What's new

"Your courageous leadership to Myanmar peace process needs to be lauded" - Modi to Aung San Suu Kyi

I couldn't care less about what Modi is doing in Myanmar. I only started the thread because I was startled by the particular statement in the title of the thread considering the context of what is happening right now.

Is this the ideal time to be praising a leader for 'courageous leadership'? Obviously he isn't referring to the situation at hand, but by choosing to praise Suu Kyi and ignoring what's going on, it's a tacit endorsement of the policies that Myanmar are pursuing.

I don't think this statement was necessary for Modi's visit and to further economic ties.
 
One religious extremist supporting other religious extremist in killing of innocent people. Why is anyone surprised?

Largest democracy in the world pretending to be secular supporting mass murderer regime shouldn't be surprise to anyone.

Would he had made same comment, had the victims were Hindu ? Probably not.
 
The only thing relevant here is that Indian PM has to safeguard Indias interest and how Indian PM does it is upto him.What will harm India and Myanmar relations, well let the two countries handle it.

Yep, it is up to the person who assumes a task. Only saying that not condoning and praising her personality would have not harmed the relations between two countries.

Now, it is also up to me and others at PP to discuss what we feel worth discussing. And also up to you to avoid or participate in the that discussion.

Btw, It was also up to Mussolini, up to Hitler, up to Bush and up to many others to terrorize their own countrymen or fellow humans.
 
He is Indian PM and he will do whatever is good for his country.You are free to not vote for him in the next elections if you can that is.Rest he isnt answerable to Pakistanis just like Pakistani general isnt answerable to us.

You are no one to put the Indian PM to task.Lol at putting the Indian PM to task.Dream on about that.

Pakistanis spouting rubbish about him doesnt make it the truth.You can keep condemning him anywhere you like, just like he is free to do anything he likes.Things that dont conform to Pakistani line of thought are not wrong and Indians will do what they think is right whether you like it or not, so deal with it.

Your responses on this thread are fairly obvious.

Yes, Modi will do whatever he wants.
Yes, people are free to vote for whoever they want.
Yes, he isn't answerable to Pakistan.
Yes, Pakistanis can condemn him if they wish to.
Yes, India will do what they think is right.

The only problem with your responses is that it's a discussion thread and a (Pakistani) forum therefore these discussions will take place. That is literally the whole point of a forum.

You can contribute to the discussion if you wish to, or else leave it. But saying "India and Modi don't care" isn't really taking the discussion anywhere.
 
Last edited:
I couldn't care less about what Modi is doing in Myanmar. I only started the thread because I was startled by the particular statement in the title of the thread considering the context of what is happening right now.

Is this the ideal time to be praising a leader for 'courageous leadership'? Obviously he isn't referring to the situation at hand, but by choosing to praise Suu Kyi and ignoring what's going on, it's a tacit endorsement of the policies that Myanmar are pursuing.

I don't think this statement was necessary for Modi's visit and to further economic ties.

It shows his lack of class and also that Mr Modi is not that bright, nor does he have any diplomatic skills. Unless he is deliberately trying to antagonise a
Group of people which is not improbable given his past track record.

Exactly no one cares about his economic deals with the country.

What people are discussing is his timely stupid bizzare statement when 120,000 already persecuted people have fled in the last 2 weeks. And he has the galls to talk about peace regarding Aung. Who is he trying convince ?

Modi is a joker and a fool, but is fooling no one but his base of blind national supporters - some of whom are hovering in this thread.
 
You are such a drama queen.

You love generalising the word Pakistanis as if we are all the same.

I will say it agin Einstein - this is a forum where discussions will take place on various subjects and various countries.

Your clown PM Modi made a joke of a statement that's why that he is being laughed and put to task by various opinions here.

Understand ?? Opinions, you are allowed to express those in here. If your blind Indian nationalist blood can not take such criticism then kindly buzz off somewhere else.

Otherwise learn to talk about the subject instead of parroting your usua defensive lines.

Arent Pakistanis the one bashing him here?Indians are simply telling its not his job to tell Myanmar what to do abd what not to.His job is to secure Indian interests and he will do so whether some foreigners like it or not.

Like you i am also expressing my opinion.

My PM is unaffected by anything that is said here.He wasnot elected by non Indians and he isnt answerable to them either.And as i said people like you can dream about taking an Indian PM to task,not happening ever.

India bashing is also an opinion.Isnt it?I am rather enjoying this thread, people with nothing to do with India Myanmar or Modi telling how these entities should conduct things between them.Its kind of well you know .
 
Your responses on this thread are fairly obvious.

Yes, Modi will do whatever he wants.
Yes, people are free to vote for whoever they want.
Yes, he isn't answerable to Pakistan.
Yes, Pakistanis can condemn him if they wish to.
Yes, India will do what they think is right.

The only problem with your responses is that it's a discussion thread and a (Pakistani) forum therefore these discussions will take place. That is literally the whole point of a forum.

You can contribute to the discussion if you wish to, or else leave it. But saying "India and Modi don't care" isn't really taking the discussion anywhere.

Why should i have any problems with the discussion?But i too am telling my viewpoint.It may not be one that conforms to the Pakistani one but since its the Indian PM thats why i am commenting.

As every Indian on this thread pointed out,Modi's job is to look after Indian interests and not poke his nose into Myanmars affairs.

Pakistanis may similarly think its their view to talk about and put their head into any muslim issue anywhere and its your opinion a person or a country cannot and shouldnot be criticised because it doesnt conform to your views.

For Modi his countrys interest is paramount for Pakistanis it may be the religion, doesnt mean either is wrong or should be bashed for it.

Indians and Pakistanis are different people with different ideologies and views.Why is it difficult to accept that Indians can have their views and it can be diagonally opposite to Pakistans and they shouldnot be bashed for it.

I hope i am able to make my point clear here.If you think i am not please feel free to ask me.I am not here for confrontations and disputes but discussion.
 
Yep, it is up to the person who assumes a task. Only saying that not condoning and praising her personality would have not harmed the relations between two countries.

Now, it is also up to me and others at PP to discuss what we feel worth discussing. And also up to you to avoid or participate in the that discussion.

Btw, It was also up to Mussolini, up to Hitler, up to Bush and up to many others to terrorize their own countrymen or fellow humans.

Dont twist everything.Myanmar is a chinese ally and hence India has got to go out of its way to get them to further Indian interests.

