What If Series: Would the fate of the Indian subcontinent have been any different or better had Muslim rulers not invaded it?

Would the fate of the Indian subcontinent have been any different or better had Muslim rulers not in


  • Total voters
    10
Not just quote it but respond to it and tag me ... I will properly educate you and your Islamic extremist buddies for free. Go ahead don't be shy.

And yes the Muslims are by far the biggest problem group in India. Infact it is rare to find any major religion in the world that does not have any conflict with Muslims

Here is the list

1. Christians - Check
2. Jews - Check
3. Hindus - Check
4. Buddhists- Check
Explain with examples. :inti
 
Goodness! You were one country till they got fed up with your racism towards them, and you launched Operation Searchlight on them thereby ..... (I think you know what your army did to their men and women).

But since then Bangladesh has seen the duplicity of friendship with India. India is not interested in friendship with Bangladesh or Pakistan unless it is to cement Indian control. As long as your govt is run according to hindutva doctrines, benefit to a Muslim nation in the subcontinent is off the table. On the contrary, you seek their disempowerment and regress.
 
But since then Bangladesh has seen the duplicity of friendship with India. India is not interested in friendship with Bangladesh or Pakistan unless it is to cement Indian control. As long as your govt is run according to hindutva doctrines, benefit to a Muslim nation in the subcontinent is off the table. On the contrary, you seek their disempowerment and regress.
Whatever you want to believe! Both Pakistan and Bangladesh have nothing to offer to anyone other than their nuisance value. At the end of the day, I've always believed in us minding our own business. Both Pakistan and Bangladesh can do what's the best for them as long as it doesn't create nuisance for India.​
 
If the barbarians had not invaded Bharat, we would never have been able to say that Sanatanis in their weakest times defeated Islamists at the peak of their powers.

The Mughal era is testimony to the might of Sanatan.
 
If the barbarians had not invaded Bharat, we would never have been able to say that Sanatanis in their weakest times defeated Islamists at the peak of their powers.

The Mughal era is testimony to the might of Sanatan.
It's a shame so many of those subhumans are buried in our land.
 
Whatever you want to believe! Both Pakistan and Bangladesh have nothing to offer to anyone other than their nuisance value. At the end of the day, I've always believed in us minding our own business. Both Pakistan and Bangladesh can do what's the best for them as long as it doesn't create nuisance for India.​

You can reject part of India, but the Musalman can never reject India. It is part of our sould and our destiny.
 
Jews did the same to the part of Palestine which is known as Israel now. Now listen to me, and listen carefully -

God Bless, Israel
Long live, Israel!

Sure but wrong location , learn to read properly before asking others to listen .

Jews eat meat & don’t worship stones .

I just stated facts , vegetarians have never had a global empire. You should be proud some Arabs came & eventually their fellow religious brothers ruled to make it the richest .

Now after 70 years with RSS veggies in Power, it’s 3rd world nation .

Read a book while snacking on celery
 
Kissing/touching the black stone from Kaaba is not idolatry. This stone is not treated like a deity or anything.

We Muslims only worship Allah (SWT). La ilaha illallahu muhammadur rasulullah.
Oh no you ain't fooling anyone with arabic here.

Idolatry by cambridge: The act of praying to a picture or object as part of religion.

You are guilty of the same sin you look down others for. Es hamam mein sub hi nangain hain.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Vegans never ruled a global empire.

Muslims made India the richest land in its history .

The mighty Mughalsh were begging or working as cobblers in the gullys of Delhi by the end of their reign. Sanatanis beat them black and blue. Aurangzeb was literally running from place to place out of fear from Shivaji Maharaj The Great.
 
Oh no you ain't fooling anyone with arabic here.

Idolatry by cambridge: The act of praying to a picture or object as part of religion.

You are guilty of the same sin you look down others for. Es hamam mein sub hi nangain hain

We worship Allah (SWT). One and only God. Pure monotheism.

No Muslim prays to a picture or an object.
 
Muslim rulers have enriched Indian subcontinent. Without them, modern day Indian subcontinent might have been divided into small states like it is seen in Africa.

Muslim rulers have unified and solidified many different kingdoms.
 
Muslim rulers have enriched Indian subcontinent. Without them, modern day Indian subcontinent might have been divided into small states like it is seen in Africa.

Muslim rulers have unified and solidified many different kingdoms.

How did that enrichment process work out for Afghanistan...? I see that you have been stubbornly dodging that question... I wonder why.
 
How did that enrichment process work out for Afghanistan...? I see that you have been stubbornly dodging that question... I wonder why.

Many people ask many questions here. Not practical to answer all. I don't even read all posts.

Modern day Afghanistan is not related to the topic of this thread.
 
Many people ask many questions here. Not practical to answer all. I don't even read all posts.

