What's new

"We wanted experience in the bowling in the form of Mohammad Amir and Wahab Riaz" : Inzamam-ul-Haq

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
"We wanted experience in the bowling in the form of Mohammad Amir and Wahab Riaz" : Inzamam-ul-Haq

Inzamam-ul-Haq at a presser regarding the World Cup squad:

"We realised during the series against England that the ball isn't swinging much and those bowlers can do well who can bowl with the old ball and bowl reverse swing. Wahab Riaz has experience in this regard, he can bowl with the old ball and reverse it. He's a senior bowler also and we felt that our bowlers are lacking experience a bit, so we included him"

"We realised that Mohammad Amir is also our senior bowler and he has experience of bowling in England. His economy rate is also good in England"

"We wanted experience in the bowling in the form of Amir and Wahab"

"It wasn't easy to drop Abid Ali as he's a good player but we felt that the way Asif Ali has batted, and the way the pitches are playing, we need a player who can accelerate and up the run-rate at 6/7"

"When you do any planning, you also review that. If we feel that any player is needed, we don't worry that he wasn't selected yesterday so he shouldn't be selected today. I will not compromise, if I can do something for the betterment of the team"

"It's early season right now in England but the forecast for the World Cup, it's even better and we feel the pitches will be truer so we need bowlers who can reverse the ball"

"Wahab Riaz has performed well in domestic tournaments. There is no aspect of the panic button here, we've selected the team according to the requirement after speaking to the captain and coach"

"For the third opener, we have Mohammad Hafeez and Haris Sohail"

"England's bowlers got hit like the Pakistan bowlers. The difference was 100 runs across 4 games. If Pakistan took some catches or was better in fielding then the results could have been different"

"Hasnain isn't experienced, he's new but he has express pace. England is the #1 team playing in their home conditions so it's not easy to face them"

"Alongside bowling, we need to look at the fielding factor also. We also look at which bowler will be effective. Faheem Ashraf and Junaid Khan have good performances but we feel they won't be effective on these pitches where we need pace and experience"

"We didn't discard Amir but looking at the conditions, we feel we need bowlers who have experience of bowling in these conditions"

"Junaid and Faheem aren't bad bowlers but we feel they aren't suited to these conditions"

"Pakistan showed fight in the series against England. If there were some poor performances, there's also plus points. Chasing 373, the batting showed fight and we realised that the fielding standard was poor and we needed experience in the bowling"

"I have confidence in my team and I feel they will perform better in the World Cup"

"People thought we'll bowl well and struggle with the bat but everything happened in the opposite manner. We realised these aren't conditions for swing bowlers and we need bowlers who bowl well with the old ball"

"Our batting is looking in good shape. We need experienced players in the squad who know how to finish matches and I feel that Malik and Hafeez are our senior players and I rely on them"

"Our team is a team of young players. They've lost some matches but they have won also. Over the top criticism which I hear is not right. The players who do well and the positives should be appreciated"

"I don't know how the team wiill perform in the World Cup, they will do some good things, they will make some mistakes. No team does all good things, or all bad things. We should highlight the good things also as it's our team and we need to support them which will raise their spirits"

"Mohammad Rizwan, Abid Ali and Faheem Ashraf will remain in England. They'll play cricket to stay in touch with the conditions and if we feel the need for any of them as replacements then we'll have backup"

"Sarfaraz bats well higher up the order because he is a proper batsman. He knows he isn't the type of batsman to bat at 6 or 7. He will perform better up the order"

"This is not a Uturn, we have the chance to change the team till the 23rd and we made the changes we felt were necessary and amended our policy/plans according to the requirements"

"Our team has the capability to win the World Cup"

"We will have our full squad for the warm-up matches with perhaps the exception of Abid Ali, but from the perspective of injuries, everyone is fine"
 
PCB are smart. Well done by not exposing them to a brutal England batting line up. Now watch Amir Run through West Indies top order and make it look like we were missing him badly! Selection justified
 
As for Wahab, I feel its right to include him but at the expense of the wrong person. Im not entirely impressed with Hasnain as I feel he will break down with injury at some point. Harris Rauf would have been a better option as both are equally as raw. Rauf just has a bit more attitude to him which is very important for a succesful fast bowler
 
