What's new

[VIDEO] Stuart Broad responds to Michael Vaughan's criticism [Post #53]

s28

ODI Debutant
Joined
Nov 1, 2011
Runs
9,388
The fallout from England's heavy defeat to Pakistan at Lord's has continued, with former captain Michael Vaughan suggesting one of James Anderson or Stuart Broad should be dropped for the second Test.

The nine-wicket thumping at the Home of Cricket has already cost opener Mark Stoneman his spot, with England confirming on Monday that the out-of-form left-hander has been replaced by Lancashire's Keaton Jennings.

But Vaughan says England's problems have "gone beyond just changing the opening batsman" and says axing one of their star quicks, who have taken 946 Test wickets between them, could shake the side from its malaise.

"Perhaps England have to make a bold call this week at Headingley and consider leaving out one of James Anderson or Stuart Broad," Vaughan wrote in The Telegraph.

"Anderson’s record at Headingley has improved in recent years but neither has particularly enjoyed bowling in Leeds, which requires a fuller length. I am sure England will pick both of them but it might be an idea just to consider doing something different because at the moment it is not working.

"England are losing. The Test team are just not playing very well and something has to be done. Anderson and Broad are brilliant bowlers but it would be a wake-up call if one was left out."

Vaughan added "the easy call" would be to replace Mark Wood with Chris Woakes for the clash in Leeds, but that England need to look to the future and back in the pacey right-armer.

"Having three senior players in the team in Anderson, Broad and Alastair Cook is very difficult for Joe Root to manage ... (but) the one thing they cannot be doing is just hanging on until the end of the Ashes (next year)," he wrote.

"They have to buy in and lead the team.

"Those three have to drive England’s rebuilding before they (retire). They have to give a lot more than just turning up and playing."

Coach Trevor Bayliss, meanwhile, has put the spotlight on his side's batsmen and called for urgent improvement after their "embarrassing" performance at Lord's.

The England coach admits he feels like throwing his hands in the air in frustration when he thinks his message has finally got through, only to then watch his players prove it hasn't once they go out to bat.

Joe Root's men couldn't recover from being bowled out for 184 on the first day of the Test summer and the loss to Pakistan extended their current winless streak to eight matches.

Unless they win the second and final match of the series starting on Friday, they will also lose a third successive series.

Asked if his words are being heeded by his batsmen, Bayliss responded: "Well, obviously not enough.

"In a way, you almost throw your hands up sometimes.

"But what else can you do? We continually deliver that type of message and are continually working on it in the nets."

Asked what he told England's batsmen before the Lord's defeat, Bayliss said: "It was the same as always on these type of wickets.

"'It's going to be difficult early - you've got to work hard early and earn the right to bat long, you've got to bat in partnerships'.

"The mistakes we made - throwing hands at the ball ... (not) letting the ball come - under pressure, in the middle, we've got to do it better.

"They've been up for it in the past. I'd be expecting they'd be a little embarrassed about the way they played, and the performance in the next one will be better."

https://www.cricket.com.au/news/mic...gland-pakistan-test-trevor-bayliss/2018-05-29
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Explained in article. He thinks they are complacent and need a kick up the posterior
 
the guy won 26 Tests and Lost 11. I know he had good players but he manged to get the best out of Harmison and Flintoff, two guys who fell apart once he retired.

So I guess he must know what he is talking about.
 
Agree with Vaughan because eventually England will have to live without either of these two as they aren't getting any younger.

Woakes should open the bowling in the expense of one of the senior opening bowlers. Mark Wood needs a good run of games because his ability to take the pitch out of the equation will be needed on flat wickets. Bowling Anderson, Broad and Woakes makes the bowling attack one dimensional.
 
That's why Vaughan was a successful captain - not afraid to make bold calls.

I remember how he opted for young Kevin Pietersen ahead of the more experienced and established Graham Thorpe before the 2005 Ashes.
 