Modi isnt a dictator.If he tries to be one he will be shown his place.So whats the point of bringing in dictators?

Bush was elected US president , Twice.Dont see anyone trying to put him to trial for anything.
 
Last edited:
Why should i have any problems with the discussion?But i too am telling my viewpoint.It may not be one that conforms to the Pakistani one but since its the Indian PM thats why i am commenting.

As every Indian on this thread pointed out,Modi's job is to look after Indian interests and not poke his nose into Myanmars affairs.

Pakistanis may similarly think its their view to talk about and put their head into any muslim issue anywhere and its your opinion a person or a country cannot and shouldnot be criticised because it doesnt conform to your views.

For Modi his countrys interest is paramount for Pakistanis it may be the religion, doesnt mean either is wrong or should be bashed for it.

Indians and Pakistanis are different people with different ideologies and views.Why is it difficult to accept that Indians can have their views and it can be diagonally opposite to Pakistans and they shouldnot be bashed for it.

I hope i am able to make my point clear here.If you think i am not please feel free to ask me.I am not here for confrontations and disputes but discussion.

Glad to be back on topic.

What does Modi's statement in the OP have to do with economic ties and Indian interests?

Was this statement really necessary in the current context? That's what I found strange.
 
One religious extremist supporting other religious extremist in killing of innocent people. Why is anyone surprised?

Largest democracy in the world pretending to be secular supporting mass murderer regime shouldn't be surprise to anyone.

Would he had made same comment, had the victims were Hindu ? Probably not.

Rohingyas have hindus too.
 
Indian PM is answerable to Indian people and his job is to further the interests of his 1.25 bn people.

He isnt going to take permission from Pakistanis to do so.People of other countries are not going to behave according to your wishes.

Pakistanis bashing India or Indians is a common practise.Doesnt surprise anyone nor anyone takes notice these days.

Such blind support never ends well.
 
Glad to be back on topic.

What does Modi's statement in the OP have to do with economic ties and Indian interests?

Was this statement really necessary in the current context? That's what I found strange.

India's interest in Myanmar are more than economic.Its strategic as well.I explained a few points in one of my posts to Finisher here.

Secondly Myanmar is a Chinese ally,so getting them to work for India isnt the easiest task.Suu Kyi is the only hope as she has been educated in India and was constantly supported by the west and India during her struggle and is someobe who India can work with.India needs here support now and repeating the praise her for things she did and that actually received world wide praise isnt going to harm the Rohingyas.Rather if India criticises her it may jeopardise Indias interests in Myanmar and also raise new hassles for India in the north east.

I dont think many world leaders have directly attacked Suu Kyi either.May be they understand that the military is still powerful in Myanmar and Suu Kyis is holding power because of her popularity among the people.May be if she supports the Rohingyas who are supposed illegal migrants will decrease her support among common Burmese (There are issues of Rohingyas attacking the non muslims etc).So everyone has limitations.Even Pakistan hasnot directly attacked Suu Kyi.

Its not like the issue isnt being discussed in India, But most foreign policy experts have pointed to the limitations India have with Burma and that its better to stick with Suu Kyi.


Thank you for understanding and asking and not summarily dismissing Indians as murderers extremists clowns fools jokers etc etc.
 
Such blind support never ends well.

KU with all due respect,this isnt about Modi.Its what good for India.I would say the same if the PM was Rahul Gandhi.

We come from different ideologies.Pakistan being formed on basis of Islam has considerations of Muslims as its paramount importance.India being held together by the idea of India as a single nation puts National interests as paramount.Both ideologies are not wrong.Both need to be respected.
 
Arent Pakistanis the one bashing him here?Indians are simply telling its not his job to tell Myanmar what to do abd what not to.His job is to secure Indian interests and he will do so whether some foreigners like it or not.

Like you i am also expressing my opinion.

My PM is unaffected by anything that is said here.He wasnot elected by non Indians and he isnt answerable to them either.And as i said people like you can dream about taking an Indian PM to task,not happening ever.

India bashing is also an opinion.Isnt it?I am rather enjoying this thread, people with nothing to do with India Myanmar or Modi telling how these entities should conduct things between them.Its kind of well you know .

wherr did anyone on this thread has said how India or Modi should conduct their business?

India bashing could be an opinion, not agreeing with Modi could be an opinion but no one has said Modi, India or you should be like this, people have criticized him for his comment, anyone from anywhere could do that, you can't tell people to not express your opinion. stop conflating opinion with command, you aren't that naive stop pretending to be one.

Now go on with your memorized reply when you can't understand the difference between opinion with demand or command.
 
wherr did anyone on this thread has said how India or Modi should conduct their business?

India bashing could be an opinion, not agreeing with Modi could be an opinion but no one has said Modi, India or you should be like this, people have criticized him for his comment, anyone from anywhere could do that, you can't tell people to not express your opinion. stop conflating opinion with command, you aren't that naive stop pretending to be one.

Now go on with your memorized reply when you can't understand the difference between opinion with demand or command.

Can people be respected for having a different opinion and not bashed for it?
 
KU with all due respect,this isnt about Modi.Its what good for India.I would say the same if the PM was Rahul Gandhi.

We come from different ideologies.Pakistan being formed on basis of Islam has considerations of Muslims as its paramount importance.India being held together by the idea of India as a single nation puts National interests as paramount.Both ideologies are not wrong.Both need to be respected.

Of course, but national interests shouldn't be used as a crutch to justify/overlook atrocities.

And that goes for any ideology.
 
At this very moment, one of the most persecuted groups on the planet is once again being ethnically cleansed by Myanmar’s military. Rohingya people are a stateless Indo-Aryan people from Rakhine State, Myanmar. Here are quick facts that everyone should know and share.
-There are 1.3 million Rohingya Muslims, only 40,000 recognized by the state.
-United Nations announced over 120,000 Rohyingya people have fled to Bangladesh in the last 2 weeks.
-Many families have drowned in the process.
-400,000 are estimated to be trapped in conflict zones in Northern Rakhine at this moment.
-Aid groups reported rapid decrease in medical aid, while 40-50% increase in injured patients.
-Over 20,000 people are estimated to be ‘stuck’ in no man’s land between Bangladesh and Myanmar border.
-Human Rights Watch cited satellite evidence of widespread burning in at-least 10 parts of Rakhine state.
-Myanmar's military confessed to massacring only 400, however, the United Nations estimated the death toll at “around a thousand."
-Many refugees whom fled the genocide have reported seeing groups of muslims being tied then slaughtered. This is the style of this genocide.
"One mother recounted in the report how her five-year-old daughter was trying to protect her from rape when a man “took out a long knife and killed her by slitting her throat” -independent UK


happening while she is in power. It does matter. Stop trying to defend indefensible.