While they invested in Usman Khan Shinwari, he bowled exceptionally in ODIs, took wickets, great bowling average aswell but guess what ?? we pick a rookie Hasnain in a mega event who hasn't even played a full FC season. :facepalm:
 
Inzamam-ul-Haq at a presser regarding the World Cup squad:



"Mohammad Rizwan, Abid Ali and Faheem Ashraf will remain in England. They'll play cricket to stay in touch with the conditions and if we feel the need for any of them as replacements then we'll have backup"

"Sarfaraz bats well higher up the order because he is a proper batsman. He knows he isn't the type of batsman to bat at 6 or 7. He will perform better up the order"


Well, atleast 2 positives. :cummins
 
PCB are smart. Well done by not exposing them to a brutal England batting line up. Now watch Amir Run through West Indies top order and make it look like we were missing him badly! Selection justified

Lol, nah he will get smashed by the likes of Hope, Lewis and Hetmeyer
 
Is this for the experience of being thrashed all over the place so as not to make the other bowlers feel as bad?
 
Hope, Hetmyer, Lewis were made laughing stocks by him in the Pak vs WI Test and ODI series 2017, let's see how they smash him.

The pitch is going to be flat.

Plus all batsmen grow after 2 years of experience.

So West Indies + Flat Track + Chasing a Pakistani score 60 40 chance of a Windies Win.

West Indies + Flat Track + West Indies batting first 70 30 chance of Pakistani win
 
At last I agree with Inzi. Thanks Inzi, you gave renewed my optimism for the world cup. Batting is clicking, now only if bowlers support them, we will be in good shape.
 
The pitch is going to be flat.

Plus all batsmen grow after 2 years of experience.

So West Indies + Flat Track + Chasing a Pakistani score 60 40 chance of a Windies Win.

West Indies + Flat Track + West Indies batting first 70 30 chance of Pakistani win

Their batting usually crumbles against us and with the quality of bowling they have, they will be chasing 350+. Not sure how can they chase that much against an attack of:

Amir
Shaheen
Hasan
Shadab
Imad
M Hafeez
 
"Sarfaraz bats well higher up the order because he is a proper batsman. He knows he isn't the type of batsman to bat at 6 or 7. He will perform better up the order"

So why did he keep coming in at 6 or 7? :91:
 
Interested to see what bowling lineups they will play.

If they play hafeez, Malik, Imad, Wahab they will surely lose especially hafeez and Malik, which was proven yesterday. Without these two the same team chased 373 and lost by just 12 runs but with these two they didn’t even cross 300 that why and how they are useless.
 
So why did he keep coming in at 6 or 7? :91:


Hope he comes in at no.5 and hafeez is replaced with Haris

Hafeez is a walking wicket if there is early swing or a collapse. He will expose the tail under 20 overs, where Haris and Imam wouldn’t let that happen. 3rd ODI was a proof of it where the same thing happened 2 quick wickets with woakes and Wiley swinging,, Imam and Haris made sure to see off the new ball and at the same time scored at good pace which hafeez could only dream of
 
So why did he keep coming in at 6 or 7? :91:

From the limited over matches I could remember he allowed full time batsmen to bat ahead of him as he is selfless, and often when it chance to bat there was need to hit out, so he opted for those who are better than him at hitting 6s.
 
"We realised during the series against England that the ball isn't swinging much"

Lol, they just noticed?

And who will be the new ball pairing? Desperately need wickets up front.
 
Lol, they just noticed?

And who will be the new ball pairing? Desperately need wickets up front.

After Hasan Ali's failure to replicate PSL form and Mohamed Hasnain and Wahab Riaz suited to bowl with the older bowl, its pretty much confirmed that it will be Amir and Shaheen.
 
Model Town Gang of Five reassemble !!!


