daytrader
ODI Debutant
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2015
- Runs
- 11,282
- Post of the Week
- 1
Sorry bro, disagree here.
Babar took his time, and got himself settled in the pp and would start attacking later, only to slow down near his 50 agaun.
Farhan takes on bowlers in the pp. See if you get 50 runs in pp, have a collapse and score 24 to 30 runs from 7th till 10th over, that still helps keep the score card ticking.
If you score 30 in the pp, you cant get 50 from overs 7th till 10th, as field is spread and teams deploy their best bowler in the 7th and 9th over.
Babar was taking away the pp advantage, farhan is using the pp advantage.
In this case you cant look in to the strike rate, but you need to look at these things from a qualitative perspective.
What PP advantage bro. Our PP scores are similar to when RizBar were opening except now we lose a couple of wickets more.
This is our PP performance this WC:
61/2 Netherlands
56/2 USA
38/4 India
47/1 Namibia
46/2 England
I recall a thread from a few years ago about what's a better score in the PP - 66/1 or 40/0. We are not hitting 60 regularly in the PP, especially against quality sides. So the problem is still there.
Again, I have nothing against Farhan as I'm a fan and he's our only performing batter. But to say his impact is earth shattering and that we are getting an advantage in the PP is just a false narrative.






