Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We have to see him how he does well on slightly bouncier, faster wickets.He is a Johnson Charles type batter. He will always be a limited slogger but occasionally will knock good bowlers off their lengths.
He was absolutely a clown in aus tour last year.marj waugh was laughing at his technique. Pacers were bouncing him out at their will.ecen in sharjah tri series, he was getting bowled by zero footwork. Sohail also commented that he got out in his usual style with out any footwork. Dubai sluggish wickets helped him with out any movement. But definitely he will be facing music outside of it.We have to see him how he does well on slightly bouncier, faster wickets.
Had Bumrah been his usual self in this Asia cup, he may not gone far in this Asia cupHe was absolutely a clown in aus tour last year.marj waugh was laughing at his technique. Pacers were bouncing him out at their will.ecen in sharjah tri series, he was getting bowled by zero footwork. Sohail also commented that he got out in his usual style with out any footwork. Dubai sluggish wickets helped him with out any movement. But definitely he will be facing music outside of it.
It was quite strange from bumrah.almost physically present mind absent kind of stuff.he should have simply ignored trolls and took rest.Had Bumrah been his usual self in this Asia cup, he may not gone far in this Asia cup
Learn to appreciate it when the opposition player does well. Indian fans don't have to behave like their team and players are all invincibleHad Bumrah been his usual self in this Asia cup, he may not gone far in this Asia cup
Learn to acknowledge that Bumrah was way below his best in this tourney.Learn to appreciate it when the opposition player does well. Indian fans don't have to behave like their team and players are all invincible
Apply some of your advice to yourself.Learn to acknowledge that Bumrah was way below his best in this tourney.
There was a clear difference in the level Shaheen bowled in the first 2 games to Abhishek and then the 3rdLearn to acknowledge that Bumrah was way below his best in this tourney.
Because Abhishek have made far better bowlers than Shaheen sweat.There was a clear difference in the level Shaheen bowled in the first 2 games to Abhishek and then the 3rd
Don’t see you pointing that out?
Which “far better” bowler??Because Abhishek have made far better bowlers than Shaheen sweat.
Pakistan cricket goes through weird phases where they either prepare green mambas or then have ultra flat wickets, either domestic is challenging, or there are so many teams and it's spread so thin that matches are probably second XI standard.I don’t have a definitive opinion since yesterday was my first time observing Farhan.
What I don’t like: his feet don’t move. And that stand and deliver style doesn’t go far.
I think he may be limited in his contribution to Pakistan cricket in the longer forms. FWIW he has a FC average of 45, but then Pakistan domestic cricket is quite mediocre apparently.
However he’s pulled off an innings to remember - he certainly got into my head as an opposition fan. That performance counts for a lot, more than technique. So for now he’s aces.
And Shaheen has gotten the better of far better batsmen than Abhishek as well.Because Abhishek have made far better bowlers than Shaheen sweat.
A very good t20 opener. Loses the plot after reaching 50. Needs to be drafted into odi and test to improve on that aspectBalls per six ratio of 13.25 for Pakistan
He is much more destructive than his current 125sr
He’s been a 140-150+ strike rate batter since his resurgence in the last 2 years
Bro watch this postA very good t20 opener. Loses the plot after reaching 50. Needs to be drafted into odi and test to improve on that aspect
For his 1st tournament he did extremely extremely well. Can become Fakhar's replacement but I don't think he's their atmBro watch this post
He will blast a 130+ score too for Pakistan.
I’ve seen this guy in domestics, he has an unreal 5th gear once he puts the foot down.
He’s a better opener than Fakhar. Not as clutch but batsmanship wise I think he’s betterFor his 1st tournament he did extremely extremely well. Can become Fakhar's replacement but I don't think he's their atm
He is better than Fakhar and has consistently proven this in domestic cricket last 5 yearsFor his 1st tournament he did extremely extremely well. Can become Fakhar's replacement but I don't think he's their atm
What he said is wrong but good to see you acknowledge Sahibzada Farhan after making such posts on himApply some of your advice to yourself.
Just another TTF
YesAnother cry to bring back another average bloke. They are all apples.
Yes, like SharafuGreat opener. His biggest strength is that he plays for the team
LegendNational T20 last two seasons were played by close to 30 teams I think.
Other that that crap tournament Sahibzada is a complete failure.
Get over it
He was acknowledging Sahibzada (and Faheem) on the other thread.
Barsati maindaks.He was acknowledging Sahibzada (and Faheem) on the other thread.
