What's new

“I will not be contesting the election for ICC Chairman" : Ehsan Mani [Post#24]

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
218,132
Karachi: The chairman of Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB), Ehsan Mani, is under consideration for the next chairman of the International Cricket Council (ICC), ARY News reported.

According to the sources, few of the ICC Board members have contacted Mani and assured full support to him to become the new ICC chairman. The board members think that Mani can resolve the financial issues of the world’s cricket governing body.

Remember, currently, Mani is heading Finance & Commercial Affairs in the ICC, one of its most powerful committees.

On the other hand, current chairman Shashank Manohar wants Saurav Ganguly, the President of Board of Cricket Control in India (BCCI), to take over his post after his tenure ends in July.

It is pertinent to mention here that Manohar had already decided to not take any extension in his regime. On Wednesday, the ICC will discuss the process of electing a new chairman via teleconference.

https://arysports.tv/icc-board-members-favor-ehsan-mani-chairman/
 
No way Mani can beat Ganguly. Ganguly will take Indian nationalism and boasting, flaunting India's financial might to new levels
 
No way Mani can beat Ganguly. Ganguly will take Indian nationalism and boasting, flaunting India's financial might to new levels

Yes, agreed. The probability is remote that the BCCI will allow other members to vote in someone that could potentially give the PCB a bigger say in ICC matters.
 
Hypothetically if Ehsan Mani does take the chairmanship of ICC, does that mean he will no longer be the chairman of PCB?
 
It's a powerless position that has little to no say within the ICC. I don't see what has to gain from taking this position when he has already served many years in the ICC with distinction.
 
Regardless what Mani decides, Ganguly will likely be chosen. But it depends if Ganguly himself wants to take this role on.
 
Will be great news if Mani is chosen so IK may choose someone strong personality as PCB chief.
 
Mani is useless and only good for powerless positions, so I think he can be a good fit.

“The board members think that Mani can resolve the financial issues of the world’s cricket governing body.”

So Mani cannot resolve ICC’s financial issues as the current head of finance & commercial affairs in the ICC?
 
My Dad lived in Pakistan’s second city, Dacca, for the first 19 years of Pakistan’s existence. He had been born there 7 years before Partition and he always felt much more affiliation to West Bengal than West Pakistan.

So I’d be delighted to have a Bengali head of world cricket.
 
Yes, agreed. The probability is remote that the BCCI will allow other members to vote in someone that could potentially give the PCB a bigger say in ICC matters.

All members are free to vote the way they want. No one has the authority to force anyone.
 
Mani is useless and only good for powerless positions, so I think he can be a good fit.

“The board members think that Mani can resolve the financial issues of the world’s cricket governing body.”

So Mani cannot resolve ICC’s financial issues as the current head of finance & commercial affairs in the ICC?

Excellent point. He is already in charge of finance at ICC and has not been able to resolve anything.
 
All members are free to vote the way they want. No one has the authority to force anyone.

Of course, they are free to vote as they want, how naive can one be to get bogged down in semantics.

There will be intense lobbying going on behind the scenes, if Ganguly wants this position it's as good as his.
 
Last edited:
Of course, they are free to vote as they want, how naive can one be to get bogged down in semantics.

There will be intense lobbying going on behind the scenes, if Ganguly wants this position it's as good as his.

And he will get it because others voted for him on their own will. Also because there is something in it for them as well. In fact that is the primary reason the votes are cast. Something in return. We all live in the real world.
 
Question is, whether Ganguly is willing? News vine has it that he may be in for a huge political post in India. If he takes that, can he still be ICC chairman?

Ganguly has all the qualifications, Fantastic players,very good captain, has administration experience of running the CAB and BCCI.But is he ready to take the post?

Mani too is well qualified to hold the post, but is he willing to fight the election?

This ICC election most likely will not be uncontested.
 
CHENNAI: A day before Wednesday’s online ICC meeting to finalise the electoral process for choosing its next chairman, Pakistan Cricket Board’s Ehsan Mani emerged a potential challenger to Colin Graves. It is believed that the current regime led by outgoing chairman Shashank Manohar thinks Mani’s election will keep intact the current financial model which has benefited the smaller boards. This is not guaranteed if Graves is elected.

The BCCI has ambitions of fielding its own candidate, but there is no clear indication whether president Sourav Ganguly will join the race. The BCCI is trying to gauge the situation, but an Indian replacing another may complicate matters.

