Really? I checked his comment again and he was clearly saying that China hasn't interfered in Sikkim and Arunachal Pradesh which they clearly did in 2017 during the Doklam Issue.
The only reason China has backed down from a face-off with India is because of it's ongoing trade war with the US, otherwise the Doklam Issue would've escalated imo.
Good Lord, how difficult is it to understand simple statements, without getting caught up in semantics. As I read it, his comment implied that it is too presumptuous on the part of Pakistanis to expect China to interfere/intercede/fight to achieve Pakistan's objective of balkanizing Indian Kashmir, when China's own claims over territories within India (Sikkim/Arunachal) remain unachieved.
In other words, if China had to expend capital (Political/Military/Economic) on breaking loose Indian territories, won't it expend said capital to first free territories from India that China covets, instead of focussing first on cutting loose Indian territories that Pakistan covets.
Stop nitpicking words from someone's post. Well, if you want to dream on that the Chinese are going to spill the blood of their soldiers to achieve Pakistan's objective of getting Indian Kashmir, you are free to do so. I for one am yet to see evidence of such Chinese magnanimity for Pakistan, on the ground.
In 1962 India and China went to war. Three years later in 1965 Pakistan and India were at war. Did China interfere militarily, economically, or otherwise on Pakistan's behalf? NO. China maintained silence and equi-distance from Pakistan and India, letting them to fight it out among themselves. Ditto with the 1971 Indo-Pak war, when China's good friend Pakistan was being cut into two by the Indian Army, and China merely looked on. Various nations helped Pakistan. Various nations helped India. China remained neutral. Focussing instead on developing itself.
When Kargil happened, the Chinese again adopted a hands off policy. When they did make a statement it was an oblique critique of Pakistan's tactics. China asked forces who had stealthily entered into the other nation's territories to withdraw back into their own territories in the interest of world peace.
Even during the recent standoff between India and Pakistan, China adopted a neutral stance, and asked both countries to maintain peace.
But we are all free to draw conclusions that make us feel happy. Aren't we?
My friendly advice to my Pakistani friends is this. If you feel so strongly about Liberating Indian Kashmir, first try and become strong yourself so that you develop the ABILITY and the SELF CONFIDENCE to get the job done yourself.
As long as you keep indulging in 'khayali pulao banana' (living in a dream world) that one day uncle China or Uncle Amreeka will come galloping astride a dazzling white horse with a large sword in hand to carve out Indian Kashmir and lob it on your waiting lap, you will continue to remain disappointed. Don't expect some superpower to carve out Indian Kashmir and gift wrap it for you, like a benevolent uncle brings a lollipop to an undeserving little boy. Stop living in some 'Alice in wonderland' dreamworld.
Time to either man up, wear your big boy shorts, and achieve your objectives yourself. And if your dreams and desires and well beyond your capabilities, then either work on your capabilities till the little birdie's wings grow stronger, so she can fly away to her goals.
Else, if you hear a voice inside your head saying, 'Beta, yeh tum se nahin ho payega' ('Son, this is clearly beyond you'), then just give up and continue administering those little cross border pin ****** to India.
Just keep in mind that as the elephant keeps growing in size it shall feel those little pin ****** even less, and increasingly ignore the little prankster. Unless the day comes when the elephant has time on its hand to spare, with nothing else to do, and decides to squish away the little petulant prankster, before strolling away on its own merry way.