[MENTION=136079]ahmedwaqas92[/MENTION] :uakmal
 
"We realised during the series against England that the ball isn't swinging much"



Inzi isn't even competent enough to select a team of Malir warriors cricket club let alone the Pakistan national side. Pathetic individual. This is what happens when uneducated, incompetent people are given positions of power.
 
i agree with Rana.. Hasnains run up issues are where his rythem goes Rauf would have been better as he a better fielder plus he is 24 so kind of more mature i would say
 
Wahab 100 runs in 10 overs.

Inevitable, unstoppable.

Wahab and Usman Shinwari are pure spray guns, even a 15 year old club cricketer would love to smash these two out of the park any day.
 
For the first time I am actually satisfied with his two explanations- the bowlers pick and Sarfraz’s batting position. No. 5 is best for him, as no. 4 will be too high for a WK.

Regarding the bowling, he is absolutely spot on - unlike CT, don’t think swing is going to be that crucial factor in this WC, rather those absolute batting belters in dry conditions need spin, extra pace & reverse swing. I believe most teams will try damage control in first 20 overs, then strike with oldish ball.

Only question mark I can raise is that they are one bowler (pacer) short - instead of Malik/Asif I think they should have picked one extra pacer, but Malik is like the 8th bowler and only conventional off-spinner in squad, may be he'll be used more with ball in later half.

Good to see 3 extra reserves, which covers for WK as well - may be they should have made it 4 with Shinwari (or Rauf, why not) in it.

Still much better squad than usual and best of luck. Finally, Ul Haq has spent some quality times for the purpose, which is evident in his squad and explanations.
 
Time for some more delicious experience.... after Malik, Hafeez we now have some more lovely experience thanks to Wahab. I say we need even more experience, if Immy is having a tough time in the hot seat he should take a couple of weeks off and bring some of that experience to the WC, because by God we can never have enough of that experience. Somebody check if Maindad is available, perhaps time to send him over too.
 
Some people are living under a false delusion that Wahab will be good with the old ball and reverse.

This shows some lack of ability to read the conditions.

On these ENG grounds, you CANNOT rough up the ball enough in a way to generate meaningful reverse. This was evident in these 5 ODIs too.

The outfield is lush, nothing abrasive or dry on the pitch either. This isn't subcontinent / UAE dry pitches or minefields.

All of this means Wahab is again going for 100 runs in one spell.
 
Some people are living under a false delusion that Wahab will be good with the old ball and reverse.

This shows some lack of ability to read the conditions.

On these ENG grounds, you CANNOT rough up the ball enough in a way to generate meaningful reverse. This was evident in these 5 ODIs too.

The outfield is lush, nothing abrasive or dry on the pitch either. This isn't subcontinent / UAE dry pitches or minefields.

All of this means Wahab is again going for 100 runs in one spell.

He is not likely to start for sure but what else do we have? What you wrote is probably applicable for Shinwari as well, but they can’t take 3 of the 5 pace bowlers officially U21, with may be total 35 games under belt. I think, within given context, this is what it is and PAK has to manage within.

Ideally, Wahab (if he was in RADAR) & Rauf should have been sent to UAE (AUS) & UK, but Inzamam finally has accepted his shortfall here - they mis-predicted the condition and trying to rectify that. Raees and others had absolutely no chance as none were tried in last 1 year - Wahab at least has tremendous WC record behind him.

You know that I am not the biggest fan of Wahab, but here I see the merit, can’t complain much. PCT is screwed here for investing 2 years trying to extract a fast bowling all-rounder out of Faheem Ashraf, now Wahab is just a damage control effort. Faheem & JK would have been literally buried under boundaries if selected.
 
Wahab 100 runs in 10 overs.

Inevitable, unstoppable.

Wahab and Usman Shinwari are pure spray guns, even a 15 year old club cricketer would love to smash these two out of the park any day.

There is no other experienced bowlers around so we have no choice.
.Faheem,Junaid and Yasir had to go.Abid Ali was unlucky.Overall the team selection is pretty good.
 
He is not likely to start for sure but what else do we have? What you wrote is probably applicable for Shinwari as well, but they can’t take 3 of the 5 pace bowlers officially U21, with may be total 35 games under belt. I think, within given context, this is what it is and PAK has to manage within.