Reminds me of when Harmison and Hoggard were dropped during a tour of NZ for Jimmy and Sidebottom.
 
Anderson averaged 17 last year he's undroppable Broad hasn't been performing well it's time for a wake up call for him.
 
I want both of them in the team against us. They are old and not as effective as they were in the past. With them and cook in the side, we will win the series easily.
 
aparantly they havent found a replacement yet... so this is not the right time.. Also this will show that english set up is a bit nervous... both these bowler should play against india as well
 
the guy won 26 Tests and Lost 11. I know he had good players but he manged to get the best out of Harmison and Flintoff, two guys who fell apart once he retired.

So I guess he must know what he is talking about.

Back then he was trying to win cricket matches. Right now he is trying to grab headlines.
 
Anderson still looks decent, Broad as a cricketer with bat and ball just looks shot to pieces and needs be dropped.
 
This doesn't make sense. You drop non-performers. That said, I believe Broad does need a kick up the backside, it appears he has been taking his position in the team for granted and has developed into a comfort zone. His non-serious attitude towards his batting is proof enough.
 
England are rusty.

We make fun of our training camps but the bonding etc that happens there goes a long way. England do not have that culture so will need a game or 2 to get going.
 
That's why Vaughan was a successful captain - not afraid to make bold calls.

I remember how he opted for young Kevin Pietersen ahead of the more experienced and established Graham Thorpe before the 2005 Ashes.

Thorpe was dropped for Bell.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Maybe worth a mention today that Jimmy Anderson in his last 15 tests.. in a variety of conditions and with different cricket balls has 68 wickets at 19.36 .....</p>— Nasser Hussain (@nassercricket) <a href="https://twitter.com/nassercricket/status/1001510701553287170?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 29, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


Can't see Anderson or Broad being dropped.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Maybe worth a mention today that Jimmy Anderson in his last 15 tests.. in a variety of conditions and with different cricket balls has 68 wickets at 19.36 .....</p>— Nasser Hussain (@nassercricket) <a href="https://twitter.com/nassercricket/status/1001510701553287170?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 29, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


Can't see Anderson or Broad being dropped.

Jimmy has been bowling quiet well, many fans expected him to get violated in Australia; the spotlight should be on Broad and his poor performances, barbie tends to get overly pampered by the selectors and his fans.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
He is talking about Broad I think because Anderson has done well recently.
 
I think England do need to make a bold decision like this. A few of their players play regardless of form. Something like this could give their players a kick up the backside.
 
I feel Michael Vaughan thinks that the captain and coaching staff do not have enough sway with the bowlers. He might be right, but it’s difficult to argue that when the bowling is so poor
 
Who is the replacement? Broad I thought bowled better than Jimmy in last match. Pak batsmen (Azhar and Haris in 1st innings, last hour on day 1 and 1st hour on day 2) were just too good.
 
Bell was already in the Test side. Thorpe was dropped for Pietersen

Yes and no. KP was going to play because of his performances in SA in the ODI games and hence the choice was between Bell and Thorpe. I thought at the time that it was mistake and Bells poor performances proved me right.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">25 wickets in the last 5 matches <a href="https://twitter.com/StuartBroad8?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@StuartBroad8</a> has played?!? Only 15 months older than Mark Wood?? The experience of 117 Test matches? And we got bowled out for 180 first innings...let’s get rid of a bowler &#55357;&#56397;&#55356;&#57340; <a href="https://t.co/KZxE6hP5GS">https://t.co/KZxE6hP5GS</a></p>— Matt Prior (@MattPrior13) <a href="https://twitter.com/MattPrior13/status/1001574933816840192?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 29, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
A bit childish & emotional from Mike - he is too bitter from that loss. He’ll do a tongue bite job soon.

England batted poor (in both inning - lost like 10/115 in 2nd innings, outside one partnership against tired attack) & dropped crucial catches. No matter who is playing (or getting dropped), unless these two areas are improving drastically, result at Leeds won’t change much.