What ?? Just because she wants a democratic system instead of continuous military dictatorship doesn't mean her credentials can not be questioned when an ethnic group is getting attacked.

If she doesn't speak up now when will she speak up ?? When all the Rohingas are all gone ??

I was bitterly disappointed in her a few years ago when she kept quite on the issue but now I'm in totally disgusted with her silence and she should hand back her peace prize because it's proven she is a fake peace activist.

And it's not just Muslims, many many non Muslim academics feel the same about her.

It's a political award, I remember her interview to the leftist Indian paper ' The Hindu' where she said "I was always a politician",

So maybe the community can take away the award,and if her vote bank asks her to give up award she would as well, coz she is a politician.

I'm not defending her, defending that the award is Political and it has always been,I get that the award matters to people in West.
 
Of course, but national interests shouldn't be used as a crutch to justify/overlook atrocities.

And that goes for any ideology.

Indian line is of being neutral and not poking is nose in Myanmar.It will have poor results for India as well.We may likely see more refugees coming into India and obstacles in deporting the 54k Rohingyas we already have.No Myannarese support to weed out terrorists in north east India.So the neutral path India has taken is better for us.
 
Indian line is of being neutral and not poking is nose in Myanmar.It will have poor results for India as well.We may likely see more refugees coming into India and obstacles in deporting the 54k Rohingyas we already have.No Myannarese support to weed out terrorists in north east India.So the neutral path India has taken is better for us.

How is praising the leader of Myanmar on her contributions to peace process while overseeing ethnic cleansing, taking a neutral path?
 
How is praising the leader of Myanmar on her contributions to peace process while overseeing ethnic cleansing, taking a neutral path?

Praising Suu Kyi for her past work has nothing to do with her present stance.Modi is just following the established Indian line of decades to support and praise Suu Kyi.Suu Kyi was educated in India and lived in Delhi for a long time.Througout her struggle for democracy in Burma, India supported her.She is often called the mother of Myanmarese nation.Modi is just following the same line and not jeopardising relations.
 
Praising Suu Kyi for her past work has nothing to do with her present stance.Modi is just following the established Indian line of decades to support and praise Suu Kyi.Suu Kyi was educated in India and lived in Delhi for a long time.Througout her struggle for democracy in Burma, India supported her.She is often called the mother of Myanmarese nation.Modi is just following the same line and not jeopardising relations.

Yet he changed tact with the Palestinians, seems like the Butcher of Gujarat enjoys a bit of spilt Muslim blood.
 
Praising Suu Kyi for her past work has nothing to do with her present stance.Modi is just following the established Indian line of decades to support and praise Suu Kyi.Suu Kyi was educated in India and lived in Delhi for a long time.Througout her struggle for democracy in Burma, India supported her.She is often called the mother of Myanmarese nation.Modi is just following the same line and not jeopardising relations.

Hitler was times man of the year, should he be pra used for that?
Talk about the present situation when the PM of India is praising someone who's continuing to blindside a democide.
The whole world including the Muslim's were In uproar when the yazidiz were getting persecuted.
 
Hitler was times man of the year, should he be pra used for that?
Talk about the present situation when the PM of India is praising someone who's continuing to blindside a democide.
The whole world including the Muslim's were In uproar when the yazidiz were getting persecuted.


You know how many years Hitler ruled Germany?Not more than 15yrs.Suu Kyi spent more than that in imprisonment.They didnot allow her to meet her dying husband or children.

India has interests in Myanmar and for decades those interests were languishing as India supported Suu Kyi and not the army.Finally India has the oppurtunity to safeguard its interests and only a foolish PM will change the line of praising Suu Kyi fir decades,when finally that line is close to its goal.

For Indian PM the interests of 1.25bn Indians is more important than anything else and that is why he has been elected.He has to safeguard it any which way possible.
 
You know how many years Hitler ruled Germany?Not more than 15yrs.Suu Kyi spent more than that in imprisonment.They didnot allow her to meet her dying husband or children.

India has interests in Myanmar and for decades those interests were languishing as India supported Suu Kyi and not the army.Finally India has the oppurtunity to safeguard its interests and only a foolish PM will change the line of praising Suu Kyi fir decades,when finally that line is close to its goal.

For Indian PM the interests of 1.25bn Indians is more important than anything else and that is why he has been elected.He has to safeguard it any which way possible.

So, if Indian interest were to uphold by praising hitler, Modi would praise him and 1.25 billion Indian would be okay?

And yet 1.25 Indian beat the dhol of terrorism everyday in the media and o every forum while conducting business with people who are terrorizing its own people.
 
So, if Indian interest were to uphold by praising hitler, Modi would praise him and 1.25 billion Indian would be okay?

And yet 1.25 Indian beat the dhol of terrorism everyday in the media and o every forum while conducting business with people who are terrorizing its own people.

What is happening in Myanmar is a internal matter of Myanmar, its not for India to interfere.That is a policy India is following.
 
So, if Indian interest were to uphold by praising hitler, Modi would praise him and 1.25 billion Indian would be okay?

And yet 1.25 Indian beat the dhol of terrorism everyday in the media and o every forum while conducting business with people who are terrorizing its own people.

If those terrorists from the neighbouring country stay out of India i assure you India wont be bothering.

Pervez Mussaraff did Kargil, but when he was ruler of Pakistan we did business with him.Putin is hated by western media and countries but they all do business with him.China and Russia are likely to block UNSC censure on Myanmar.China is supporting the NoKo regime,who have been terrifying their own people for decades.Pakistan itself is selling JF17s to Myanmar.I can give many more examples.

International diplomacy is conducted on the basis of national interests and not on basis of emotions.
 
If those terrorists from the neighbouring country stay out of India i assure you India wont be bothering.

Pervez Mussaraff did Kargil, but when he was ruler of Pakistan we did business with him.Putin is hated by western media and countries but they all do business with him.China and Russia are likely to block UNSC censure on Myanmar.China is supporting the NoKo regime,who have been terrifying their own people for decades.Pakistan itself is selling JF17s to Myanmar.I can give many more examples.

International diplomacy is conducted on the basis of national interests and not on basis of emotions.