The likes of jofra archer and Mark wood bashing on mumbai pattas is all on his credit till now.....he dropped in every Asia cup match otherwise he would have been out cheaply in every game...And Shaheen has gotten the better of far better batsmen than Abhishek as well.
Abhishek is a nobody compared to Shaheen. Come back when he wins an ICC player of the year award.
Those are very impressive returns against one of the best fast-bowlers in the world
CertifiedSahibzada Farhan is currently the only batsman to have scored 50+ runs against Jasprit Bumrah in T20Is without being dismissed.
Sahibzada Farhan vs Jasprit Bumrah
- Balls Faced: 34
- Runs Scored: 51
- Strike Rate: 150.00
- Dismissals: 0
- Boundaries: 6 fours, 3 sixes
Barsati maindaks.
Take their praise with a pinch of salt. They will be back to their snakey ways after one or two failures.
You people have been completely exposed recently..now you don't have to do all of this to feel better.What he said is wrong but good to see you acknowledge Sahibzada Farhan after making such posts on him![]()
You exposed yourself when you compared Farhan to SharafuYou people have been completely exposed recently..now you don't have to do all of this to feel better.
In fact propagandists like you is the reason we failed to win Asia cup. Our batting was non-existent
Yes and Rizwan is world class according to youI still think Sahibzada is average at best.
Rubbish post #87705Yes and Rizwan is world class according to you![]()
His returns are the same as Rizwan. Also if Rizwan was batting and score was 113-1 after 12 overs , Pak would have hit a minimum 160-175Yes and Rizwan is world class according to you![]()
They did the same to Imad when he delivered in last year the PSL final merely to save face but then went back to their snakey ways after the USA game.
The likes of Major, daytrader and khyberlian (ex-PakEngFan) were all saying "Imad deserves a recall" after the final but I guess a leopard never changes its spots.
Lol. I hope you see the irony in this. The fact that this is coming from you ........Yea I supported Imad after his stand out performances in the PSL. However he was massive let down in the World Cup.
If you weren't fixated on individuals you would see that mosy of us support performers without a personal prejudice. Imad is a cricketer I like but his attitude didn't live up to his performances so he's rightly criticized.
Maybe you should show some maturity as well and not be fixated on always looking for scapegoats. According to you we lost the ACC final because Misbah played in Mohali in 2011![]()
Seems to me he has a different technique for Lois. He is from what i hear the best red ball player in Pak domestics. No way he is surviving with that technique even in first class. He has a great base and balance when striking but you can see he swooshes and misses a lot.One thing i noticed, i believe Farhan has suffered from wrist problems in the past, the bat slips out of his hand easily when he goes for the big shots. He had a problem against the short ball in Australia.
He wasn't good on Australian tracks last time he played. Maybe he has improvedWe have to see him how he does well on slightly bouncier, faster wickets.
Unn ke bas ki baat nhi hai chothe bhai. They're blinded by hate.
As for the irony, name one performer from PCT that I don't support. I know there's only one that I majorly dislike but let's see if you know me well enough
Listen to Jarrod Kimber & Uthappa analysis on how Pakistan "looked" aggressive but they were not really aggressive. At the end of the tournament pakistan's average was 16 with attacking shots. Second worst among all teams. They hit the air more time than they hit fours and sixes. Their run rate never went above 9 even during their partnership. Jarrod kimber says 50 in 37 balls is not ground breaking. Because mostly due to amount of dot ballsHis returns are the same as Rizwan. Also if Rizwan was batting and score was 113-1 after 12 overs , Pak would have hit a minimum 160-175, it’s the 200 + fantasy that resulted in 146
Farhan is good in his own way. Like him
but you are comparing apples to oranges here
Listen to Jarrod Kimber & Uthappa analysis on how Pakistan "looked" aggressive but they were not really aggressive. At the end of the tournament pakistan's average was 16 with attacking shots. Second worst among all teams. They hit the air more time than they hit fours and sixes. Their run rate never went above 9 even during their partnership. Jarrod kimber says 50 in 37 balls is not ground breaking. Because mostly due to amount of dot balls
I didn't judge these guys based on their outings against India, although this Indian unit is less experienced than the Pakistan unit. I just go by their performance against other teams in this tournament. They had an issue with rotating strike against every team.Pakistani players have trouble finding gaps. A lot of shots went straight to the fielders. How much of this is credit to the Indian captain for his field placings vs the limitations of the Pakistani batsmen
Bumrah has to take tip from Dube against whom Farhans strike rate is 68.Bumrah has faced Farhan so many times but still couldn’t work him out, unlike another batter
![]()
Not when he’s facing Bumrah.The reality is this guy is a limited player
What do you want me to say? It seems like we have set our standards so low that we hype up inconsequential half-centuries as some great knocks.If it was Bangladesh in the final—you’d dismiss it. If it was Bumrah/Kuldeep once—you’d call it a fluke. But back-to-back? Not a word from @Mamoon
Don’t hide behind Asia Cup strike rates. Babar and Rizwan may match that on paper, but when was the last time they dominated our arch-rivals? You’d have to dig back years. And neither has ever taken on Bumrah or Kuldeep with authority.