Outgoing England and Wales Cricket Board chairman Graves was earlier seen as the favourite to succeed Manohar, with Singapore representative Imran Khwaja expected to give him competition. Khwaja played a role in stopping the Big Three from taking over ICC, but being the representative of an Associate nation queers the pitch for him.

Mani is a former ICC president, who was PCB’s representative in ICC from 1989 to 1996. He was also part of various committees. Sources close to Mani didn’t rule out the possibility and one understands that he has the backing of current members.

“It’s important to continue the work done by Manohar, which has brought stability in member boards. If we disrupt it, it will be a setback for many. There is time for filing nominations and it will be a long process. We’ll know in the coming days,” sources said.

Mani’s candidature will be seen as a blow for BCCI, which aspires to take control of the ICC post Covid. While it plans to get support by committing to tours, ICC members are wary that BCCI might change the revenue sharing model. The ICC is unlikely to take a decision on the T20 World Cup in Australia in Wednesday’s meeting. While Cricket Australia is expected to reveal its stand, a decision is unlikely until a new chairman is elected.

ACC meeting

The PCB handed over hosting rights of this year’s Asia Cup to Sri Lanka at Monday’s Asian Cricket Council meeting. A final decision will be taken once the ICC decides on the T20 World Cup. It may become an ODI event if the T20 World Cup is not held this year.

https://www.newindianexpress.com/sp...mani-might-join-race-to-lead-icc-2154654.html
 
Those tracking developments say the impending decision over the T20 World Cup, the ethics inquiry, and the sharp email-exchange between BCCI and ICC over tax issues are all related to July’s ICC elections. The wait keeps the Indian cricket board, who are hoping that the World Cup is deferred or cancelled so the IPL can be held in that window, on the edge.

“Everyone is waiting for them to make a decision about the World Cup. It’s about time a decision is arrived at, since boards have their bilateral calendar to attend to,” said BCCI treasurer Arun Dhumal.

At an Asian cricket council (ACC) meeting on Monday, a decision to postpone the Asia Cup was also deferred, although pulling off a six-nation competition in three months time looks improbable. Pakistan cricket board (PCB) Chairman Ehsan Mani is reportedly considering running for the ICC Chairmanship. Mani also heads ICC’s Finance and Commercial affairs committee, where there is no BCCI representation. BCCI blames current ICC chairman Shashank Manohar of wiping out India’s presence from the crucial committee that deals with ICC finances, with the help of Mani. Manohar, after he became ICC Chairman, also scuttled the proposed “Big Three” formula, that would have given BCCI significantly more revenue share from the ICC..

The England and Wales cricket board (ECB) Chairman Colin Graves is the front runner to replace Manohar in July. That is if he gets BCCI support. The Indian board is not revealing its stance, but BCCI president Sourav Ganguly’s name has been doing the rounds for the ICC Chair as well.

If it is decided that the T20 World Cup needs to be postponed, an alternate window will also have to be found for it. Cricket Australia prefers to postpone it to October 2021, but next year is India’s turn to host a T20 World Cup, and BCCI will not want to mess with that.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/cric...n-crossfire/story-IgGUfhryVorc3XMHnYQaYI.html
 
Question is, whether Ganguly is willing? News vine has it that he may be in for a huge political post in India. If he takes that, can he still be ICC chairman?

Ganguly has all the qualifications, Fantastic players,very good captain, has administration experience of running the CAB and BCCI.But is he ready to take the post?

Mani too is well qualified to hold the post, but is he willing to fight the election?

This ICC election most likely will not be uncontested.

Why does Ganguly want to get a demotion just to fix Manohar's doings?
 
Last edited:
Why does Ganguly want to get a demotion just to fix Manohar's doings?

Two reasons,

Supreme court order on Lodha reforms say Ganguly has to go for a cooling off period in July. If SC doesn't modify the order, Ganguly has to quit the post anyway. So ICC chairmanship is a good replacement, unless ofcourse he gets into politics.

Secondly, Bcci doesn't want Manohar or any of his men to be Chairman. Manohar first tried Imran Khawaza but test nations were not in favour of an associate taking over. Next gambit is Mani, as he will be going against Bcci.

Manohar is trying his best get things done before he leaves, as its not guaranteed that his candidate will win.

He tried taking away the tournament rights from Bcci, but when the actual meeting happened, Bcci had the votes to get an extension.
 
Two reasons,

Supreme court order on Lodha reforms say Ganguly has to go for a cooling off period in July. If SC doesn't modify the order, Ganguly has to quit the post anyway. So ICC chairmanship is a good replacement, unless ofcourse he gets into politics.