If India stop killing and raping kashmiri, i assure you Pakistan won't be bothering.
 
The more understanding I gain of India and Myanmar relations this message form Modi seems like a subliminal appreciation to keep up whatever is being done with the Rohingyas
 
The more understanding I gain of India and Myanmar relations this message form Modi seems like a subliminal appreciation to keep up whatever is being done with the Rohingyas

It's almost like he's there to coach her towards his figures from the Gujarat Riots.
 
The more understanding I gain of India and Myanmar relations this message form Modi seems like a subliminal appreciation to keep up whatever is being done with the Rohingyas

Or may be India isnt getting involved in that matter altogether.
 
Perhaps the people in this other country who rightfully consider themselves Pakistani?

You have a plebicite to prove this?35% of J and K is hindu and thus despite the genocide of Pandits.More than 5% is shia and buddhist and these people have no interest in Pakistan.Based on a few thousand in Srinagar you think J and K is Pakistan territory?FYI even Pakistan govt doesnt claim J and K as Pakistani territory.

No country has the right to poke its nose in another country.Thats the international law.

No country has the
 
Dont twist everything.Myanmar is a chinese ally and hence India has got to go out of its way to get them to further Indian interests.

Modi isnt a dictator.If he tries to be one he will be shown his place.So whats the point of bringing in dictators?

Bush was elected US president , Twice.Dont see anyone trying to put him to trial for anything.

If any one it is you who is the master of twisting. I am only pondering about your "up to" thing which is your favorite in defending stupid situations.

Even your ultra-nationalist mindset notes that it is a bit off routine and abnormal for a head of state to praise another one when there are growing concerns about her treatment to minorities and severe allegations of human rights violations to the extent of genocide.

Don't want to digress any further but Bush by starting Iraq war, based on a lie and ulterior motives resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths. It is plain fact.
 
Or may be India isnt getting involved in that matter altogether.

Yeah not getting involved would be staying quiet or passing on your praises personally when they meet. Why do it so openly during a time her actions are being questioned? Is Modi dumb or is he trying to give her a pat on her back?
 
If any one it is you who is the master of twisting. I am only pondering about your "up to" thing which is your favorite in defending stupid situations.

Even your ultra-nationalist mindset notes that it is a bit off routine and abnormal for a head of state to praise another one when there are growing concerns about her treatment to minorities and severe allegations of human rights violations to the extent of genocide.

Don't want to digress any further but Bush by starting Iraq war, based on a lie and ulterior motives resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths. It is plain fact.

Bush's war resulted in 100s of 1000s of deaths, still every nation on the planet went about dealing with him as usual.Pervez Mussaraff did Kargil, but when he was ruler of Pakistan we did business with him.Putin is hated by western media and countries but they all do business with him.China and Russia are likely to block UNSC censure on Myanmar.China is supporting the NoKo regime,who have been terrifying their own people for decades.Pakistan itself is selling JF17s to Myanmar.I can give many more examples.

India has been praising Suu Kyi since she started her movement for democracy in 1988.It would be abnormal to leave that line now.Rather it would create problems for India if Suu Kyi decides to be not friendly with India as the other power center in Myanmar, The Army isnt exactly fond of India.

International diplomacy are done on basis of national interests and national interests alone.India isnt killing the rohingyas.Neither is India breaking any international laws by dealing with Myanmar.

There is nothing stupid here, Modi is elected to further interests of 1.25bn Indians and not teach Myanmar how they run their country.Their country Their issue and India should stay a mile away from getting into this quagmire.Those who want to are free to do so.
 
Yeah not getting involved would be staying quiet or passing on your praises personally when they meet. Why do it so openly during a time her actions are being questioned? Is Modi dumb or is he trying to give her a pat on her back?

Staying quiet? You go to a country whose leader your country has supported since 1988 and you stay quiet.That is abnormal. Modi did what is the official line of India on Suu Kyi since 1988.Any deviation would have been bad for India.

India simply wants nothing to do with the Rohingya issue. Those who want can ask their countries to get involved.Spare mine please.
 
Staying quiet? You go to a country whose leader your country has supported since 1988 and you stay quiet.That is abnormal. Modi did what is the official line of India on Suu Kyi since 1988.Any deviation would have been bad for India.

India simply wants nothing to do with the Rohingya issue. Those who want can ask their countries to get involved.Spare mine please.

Why not convey your appreciation to her in person? Knowing full well how sensitive the current issue...as a PM of millions of Muslims doesn't he have that much EQ?
 
Why not convey your appreciation to her in person? Knowing full well how sensitive the current issue...as a PM of millions of Muslims doesn't he have that much EQ?

What has Indian muslims got to do here??Nothing.If their rights were being prejudiced Modi should have intervened with all his might.

Thing is you may be looking at India from a Pakistani point of view which is not correct.Pakistan was formedon basis of Islam, hence the religious identity take precedence over everything else.Therefore, the thinking to interfere everywhere, where the problems involve muslims.

On the contrary, the Idea of India as a united nation that formed India. Here National interest is of paramount importance.So why should Indian muslim's interests be hampered by what is happening in Myanmar.
 
Bush's war resulted in 100s of 1000s of deaths, still every nation on the planet went about dealing with him as usual.Pervez Mussaraff did Kargil, but when he was ruler of Pakistan we did business with him.Putin is hated by western media and countries but they all do business with him.China and Russia are likely to block UNSC censure on Myanmar.China is supporting the NoKo regime,who have been terrifying their own people for decades.Pakistan itself is selling JF17s to Myanmar.I can give many more examples.

India has been praising Suu Kyi since she started her movement for democracy in 1988.It would be abnormal to leave that line now.Rather it would create problems for India if Suu Kyi decides to be not friendly with India as the other power center in Myanmar, The Army isnt exactly fond of India.

International diplomacy are done on basis of national interests and national interests alone.India isnt killing the rohingyas.Neither is India breaking any international laws by dealing with Myanmar.

There is nothing stupid here, Modi is elected to further interests of 1.25bn Indians and not teach Myanmar how they run their country.Their country Their issue and India should stay a mile away from getting into this quagmire.Those who want to are free to do so.

I don't remember any real leader praising Bush's courageous leadership while he was causing deaths.Similarly, those Europeans who engage Putin don't distribute character certificates to his style of leadership.
Never said anything about stopping business with Myanmar either.
 