It’s sad that most Pom critics are too critical about their team rather than praising PAK, who played a near perfect game. Nass called spade a spade and that’s why I don’t see him in any influential role under ECB.
 
I think dropping Anderson or Broad is not the answer. England need to fix their batting and fielding. You cannot win if you drop catches and lose wickets in a heap like they did in both the innings.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">25 wickets in the last 5 matches <a href="https://twitter.com/StuartBroad8?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@StuartBroad8</a> has played?!? Only 15 months older than Mark Wood?? The experience of 117 Test matches? And we got bowled out for 180 first innings...let’s get rid of a bowler <a href="https://t.co/KZxE6hP5GS">https://t.co/KZxE6hP5GS</a></p>— Matt Prior (@MattPrior13) <a href="https://twitter.com/MattPrior13/status/1001574933816840192?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 29, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

:)) killer

Looks like Vaughan didn’t see the age of the beauty youngstah Mark Wood before he spoke up :afridi
 
Poor short-sighted comment from Vaughan.

Anderson is having a late career peak and Broad (even after everything) is still his reliable second fiddle.

The big problem is the batting and that will take several seasons to truly fix.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">25 wickets in the last 5 matches <a href="https://twitter.com/StuartBroad8?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@StuartBroad8</a> has played?!? Only 15 months older than Mark Wood?? The experience of 117 Test matches? And we got bowled out for 180 first innings...let’s get rid of a bowler &#55357;&#56397;&#55356;&#57340; <a href="https://t.co/KZxE6hP5GS">https://t.co/KZxE6hP5GS</a></p>— Matt Prior (@MattPrior13) <a href="https://twitter.com/MattPrior13/status/1001574933816840192?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 29, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I dont get it.

Broad has 23 wickets in last 8 tests. Bowling avg is poor.
 
Absolutely back Vaughan on this!

It is not about wickets (although Broad has been poor.) It is about attitude.

Anderson and Broad set poor examples in terms of a winning mentality. They are too used to losing and it doesn't even appear as if it bothers them. Case in point: not bowling more overs in the last innings at Lord's.

They are not part of the ODI/T20 teams - which has free'd up everyone to express themselves.

They need to be caste aside - it will rejuvenate the team. May as well take Cook with them.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">25 wickets in the last 5 matches <a href="https://twitter.com/StuartBroad8?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@StuartBroad8</a> has played?!? Only 15 months older than Mark Wood?? The experience of 117 Test matches? And we got bowled out for 180 first innings...let’s get rid of a bowler ���� <a href="https://t.co/KZxE6hP5GS">https://t.co/KZxE6hP5GS</a></p>— Matt Prior (@MattPrior13) <a href="https://twitter.com/MattPrior13/status/1001574933816840192?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 29, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Matt .. 1..England have dropped a Batsman .. 2..Please listen to the whole show .. 3.. 18 wkts in his last 5 Test Matches .. 4.. 53 wkts in his last 20 at 35 .. and it’s only an opinion .. <a href="https://t.co/ET5ePQVql9">https://t.co/ET5ePQVql9</a></p>— Michael Vaughan (@MichaelVaughan) <a href="https://twitter.com/MichaelVaughan/status/1001705153727291392?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 30, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Darren Gough on Talksport is saying the same - he wants Cook, Anderson, Broad dropped. I think people are taking this out of context.

Gough says that all 3 are good enough to play for England. However, they need to be dropped because a) they are good but NOT as good as they were b) If no-one else is given a chance to replace these 3 crucial positions, how will they develop ? You have to play them to develop them.


However - I disagree with both Vaughan and Gough. If any of these 3 are dropped, I'd be cock a hoop.
 
Vaughan is a brilliant pundit. We may disagree with his assessment but he is innovative in his thinking - as he was when he was the skip. Prior talks nonsense.
 
