A few days ago Rameez Raja's comments on the recently concluded test series appeared in Hindustan Times. In his analysis Raja raised many relevant points such as, "what is the role of senior players? Will they keep on failing and will we keep playing them?"
Before I dissect Raja's words let me begin by rejecting the standard of journalism in Hindustan Times. In their article(most likely a transcript of Raja's Youtube Show, HT referred to Raja as a "Pakistan Batting Legend." We live in an era of compromised journalism but this must be the nadir. Rameez Raja, the "batting legend" averaged 31.83 in 57 Test Matches. He played 198 ODIs finishing with an average of 32.09. Yes, this is the stuff of legends! In comparison, Mohammad Hafeez, Shoaib Malik, Azhar Ali, and Asad Shafiq are legends. Rameez on the other hand has good command of the English language. Kudos to his parents!!! With that said, let me move on to dissecting his quotes.
What is the role of senior players? Will they keep on failing and will we still keep playing them?
Before we can get into the "role of senior players" shouldn't we first define what a senior player is. When Misbah and Younis retired from International Cricket, Asad Shafiq and Azhar Ali in their 30s at the time were expected to take the mantle. Even then having played 50 Test Matches and close to 10 years of international cricket they were considered Junior Players. Unfortunately, cricket is not a sport blessed with the best and the brightest. As a result we end up hearing meaningless cliches every time someone grabs a microphone.
In response to the second sentence, Pakistan in its history has never had a coherent Team Building Strategy. No one knows why player X plays over player Y. Why player X gets more rope than player Y? The mentality and approach is not dissimilar to operating a club team. Decisions are full of biases. Mainly recency bias, anchoring bias, and confirmation bias. Rather than asking, "Will they keep on failing and will we still keep playing them?" Raja should define failure. He should outline a methodology for Building Teams, Identifying Talent, Analyzing Talent, Developing Talent, Integrating Talent Etc.....
"Decision-Making has to be strong? Experimentation and ruthless strong decisions are the only way up."
Decision-Making is strong. Despite clear evidence to the contrary, Shan Masood, Azhar Ali, Asad Shafiq, Yasir Shah, Fakhar Zaman, Mohammad Hafeez, and Shoaib Malik remain undroppable. Is this a consequence of weak decision-making? I would contend that it takes a certain level of stubbornness and fearlessness to select players that are projected to fail. Rather than focusing on strong decision-making, we should focus on building decision-making frameworks and processes that lead to better decisions.
We hear the term experimentation a lot in cricket. It's a common refrain in Pakistan but really the entire cricket community. For those not paying attention "experimentation" is code for "don't blame me when we lose." Sell hope and cash your paycheck. This ploy is certainly far easier than doing In-Depth Research, Critical Thinking, and Analytical Reasoning. No Sports Team anywhere in the world should ever have to Experiment. For me, it's a red flag that indicates a lack of strategy and vision. To be fair I wouldn't limit this to Pakistan. England is also guilty after they asked an average Joe Denly to play 15 tests using faulty data.
Rameez like so many talking heads on YouTube just talk. Rarely do they ever say anything that makes sense or drives meaningful conversation. Hence, like journalism Pakistan Cricket is at its nadir in terms of intellectual curiosity and critical thinking.