Ideally, Wahab (if he was in RADAR) & Rauf should have been sent to UAE (AUS) & UK, but Inzamam finally has accepted his shortfall here - they mis-predicted the condition and trying to rectify that. Raees and others had absolutely no chance as none were tried in last 1 year - Wahab at least has tremendous WC record behind him.

You know that I am not the biggest fan of Wahab, but here I see the merit, can’t complain much. PCT is screwed here for investing 2 years trying to extract a fast bowling all-rounder out of Faheem Ashraf, now Wahab is just a damage control effort. Faheem & JK would have been literally buried under boundaries if selected.

Don't expect a satisfactory answer to that question. Bitter truth is, Wahab was out of the team and consideration, the only thing which brought him back was the abject failure of the no 1 choices on this tour. Faheem and Junaid looked helpless on these wickets and so some tough decisions had to be made. When you get the shirt you have to fight for your life to keep it.
 
Don't expect a satisfactory answer to that question. Bitter truth is, Wahab was out of the team and consideration, the only thing which brought him back was the abject failure of the no 1 choices on this tour. Faheem and Junaid looked helpless on these wickets and so some tough decisions had to be made. When you get the shirt you have to fight for your life to keep it.

But, you see - I wrote almost identical explanation in some other thread on why Wahab should be in consideration. The damage was done in last 2 years, when they kept giving unconditional backing to Faheem and played best available XI even against ZIM reserves. Also, PAK’s batting is more settled, but they experimented with wrong guys with ball against AUS - Wahab, Rauf & one genuine spinner (instead of Yasir) should have been tried.

Better late than never - at least Ul Haq is trying to earn his money here with some logical thinking ...... 6 pacers for net practice in UAE was too shallow, even for his standards.
 
He is not likely to start for sure but what else do we have? What you wrote is probably applicable for Shinwari as well, but they can’t take 3 of the 5 pace bowlers officially U21, with may be total 35 games under belt. I think, within given context, this is what it is and PAK has to manage within.

Ideally, Wahab (if he was in RADAR) & Rauf should have been sent to UAE (AUS) & UK, but Inzamam finally has accepted his shortfall here - they mis-predicted the condition and trying to rectify that. Raees and others had absolutely no chance as none were tried in last 1 year - Wahab at least has tremendous WC record behind him.

You know that I am not the biggest fan of Wahab, but here I see the merit, can’t complain much. PCT is screwed here for investing 2 years trying to extract a fast bowling all-rounder out of Faheem Ashraf, now Wahab is just a damage control effort. Faheem & JK would have been literally buried under boundaries if selected.

Inzi has accepted his fault, but the rectification isn't right either.

We don't have a proper attacking spinner, only Shadab.

Besides, if Wahab was playing this ODI series, he would've been our worst bowler.

Now that he's selected, we can't do anything. Let the cup start.
 
Is Wahab capable of bowling 10 overs?
Did he pass the yoyo test?
Take one step forward, go back 5 steps backwards, never ending saga.
 
Is Wahab capable of bowling 10 overs?
Did he pass the yoyo test?
Take one step forward, go back 5 steps backwards, never ending saga.

He is capable of bowling 10 overs. He did it multiple times in the pak cup.
 
Only in Pakistan cricket do we replace mediocrity with even more mediocrity.
 
Only in Pakistan cricket do we replace mediocrity with even more mediocrity.

That happens because we only have mediocrity to choose from. If we had a Pakistani Jofra or Woakes then I am sure we would pick them.
 
"Mohammad Rizwan, Abid Ali and Faheem Ashraf will remain in England. They'll play cricket to stay in touch with the conditions and if we feel the need for any of them as replacements then we'll have backup"

So three players will stay in England and can replace players in the squad. What are the rules regarding this? I thought only injured players can be replaced.
 
So three players will stay in England and can replace players in the squad. What are the rules regarding this? I thought only injured players can be replaced.
They're reserve. If someone gets injured then they'll replace them.
 