Don't think Anderson and Cook should be dropped, but Broad needs a kick in the backside, he has not delivered a performance of note for a while, his attitude towards his batting is disgraceful and he needs to be replaced for now by a younger player who has more hunger and fire in his belly to do something.

That also said, Anderson and Cook are really on final legs, they will not be around forever and England really needs to plan for their replacements.
 
Was this media statement Vaughan’s own ingenious way of motivating Broad to bowl well in this match? Surely deep down Vaughan knew that Broad would have been retained anyway, and Vaughan knows Broad’s push-points very well having captained him in the past..... Hmmm.
 
Yea Vaughan, Talk Nah.

Vaughan was a good captain, and man management is a big part of being one, it had the desired effect didn't it?

Actually his reasons for dropping one of them was to wake the current players out of any complacency that might have crept in.
 
Yea Vaughan, Talk Nah.

Vaughan was a good captain, and man management is a big part of being one, it had the desired effect didn't it?

Actually his reasons for dropping one of them was to snap the current players out of any complacency that might have crept in.
 
Stuart Broad has hit back at Michael Vaughan after the former England captain said he should be dropped from the side for the second Test. Broad returned to form with 3-38 as Pakistan were bowled out for 174, and afterwards admitted that he had called Vaughan to express his anger at views expressed in his Daily Telegraph newspaper column and BBC radio show this week.

Vaughan wrote that Broad, a veteran of 117 Tests, should be dropped to “ruffle” the England dressing room, which he feels has become too cosy in recent months. But Broad firmly defended his own recent form, retorted that Vaughan had “little insight” into what happens in the dressing room, and suggested that he was being deliberately controversial in an attempt to stir attention.

“It’s a complete shot in the dark, because he doesn’t know what the changing room’s like,” Broad said. “I don’t think he’s got much insight into the changing room at all. The players don’t talk to him about cricket, or what’s going on in the changing room. But it’s personal columns, it’s radio shows that need likes and airtime.

“I like punditry. I like hearing different people’s opinions, I respect people’s opinions when it’s fair. I didn’t feel last week it was particularly fair. Only two Tests ago, I got eight wickets in Christchurch. I’ve been beating the bat, I’ve been getting wickets for Nottinghamshire. But that’s the world we live in. You get used to both positive and negative opinions, but this time it did anger me a little bit, because I thought it was a bit unfair and a bit targeted.

“I called him. I’m friends with Vaughany, he was a fantastic captain to me, I like sharing a glass of wine with him. I called him and expressed my disappointment. He had his opinions on the headlines, et cetera. I’m very open to criticism. I’m not going to hold a grudge if I feel like I deserve it, but I don’t really feel like I deserved that. I thought I’d express that opinion to him, because there’s no point in it spinning around my mind and annoying me.”

Broad felt that England needed a performance after their supine display at Lord’s, and said that the disappointment over their First Test defeat had spurred them into improvement. “At this level you’ve always got a point to prove,” he said. “As a team, we didn’t do ourselves justice at Lord’s. We left angry, because it’s always frustrating when you do a lot of talking and training and then collectively put in a performance like that.

“But we’ve trained very specifically and well here at Headingley. We talked a lot about specific lengths at Lord’s, and almost got too focused on the exact lengths we were hitting, the percentage of this, the percentage of that. We’re here because we’ve got a good feel for the game. Let’s play with our instincts, and make the batsman play as often as we can. It doesn’t matter whether they’re playing and missing from back or a length or full of a length.”

Broad confirmed that England would also have batted had they won the toss, and that they were surprised by the amount of movement on offer, especially off the pitch. He also suggested that his fuller length was partly a function of bowling down the hill at Headingley, a local peculiarity that seemed to unsettled debutant Sam Curran in his first Test innings. “You can see he’s not bowled here much,” Broad said. “I let the hill take me down, and appreciate it’s going to push me fuller.”

https://www.independent.co.uk/sport...tan-second-test-day-one-cricket-a8379711.html
 
I have always considered Vaughan to be a total fraud of a pundit. Never take this guy seriously.
 
