What's new

Virat Kohli, Yuvraj Singh's dropped catches were the turning point, admits Azhar Ali

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
Appointed as Misbah-ul-Haq's replacement as captain in the aftermath of the 2015 World Cup disaster, Azhar Ali's captaincy failed to inspire the Pakistan team to any greatness. With the former World Cup winners plunging to a lowly eighth position in the ODI rankings, the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) had no option but to replace Azhar with Sarfraz Ahmed for the tour of West Indies. The Pakistan batsman was also ignored for the recent tour of the West Indies adding further insult to injury.

A few months are a lifetime in the world of Pakistan cricket and the Pakistan selectors after having previously discarded Azhar decided to make a U-turn by bringing him back for the Champions Trophy. Considering the criticism Azhar had received prior to his removal as skipper and even by Pakistani standards, it was a surprise that he was recalled for the Champions Trophy tournament in England.

Pakistan's Champions Trophy campaign got off to a terrible start when they suffered a humiliating 124 run loss against their arch-rivals India in Birmingham, re-emphasising the enormous gap in skills between both sides but as Azhar explained, the blame for victory lay squarely on some basic mistakes by his side.

"We only have ourselves to blame and as a team, we have to collectively accept the responsibility and take the blame. We made some crucial mistakes and they were the turning points and proved to be pivotal in the outcome of the match against India," Azhar explained.

Head Coach Mickey Arthur and captain Sarfraz Ahmed had been at pains to allay any fears of their side succumbing to the immense pre-game stress that is involved in typical India-Pakistan games but it appeared that the team lost its nerve when confronted with the magnitude of the occasions as Azhar remarked, "I don't think we were under pressure or more nervous than we would be for any other international match. India versus Pakistan matches are always huge encounters and are decided more often than not in key moments and we were found wanting at the key moments."

The Pakistan bowling firepower has in the past been a major factor in successes against India but it appeared that a combination of some loose bowling and fielding errors where two crucial catches of Yuvraj Singh and Virat Kohli were spilt seem to take the wind out of Pakistan's sails.

"I thought we had India in check when they were batting for large parts of their innings and although they weren't losing wickets, they were not scoring at a huge rate. However, the dropped catches of Virat Kohli and Yuvraj Singh seemed to be the turning point. If we had taken those two catches it could have been an altogether different match and India would not have found it easy to reach such a large total. If we had taken the catches of Kohli and Yuvraj, then who knows there may have been a different outcome to the match," Azhar reasons.

There aren't too many batsmen in the world of cricket which command so much respect as do the duo of Virat Kohli and Yuvraj Singh and allowing them lives at crucial points of the game was something that hurt Pakistan in Azhar's view, "Virat Kohli and Yuvraj Singh are world-class and proven performers. If you give players of that calibre lives by dropping catches off them then they will make you pay for your mistakes. We should have capitalised on those opportunities, but we didn't and they made us pay for those errors."

Mohammad Hafeez's vast experience and big-match abilities have been recognised by many and to find that he was not asked to bowl one over in the whole India innings left many experts confused. It would have been logical to employ the services of a bowler with a record like Hafeez's but as Azhar explained rather unconvincingly, it was the captain's decision based upon the conditions and the demands of the match situation.

"The captain knows best but I believe Mohammad Hafeez did not bowl against India as the conditions were difficult for spinners when we were bowling. Conditions were damp and we were on and off the field and it was not easy for the spinners to grip the ball. I think the captain felt that conditions were more suitable for the seamers as the ball was moving around at times especially when it was damp and overcast," he said.

With a revised target of 289 in 41 overs, the Pakistan batting was tasked with making a game out of an increasingly tough situation. A tough required run-rate meant that the batsmen would have little or no time to play themselves in and whilst the Pakistan openers did put up a 47-run partnership, the run-rate was nowhere near what was needed. This pattern continued throughout the innings where scoreboard pressure and a regular loss of wickets did not allow any freedom to Pakistan as Azhar explained.

"When it came to our batting, we just could not keep up with the required run-rate and build momentum. When you are chasing seven or more an over you need to build momentum to the innings right from the start but we just could not do that."

The odds were stacked against Pakistan whilst bowling and the equation was tough when they came into bat but on a personal basis, Azahr seemed to show exactly why the selectors chose him for the job. He displayed strong character, driven possibly by a bid to repair his reputation in the shorter format of the game and duly became the top scorer in the Pakistan innings with 50 off 65 balls. Whilst he was dismayed by Pakistan's loss to their rivals, Azhar sought to draw some positives from his own performance.

"I wanted to play positively out there and my intentions were to go out there and try to keep up with the scoring rate and I tried my best to do that and to keep the required run-rate in check, but I feel that I could have batted better than I did."

Pakistan were clearly marked as underdogs at the beginning of the tournament and for a good reason as their lacklustre performance showed in the game against India. However, with two games remaining, it is up to Pakistan to see whether they can lift their game to a level which will help them compete with the top teams of the competition. For Azhar Ali, his team needs to move on from the embarrassment of the defeat against India and the equation is quite simple, "We have two matches left at the Champions Trophy, they are must-win games and we owe it to ourselves and the fans to up our game and perform better than we did against India", he concluded.

http://www.firstpost.com/sports/ind...e-turning-point-admits-azhar-ali-3520413.html
 
The turning point was when azhar, shehzad, Hafeez and Wahab were selected
 
Ever since I've been watching cricket, we have always had dropped catches costing us the big games against India. Razzaq dropping Tendu in '03, Hafeez palming the final ball of the innings over for 6 in '07, the 4 ridiculous drops of Tendu in '11, dropping Kohli twice in '15 and again yesterday. Pretty depressing really.
 