Modern day Afghanistan is not related to the topic of this thread.

It most certainly is pertinent to the topic of this thread as todays Afghanistan region was the first region of the Indian subcontinent that was ruled by the Muslim rulers that you seem to hold in high regard and claim that they enriched the region's that they Ruled.

So go ahead explain how that turned out for Afghanistan as the implementation of Muslim rule was total and complete in that region.
 
Many people ask many questions here. Not practical to answer all. I don't even read all posts.

Modern day Afghanistan is not related to the topic of this thread.
Modern times are not relevant but an empire which was restricted to one colony in delhi (260 years ago) is very relevant.
 
Yea, an Islamic country afloat on alms from IMF and other nations is akin to Musalmans not begging for alms.

Pakistan's constitution is not Islamic, it is officially a republic which has included Islam in it's description despite not implementing Sharia in finance. Otherwise IMF loans based on interest would be out of the question. In that case India mashallah is actually more Islamic than Pakistan.
 
A country's progress isn't measured by GDP alone. Moreover BD is yet to Implement purest form of Islamic governance so thats why I picked Afghanistan.

So now let us know how that has worked out for Afghanistan.
Ok not by GDP alone then what achievements has India accomplished on other fronts?? CAA, branding of current Muslims as "invaders" by their PM, the deplorable situation of Dalits or the Sikh farmers so called "hey days".

Please shed light on some. And Afghanistan not the thread topic but still that country has been under foreign occupation until 2020 one way or the other unlike India they didn't become the 2nd largest economy under invaders
 
Ok not by GDP alone then what achievements has India accomplished on other fronts?? CAA, branding of current Muslims as "invaders" by their PM, the deplorable situation of Dalits or the Sikh farmers so called "hey days".

Problems like these exist in most countries.... including Amreeka.

Please shed light on some. And Afghanistan not the thread topic but still that country has been under foreign occupation until 2020 one way or the other unlike India they didn't become the 2nd largest economy under invaders

It most certainly is ... look at the very first paragraph in the OP that you made. Afghanistan was the very first region that fell to Muslim invaders and it totally adopted the Muslim rule and has been so for nearly a 1000 years!. If Muslim rule was such a good thing like you guys believe , then why is it that country at the bottom of every modern development index ?

So therefore it is a very very good example of what happens when Muslim rule takes over completely. Fortunately India did not completely go that route and the evidence is right infront of you unless you think Afghanistan is a livable place and comparable to India in 2024.

You can also look at Afghanistan before and after Muslim rule.
 
Problems like these exist in most countries.... including Amreeka.



It most certainly is ... look at the very first paragraph in the OP that you made. Afghanistan was the very first region that fell to Muslim invaders and it totally adopted the Muslim rule and has been so for nearly a 1000 years!. If Muslim rule was such a good thing like you guys believe , then why is it that country at the bottom of every modern development index ?

So therefore it is a very very good example of what happens when Muslim rule takes over completely. Fortunately India did not completely go that route and the evidence is right infront of you unless you think Afghanistan is a livable place and comparable to India in 2024.

You can also look at Afghanistan before and after Muslim rule.
Unlike India, they hardly had any centralized state structure so wealth there was unevenly distributed and concentrated in big cities or regions.
 
Unlike India, they hardly had any centralized state structure so wealth there was unevenly distributed and concentrated in big cities or regions.

well you guys were the Ones that were crowing about how good the Muslim rule is ... so YOU tell me why the HQ of Muslim rule is in such a pitiable condition today.
 
well you guys were the Ones that were crowing about how good the Muslim rule is ... so YOU tell me why the HQ of Muslim rule is in such a pitiable condition today.
Lol...Even your government still begs Saudis for investment from their mamooth investment and soverign fund
 
Lol...Even your government still begs Saudis for investment from their mamooth investment and soverign fund

These are all mutually beneficial trade relationships ... what you probably are referring to is how Pakistan operates whether it be IMF or China or Saudis or USA. Vastly different from that.

So going back to Afghanistan... why is it such a massive failure despite embracing Muslim rule for 1000 years ? If Muslim rule was a such a great thing they should have been in a much better shape than what India is today... right?
 
Lol...Even your government still begs Saudis for investment from their mamooth investment and soverign fund
The Hindutva cult will never understand this. India still relies on foreign investment to survive. India's reserves would evaporate within hours if it wasn't for rich Muslim leaders and Western masters.
 
The Hindutva cult will never understand this. India still relies on foreign investment to survive. India's reserves would evaporate within hours if it wasn't for rich Muslim leaders and Western masters.

Do you understand that India runs a trade deficit with Saudi Arabia ? Meaning we literally are one of the largest paying Customers for them. Not freeloaders like Pakistan.

Time for you to slip away from the thread.
 
Back
Top