Breaking news: Killer of innocents find common ground
 
Staying quiet? You go to a country whose leader your country has supported since 1988 and you stay quiet.That is abnormal. Modi did what is the official line of India on Suu Kyi since 1988.Any deviation would have been bad for India.

India simply wants nothing to do with the Rohingya issue. Those who want can ask their countries to get involved.Spare mine please.

Imagine if the rest of the world had taken this attitude when dealing with Adolf Hitler, he could have practically have exterminated the Jewish race. Your reaction would presumably have been, not our issue, we look after only India's interests, if there is genocide of a people somewhere else, too bad.
 
I don't remember any real leader praising Bush's courageous leadership while he was causing deaths.Similarly, those Europeans who engage Putin don't distribute character certificates to his style of leadership.
Never said anything about stopping business with Myanmar either.

Other countries leaders followed Bush into his war with men and material.What are you talking sir? These countries sanctioned war and you talk about mere praising.
 
Imagine if the rest of the world had taken this attitude when dealing with Adolf Hitler, he could have practically have exterminated the Jewish race. Your reaction would presumably have been, not our issue, we look after only India's interests, if there is genocide of a people somewhere else, too bad.

Hitler exterminated jews for years.The allies only reacted when war was brought to their door step. The British and French kept quiet till they realised that they were the next target.The Soviets gladly shared Poland with Germany and gobbled up the baltic countries with german help. They only entered the war in 1941 againist Germany when the Germans attacked USSR.

When did USA enter the war?Any idea?And why did they enter the war?



Sir this isnt an India-Pakistan issue, this is common knowledge that countries act according to their own national interest.
 
Other countries leaders followed Bush into his war with men and material.What are you talking sir? These countries sanctioned war and you talk about mere praising.

They participated considering his lies as a possibility that Iraq actually had WMDs. Even if some of them knew the truth they convinced their public that they were in fact going for a just cause Once the truth came out the leadership of those countries including vast majority of those countries' masses detested war and one after another started pulling back their soldiers owing to growing public pressure. So, the ultimate blame lies with Bush for taking undue advantage of American goodwill in the eyes of its allies.
 
They participated considering his lies as a possibility that Iraq actually had WMDs. Even if some of them knew the truth they convinced their public that they were in fact going for a just cause Once the truth came out the leadership of those countries including vast majority of those countries' masses detested war and one after another started pulling back their soldiers owing to growing public pressure. So, the ultimate blame lies with Bush for taking undue advantage of American goodwill in the eyes of its allies.

So these countries including the NATO ones didnt have their own intelligence?They followed Bush because they wanted to.They knew what was the truth, but sticking with USA was in the interest of their country.

36 countries sent active boots into Iraq.Most stayed till 2008.15 countries covertly sent forces in support of the war.

Everyone wanted to be on the right side of the USA, because that served their interests.
 
Imagine if the rest of the world had taken this attitude when dealing with Adolf Hitler, he could have practically have exterminated the Jewish race. Your reaction would presumably have been, not our issue, we look after only India's interests, if there is genocide of a people somewhere else, too bad.

While we are on the 2nd world war, DidBritain put Churchill on trial for his role in killing millions in Bengal during the world war?He is a British Hero.
 
We have enough problems of our own to take care of others issues as well.. Funny how the world is when America tries to be the thekedyaar of the world and meddles in internal affairs of any country people have issue when someone like India doesn't want to people still have issues..

Anyways U.N. was created to resolve such issues, as a human I feel for the Rohingya's and hope and pray they get justice ASAP but only one who can solve it is U.N
 
So these countries including the NATO ones didnt have their own intelligence?They followed Bush because they wanted to.They knew what was the truth, but sticking with USA was in the interest of their country.

36 countries sent active boots into Iraq.Most stayed till 2008.15 countries covertly sent forces in support of the war.

Everyone wanted to be on the right side of the USA, because that served their interests.

Talking about twisting..... I have requested you many times to comment on the gist of my post and not only a single aspect of it.

A vast majority of their countries did not appreciate the war. Close US allies such as France and Germany opposed. And that's considering America's sole super power status. US failed to get support of majority of nations despite its large goodwill and power. They had to shelve their plan of UN support. See, the difference between support for Iraq and Afghan war. Afghan war started earlier but troops stayed longer here than Iraq.
In fact in Iraq troop withdrawal started as early as 2003.

We are not equating US with Myanmar here? Despite being so powerful USA could gain support of a handful of his little brothers . The situation is different with India-Myanmar here.
 
We have enough problems of our own to take care of others issues as well.. Funny how the world is when America tries to be the thekedyaar of the world and meddles in internal affairs of any country people have issue when someone like India doesn't want to people still have issues..

Anyways U.N. was created to resolve such issues, as a human I feel for the Rohingya's and hope and pray they get justice ASAP but only one who can solve it is U.N

UN is a complete joke with no teeth.

What can they do other than condemn the ethnic cleansing.

However the least most countries can do is put diplomatic and economic pressure on Burma so they feel it.

Otherwise empty rhetoric means nothing.
 
Talking about twisting..... I have requested you many times to comment on the gist of my post and not only a single aspect of it.

A vast majority of their countries did not appreciate the war. Close US allies such as France and Germany opposed. And that's considering America's sole super power status. US failed to get support of majority of nations despite its large goodwill and power. They had to shelve their plan of UN support. See, the difference between support for Iraq and Afghan war. Afghan war started earlier but troops stayed longer here than Iraq.
In fact in Iraq troop withdrawal started as early as 2003.

We are not equating US with Myanmar here? Despite being so powerful USA could gain support of a handful of his little brothers . The situation is different with India-Myanmar here.

US gained support of 36+15 nations to go to war on another country killing 100s of 1000s.Going to war was in their interest.Enough countries followed Bush.Thats the thing.

Here India is just keeping up their decades old diplomatic stance with Myanmar.India isnt involved in Rohingya incident and shouldnt be involved in it by anyway.Keeping away is the best.
 
UN is a complete joke with no teeth.

What can they do other than condemn the ethnic cleansing.

However the least most countries can do is put diplomatic and economic pressure on Burma so they feel it.

Otherwise empty rhetoric means nothing.

That will depend on country to country and whether they want to get involved or not. Indications are that Russia and China will veto any UN resolution on Myanmar.
 
US gained support of 36+15 nations to go to war on another country killing 100s of 1000s.Going to war was in their interest.Enough countries followed Bush.Thats the thing.

