:
Little bit about mahanjo daro and Harapa.
Life of prophet of islam (only good events are taught )
Muhammad bin Qasim (712AD) attack on Sind (from winner's perspective)
Mahmood Ghaznavi (998 AD)
Haider Ali, Tipu and Sirajuddollah (focus on traitors)
Freedom/independence moment (sir syed, creation of muslim league, ali brothers, allama iqbal, MAJinnah, etc.etc.)
The courses were mainly designed to brain wash people.
[MENTION=27435]Zahid87[/MENTION] [MENTION=42489]Black Zero[/MENTION]
Do they teach you our shared Subcontinent history in Pakistani schools? Like the Mauryan empire, The Delhi sultanate, Tughluq dynasty, Rajputs etc apart from the Mughals.
They don't teach you about the Moplahs/Mappilas ? They are the oldest muslim community of the subcontinent .. Thought they would teach you something like that .
They don't teach you about the Moplahs/Mappilas ? They are the oldest muslim community of the subcontinent .. Thought they would teach you something like that .
What is there to be taught about moplahs? They never participated in the freedom struggle. Were mercenaries and except killing their brothers they did nothing of note in history.