What's new

Why was the lunch break taken 10 minutes early?

marlonbrowndo

Senior ODI Player
Joined
May 29, 2015
Runs
22,526
Post of the Week
2
Seemed to me like the Australian captain convinced the umpires to take the early lunch break so his precious new ball wouldn't be spoiled. Australian commentators were baffled as well. Mickey was angry.
 
Combination of things it seems, but seeming like a blunder by Ian Gould at the moment.

Gould was already worried about the rain and was trying to get guidance from the ground staff and smith having a word with him, sort of accelerated his decision making.
 
Weird to see that. Aus didn't want to bowl with new ball before lunch and that was obvious, but not sure how you will not play for 10 more minutes when time was there.
 
"Finally! Time for the new ball. What's that? Conditions aren't perfect? Run away! Run away!"

lT6fYbw.gif


:smith
 
We could've added some more runs and Shafiq could've gotten his milestone. What could've been...
 
or we could have lost a wicket on stroke of lunch like yesterday

let's quit bleating and get on with the game
 
or we could have lost a wicket on stroke of lunch like yesterday

let's quit bleating and get on with the game

It's not about what could have happened. It's a matter of principle. That 10 minutes would probably have made no difference to the game but that's not the point
 
awful decision!!!!

how can a fielding captain influence the umpires to take lunch early!
 
I don't want to use the word bigot in a cricket game, but Gould has done something very close to that. With 2 set batsmen in, Smith didn't want to drain another 20 runs to old ball before break, neither he wanted to take the new ball when there is moisture around - so he went to the white umpire and asked him to close the session 14 minutes earlier for rain. Now, the game can only start when the field is dry & straightway Smith will take the new ball. Gould has played enough cricket to know this & if Misbah was in same spot, he would have simply waved him aside - sorry Misbah, can't go off, light is good; either take the new ball or continue with your part-timers. He is just repaying part of what Darrell Hair favored them at Oval.

Every Asian team, including India was at receiving end in past, most notably 1991-92 series which was the worst umpiring display of my experience (because I didn't see 1985-86 India Tour & 1989-90 PAK tour to Australia); but now, if any Umpire does this to Indian team, BCCI 'll call him to India and push entire Cape of Kanyakumari into his back side & the umpire's home board will tell him to bear it for some times, while they try to comfort BCCI - by that time, he should be habituated with the pain.

I understand, my post is not respectful to a Cricket Umpire, but respect is earned - it's not a close call or Umpiring mistake; it's a strategic call, which might cost PAK the game. Weather interruption is part of game - one can't call off a session so that bowling side can take the new ball at their convenience.
 
I don't want to use the word bigot in a cricket game, but Gould has done something very close to that. With 2 set batsmen in, Smith didn't want to drain another 20 runs to old ball before break, neither he wanted to take the new ball when there is moisture around - so he went to the white umpire and asked him to close the session 14 minutes earlier for rain. Now, the game can only start when the field is dry & straightway Smith will take the new ball. Gould has played enough cricket to know this & if Misbah was in same spot, he would have simply waved him aside - sorry Misbah, can't go off, light is good; either take the new ball or continue with your part-timers. He is just repaying part of what Darrell Hair favored them at Oval.

Every Asian team, including India was at receiving end in past, most notably 1991-92 series which was the worst umpiring display of my experience (because I didn't see 1985-86 India Tour & 1989-90 PAK tour to Australia); but now, if any Umpire does this to Indian team, BCCI 'll call him to India and push entire Cape of Kanyakumari into his back side & the umpire's home board will tell him to bear it for some times, while they try to comfort BCCI - by that time, he should be habituated with the pain.

I understand, my post is not respectful to a Cricket Umpire, but respect is earned - it's not a close call or Umpiring mistake; it's a strategic call, which might cost PAK the game. Weather interruption is part of game - one can't call off a session so that bowling side can take the new ball at their convenience.

The chances of the 10 runs Pakistan could have scored in the last over or two costing them the game are very low.
 
If Misbah and Co. have any sense of pride they should protest this decision with the match referee.

The longer the rain holds up play the worse Ian Gould's decision is seeming to be.
 
The chances of the 10 runs Pakistan could have scored in the last over or two costing them the game are very low.
1) it's a matter of principle and following rules
 
The chances of the 10 runs Pakistan could have scored in the last over or two costing them the game are very low.

May be, but this is where we Asian teams get caught so many times - won't go to other examples, check how many times Indian batsmen were given LBW in last 10 minutes of a Session in that 1991-92 series.

10 runs doesn't cost a game, but it's about closing a session - every over after 80, is a opportunity with Kookaburra, unless you take the new ball. That break not only protects the ball,but it gives them 40 minutes rest & a reassessment of the situation - it can be the difference of 262/6 or 266/4 after Josh & Starc has finished their spell with 2nd ball. One famous comment from Gavaskar in that 1991-92 Series was - "they know exactly what to do when & they do know how to balance it numerically".

Anyway, that was a biased call, not taken at the heat of the moment - a cool headed decision, that gives one side significant advantage - PAK can still go to 303/4 at tea, but that won't prove Gould's decision fair.
 
Or maybe it was S Ravi who maybe acted behind the scenes.He could not see Pakistan advancing in world of cricket for obvious reasons.
 
I Wont make a big deal out of it but the umpires need to be a bit more professional with their approach
 
Weired, seemingly biased, decision by the umpires. But I don't think Pakistan should mind. They have developed a habit of losing wickets on the stroke of lunch/tea/close and the best they were going to get was another 10 runs.
 
Weired, seemingly biased, decision by the umpires. But I don't think Pakistan should mind. They have developed a habit of losing wickets on the stroke of lunch/tea/close and the best they were going to get was another 10 runs.

14 minutes were left, and spinner was bowling from one end. They could have easily gotten in three, perhaps four overs. Pakistan had scored 46 runs in the last 10 overs, so if the trend continued Pakistan would have scored an extra 18-20 runs.

Pakistan got robbed by a cry baby Aussie and a colluding ump.
 
It is not going to cost Pakistan the match; if they don't win, it is because it rained or they played really badly and lost it from here. As for the early lunch, Australians have always been bad losers, but the fault is squarely with the umpires.
 
Well, I didn't know it'll come down to such - when I posted on this ......
 
Back
Top