Here India is just keeping up their decades old diplomatic stance with Myanmar.India isnt involved in Rohingya incident and shouldnt be involved in it by anyway.Keeping away is the best.

Enough, according to you. Most of them against their people's wishes. And the support wavered with the unraveling of truth.
By going out of its way, as you mentioned, which is the point here. I think not appreciating her courageous leadership to the so called peace process ,at this stage, would be keeping away from Myanmar's internal matters.
 
Enough, according to you. Most of them against their people's wishes. And the support wavered with the unraveling of truth.
By going out of its way, as you mentioned, which is the point here. I think not appreciating her courageous leadership to the so called peace process ,at this stage, would be keeping away from Myanmar's internal matters.

People's wishes?Sir the leaders take the decision.

Support wavered?By that time Iraq was ravaged.I suggest please look which country withdrew troops at what stage.

India supported Suu Kyi's democratic movement throughout saying otherwise now would mean losing our only potential ally in Myanmar.
 
Not surprising when a butcher appreciates another butcher, probably need Netanyahu to complete the group of evils. Another of Modi's friend Hasina isn't too far behind with her cold hearted response.

Pathetic justification by Modi's supporters so far, it's all about economics and self interests with complete disregard for humanity. Same group cry rivers about mis treatment of Hindu Pandits in Kashmir which is FAR better in comparison to Rohingyas.

And yes I do condemn selective humanity by some Pakistanis as well who throw full support behind Muslim victims but don't raise their voice when non Muslims suffer same way.
 
Not surprising when a butcher appreciates another butcher, probably need Netanyahu to complete the group of evils. Another of Modi's friend Hasina isn't too far behind with her cold hearted response.

Pathetic justification by Modi's supporters so far, it's all about economics and self interests with complete disregard for humanity. Same group cry rivers about mis treatment of Hindu Pandits in Kashmir which is FAR better in comparison to Rohingyas.

And yes I do condemn selective humanity by some Pakistanis as well who throw full support behind Muslim victims but don't raise their voice when non Muslims suffer same way.

Yes interests of Indians are paramount for Indian PM and thats the job he has been elected for.You may not like it but i dont think you voted to elect him nor is he your PM so i dont understand what your issue is?
Is your problem that he is working for India's good?

Regarding Pandits of Kashmir,they were mistreated on Indian soil so ofcourse Indians will talk about it and let their views be known.Rohingyas are not Indians and Indians are not involved in their mistreatment so again what are you blaming Indians for?

Netanyahu or Hasina or Modi they are all elected to look after the interests of their own country.
 
Hitler exterminated jews for years.The allies only reacted when war was brought to their door step. The British and French kept quiet till they realised that they were the next target.The Soviets gladly shared Poland with Germany and gobbled up the baltic countries with german help. They only entered the war in 1941 againist Germany when the Germans attacked USSR.

When did USA enter the war?Any idea?And why did they enter the war?



Sir this isnt an India-Pakistan issue, this is common knowledge that countries act according to their own national interest.

So your argument is basically, ethnic cleansing is fine as long India benefits from it, and the west set an example by implementing this strategy so why not follow it. Okay, fair enough. Seems like ISIS could use similar justification, but I guess the ends justifies the means.
 
So your argument is basically, ethnic cleansing is fine as long India benefits from it, and the west set an example by implementing this strategy so why not follow it. Okay, fair enough. Seems like ISIS could use similar justification, but I guess the ends justifies the means.

India isnt involved in ethnic cleansing of Rohingyas.Its not happening on Indian soil nor are any Indians involved in it. India has nothing to do with it nor does India want to get involved in it in anyway, for India its an issue of Myanmarese people and its for them to solve it.

I dont know why some people are uselessly dragging India into this, may be just so that they can do some India bashing.Its a issue in Myanmar and if you are concerned please ask your govt to take up the matter with Myanmar.

India will not get involved in another countrys matter and get itself into a quagmire. We have 10000s of our own issues to solve rather than try to be the policeman.
 
India isnt involved in ethnic cleansing of Rohingyas.Its not happening on Indian soil nor are any Indians involved in it. India has nothing to do with it nor does India want to get involved in it in anyway, for India its an issue of Myanmarese people and its for them to solve it.

I dont know why some people are uselessly dragging India into this, may be just so that they can do some India bashing.Its a issue in Myanmar and if you are concerned please ask your govt to take up the matter with Myanmar.

India will not get involved in another countrys matter and get itself into a quagmire. We have 10000s of our own issues to solve rather than try to be the policeman.

Maybe you should scroll back to the top and re-read the OP then.
 
India isnt involved in ethnic cleansing of Rohingyas.Its not happening on Indian soil nor are any Indians involved in it. India has nothing to do with it nor does India want to get involved in it in anyway, for India its an issue of Myanmarese people and its for them to solve it.

I dont know why some people are uselessly dragging India into this, may be just so that they can do some India bashing.Its a issue in Myanmar and if you are concerned please ask your govt to take up the matter with Myanmar.

India will not get involved in another countrys matter and get itself into a quagmire. We have 10000s of our own issues to solve rather than try to be the policeman.

Turn a blind eye and count up the cash. Jai Hind!
 
Turn a blind eye and count up the cash. Jai Hind!
Iron beradar says hi :snack:
Malala has a lot to learn before hitting out at Suu Kyi

Malala Yousafzai, a Pakistani Nobel Peace Prize laureate, has stood out against Myanmar's de facto leader Aung San Suu Kyi, condemning her for the treatment of the minority Muslim Rohingya in Myanmar. With a Nobel Peace Prize, Malala has been made into an advocate and a judge of world peace. She speaks as if she has mastered the truth of peace.

Malala took to Twitter to hit out at Suu Kyi this week. "Over the last several years, I have repeatedly condemned this tragic and shameful treatment [against Rohingya]," Malala said in a post. "I am still waiting for my fellow Nobel laureate Aung San Suu Kyi to do the same. The world is waiting and the Rohingya Muslims are waiting."

Malala should get herself acquainted with the basic facts of the violence in Rakhine state before criticizing her fellow Nobel laureate.

The crisis is triggered by Muslim extremists' violent attacks against Myanmar's governmental forces, and the latter were pressured to take retaliatory actions. Ethnic and religious conflicts between the minority Muslim Rohingya and the majority Buddhist population have been simmering for a long time. Malala seems to be unaware that like many issues in her own country, Myanmar's Rohingya crisis is a sophisticated issue that cannot be realistically solved in a short span of time.

