What's new

Which is the better bowling attack at the 2017 Champions Trophy - India's or Pakistan's?

Which is the better bowling attack at the 2017 Champions Trophy - India's or Pakistan's?


  • Total voters
    13
  • Poll closed .

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
Seems to be a popular topic at the moment. :msd

After the first match, it looked like India's was much better after Pakistan conceded 300 and then barely managed to score half of the runs they needed in the chase.

But Pakistan's bowling against South Africa was excellent, while India's against Sri Lanka... :srt

What's the verdict?
 
Pakistan have made India's attack look too special. Sri Lanka proved it isn't. The bowlers weren't able to get more than a SINGLE wicket in the entire 50 overs. While I do agree that they are much superior to Pakistan as a team and are galaxies ahead of us at handling pressure, I am of the opinion that Pakistani bowlers are better.
 
Pakistan alhamdulillah, mashallah. Indian one is overatted imo...
 
Indians were bowling to Pakistani Batting lineup so the credibility based on that game is extremely questionable. Pakistan has the ability to make anyone look like Dennis Lillee hence anyone getting Pakistan Batsmen out is not the benchmark.

However, Pakistan bowled SA (A lineup filled with Dekock, Amla, AB and Faf) for 219. If India can contain them less than that in their game then I'll say India has a superior bowling lineup until then it looks like Pakistan is quite a stretch ahead of them especially when it comes to pace bowling attack.
 
Pakistan has always, always, always been the best bowling side from Asia. The batting crown has kept moving around the top three countries.
 
Pak has better bowlers individually.

As a combined attack Ind tends to do better.
 
If Pakistan bowls out SL for a cheap total like 250. Then we are indeed the best bowling attack in Asia. I have great hope.
 
Back
Top