While they invested in Usman Khan Shinwari, he bowled exceptionally in ODIs, took wickets, great bowling average aswell but guess what ?? we pick a rookie Hasnain in a mega event who hasn't even played a full FC season. :facepalm:

I do maintained the same regarding usman as nobody in the world can drop the bowler who is taking wickets with an avg of 19 but ofr Hasnain part I may not agree to you. They both should be in the team.
 
Is Wahab capable of bowling 10 overs?
Did he pass the yoyo test?
Take one step forward, go back 5 steps backwards, never ending saga.

Wahab is the fittest Pakistani cricketer playing at the moment and has always been.
 
Strange logic. Junaid is as experienced as Wahab. Last time they played the same tournament, Junaid comfortably outperformed Wahab.
 
That happens because we only have mediocrity to choose from. If we had a Pakistani Jofra or Woakes then I am sure we would pick them.

There was no need to resort to the TTF Wahab Riaz and we already have the Pakistani Jofra in Hasnain.
 
My criticism remains basically about sacrificing two positions in the squad: hafeez and malik vs. one.
I hope we dont waste the warm ups playing these guys. They are a know commodity. it goes without saying that they will do well vs bangladesh and afghanistan. but when facing better bowling (malik) or a pressure situation (hafeez) they will fail more than they will succeed.
 
Strange logic. Junaid is as experienced as Wahab. Last time they played the same tournament, Junaid comfortably outperformed Wahab.

neither deserve to be there...but these pitches are unforgiving. Having said that, if this is inzi's logic, I would have preferred shinwari
 
neither deserve to be there...but these pitches are unforgiving. Having said that, if this is inzi's logic, I would have preferred shinwari

I agree. On merit, Shinwari should have made it over both Junaid and Wahab. The only thing that goes against him is that he can leak runs on a bad day but then who else is not as seen in the recently concluded series.
 
I agree. On merit, Shinwari should have made it over both Junaid and Wahab. The only thing that goes against him is that he can leak runs on a bad day but then who else is not as seen in the recently concluded series.
I am reminded of our first first game against india in CT. Wahab was rubbish and we learnt our lesson and did not play him in the rest of the tournament.
 
I am reminded of our first first game against india in CT. Wahab was rubbish and we learnt our lesson and did not play him in the rest of the tournament.

I remember that there was the same Junaid vs Wahab debate at that time. I can even find that thread if I dig enough. We heard the same arguments about how Wahab has pace, yorkers, etc and how he was better than Junaid. The end result was there to see. Wahab was not picked after than India game and Junaid ended up in the all-team tournament XI.

I am not a Junaid Khan supporter but picking Wahab Riaz of all people over him makes absolutely zero sense.
 
Hasnain having express pace and Faheem being an all rounder are one of the biggest misconceptions in recent times.
 
A few selections seem to be self-fulfilling prophecies!
 
The lack of planning, the panic and the scattergun approach to team and squad selections of late has been an eye-opener and extremely worrying.

It just seems to be rather chaotic, with very little focus and direction.
 
There is obviously no rhyme or reasons to the decisions made by the Selection Committee.
 
The lack of planning, the panic and the scattergun approach to team and squad selections of late has been an eye-opener and extremely worrying.

It just seems to be rather chaotic, with very little focus and direction.

I don't think this a new phenomenon.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Another world cup and yet again we pick "experienced" players are we expect miracles for hasbeens and TTFs. Am sure after another world cup flop we will see more experienced players recycled before the 2023 world cup, pakistan will continue to go backwards :facepalm:
 
Another world cup and yet again we pick "experienced" players are we expect miracles for hasbeens and TTFs. Am sure after another world cup flop we will see more experienced players recycled before the 2023 world cup, pakistan will continue to go backwards :facepalm:

Let me take a guess... in 2023 "seniors" Umar Akmal and Ahmed Shehzad will be making comebacks into the side right before the WC despite not playing for 4-5 years to provide us with much needed precious experience.

:salute
 
Let me take a guess... in 2023 "seniors" Umar Akmal and Ahmed Shehzad will be making comebacks into the side right before the WC despite not playing for 4-5 years to provide us with much needed precious experience.

:salute

I can probably see asad shafiq been addee to that duo aswell. Pretty much since the 1996 we have continued to pick on average atleast 2 senior players past their sell by during world cup squads, thinking that experience will come good.