For those critical of Michael Vaughan over this don't have a clue what they're talking about to be frank because I'm sure they don't know he was the best England captain after Nasser Hussain (in the 2000s thus far) because of his ability to be innovative and think outside the box as captain on and off the field with his team plans. If you're a tactical genius like he and Nasser were, then more often than not you'll get it right and you will make a few bad calls on the way, this was one of them. I agree with him that England shouldn't have dropped Wood because he needs games under his belt and therefore build up his confidence because he may come handy when the ball isn't swinging or seaming on slower wickets. Sam Curran's bowling looks dead.

If we had a captain like these two rather than Misbah we wouldn't have seen 4 bowlers being deployed like in England and Australia with Yasir being bowled to the ground and with all his other tactical mishaps which were so eye-opening that Channel 9 were ridiculing him.
 
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/lp98Ouubh_o" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>.
 
Broad is pumping his chest but he performs once in a blue moon and has been far from consistent recently, he should send Vaughan a thank you card for lighting a fire under his back side. Ignorant idiot disrespecting a legend as of he is the second coming of Sir Richard Hadlee.
 
Looks like this spat aint over....

Michael Vaughan

Ex-England captain on BBC Test Match Special

I got the sense last night that you can't criticise Stuart Broad because he's been in the team a long time. He got a six-for at Christchurch - but England didn't win. I remember when Darren Gough and Andy Caddick were around, people asked how you replaced them... you do. Same with Flintoff, then Hoggy and Harmy. You just do.


I keep hearing from people in the England camp that this is a team in transition when you have three of England's greatest in the team - Cook, Anderson and Broad - and then you add Joe Root, Ben Stokes and Jonny Bairstow. They are fantastic players.

The transition comes when Cook, Anderson and Broad leave the team, not now. If they get criticism, deal with it - like they did yesterday. It's the nature of international sport.

https://www.bbc.com/sport/live/cricket/43870805
 
Last edited:
Looks like this spat aint over....

Michael Vaughan

Ex-England captain on BBC Test Match Special

I got the sense last night that you can't criticise Stuart Broad because he's been in the team a long time. He got a six-for at Christchurch - but England didn't win. I remember when Darren Gough and Andy Caddick were around, people asked how you replaced them... you do. Same with Flintoff, then Hoggy and Harmy. You just do.

https://www.bbc.com/sport/live/cricket/43870805

Great response from a legendary test captain. Stuart Broad reeks of arrogance.
 
Last edited:
Broad is pumping his chest but he performs once in a blue moon and has been far from consistent recently, he should send Vaughan a thank you card for lighting a fire under his back side. Ignorant idiot disrespecting a legend as of he is the second coming of Sir Richard Hadlee.

Spot on it's funny how he acts when he's just a 29 average test bowler.
 
Vaughan's second rebuttal was also impressive, saying that it was only the first day of the Test match and it hadn't been won yet.
 
I feel England should cut short 2-3 test matches per year because it takes a huge load on fast bowlers to play that amount of test cricket every year and as a result, it become really hard for them to maintain consistency.

I recall Broad started off the Ashes last year very well but lost motivation from the 4th inning of the series and eventually got broke down and gave up for the rest part of the series, ending up with a 45+ bowling average.

These 5 matches test cricket are horrendous and teams should play 4 tests only at maximum.
 
Vaughan's second rebuttal was also impressive, saying that it was only the first day of the Test match and it hadn't been won yet.

Vaughan is developing into an impressive elder statesman of the game. He's no Athers or Nass, at least not yet, but his rebuttal was pretty funny.
 
Stuart Broad interview: England seamer explains how punditry has given him a greater insight

Stuart Broad made Ricky Ponting one of his victims during his scintillating, five-wicket spell at The Oval in 2009 as England beat Australia to regain the Ashes.