Secondly, Bcci doesn't want Manohar or any of his men to be Chairman. Manohar first tried Imran Khawaza but test nations were not in favour of an associate taking over. Next gambit is Mani, as he will be going against Bcci.

Manohar is trying his best get things done before he leaves, as its not guaranteed that his candidate will win.

He tried taking away the tournament rights from Bcci, but when the actual meeting happened, Bcci had the votes to get an extension.

Ok I can't wait to just get rid of him, hate seeing Manohar's name anywhere worst thing to happen to Indian cricket in my lifetime other than fixing in 90s.
 
Karachi, Jun 17 (PTI) The PCB chairman Ehsan Mani on Wednesday made it clear that he doesn''t intend to contest for the post of ICC chairman, insisting that his main focus is to bring about a change in Pakistan cricket.

Referring to recent media reports that he was a strong candidate to head the ICC and would contest for the post with BCCI chief Sourav Ganguly after the end of Shashank Manohar''s tenure in July, Mani said he had been brought back into cricket administration by Prime Minister Imran Khan to correct and improve Pakistan''s cricket set-up.

"Imran had asked me to come and work in Pakistan cricket. I have stayed away from cricket for nearly 12 years since my last term as ICC chief. So I didn''t come back into the game to serve ICC but only Pakistan cricket," the veteran cricket administrator said.

Mani admitted that some ICC members had requested him to contest for the post of ICC chairman but it is not in his agenda.

"I have come to serve Pakistan cricket that is all. My agenda is not the ICC."

Mani had served as head of the ICC between 2003 and 2006.

The PCB chief also made it clear that the board had not kept any condition for touring England.

"We have not asked them for a tour in return or anything like that because right now our main thrust was to ensure resumption of world cricket and nothing else," Mani said.

https://www.outlookindia.com/newssc...ovement-in-pakistan-cricket-says-mani/1869234


Mani said he was confident that England will tour Pakistan in 2021-22.

"And this tour will also be good for our players." PTI
 
PCB chairman Ehsan Mani, who is looked as an aspirant to take over as the ICC chief, has pulled out of the race, according to Mumbai Mirror. This means now that the way for Sourav Ganguly to become the head of the apex body becomes clear, only if he wants to contest the elections.

Talking about the development, Mani said, “It is true that I will not be contesting the election. I have announced it in the media also. I was never interested. The news actually came from India. I was approached by a few to contest and I have said I am not interested."

Asked about Ganguly's chances Mani said, he wasn't sure of the Indian's candidature.

“Not to my knowledge,” he said and then added, “I do not know if he is contesting. My stint with the ICC is over after I left it in 2006. And when I stood in the ICC election, I was elected unopposed. No one stood against me.”

He further said, “My interest in the ICC will only be through Pakistan Cricket Board. I was called by Prime Minister Imran Khan and I am working for the interest of Pakistan cricket,” he said.

The ICC is yet to come out with a selection process for the candidates. Current head, Shashank Manohar's term is supposed to end this July and these two names have been doing the rounds.

The BCCI has still not made it clear whether Ganguly will contest the elections or not. “Let the ICC announce the procedure, then we will take a call,” said Arun Singh Dhumal, the BCCI treasurer.

https://www.news18.com/cricketnext/...ce-clears-way-for-sourav-ganguly-2674977.html
 
KARACHI: The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) Chairman, Ehsan Mani expressed grave doubts on Wednesday that this year’s ICC T20 World Cup will be postponed for a year at least because of the novel coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic.

Talking to a selected group of reporters via video link, the PCB chief remarked the uncertain situation across the globe has derailed the day-to-day life and termed staging of the global competition as a huge risk from health’s point of view.

“The biggest challenge that the Australian government is facing these days are the restrictions it has put in place on travel. They are extremely cautious in dealing with the prevailing circumstances because of the novel coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic. It would be a massive risk and if God forbid, any of the players contracts Covid-19, that would lead to great panic everywhere,” Mani said.

“And although there have been much less casualties as compared to rest of the world, it would be very, very demanding to host teams competing in the T20 World Cup. Logistically speaking, I fear that a postponement is imminent at this point in time because it’s not a small matter of couple of countries but as many as 15 of them, apart from the host nation [Australia] will be participating. Travelling will be the biggest concern and there’ll be other related issues as well. That’s I think it is almost impossible for the event to be played this year on schedule.

“I’m saying through my regular contacts with the ICC because I’m chairman of the finance committee there. The ICC, therefore, will look for a window next year to hold the competition because I don’t think it will be feasible that we will see any ICC tournament taking place in 2020, and will probably be deferred for at least a year,” the 75-year-old cricket administrator, who is a charted accountant by profession, went on.

