What's new

Which career has been the most tragic: Simon Jones, Lakshmipathy Balaji or Shane Bond?

msb314

ODI Debutant
Joined
Oct 29, 2014
Runs
10,738
Post of the Week
2
Simon Jones was an amazing fast bowler with good height and pace and good swing the ball incredibly well. The highlight of his career must be the 2005 Ashes series where he picked up 18 wickets and an incredible average of only 21! His career was looking very promising back then but final test at the Oval of the 2005 Ashes series would turn out to be the last time he played international cricket for England :( He would miss the tour of Pakistan and India in 2006 and just succumbed to injury after injury - what a sad and early end to what could have been...

Laxshmipathy Balaji was a very good fast bowler for India who debuted back in 2002. He was most well known for his exploits against Pakistan during India's tour in 2004 in which he and Irfan Pathan bamboozled the Pakistani batsman in the ODI and Test series. Many Pakistani fans heckled him with chants of "Balaji zara dheere chalo!". He was in great form when Pakistan toured Indian in 2005 but the epic test of Bangalore where YK scored 267 would turn out to be the last for Balaji in his Test career :( Back injuries just destroyed him although he did play T20's for India until 2012.

IMO - Shane Bond was one of the best fast bowlers I have ever seen in the 2000's. His incredible spell in the 2003 WC was a sight to watch. Makes Boult and Southee look like amateurs now! Had incredible pace and control and was unplayable on green wickets. Again back injuries destroyed him and he pre-maturely retired from cricket in December 2009 after the 3rd Test against Pakistan (coincidentally that test was also the last time Iain O'Brien played as he retired and Fawad Alam last test match for Pakistan :( )

Which career was the most tragic and who was the biggest loss to cricket?
 
Balaji wasn't as good as the other two.

Jones was an unbelievably talented bowler and would have been an immense asset to England because unlike others in the team, he was a superb old ball bowler. Some of the reverse swing spells he bowled against Australia were incredible. England could have had lots of success in Asia if they had him.

Bond was easily the best of the three. Wouldbe up there with Steyn as the greatest bowler since 90s generation if he dind't get injured.Huge tragedy for cricket that his body was fragile.
 
Balaji wasn't as good as the other two.

Jones was an unbelievably talented bowler and would have been an immense asset to England because unlike others in the team, he was a superb old ball bowler. Some of the reverse swing spells he bowled against Australia were incredible. England could have had lots of success in Asia if they had him.

Bond was easily the best of the three. Wouldbe up there with Steyn as the greatest bowler since 90s generation if he dind't get injured.Huge tragedy for cricket that his body was fragile.

I think so too - Bond still has the best SR in Test history after Lohmann and his career average of 22 was amongst the best.

You are right that Balaji was not as good as the others but by Indian standards - he was worth his weight in gold. He was better than Irfan and Zaheer khan back then and good swing it well too. Could have had a great career...
 
Shane Bond was head and shoulders above the other two. A great pace bowler indeed. But he would remain injured all the time. Looking at his injuries, one develops renewed respect for pace bowlers who rarely got injured during their careers.
 
Definitely Shane Bond, I used to despise his bowling action and hated it so much because I used to find it ugly. Watched a couple of videos of him bowling and I've grown to like it now.
 
Balaji doesnt even belong in the same league

Heck arguably Jones doesnt belong in Bond's league but is streets ahead of Balaji
 
all 3 of those players are in a completely different stratosphere talent wise

Bond couldn't been a legend, as good as Steyn in tests and even better in ODIs

Simon Jones was solid, could've been a good bowler. Best case scenario is probably a career similar to James Anderson

Balaji was a nothing bowler. A dime a dozen...
 
Definitely Shane Bond, I used to despise his bowling action and hated it so much because I used to find it ugly. Watched a couple of videos of him bowling and I've grown to like it now.

Man now I have seen it all, if someone thinks that Shane Bond bowling style was ugly than something is seriously wrong with him because his bowling style is one of the most beautiful bowling I have ever seen, pure poetry of body movements or rather I should say he was Maclaren of fast bowlers epic speedy and killer looks.
 
Definitely Shane Bond, I used to despise his bowling action and hated it so much because I used to find it ugly. Watched a couple of videos of him bowling and I've grown to like it now.

You are the first person ever who Ive found to despise Bond's action

It was so smooth man
 
Man now I have seen it all, if someone thinks that Shane Bond bowling style was ugly than something is seriously wrong with him because his bowling style is one of the most beautiful bowling I have ever seen, pure poetry of body movements or rather I should say he was Maclaren of fast bowlers epic speedy and killer looks.

yes that action was beautiful.
 
Man now I have seen it all, if someone thinks that Shane Bond bowling style was ugly than something is seriously wrong with him because his bowling style is one of the most beautiful bowling I have ever seen, pure poetry of body movements or rather I should say he was Maclaren of fast bowlers epic speedy and killer looks.

I'll admit he was an excellent bowler but I found his bowling action hideous from the moment he jumps.
 
Simon Jones was an amazing fast bowler with good height and pace and good swing the ball incredibly well. The highlight of his career must be the 2005 Ashes series where he picked up 18 wickets and an incredible average of only 21! His career was looking very promising back then but final test at the Oval of the 2005 Ashes series would turn out to be the last time he played international cricket for England :( He would miss the tour of Pakistan and India in 2006 and just succumbed to injury after injury - what a sad and early end to what could have been...