The Englishman and the Aussie were reunited at the south London ground on Wednesday as part of Sky Cricket's commentary team for the first one-day international of the five-match series.

It was Broad who was happier come the conclusion, with England earning a slender three-wicket victory over their rivals, thanks to three-wicket hauls for Moeen Ali and Liam Plunkett and half-centuries for skipper Eoin Morgan and Test counterpart Joe Root.

Broad's absence from international white-ball cricket - the 31-year-old last figured for his country in a limited-over clash over two years ago in Cape Town - gave him the opportunity to sample life as a pundit, something he says he wishes he had experienced sooner.

"It has been fascinating coming in and being on the same team as Ricky, Kumar Sangakkara, Isa Guha - and Nasser Hussain, to a certain extent!" Broad told Sky Sports during England's run chase.

"I wish I'd done more younger as you understand how it all works and that if you are getting criticised, a lot of the time it is not personal, it is just an angle to talk about your technique.

"If I'd have known how it all operated before then I would have been a lot more relaxed over the last couple of years. The media are just looking for something to talk about to give interest to the viewers.

"It was slightly nerve-racking before I went on air. Different nerves to playing, as I was stepping into the unknown somewhat. Credit where credit is due to the pundits because there is a lot going on.

"You do watch the game in a different way. You are watching every ball to see if there is something interesting you can note about the field or the seam position of the bowler.

"In the changing room you are only watching your own team and what they are doing - are Joe Root's movements shaping up as usual? Is Eoin Morgan playing his usual positive brand of cricket?

"As a commentator, I watched it as an England fan but perhaps slightly more neutrally, as you don't want to come across as just a cheerleader for England."

Broad's England place was questioned by Michael Vaughan ahead of the second Test against Pakistan at Headingley earlier this month - which the hosts won by an innings to earn a series draw - with the former captain saying the senior seamer could be left out to "ruffle" the dressing room.

Broad responded, as he has been doing since a tough Ashes series in which he picked up 11 wickets at an average of almost 48, with six scalps in Leeds as England recovered from their hammering at Lord's a week earlier.

"I was slightly surprised [at the comments] and I didn't feel they were massively justified," added the Nottinghamshire man, who now has 417 Test wickets to his name. "But I have spoken to Michael and we are fine now.

"I like punditry - I understand that when players aren't performing or are under pressure that you get the full force, while I know everyone has got a job to do in the media.

"But I felt like I had bowled pretty well at Lord's and had come off an okay tour personally in New Zealand. I then ended up bowling nicely at Headingley to help us win.

"I felt in good rhythm and like I was making chances. Since February I have got something like 32 wickets at 16 in Test matches and Division One County Championship cricket, so that is a really good turnaround.

"I don't think you can let comments affect you too much as then you are not doing your job properly. Plus, in an England changing room, someone is being talked about positively or negatively at every stage.

"Part and parcel of being an international sportsman is dealing with fair or unfair criticism and also when you are on the back pages when you are performing.

"You tend to go through the same journey as a player - built up before you make your debut, with people analysing your strengths and best performance, and then, when you have a bad game, which every player goes through, analysis of weaknesses and what's the matter technically.

"You have to be able to pull through both of those. You have to deal with your emotions and not spike too much on the graph - not get too elated with the highs or too down with the lows."

Broad used his break after the Ashes to "go back to basics" with his bowling, putting out pictures on social media of his tweaked action and wrist position.

The benefits have been clear - Broad claimed 11 wickets in two Tests at under 19 in New Zealand and then 14 in three games for Notts in the top flight before resuming England duty.

"It wasn't like I stopped trying to improve in Australia, I just couldn't find a way to improve as I was always trying to get ready for a game.

"When you are performing at the top level you don't get many chances to go back to basics as you are in elite performance mode. It's hard to break your technique or action down when it always needs to be at a match intensity.

