) He is India's Zaid Hamid.
Kaaba is in Saudi Arabia. I don’t think so India would ever invade one of its most important trade partners any time soon. So op can sleep easy.
Also c’mon bro to counter Suella which by the way has nothing to do with India or Indians: Yati whatever this guys name is the best you got
Maybe Google can be a useful resource after all if used rightly especially if used to educating yourself. At least you got it’s utility of searching for keywords and copy pasting the links down to a tee. Kudos. We all have to start somewhere.
I know there are many sensible Indian's as well as their are Pak's. I also laugh at the likes of Zaid Hamid when they speak of Ghazwa-e-Hind. A nuke war will make the entire subcontinent inhabitable for countless years. No one wants another Nagasaki or Hiroshima where deformed children are still born
I know there are many sensible Indian's as well as their are Pak's. I also laugh at the likes of Zaid Hamid when they speak of Ghazwa-e-Hind. A nuke war will make the entire subcontinent inhabitable for countless years. No one wants another Nagasaki or Hiroshima where deformed children are still born
We have many similar war mongers in our country too. Instead of progress they see conspiracies everywhere. According the them the USA is responsible for everything that is wrong in the world. From abrupt weather to COVID that was all about transforming humanity in to zombies
Everyone knows people like these exist everywhere. The problem arises when people of such kind come into some kind of power especially in the political circuit. Politics + Unbridled hatred = War
It's a problem when any such nutcase starts appearing over any type of media. Puts a horrible image on the country.
Yep an idiot character.
This sums up Hindutva.
Well a nation SHOULD not be judged on the basis of actions or words of a few nutcases but in the current world a lot of people do. Just as we know there are a lot of great Indians (followers of many religions), there are some nutjobs there as well.
It's funny Muslims who are indeed evil, terrorists or general troublemakers won't even probably make 10 per cent of the total population of Muslims in the world. And yet the rest of the world paint the rest of the good 90 per cent with the same brush.
This is why racism/bias is such a despicable virtue that it falsely attributes an evil conception and generalizes it to everyone who looks or talks like them etc.
How did you calculate those ratios?No big deal there is probably 1 such character or maybe 10, for every such Narsinganand types there are a 1000 such who hold dumb theories about Ghazwa-e-hind etc etc. I feel the same way about this guy as you guys feel about those theories. All good.
India boasts a population of approximately 1.5 billion, with Hindus comprising 85% of this demographic. Even if we consider the BJP's claimed support of 49%, it's important to acknowledge the party's historical stance, which has often been perceived as deeply anti-Muslim and anti-Pakistani.No big deal there is probably 1 such character or maybe 10, for every such Narsinganand types there are a 1000 such who hold dumb theories about Ghazwa-e-hind etc etc. I feel the same way about this guy as you guys feel about those theories. All good.
He is not affiliated with any political party. He is a mentally challenged individual. You have no idea about the type of things he has said in the past including about your Prophet. I can't even post them here.
Well, he should not invoke the Muslims then. These kinds of statements make no sense and can bring a lot of violent reaction.
Never question a bhakt's wisdom because they don't have it.
Swept aside, Muslims mentioned and then told they are 1000 times worse.
Happened to America with regards to their safety post 9/11.
Does this guy want to attack the Kaaba to make his loved one safe? This is bizarre
It's acceptable to hold a neutral stance on certain matters, however, advocating for ideologies such as racism, bigotry, religious supremacism, and ignorance, which the BJP is frequently accused of, is not only undesirable but morally reprehensible.
Yes because of safety, one should start planning about invading their Holiest site.
Why try and be neutral when one can be openly racist and Islamophobic.
Could you please elucidate the distinction between 'Pro-Muslim' and 'Pro-Hindu' parties? Dividing political entities along religious lines underscores India's failure to transcend the specter of Partition. Such division inherently rests on the foundation of bigotry, evident when political parties align themselves along religious affiliations.
Has America failed as well? They have a Pro Christian party.
Read your previous post about safety and stuff. You were pretty much defending the guy for which this thread was made or were you oblivious regarding what was being discussed in this thread?
Could you kindly furnish an illustration delineating the encroachment upon personal laws of Hindus or any other religious communities by purportedly Pro-Muslim political entities?
How has this law impacted Hindus, Sikhs, Christians, or adherents of any other religious denomination apart from Muslims?1955:
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
This was the year the Congress had power to bring UCC.
——
1986:
“In 1986, the Parliament of India passed an act titled The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, that nullified the Supreme Court's judgment in the Shah Banojudgment. Diluting the Supreme Court judgment, the act allowed maintenance to a divorced woman only during the period of iddat, or till 90 days after the divorce, according to the provisions of Islamic law. This was in stark contrast to Section 125 of the Code.[20] The 'liability' of husband to pay the maintenance was thus restricted to the period of the iddat only."
Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum - Wikipedia
When Congress did the above they had most seats in history and BJP had 2(lol)
1955 impacted Hindus.(Interference in personal Hindu laws)
I am trying to gain a more comprehensive understanding.
I do agree that there should be a uniform civil code or that all religious communities should have their own personal laws.
None, would just prefer UCC.
1955 law directly impacts Hindus.. and including Sikhs in them impacted them as well.
Bro being completely honest i don't understand the logic here.
Laws of Muslim don’t affect me yes, in that logic nothing affects me coz i don’t even live in India currently..
Thats fair enough.
Ideally i wouldn't prefer personal laws but that’s my own bias against people that hold religious power or caste ones- Khap Panchayat another example.
Based on my perspective as outsider I think that a UCC will be the safest option for Muslims too in the long run.