It’s time you acknowledge this guy’s talent. Flawed, yes—but still a level of play we rarely see, specially temperament and mental strength. By our standards, that’s exactly the kind of player we should be investing in.
Bumrah, Haris Rauf, Shaheen, Harshit Rana all travelled when they bowled at full pace. But guys like Rana, that oman trundler, DUbe looked difficult. Condition became an equalizer here made average bowlers look better. Good bowlers look average.I thought he looked awful in that first over against Dube when he was swinging blindly with no footwork.
Although he got the measure of Bumrah, still concerned about him on pitches outside Asia with decent pace and bounce.
That said it was a good knock in a high pressure final, and some of his hitting against spin was enjoyable. The middle order completely wasted the platform he and Fakhar set.
Bumrah, Haris Rauf, Shaheen, Harshit Rana all travelled when they bowled at full pace. But guys like Rana, that oman trundler, DUbe looked difficult. Condition became an equalizer here made average bowlers look better. Good bowlers look average.
Nazir had quick hands if i remember. Farhan is more about power than timing. It is almost like he wants to hit every ball out of Dubai and in the process lost shape. One of the reason why he ended up with strike rate of 116. He struggled against every slow trundlers.I guess slowish pitch favors medium/fast more than fast/medium pace (especially with the cutters grip and "bite the surface" thing, pitch’s own pace becomes deceptive.)
Farhan reminds me of Imran Nazir (intent/bottom hand and pick up shots/limited footwork) but Nazir had a higher back lift and bigger swing arc while Farhan can be more compact and repeatable, thus less "spectacular".
Both seem equally good against spin, but Nazir was more of a back foot player and his longer swing arc meant more sixes but also more chances of edges with some seam/swing, whereas Farhan can play on the front foot and also operates cautiously confronted with pace (yet if he doesn’t lose wickets he should still at least rotate the strike).
I’m kinda biased because when I was more immature Nazir was my fav batsman but let’s see if Farhan can evolve better (he did make a better comeback in domestics than Nazir).
Clutching at straws much… Oman? SL? Really? This India-Pakistan final was probably the most high pressure game this decade given the context and you’re comparing it with random dead rubbers.What do you want me to say? It seems like we have set our standards so low that we hype up inconsequential half-centuries as some great knocks.
What stopped Farhan from converting these half-centuries into something meaningful?
Why did he throw his wicket away both times when he got himself in and had the measure of the bowlers?
Even an Oman batsman scored a half-century against Indian bowlers and Nissanka scored a ton. These bowlers aren’t sent from the heavens. They are not impossible to tame.
Having said that, I don’t mind him ahead of Fakhar who is garbage in this format and always has been or ahead of Saim for now because he can’t buy a run at the moment, although his ceiling is higher.
However, I will continue to have a problem if he is picked ahead of Babar. He never was and never will be better than him in any format of the game and they are the same age bracket too, so it is not a case of future investment either.
Some of Babar’s best knocks in all formats are bigger than Farhan’s entire career.Clutching at straws much… Oman? SL? Really? This India-Pakistan final was probably the most high pressure game this decade given the context and you’re comparing it with random dead rubbers.
‘But behind Babar’—translation: fine, he’s worth persisting with. Took you long enough.
Babar’s great bat, but he’s never handled a pressure innings like Farhan did in the final. You are right that Kuldeep and Bumrah aren’t angels—but somehow all our other batters make them look like they are.
Obviously. Farhan hasn’t had the volume of cricket to build a full body of work, nor has he been given consistent chances. We judge players based on aesthetics rather than substance, and Farhan has been an easy target for that.Some of Babar’s best knocks in all formats are bigger than Farhan’s entire career.
Speaking of straw clutching, the only straw clutching that I see these days is by Haris apologists who come up with all sorts of mental gymnastics to prove that he is not awful with both bat and gloves.
I think people are giving Farhan due credit. He has done well, but had the opportunity to do better but couldn’t.