As the youngest Nobel laureate, Malala was awarded the prize for her fearless fight against the Taliban. She is a victim of terrorism herself and is supposed to have her own feelings and thoughts about the violence of Muslim terrorists.
Muslim extremist groups, such as the Islamic State, are responsible for many violent attacks in the world, and are a common enemy for the whole world.

Asia's development and global peace must be taken into account in anti-terrorism operations. Terrorists must be eradicated, and Rakhine state, a region of geostrategic significance, cannot become a hotbed for terrorist groups to take root and blossom.

Malala is clueless about the significance of Myanmar's strikes against extremists. She should learn more about the situation in Myanmar, and her criticism against Suu Kyi is inappropriate.
Not long ago, Malala was manipulated by the Western media outlets to attack China over the treatment of Liu Xiaobo following his death. Liu was sentenced for instigating subversion of State power. Regrettably, she is still being used by the West as a pawn on the Rohingya issue.

Malala has a lot to learn, rather than posing as a "Peace Master" to lecture others who she thinks don't understand the true essence of peace. She was almost killed in 2012 by Muslim extremists. And it is those Muslim extremists that she should firstly target.
www.globaltimes.cn/content/1065361.shtml
 
Please show me where any Indian has talked a word about Rohingyas?

These are just weasel words and you know it. The rest of the world leaders are either condemning Suu Kyi's failure to address the ethnic cleansing carried out by her security forces, or at least maintaining an embarrassed silence. Only Modi has gone out of his way to PRAISE Su Kyi at a time when she is being accused of encouraging the horrific genocide against women and children. But then you know this already, and are a staunch supporter of a leader who has been accused of the same in India so no surprises here. Carry on as you wish.
 
These are just weasel words and you know it. The rest of the world leaders are either condemning Suu Kyi's failure to address the ethnic cleansing carried out by her security forces, or at least maintaining an embarrassed silence. Only Modi has gone out of his way to PRAISE Su Kyi at a time when she is being accused of encouraging the horrific genocide against women and children. But then you know this already, and are a staunch supporter of a leader who has been accused of the same in India so no surprises here. Carry on as you wish.

Which world leader has directly attacked Suu Kyi?Which one of the P5 or G20 leaders?

Modi has praised for a totally different thing and has nothing to do with the Rohingya issue.

India has nothing to do with Rohingyas and will not get involved in the issue at all.Other countries are free to decide their line.
 
Which world leader has directly attacked Suu Kyi?Which one of the P5 or G20 leaders?

Modi has praised for a totally different thing and has nothing to do with the Rohingya issue.

India has nothing to do with Rohingyas and will not get involved in the issue at all.Other countries are free to decide their line.

I said condemned OR at least maintained an embarrassed silence. This is something that Modi could have done as well, instead he chose to praise Suu Kyi at a time when she is under pressure from the outside world to take action to stop the ethnic holocaust carried out by her security forces. But with his history it will be of no surprise to many.
 
I said condemned OR at least maintained an embarrassed silence. This is something that Modi could have done as well, instead he chose to praise Suu Kyi at a time when she is under pressure from the outside world to take action to stop the ethnic holocaust carried out by her security forces. But with his history it will be of no surprise to many.
Your lots' hypocrisy know no bounds, this from a piece of land you gifted China!
Islamophobia in China and Pakistan’s vow of silence

Recently, in a country that is decidedly not France, a Muslim man has been sentenced to six years in prison for keeping a beard.

I daresay it’s time we have a polite talk about Islamophobia with our good neighbor in the north.

In the Muslim dominant region of Xinjiang, the 38-year-old man was handed the punishment by the Chinese court. In addition, his wife has been sentenced to two years of imprisonment for wearing an Islamic veil.

Ironically, this took place in Kashgar: the city romanticised in Iqbal’s poetry as one end of the unbreachable Muslim flank guarding the sacred ‘Haram’.

The couple was pronounced guilty of “picking quarrels and provoking trouble”, which is basically my job description as a blogger.

The charge is so absurdly vague and ambiguous; it may as well be Mandarin for “not liking one’s face”. Which is indeed what it sounds like, if one follows the trail of violent suppression of the Uighur populace through history, marked with arbitrary arrests and baffling restrictions.

In July last year, the government forbade Xinjiang officials to fast in the month of Ramazan, and initiated a robust campaign discouraging native women from wearing veil. In Urmaqi, bus passengers were banned from carrying a wide range of common household items, including yoghurt.

The restrictions, each a flagrant assault on the Uighur people’s cultural values, are justified by the most valuable excuse available to us in the post-9/11 universe: ‘security’.

These increasingly despotic measures are being adopted under the doctrine that counter-terrorism definitively trumps individual liberty, although I’m personally having a hard time figuring out how to weaponise yoghurt and facial hair.

Also read: Chinese anti-veil 'beauty' campaign sows ugly tensions

I’d reach out and ask the exceptionally inventive Muslims of Uighur, had the Chinese government not dismantled the internet in that region almost to its entirety.

One may be forgiven for asking at this point, if there is a giant portrait of Mao Zedong hanging reverently somewhere in the upper offices of Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA).

These ‘whimsical’ freedom violations barely make up the prologue of a book on Chinese aggression against the Muslims of Xinjiang.

Between 1964 and 1996, China conducted more than 40 poorly-controlled, nuclear tests in Xinjiang. An expert who studied radiation effects from tests by the US, France, and former Soviet Union, calculated that as many as 194,000 people may have died from acute radiation poisoning, among a whopping 1.2 million people who received doses high enough to induce cancer and gross fetal abnormalities.

These are the “conservative estimates” of the damage caused in three decades.

If this form of aggression appears too indirect and impersonal, it should be viewed in context of decades of arbitrary arrests, executions and reports of heinous torture.

The government has been accused of promoting a Hans mass migration to Xinjiang to dilute the natives’ proportion from 90 per cent of the population in 1949, to almost 45 per cent today.

The regime now “manufactures consent” (weirdly, a Chomskian term usually reserved for Western imperialists) of its people for these extreme measures against the Muslims of Xinjiang, by citing ‘Islamic terrorism’ against the Hans in the province.

Also read: Breaking up with China?

Ultimately, the Chinese government’s greatest feat is to have its President sit beamingly in the same room as the Prime Minister of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, without ‘Uighur’ creeping into conversation.

More impressive still, is the capacity of the Pakistani political leaders, touting Islamic unity and decrying the oppression of Muslims wherever they may be, to ignore the Islamophobia raging in its most favoured state.

