RedwoodOriginal
Test Debutant
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2018
- Runs
- 16,708
- Post of the Week
- 4
So the guy who has his friends in media drum up a campaign for his return every few months, is talking about media campaigns to promote Haris? Ironic to say the least.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tbh, I'd rather have him then Shan Masood of all people in test.I am sick & tired of Ahmed Shehzad making the world of Pakistan Cricket media all about of himself.
He is definitely obsessed with the national team as he feels he got discarded with reason. Sure his test numbers are goodish, however he was appalling in the other formats. He clearly didn't understand the correct criticism on his game.
He had many weaknesses & I mean many weaknesses, but the worst of all was his attitude. It just stank.
Ahmed Shehzad is the reason, Ahmed Shehzad failed in International Cricket.
As for M.Haris, he clearly has areas to improve, but fortunately has plenty of time to do so. He just needs to be disciplined, attentive & positive.
Feels like, theirs a lot of noise about the kid in the last few weeks.
Did Rizwan play for Pak permanently since 2017? He was not ready, he grinded and then came back as a better player in 2020, a poor player like Haris wants to play 2 innings for 20 runs and get a lifetime free rideYou asked for a consistent player with a strike rate of 140+ and I gave you that.
Those 5 international games consist of 3 back in 2018 where he should’ve been given a longer rope and 2 this year where he came in at number 5 and 7, an opener coming in at number 5 and 7. And, you’re judging him based on that?
Now, I want you to ignore the above and address what’s written below.
Mohammad Rizwan played 25 games before T20i debut, here’s what he did in the 3 T20 domestic cups leading up to his selection.
2012/13 Cup - 4 innings, 23 average with a strike rate of 87.
2013/14 Cup - 6 innings 35 average, with a strike rate of 112.
2014/15 Cup - 3 innings, 24 average with a strike rate of 104.
Looking at those stats, did that warrant his selection into the T20 team?
Why does everyone else have to grind it out in domestic and be consistent when Rizwan himself wasn’t?
Bro the issue isn't merit and non merit. I'd agree with you for Haris IF PCB ACTUALLY HAD MERIT BASED SELECTIONS.Did Rizwan play for Pak permanently since 2017? He was not ready, he grinded and then came back as a better player in 2020, a poor player like Haris wants to play 2 innings for 20 runs and get a lifetime free ride
Did Rizwan play for Pak permanently since 2017? He was not ready, he grinded and then came back as a better player in 2020, a poor player like Haris wants to play 2 innings for 20 runs and get a lifetime free ride
FC , List A, domestic T20.He had 10 games from 2015 - 2016, failed to secure his spot.
He made a return to the squad in 2019.
Did he grind? I had a look at the stats between 2016 - 2019
PSL 2016 - 5 innings - 25 Average - 127 Strike Rate.
PSL 2017 - 7 innings - 26 Average - 121 Strike Rate.
T20 Cup 17/18 - 2 innings - 18 Average - 100 Strike Rate
PSL 2018 - 6 innings - 22 Average - 117 Strike Rate
PSL 2019 - 5 innings - 19 Average - 96 Strike Rate.
Where’s the grinding?
FC , List A, domestic T20.
Check his stats and compare them to Sahibazada
T20 career stats. And why would anyone want to replace Rizwan by Farhan who's clearly not superior to former?I gave you the domestic stats directly from the PCB site.
Lists A and FC is irrelevant, we’re talking T20.
T20 career stats. And why would anyone want to replace Rizwan by Farhan who's clearly not superior to former?
But Farhan's career strike rate is 129 at a much lower average than Rizwan. 20 teams played in the 2023 National T20 and the bowling standard was very poor.With the T20 career stats I’ve given you, does it look like he averaged 40+ with a high strike rate? I’ve given you the PSL stats + the domestic cup stats.
I mentioned farhan because you asked for someone who was consistent with a high strike rate
But Farhan's career strike rate is 129 at a much lower average than Rizwan. 20 teams played in the 2023 National T20 and the bowling standard was very poor.
Only the selectors can answer that not me.Ok but how does that justify Rizwan’s selection? Do you think from the stats I gave you off Rizwan that he deserved to be picked in the T20 team?
No Misbah did not get this one right lol.Only the selectors can answer that not me.
May be Rizwan did not deserve to be picked in 2015.
But Rizwan was doing very well batting in top order for KPK for couple of seasons before being picked in 2020. Not a fan of Misbah but he did get this one right
Where did you get this from?
Where did you get this from?
Also, situations matter. Babar and Rizwan are playing a lot more powerplay deliveries, more deliveries in general. Plus, these statistics don’t explain the quality of bowling faced by all 3 batsmen.
its allowed!Yes, this is only indicator. Not perfect. But that's why Babar, Rizwan struggle to score quick in PP.
They can't hit spin and can't hit good length pace bowling.
Don't know if sharing source allowed in this forum
its allowed!
23 and 29 Fc and List A avg on Pakistan soil is very poor.Mohammad Harris has been the biggest bust in Pakistan cricket.
Guy just doesnt know how to bat, he thinks he is De Villiers in his head and ends up throwing his wicket.