"It was a great opportunity in February to do that. I feel a lot stronger for it and I have been threatening both edges of the bat since. Hopefully that can extend my England career."

Broad's next challenge will be India, with Virat Kohli bringing his charges to these shores for a five-Test series, starting at Edgbaston on August 1, live on Sky Sports Cricket.

India and their skipper will be looking for a vast improvement on their 2014 tour - the visitors were beaten 3-1, with Kohli managing just 134 runs in five games at an average of 13.40. Broad expects a stiff test.

"For hunger for runs, he is an incredible player," Broad said of Kohli, who has struck 21 tons his 56 Tests, including six double centuries. "He plays all around the wicket, doesn't have too many weaknesses and is a very competitive character.

"It is very exciting for the England team and supporters that he will be over here for a long Test series. It is up to us as a bowling attack on different types of pitches to be better than him, which around the world, not many teams can say they have been.

"In terms of bowling, Bhuvnehswar Kumar is probably their danger man. His skills with the Dukes ball were fantastic in 2014. On paper, India are a good-looking team so it should be a fascinating series."

Broad will be back in his Test whites soon enough but says he does not hanker to put on his coloured kit again with England rising to No 1 in the world.

"It was a weird feeling walking out onto The Oval in my jacket and smart shoes and seeing the lads smiling and warming up. But it wasn't a case of me thinking 'I should be out there' or there being any negativity," he added.

"I look at all the players and think this is the best England team we have got fit. If it was a Test match and I was fully fit, I'd be a bit more disappointed but when you know the white-ball players are doing such a great job, you can't have any complaints."

http://www.skysports.com/cricket/ne...-how-punditry-has-given-him-a-greater-insight
 
Like Jonny Bairstow, I used to think the media was out to get me - Broad Article

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/c...-Like-Jonny-Bairstow-used-think-media-me.html

Like Jonny Bairstow, I used to think the media was out to get me

Playing in a World Cup undoubtedly attracts an increased level of scrutiny
I have been in Bairstow's position and it's not advisable to get into a public spat
The comments don't represent the team, the public want them to succeed
I am confident what he said is not the collective view, just what is in his head


Playing at a World Cup undoubtedly attracts an increased level of scrutiny that feels different to participating in regular bilateral series.

It is not only your physical ability to deliver skills like hitting the top of off-stump or striking the ball through the covers that is tested.

There is a mental challenge presented by such global events, across all major sports, and that is why I think team psychologist David Young will have been the most important person in the England changing room since Tuesday evening.

This is the kind of time the man I fondly call 'head doc' is earning his money, reminding players of their strengths and reinforcing the style of play that took this team to the top of the rankings heading into the tournament.

He will have been telling individuals to stick to their guns: for Jonny Bairstow, what makes him the player he is; for Jos Buttler to keep taking on his shots; for Eoin Morgan to keep targeting sixes even though he's getting out caught on the boundary.

A lot of the conversations that will have taken place ahead of Sunday's game against India will have been player-led because when you reach the top level you are always striving to be better in any way you can but I am sure there will have been times when he will have grabbed players to have a word to focus on what is important.

Of course, there has been a lot of external noise, revved up by Jonny Bairstow's 'waiting for us to fail' comments, and I have to confess I feel slightly responsible — because I was meant to be making the appearance for Yorkshire Tea on Wednesday, only for Nottinghamshire to call a training session which meant I had to pull out.

As a player not involved in this tournament, anything I would have said would have attracted less attention but as one of the leading players Jonny's words naturally made headline news and created unwanted distraction around the team.

Don't get me wrong, I have been in this position before and this is very much a 'do as I say, not as I do' response to the incident — because myself and Michael Vaughan had a ding-dong during the 2018 summer — but it's not advisable to be drawn into a public exchange like that.

The comments don't represent this England team. The public want them to succeed. At my testimonial launch on Friday, every single person was desperate for them to beat India.