In reality 92 was one of few occasions our senior players (miandad, imran) proved seniors could lead from the front.
 
The lack of planning, the panic and the scattergun approach to team and squad selections of late has been an eye-opener and extremely worrying.

It just seems to be rather chaotic, with very little focus and direction.

An indicement on the team management and selection panel, the rest of the world was very certain about their final squad of 15 4-6 months ago while the Pakistani think tank is just gambling and praying hoping for the best. Its a combination of incompetency from the team management which has no real idea on what it is doing, what the composition balance of the playing 11 needs to be and the fact some players did not grab their chances inspite of being given multiple opportunities by the team management and were confirmed liabilities. The illness to Shadab also didn't help.

Coach, Captain and Chief Selector need to be shown the door after the WC.
 
Let me take a guess... in 2023 "seniors" Umar Akmal and Ahmed Shehzad will be making comebacks into the side right before the WC despite not playing for 4-5 years to provide us with much needed precious experience.

:salute

They won't be old enough to be called experienced it will be the WC for a last hurrah for Hafeez and a resurgent in recent times Asad Shafiq.

:ua
 
They won't be old enough to be called experienced it will be the WC for a last hurrah for Hafeez and a resurgent in recent times Asad Shafiq.

:ua

We haven't played tests in so long that the existence of Asad Shafiq slipped my mind. You are right Shafiq will be in the ideal age bracket to be called up as a "senior". You never know we might even have his buddy Azhar Ali providing some more of that valuable experience.

:ua
 
If you wanted experience Inzi then Junaid and Shinwari should have been considered. They are not newcomers that they are not in the side.
 
If you wanted experience Inzi then Junaid and Shinwari should have been considered. They are not newcomers that they are not in the side.

Junaid is a trundler on these wickets. Wahab can bowl express yorkers. That's what we need on these pitches.
 
Junaid is a trundler on these wickets. Wahab can bowl express yorkers. That's what we need on these pitches.

Even if you prefer Wahab still Junaid could have replaced the useless Shaheen.
 
I think presence of Amir would benefit Shaheen a lot. Amir may will not feature in the list of top wicket takers at WC but Shaheen might. I have high hopes from Shaheen. He is a class apart and he needs Amir to guide him a little.
 
Model Town Gang of Five reassemble !!!


[MENTION=136079]ahmedwaqas92[/MENTION] :uakmal

With Inzi at the helm, we all knew that Model Town Gang is always in contention - It's the 'you scratch my back I'll scratch yours' type of thing!

Heck, we have played Kamran Akmal as latest as 2017 and Umar too just recently featured in trying to break into the Squad somehow. Furthermore, Butt is successfully playing PSL and now this.......Yet they call him the revolutionary. LOL

I Tweeted out an entire thread on Wahab's various comebacks and his stats for various series starting from the Mohali game against India in 2011 - Here you go Bro :)

Wahab Riaz ODI Comebacks & Stats Post Mohali 2011 Game.

After the Mohali game against India in 2011 Wahab played a series against WI in which he managed to take 5 wickets across four games with an Econ of 5.70; he was then consequently dropped and made an ODI comeback a year later going up against England in the 1st ODI in Abu Dhabi. In this match he failed to take any wickets and went for 47 runs in 7 overs (Econ 6.71) – He did not feature in the remaining 3 games as England completed their whitewash.

The next ODI feature for Wahab, a month later, was the game against India in Dhaka for the Asia cup encounter. Even though all Pakistani bowlers took a beating Wahab went for 50 runs in 4 overs without a wicket (Econ 12.50) – following this dismal performance he was permanently dropped from the ODI squad for a year

His next ODI reckoning was a comeback for a 5 match bilateral series against South Africa in 2013. Wahab failed to take any wickets in that series and conceded 151 runs at an economy of 7.28. Even though he was not setting any stages alight, our management decided to take him to the Champions trophy in 2013, where he averaged 112.0.