Laxshmipathy Balaji was a very good fast bowler for India who debuted back in 2002. He was most well known for his exploits against Pakistan during India's tour in 2004 in which he and Irfan Pathan bamboozled the Pakistani batsman in the ODI and Test series. Many Pakistani fans heckled him with chants of "Balaji zara dheere chalo!". He was in great form when Pakistan toured Indian in 2005 but the epic test of Bangalore where YK scored 267 would turn out to be the last for Balaji in his Test career :( Back injuries just destroyed him although he did play T20's for India until 2012.

IMO - Shane Bond was one of the best fast bowlers I have ever seen in the 2000's. His incredible spell in the 2003 WC was a sight to watch. Makes Boult and Southee look like amateurs now! Had incredible pace and control and was unplayable on green wickets. Again back injuries destroyed him and he pre-maturely retired from cricket in December 2009 after the 3rd Test against Pakistan (coincidentally that test was also the last time Iain O'Brien played as he retired and Fawad Alam last test match for Pakistan :( )

Which career was the most tragic and who was the biggest loss to cricket?


Balaji??? Really.....

Bond was class, when he first came in 2001 shoaib, waqar, wasim , mcgrath, donald were still playing. Admittedly, 3 out of the 5 were way past their peak but this guy was something else. No one moved the ball at pace from length like bond......He was exciting and for some reason he made things happen.
 
all 3 of those players are in a completely different stratosphere talent wise

Bond couldn't been a legend, as good as Steyn in tests and even better in ODIs

Simon Jones was solid, could've been a good bowler. Best case scenario is probably a career similar to James Anderson

Balaji was a nothing bowler. A dime a dozen...

Balaji doesnt even belong in the same league

Heck arguably Jones doesnt belong in Bond's league but is streets ahead of Balaji

Balaji??? Really.....

Bond was class, when he first came in 2001 shoaib, waqar, wasim , mcgrath, donald were still playing. Admittedly, 3 out of the 5 were way past their peak but this guy was something else. No one moved the ball at pace from length like bond......He was exciting and for some reason he made things happen.

Its not about who was the best.

The question in the OP is: who's demise was the most tragic?
 
Its not about who was the best.

The question in the OP is: who's demise was the most tragic?

Even Indians don't consider Balaji's demise tragic. Irfan, Nehra and Sreesanth were far bigger losses for us.
 
I'd vote for Shane Bond - he had the potential to be a good bowler for New Zealand for a number of years, but injuries got in the way.

Balaji played for trundlia - his shelf life was correctly a year and a half before the brakes were inevitably pumped.

Simon Jones would have faded in any case. Home series win against Australia? Check. MBE and Knighthood received? Check. What else is there to gun for after that if you're English?
 
Balaji was an "OK" bowler. Only capable of terrorising minnow level Pakistani bating lineup.
Bond was on different level. Fans expected more from him.
 
Has to be Shane Bond but then again i doubt Bond's abilities on flat pitches, he was mostly effective on supportive pitches.

Simon Jones apart from that Ashes series did squat, he in the prior series was ordinary and had even lost his place in the side due to poor form.

Same with Ballaji.
 
You're weird. :danish

I ain't weird :))) I will admit that Bond was one of NZ's best fast bowlers and could've bagged 400+ wickets in Test cricket if he didn't get injured a lot but his bowling action was too much for his body to cope with hence he looked like he had to bend his back a lot more to get more out of his bowling. So I'll still stick with me thinking his bowling action is hideous :)))

Someone said the same thing about me before when I said that I hated KP's batting stance saying it was hideous and it is :))) A brilliant batsman though that has achieved a lot.
 
Every sportsperson whose career gets cut short by injury is a sad demise.. In this case talent wise bond was a much much much larger loss to world cricket than anyone else in recent Times..
 
Easily Bond, the other two don't belong in the same sentence as him such was his talent.
 
Bond and then Jones. Bond was in future legend class talent and Jones was in a very good bowler class talent.

Balaji was tragic for the fans. Even before the back injuries he was avg.Cant forget him getting hit for 21 runs n the last over againist Mumbai and losing the match in process.That loss meant KKR didnt finish in top 2.
 
Hate KP's stance and batting both. Most Ugly.
Hate Amla's and kohli's stance but their shots are smooth as butter. So kind of saves it from being UGLY.
 
Its not about who was the best.

The question in the OP is: who's demise was the most tragic?

Naturally the best players demise is most tragic. He's the one that would've given the most to cricket

Balaji's demise sucks for him, but in the larger scheme of things who really cares
 
Simon Jones' was the most tragic.

Bond missed 2 years due to ICL and prior to that he had been a regular feature from 2005 till 2007. He just started late, retired at the age of 35 which is very good for a pacer.

Balaji wasn't as good as the other two.
 
Balaji was very good,nagging line and length with swing.Pakistani batsmen were just bamboozled by him.Trazzic end of his carrier.
 
Shane Bond could have been an all time great. Could have been a legend had he not been injury prone.
 
Shane Bonds career being stop/start due to injury is one of crickets tragedies. Could have finished as one of crickets greats had his body help up.
 
Back
Top