Ab Fan
Senior Test Player
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2015
- Runs
- 28,147
And few others like Ambrose, Steyn, Imran are about equivalent but Wasim's WC exploit takes it over them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And few others like Ambrose, Steyn, Imran are about equivalent but Wasim's WC exploit takes it over them.
"Talent". This makes his strike rate of 53 better than Steyn's strike rate of 40. Magical thinking.
What's with the recent comparison between Steyn and Akram?
Steyn got owned by Babar in SA even though he only just found his feet in Test cricket.
Even Steyn would be mad with some of you guys at this comparison.
This is possibly the greatest response in history. I mean just denied.
Don't worry about the bowling average 3 lower, or the better strike rate, or the more rounded record. Just nope
How is he better than Donald, McGrath, Marshall, Steyn, Curtly, Hadlee, Garner, Trueman, Imran
But were judging it on test cricket
Hahaha...I am the OP of the thread, I decide what's the criteria, lol.
Anyways, only tests is not the criteria over here. Robert doesn't consider ODI games as international games. So, for him, he is judging on tests only.
I would say in ODIs, he is on par with McGrath as the greatest Odi fast bowler of all-time. In tests purely, the order will be Marshall, McGrath, Ambrose, Hadlee, Imran, Steyn, Wasim and Donald .
But overall as fast bowler, only Marshall and McGrath can be considered superior to him.
he isn't.
he is better than curtly, trueman though.
the thing is he was excellent in odi too. Do we disregard that?
in tests he is out of top5. just sneaks into top 10.
in odi he is top 3.
So how do we quantify his greatness? as an overall bowler he is probably top 5.
purely as a test bowler he is top 10.
I concur with this. overall yes.
test cricket is real cricket though. so that should be a bigger factor when assessing quality.
However in wasim's case he was a great in tests too. So yes overall he would be top 3.
Hahaha...I am the OP of the thread, I decide what's the criteria, lol.
Anyways, only tests is not the criteria over here. Robert doesn't consider ODI games as international games. So, for him, he is judging on tests only.
I would say in ODIs, he is on par with McGrath as the greatest Odi fast bowler of all-time. In tests purely, the order will be Marshall, McGrath, Ambrose, Hadlee, Imran, Steyn, Wasim and Donald .
But overall as fast bowler, only Marshall and McGrath can be considered superior to him.
Nope.
Def behind McGrath, Garner and likely behind Hadlee overall. Also can't be considered above Trueman, as he didn't play ODI cricket
I don't care if they have a problem with me - Wasim is overrated on this board. The arguments are based on something akin to mythology, or refer to something unquantifiable called "talent" which is why they are proof against reason. There are plenty of better bowlers - Imran, Marshall, Garner, Hadlee, Amrose, Steyn, McGrath. Just look at the numbers. Not much better. But better.
The only time I recall saying that Tendulkar was overrated was when someone said he was the best ever, which would mean he was better than Bradman. I don't think he was better than some contemporaries such as Miandad, Lara, Ponting and Kallis.
Garner has a better test average and strike rate than Wasim.
And if you go by ODIs he is rated the highest of all time by the ICC, averaging 18. I’ll see your Wasim 3fer in a WC final and raise with Garner’s 5fer.
Good point. But Garner comes behind Wasim in tests for me as he had 250 wickets compared to Wasim's 400 and among the Windies in tests, behind Marshall and Ambrose and roughly at same level to Holding and Roberts.
Garner was an ODI legend, but Wasim is greatest ever in ODI, McGrath 2nd. So, Garner is no.3 in ODI and ahead of the rest. Btw, with ODIs, it's not just about stats but the impact they leave behind. I don't consider both formats equal. Tests remain more preferred but equally does World Cup particularly when rating players of sub continent. Garner obviously right up there taking both formats.
So how exactly did Wasim Akram end up in Wisden's All Time XI not Imran, Garner, Hadlee, Ambrose, Steyn, McGrath? Also, why exactly did Sachin Tendulkar end up in Wisden's All Time XI not Miandad, Lara, Ponting and Kallis?