Post Champions Trophy we played Wahab again vs the West Indies in 2013 where he averaged 75.00 for the series taking only 2 wickets across four games. The West Indies tour gave way to a three-match away ODI series in Zimbabwe and even though we won that series without Wahab, our management yet again decided that we needed the phast man back in the Squad against South Africa in the UAE.

During South Africa’s ODI leg of the UAE tour, Wahab again did not manage to pick up any wickets across three games and had an Econ of 5.14 in relatively low scoring matches. These dry runs without any impact or wickets made Wahab sit on the sidelines for yet another year and he returned to the ODI colors in an away tour in 2014 against Sri Lanka.

The games against Sri Lanka were rather productive (relatively speaking) as he took 8 wickets in the series but his Econ was 6.2 for the entire tour and comparatively way higher than other bowlers on show. Wahab’s better showing in these away games lent him a spot in the ODI team when Australia and NZ toured the UAE in 2014.

Across both series, Wahab only took 5 wickets and averaged 47.8 with an economy of over 6 runs per over. These performances made sure that Pakistan didn’t take him to the next NZ away tour but with Junaid’s injury prior to the WC Wahab made his way back into the squad for the mega event. The World Cup was Wahab’s most decent performance to date - He averaged 29.18 (picking up 16 wickets) with an economy of 7.0 (don’t worry I did the math on this….)

Post World Cup Wahab played against Bangladesh (3 ODIs) where he averaged above 30.xx, then played against Zimbabwe in Lahore and Away and averaged (25.xx with an Econ of 5.2 across both tours). Following such and in the same year, Wahab played against England in the UAE (2015) where he only took 3 wickets across 4 games averaging 55.00 for the series while his economy was 4.79.

In beginning of 2016, Pakistan took Wahab to New Zealand where he averaged 118 at an Econ of 6.4 per over. Later in the same year we once again tried Wahab against England and surprise surprise! Wahab averaged 186 and only could take a solitary wicket across three games – his economy for the tour was 7.15.

Post the England 2016 ODI leg disaster Wahab featured against the West Indies in the UAE later in the year and took 5 wickets across 3 games with an impressive economy of 4.3 but this entire false dawn came crashing down when he was dismantled during the Australian tour, picking up only 1 wicket and averaging 104 for the series with an Econ of 6.5.

To reward Wahab of his never give up attitude the Pakistan management tried him one last time in the Champions trophy in which Virat and Co smoked him for 10 an over for 8 overs straight making sure that we were forced to change him for other bowlers and the rest is history.

Now once against certain idiots are lobbying for Wahab Riaz without even realizing that we have been through this exercise almost 8 to 9 times. Plus after a dozen comebacks spanning nearly 8 years if anyone thinks Wahab will miraculously turn into a world beater then please get your head checked!
 
Have you been watching the same games as i have?

Because the one bowler England have feared in these ODIs is Hasnain.

Nope, you've been watching something different because Hasnain has been smashed all over and has not looked threatening at all.
 
Inzi has to be applauded for picking close to a best possible squad for this WC.

Additionally, he has shown the ability to correct the mistakes in the initially picked squad by sending Junaid and Faheem home.

Compared to last 2 world cups, this selection committee has done a commendable job.
 
Inzi has to be applauded for picking close to a best possible squad for this WC.

Additionally, he has shown the ability to correct the mistakes in the initially picked squad by sending Junaid and Faheem home.

Compared to last 2 world cups, this selection committee has done a commendable job.

Good points above.
 
Avengers Infinity War quote
Loki : "If you're going to Earth, you might want a guide. I do have a bit of experience in that area."
Thanos: If you consider failure experience…
Loki: I consider experience, experience.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">What do <a href="https://twitter.com/iamamirofficial?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@iamamirofficial</a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/WahabViki?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@WahabViki</a> bring to the Pakistan bowling attack? <br><br>&#55357;&#56803;️ <a href="https://twitter.com/RealHa55an?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@RealHa55an</a> explains. <a href="https://t.co/U0PdJEYM8U">pic.twitter.com/U0PdJEYM8U</a></p>— Cricket World Cup (@cricketworldcup) <a href="https://twitter.com/cricketworldcup/status/1131802013317177344?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 24, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Back
Top