He needs a stint at SNGPL under the pupilage of Misbah to resurrect his careerMohammad Harris has been the biggest bust in Pakistan cricket.
Guy just doesnt know how to bat, he thinks he is De Villiers in his head and ends up throwing his wicket.
Exactly and people are crying for his inclusion like he is some Ab Devilliers or Adam Gilchrist...23 and 29 Fc and List A avg on Pakistan soil is very poor.
23 and 29 Fc and List A avg on Pakistan soil is very poor.
I wouldn't mind haris at no 7. However I've come to acce0t rizwam is a better batter.Rashid Latif played a 166 ODI games with a 19 average and 37 Test matches with a 29 average.
Kamran Akmal 157 ODI with a 26 average and 31 average in Tests along with amongst the worst wicketkeeper in the history of cricket.
Moin Khan 23 ODI average 28.5 AVG in Tests.
Pakistan's history with wicketkeepers is littered with mediocrity anyways.
Haris 30 List A average is fine considering he plays in the bottom order. It's worth mentioning his SR is an impressive 107 and amongst the best in Pakistan domestically. Considering Pakistan's batting lineup is littered with accumulators, there should be an opportunity to incorporate a higher SR like him in your bottom order even if it comes at the expense of a lower average.
Haris FC average is bad but he's only played 14 innings. If PCB had any brains or sense how to develop your players, the FC teams would play him more often considering he does have potential and the wicketkeepers in the domestics are all garbage outside of a couple of guys.
I want usman khan to come good. He's actually a top domestic performer amd I can see him replacing rizwan in whiteball. However he's failed miserably in international atm.Exactly and people are crying for his inclusion like he is some Ab Devilliers or Adam Gilchrist...
Haris is far for the squad atm. His performances are not worth it so No need to cry for him
How many FC games has played your " top domestic performer " ?I want usman khan to come good. He's actually a top domestic performer amd I can see him replacing rizwan in whiteball. However he's failed miserably in international atm.
Yep. I don't think Usman is gonna get any games here but it is not like I have high hopes for him in international games but Usman has some good performances in domestics so him ahead of haris makes sense in ODIsI want usman khan to come good. He's actually a top domestic performer amd I can see him replacing rizwan in whiteball. However he's failed miserably in international atm.
The reason people have an issue is due to his technique but crickets best test batter Steve smith has the weirdest technique I've ever seen to man.Yep. I don't think Usman is gonna get any games here but it is not like I have high hopes for him in international games but Usman has some good performances in domestics so him ahead of haris makes sense in ODIs
I'm talking about psl and champions one day cup.How many FC games has played your " top domestic performer " ?
He cant buy a run in domestics as of nowRashid Latif played a 166 ODI games with a 19 average and 37 Test matches with a 29 average.
Kamran Akmal 157 ODI with a 26 average and 31 average in Tests along with amongst the worst wicketkeeper in the history of cricket.
Moin Khan 23 ODI average 28.5 AVG in Tests.
Pakistan's history with wicketkeepers is littered with mediocrity anyways.
Haris 30 List A average is fine considering he plays in the bottom order. It's worth mentioning his SR is an impressive 107 and amongst the best in Pakistan domestically. Considering Pakistan's batting lineup is littered with accumulators, there should be an opportunity to incorporate a higher SR like him in your bottom order even if it comes at the expense of a lower average.
Haris FC average is bad but he's only played 14 innings. If PCB had any brains or sense how to develop your players, the FC teams would play him more often considering he does have potential and the wicketkeepers in the domestics are all garbage outside of a couple of guys.
Rizwan is a better Test player for ODI and T20 in comparison to Harris. A lot of these guys won’t look statistically as impressive as Rizwan if they didn’t bat for the team first just like Rizwan does, who’s first goal is to secure himself before the team.I wouldn't mind haris at no 7. However I've come to acce0t rizwam is a better batter.
But rizwan should bat at 6 or 7. It's so annoying to see him open and bat at 4 in odi. Such an irritating player.
If that's a myth to you , you must not be a true crickets , just a " keyboard cricketer" unlike people like me who have played cricket at good level and understand what it takes to be a solid player.I'm talking about psl and champions one day cup.
Theirs a misconception that you need to be a good fc player to be a good odi and t20 players.
It's a false myth and has been proven to be false many times.
Why wasn’t Alistair Cook good enough to represent England during their white ball resurgence? Let’s hear it, you’ve played at a good level so explain this.If that's a myth to you , you must not be a true crickets , just a " keyboard cricketer" unlike people like me who have played cricket at good level and understand what it takes to be a solid player.
YK was a fantastic test cricketer in both FC and international test yet he's bang avg in odi as well as List A.If that's a myth to you , you must not be a true crickets , just a " keyboard cricketer" unlike people like me who have played cricket at good level and understand what it takes to be a solid player.
unlike people like me who have played cricket at good level and understand what it takes to be a solid player.If that's a myth to you , you must not be a true crickets , just a " keyboard cricketer" unlike people like me who have played cricket at good level and understand what it takes to be a solid player.