But that’s realpolitik. I’m more curious about how this information would be processed by an average Pakistani social media user, incensed by the anti-Muslim bigotry across Europe.

At the end, I suppose I’m just hoping we’d all get to hear our Prime Minister’s next passionate speech on Sino-Pak friendship over the sound of the invisible elephant blaring in the room.
https://www.dawn.com/news/1173034

Makes sense, when was the last time a(ny) state head condemned the visiting nation's head or didn;t praise them?
 
Last edited:
People's wishes?Sir the leaders take the decision.

Support wavered?By that time Iraq was ravaged.I suggest please look which country withdrew troops at what stage.

India supported Suu Kyi's democratic movement throughout saying otherwise now would mean losing our only potential ally in Myanmar.

Australia withdrew most of troops in 2003 if i remember but redeployed later. And you are conveniently ignoring Putin's case that how Europeans do business with him without praising his style of leadership. Also, note that Myanmar and US have no comparison.

But on topic that you don't need to say otherwise although on humanitarian grounds Indians can as a big brother.
But if raising concerns about Rohingya issue will damage relations then at least India could stop short of patting on her back. India has all out endorsed Myanmar's position in this case.

That's your point that pleasing another government for its inhuman treatment to its minorities is in India's interest and not endorsing that government's inhuman policy would harm the relations.
 
Note the bolded part and then re-read my post again.
Modi's a dope, I'll give you that. He tries too hard, to be popular at various times. Whether this speech was written with his full consent & understanding (of English) I cannot say for certain, but it should've been avoided given his image on Anti Muslim is only getting reinforced after he came to power.

Personally for me, he's not anti Muslim but he's pro power i.e. he'll do what it takes to win elections. In case of diplomacy however it's slightly different, give & take. I bet he wouldn't have gone to BRICS if China hadn't withdrawn from Doklam, I feel it could be the same here, India might've gotten something useful in exchange of lavishing praise on thee. Is that a good thing ~ no, but that's how diplomacy works.

Can you say that China will vote in favor of UNSC resolution condemning the genocide in Burma? China has much more control over Burmese military & civilian govt atm, more than any or all the other nations combined. Would you (Pak) favor pushing the Chinese in making sure that the Rohingyas aren't killed needlessly, if the global community asks them to?
 
Last edited:
Modi's a dope, I'll give you that. He tries too hard, to be popular at various times. Whether this speech was written with his full consent & understanding (of English) I cannot say for certain, but it should've been avoided given his image on Anti Muslim is only getting reinforced after he came to power.

Personally for me, he's not anti Muslim but he's pro power i.e. he'll do what it takes to win elections. In case of diplomacy however it's slightly different, give & take. I bet he wouldn't have gone to BRICS if China hadn't withdrawn from Doklam, I feel it could be the same here. India might've gotten something useful ion excgange of lavishing praise on thee. Is that a good thing ~ no, but that's how diplomacy works.

Can you say that China will vote in favor of UNSC resolution condemning the genocide in Burma? China has much more control over Burmese military & civilian govt atm, more than any or all the other nations combined. Would you (Pak) favor pushing the Chinese in making sure that the Rohingyas aren't killed needlessly, if the global community asks them to?

I have already said this is a UN issue, otherwise what is the point of having a UN? That means yes, China should be asked to pressure Burma. If Pak has any influence they can play their part, although I am not Pakistani so when you are addressing me, I don't speak for Pakistan.
 
I have already said this is a UN issue, otherwise what is the point of having a UN? That means yes, China should be asked to pressure Burma. If Pak has any influence they can play their part, although I am not Pakistani so when you are addressing me, I don't speak for Pakistan.
Dual citizen, no? This is a global problem, confined in the regions of South Asia.

The problem is there's only one power with considerable influence over there, like in the case of NK, but no one's willing to nudge them because they don;t want to offend the Chinese, including us South Asians. You know because they are not our people, why isn't the UK condemning the Yemen genocide, brought about by the sale of their weapons to Saudis? Why isn't the US pressing sanctions against Burma, maybe Trump (Islamophobia) is the reason?

What's the solution ~ I dunno, I;d like to think that our elected leaders will rise beyond vote bank politics & do what's best for the people, special interests & lobbyists be damned, but we know the chances of that happening! Alternatively the people must revolt, like they did against the monarchy in France, the only way democracy should work is if the govt reflects the will of the people & obeys that, so long as the majority aren;t looking for trouble, like in Burma.
 
I said condemned OR at least maintained an embarrassed silence. This is something that Modi could have done as well, instead he chose to praise Suu Kyi at a time when she is under pressure from the outside world to take action to stop the ethnic holocaust carried out by her security forces. But with his history it will be of no surprise to many.

India has praised Suu Kyi since 1988 for her efforts and Modi will just hold that line.Deviating from that line in present situation will be construed as ties being affected by Rohingya issues.


India will let the ties remain as it was.
 
Dual citizen, no? This is a global problem, confined in the regions of South Asia.

The problem is there's only one power with considerable influence over there, like in the case of NK, but no one's willing to nudge them because they don;t want to offend the Chinese, including us South Asians. You know because they are not our people, why isn't the UK condemning the Yemen genocide, brought about by the sale of their weapons to Saudis? Why isn't the US pressing sanctions against Burma, maybe Trump (Islamophobia) is the reason?

What's the solution ~ I dunno, I;d like to think that our elected leaders will rise beyond vote bank politics & do what's best for the people, special interests & lobbyists be damned, but we know the chances of that happening! Alternatively the people must revolt, like they did against the monarchy in France, the only way democracy should work is if the govt reflects the will of the people & obeys that, so long as the majority aren;t looking for trouble, like in Burma.

No one has suggested that India put pressure on Myanmar by the way, what we are registering is our disappointment that Modi has chosen such a poor time to congratulate Suu Kyi at a time when the rest of the world is expressing alarm at her policy of ethnic cleansing. It's not that difficult to comprehend and to your credit, I'm sure you do.
 
Can't be that busy if the pm is taking time out to praise genocidal leaders.

India has praised Suu Kyi since 1988 for her efforts and Modi will just hold that line.Deviating from that line in present situation will be construed as ties being affected by Rohingya issues.


India will let the ties remain as it was.

I have answered this already.His job is to further Indian interests and toe the official age old line.

India should totally avoid getting dragged into any internal issues of Myanmar.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top