I am confident what he said is not the collective view, just what is in his own head. He is someone who is very good at getting into a mental place where he feels like the world is against him. He then rises to the top. Hopefully his words trigger the best in him.

My view on how to react to criticism has undoubtedly changed, helped by experiences like Tuesday when I was part of the Sky Sports commentary team for the defeat to Australia, and spent a long time in the press box.

I wish as a 21-year-old I'd had a chance to experience such environments as it would have given me a different perspective. I probably spent five years being ultra-defensive towards the media, thinking they were out to get me all the time, and I think Jonny is maybe in that place now.

Last year, after Vaughan said I should have been dropped for the Headingley Test against Pakistan, I spent an hour and a half on the phone to him during the drive north. I called to say 'I'm not sure about that'. He has a very good cricket brain, which shouldn't be lost to the game, and his job is to offer opinions. But I felt it was good to challenge him one to one.

This week's exchange has just increased the noise around the game but this is an experienced team led by an experienced captain in Morgan and they'll know how to cope with all that.

The noise during the game has to be the focus now. I played in the Champions Trophy final against India in 2013 and it felt like an away fixture. We got booed when we came onto the field. Will it happen today? Absolutely. Is that going to bring the best out of the right characters? Absolutely. Will characters that are a bit shy stumble and hide? Potentially. Thankfully, England haven't got many and that's why we are a good team.

This is a special day to be an England cricketer — it's knockout cricket now and England still stand a brilliant chance of making the semi-finals.

They will hope for blue skies and a belter of a surface. They also need a bit more from Adil Rashid. I expected him to be the team's leading wicket-taker but he's not had that potency.

Edgbaston is a favourite ground of his, though, and it would be an ideal time for him to produce the kind of magic delivery he dismissed Virat Kohli with at Headingley last year.

Kohli has been his consistent self so far but — although India are unbeaten — they aren't smashing this World Cup to bits and, after not batting particularly well versus West Indies or Afghanistan, England's bowlers will be fancying it.
 
I got to say that English cricketers do feel that they don't get enough support when they play Asian teams.
 
I got to say that English cricketers do feel that they don't get enough support when they play Asian teams.

Reason is england had never been a good limited overs side ever until the emergence of this Roy butler root era. English fans only cared about ashes and test matches. The reason being england has always been very good at test matches than Odis. But now times have changed they are one of the best odi teams and jonny is rightly disappointed in not getting enough support from his people as the stadium will be filled with Indians tomrrow instead of Englishmen
 
I got to say that English cricketers do feel that they don't get enough support when they play Asian teams.

Indians and Pakistanis are in huge number in UK and the crowd support at grounds when these 2 teams play is huge. English public is crazy about football and ashes but Asians dispora is even more crazy about cricket so they feel they don't get enough crowd support when playing these teams.

Maybe someone living in UK would answer better but that's how I feel watching from outside.
 
Indians and Pakistanis are in huge number in UK and the crowd support at grounds when these 2 teams play is huge. English public is crazy about football and ashes but Asians dispora is even more crazy about cricket so they feel they don't get enough crowd support when playing these teams.

Maybe someone living in UK would answer better but that's how I feel watching from outside.
The "Barmy Army" are only interested in test matches.
 
Reason is england had never been a good limited overs side ever until the emergence of this Roy butler root era. English fans only cared about ashes and test matches. The reason being england has always been very good at test matches than Odis. But now times have changed they are one of the best odi teams and jonny is rightly disappointed in not getting enough support from his people as the stadium will be filled with Indians tomrrow instead of Englishmen

Semi finalist, finalist, semi finalist, finalist, finalist in the first five world cups. Must have had decent ODI players once.
 
I got to say that English cricketers do feel that they don't get enough support when they play Asian teams.

Asian teams are not a big draw for England fans. Australia, SA and until recently WI are the big tickets. Maybe not even SA any more, just the Aussies.
 
Back
Top