Ok, in what ways is akram better than Steyn in tests
Where should we start?
Quality of batsmen
Competition among peers
DRS/Neutral umpires
Frequency of test matches played annually
Not everything can be boiled down to numbers and stats.
De Villiers and Kohli are very similar stats-wise (not in T20Is) but we all know who is the better player and match-winner.
Where should we start?
Quality of batsmen
Competition among peers
DRS/Neutral umpires
Frequency of test matches played annually
Not everything can be boiled down to numbers and stats.
De Villiers and Kohli are very similar stats-wise (not in T20Is) but we all know who is the better player and match-winner.
Where should we start?
Quality of batsmen
Competition among peers
DRS/Neutral umpires
Frequency of test matches played annually
Not everything can be boiled down to numbers and stats.
De Villiers and Kohli are very similar stats-wise (not in T20Is) but we all know who is the better player and match-winner.
what about the batter friendly vs bowler friendly pitches?
Competition among peers is just a stupid argument. One of Steyn's biggest factors was how much he distanced himself from his peers. Historically only Trueman and McGrath did so to the degree he did.
Kohli is statistically ahead of ABdV, by a large margin
DRS/Neutral umpires works both ways
Steyn bowled to a no. of high quality batsmen. His peak (08-2014) was an incredibly high scoring period, significantly more so than during Akram's career. Bowled to Tendulkar, Sanga, peak Clarke, Ponting, Dravid etc. Only 3 ATG batsmen during 90's (Sachin, Lara, Waugh)
What is the relevance of frequency of test matches. Steyn had significantly higher frequency.
You calling it stupid without providing anything to back yourself shows your maturity.
How the hell does DRS/Neutral umpires work both ways?
And Wasim didn't bowl to great batsmen, wow.
Do you even watch cricket lol.
Viv. Tendulkar. Lara. Martin Crowe. Gooch. Waugh brothers. To name a few
Amongst the best ever as an ODI bowler but not in tests but a very good test bowler who underachieved
I can guarantee that if he had a good fielding side at his disposal, his test average would be similar if not better than Mcgrath.
People forget how good a fielding side Australia was during the peak of Warne and Mcgrath while what utter garbage our fielding unit was. I am not even factoring in the leg before wicket appeals that were denied because the batsmen played on the front foot.
very true. this applies to india as well actually.
australians ruled at the time due to superior fitness. other teams just never intended on training for elite fitness levels.
I can guarantee that if he had a good fielding side at his disposal, his test average would be similar if not better than Mcgrath.
People forget how good a fielding side Australia was during the peak of Warne and Mcgrath while what utter garbage our fielding unit was. I am not even factoring in the leg before wicket appeals that were denied because the batsmen played on the front foot.
The LBW rule change interpretation would have impacted all bowlers equally as more LBWs on offer would have meant bowlers attacking the stumps and the batsman would have adapted accordingly. He was a very good test bowler, but for me he didn't get enough top order batsmen and basically that's where tests are won and lost. No doubt our poor fielding was a factor but lots of time he bowled within himself at the start. Overall it was an amazing career but I just feel that he could achieved much more in tests.
First, I didn't count the leg before rule as a factor here, and secondly, unlike his counterparts who have a better average than him namely Ambrose and Mcgrath, were both bowlers who relied on line and length to get the batsmen to make errors instead of attacking the stumps like Wasim had to.
My point is, there's a role of our garbage fielding in Akram underachieving in terms of test statistics.
Hes up there One of the 10 best ever
For me Marshall is the greatest, mcgrath and hadlee follow him
Put the rest in any order after them
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Wasim Akram "if there was DRS in my time, I would have taken 1000 Test wickets and if there had not been so many dropped catches off my bowling, then I would have taken 1500 Test wickets" �� <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Cricket?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Cricket</a></p>— Saj Sadiq (@Saj_PakPassion) <a href="https://twitter.com/Saj_PakPassion/status/1337845257606746113?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 12, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>