How about realizing your limitations Mr. Ali and focusing on one format where you can play with some dignity? I can understand it's entirely not your fault and the brainless selector has to take a larger part of the blame, however, how about having some self respect as you should know it well by now that you will be humiliated each time you try yourself in the shorter formats. Cricket has moved on, and unfortunately, there is no place for players like yourself in today's shorter formats, irrespective of weather/location/opposition.
 
Lol at turning point as if we were cruising to victory before that.

These chumps would've struggled to chase 250.
 
Sorry Azhar but the current batting line up dont have the ability. You should accept this too and concentrate on tests.
 
Even if those catches were taken India still had the batting to make 285 odd and d/l would have made it 290..... Pak would still have lost...
 
Pakistan would have struggled to chase anything over 220 with that batting line up.
 
"I wanted to play positively out there and my intentions were to go out there and try to keep up with the scoring rate and I tried my best to do that and to keep the required run-rate in check"

Thats a lie
 
The turning point was yours and hafeezs criminal partnership , teams go after 8 runs an over these days over 30 overs. The target was chaseable , even it was 250 you guys could not have chased it with your faulty approach
 
The turning point was when azhar, shehzad, Hafeez and Wahab were selected

Came in to write this :))

Lol this. Or selected in the XI by Mickey Arthur.

How are our selectors so oblivious to this is beyond me :facepalm: You'd either have to be the biggest simpleton or just plain stupid to select Azhar, Shehzad, Hafeez and Wahab in the same XI :livid: :livid: :livid:

If only brain cells were readily available in retail, I'd probably send a few to the PCB every week without charge !!
 
"I wanted to play positively out there and my intentions were to go out there and try to keep up with the scoring rate and I tried my best to do that and to keep the required run-rate in check"

Thats a lie

actually he did.... once the field spread out he has no clue to find a gap to sneak a single.. plus hafeez helping the cause by making more dot balls than him on the other side....
 
Lol, there were no turning points in the match, the match was headed in just one direction from start to finish :wahab2
 
kohli's dropped catch wasnt that you azhar at mid wicket who supposed to go for the catch at square leg... You shivered seeing the ball going up in the sky and wait for fahim to run all the way from deep square leg to make it tough and drop it.. and now u say it was one of the turning points.
 
Last edited:
India had Dhoni, Pandya and Jadeja to bat after that. As Pandya showed, we could have amassed a big total even with Kohli and Yuvi back in the hut.
 
Turning point was the perplexing approach to the chase by Shahzad, Hafeez, Babar et al.
 
You had his majesty Wahab bowling at your batsmen. Other opposition won't give you such tools to score runs against.

Junaid would have had the same fate. Remember he has been expensive lately and it was beautiful batting wicket.
 
Lol at turning point as if we were cruising to victory before that.

These chumps would've struggled to chase 250.

Suppose the catches were held. All that would mean was that Pandya with his S/R of 333 would have got a few more balls to smash.

If anything the turning point was getting Rohit out, his S/R was 76 whereas everybody else was over 100.
 
Junaid would have had the same fate. Remember he has been expensive lately and it was beautiful batting wicket.

Junaid is at par with Wahab. I'm talking about OTHER opposition. Read my comment again.
 
Junaid is at par with Wahab. I'm talking about OTHER opposition. Read my comment again.

Barring the south african and Australian attacks, don't see this batting having trouble bashing all the other teams
 
The turning point, if any, was the dismissal of Rohit Sharma, who was batting quite slowly and was pulling down the run rate.
 
Junaid is at par with Wahab. I'm talking about OTHER opposition. Read my comment again.

Maybe you are right or maybe not. Every team has such bowlers. SA has Parnell. Australia has henriques.India has Pandya. Each team has a player who may leak runs.
 
Junaid would have had the same fate. Remember he has been expensive lately and it was beautiful batting wicket.

no he would have take early breakthroughs, and pak wouldnt have wasted the new ball and overcast condition bowling imad ....also he has an excellent record against kohli too... kohli is yet to find his mark against junaid...
 
no he would have take early breakthroughs, and pak wouldnt have wasted the new ball and overcast condition bowling imad ....also he has an excellent record against kohli too... kohli is yet to find his mark against junaid...

It's funny that some people actually believe that junaid's record against kohli is still relevant today or that junaid wouldve troubled kohli :yk cricketing acumen of some people ain't that great unfortunately :sanga
 
Maybe you are right or maybe not. Every team has such bowlers. SA has Parnell. Australia has henriques.India has Pandya. Each team has a player who may leak runs.

Ya but they may hide such bowlers or not select them and importantly Australia, SAF.etc are not captained by Sarfraz. They will try different things
 
Last edited:
Nah cause Pandya would have scored 100 in 4 overs!
 
not only dropped catches but no planning for death overs due to inexperienced bowlers and lack of fitness
 
Lol, there were no turning points in the match, the match was headed in just one direction from start to finish :wahab2

That's not true, we gave fight to India in the first over where Amir beat the bat four times. After that it was all India :srt
 
Back
Top