“The ICC have lined up another World Twenty [for men] in 2021 and the 50-over World Cup in 2023. Both those events are slated to be hosted by India. But if the coming T20 World T20 is put off then new plans have to be drawn up by the ICC unless the current situation changes dramatically and the tournament goes ahead this year itself in bio-secure conditions [no fans allowed at the matches and social distancing rules for the players] It’s a dicey situation because the stakeholders have to e taken on board before reaching a final verdict whether to go ahead [with the tournament].

The PCB chairman clarified that Pakistan are going to play in England without any pre-conditions with the ECB (England & Wales Cricket Board) to ensure the England visit here on reciprocal basis. “I’ll make it clear once and for all we in the PCB have not set any pre-conditions whatever in agreeing to play in England. On the contrary we are helping the ECB in restarting international cricket after this very long break because of the Covid-19 pandemic,” Mani stressed.

“The media can say and write whatever they want but from our perspective PCB is not forcing the ECB to send their team to Pakistan as conditions for this summer’s series. These are critical times at every sphere of life and we are just helping ECB in resumption of top international cricket. The West Indies are already there and we’ll also do the same in a bio-secure atmosphere necessitated by global spreading of Covid-19. England are due to tour Pakistan in 2021-22 as per the ICC Future Tours Programme and as far we understand that series is on.”

Mani dispelled the impression that he would be interested in becoming the chairman of International Cricket Council (ICC) for a second time — after having served the global body for a three-year term from 2003 to 2006.

“This is just speculation on part of the media and frankly speaking, I have no such desire to take over [as the ICC chairman] once again, although I’m currently on a committee in the ICC. I was away from cricket for a good period until Prime Minister Imran Khan [patron of the cricket board] nominated me [in August 2018] for the position of PCB chairman,” he clarified. “Therefore, it is obviously not my agenda to become chief of the ICC at this point in time.”

Mani further said he met the Prime Minister in a routine meeting to discuss matters pertaining to the game. “These meetings are generally held off-the-record on one-to-one contact. The only thing I can share with you that we discussed domestic cricket because the associations are not yet registered under the present [PCB] setup totally because of bureaucratic hassles and we are facing problems in moving forward to make the sport more viable [for all stakeholders] at the domestic level.

“But at the same time I’ll repeat that although departments have played a very important role in Pakistan cricket for a lengthy period of time, this is not a sustainable model because it isn’t the case elsewhere [in the cricketing world] and department cricket was not producing players from the grassroots level. People, perhaps are not in favour of changes and all they want is status quo.

“Our system has got to be professionalise like Australia where only six states compete and yet they keep on producing world-class players purely through their domestic cricket. Until we do that, Pakistan will perform inconsistently at the international level. Just go through the past many years and you’ll our team doing well on and off without playing consistently good cricket. The reason is simple: lack of strong backup for the retiring players.”

Mani also reiterated the law to punish match and spot fixers is being framed in shape of a bill through the federal parliament.

“Moreover, we are still in the process of framing final draft to be enacted as a law to act against issues related to match and spot fixing. Once the legislation on this very vital issue is finalised the matter will be whetted through the law ministry before being legalised like it is in the United Kingdom and Sri Lanka. This way fixing will become criminalise and culprits caught and proved will be sent to jail just like [Mohammad] Amir and company were jailed for the 2010 spot-fixing.”

Meanwhile, Mani conceded that it will be difficult to stage the remaining three matches — both semi-finals and the final — of Pakistan Super League (PSL) because of the uncertainties and logistics issues after the fifth edition was abruptly postponed by the Covid-19 outbreak last March.

“One cannot say for sure whether we will be able to complete the tournament. Finding slot in the schedule is one thing but there will be logistics problems like travelling of foreign players of the remaining teams and the broadcasting crew members,” he said. “We have a busy season in 2020-21 coming with Pakistan due to play several bilateral series and one can’t say with conviction whether those PSL fixtures could be slotted in somewhere.”

https://www.dawn.com/news/1564207/t...oned-for-a-year-due-to-covid-19-pandemic-mani
 
So it seems the road is clear for Ganguly to be Chairman ICC.
 
So it seems the road is clear for Ganguly to be Chairman ICC.

Seems to be the case - will Pakistan have a view on this?

==

Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC) has announced that they would support Indian candidate Sourav Ganguly as the next Chairman of the International Cricket Council (ICC).

“The SLC will lend support to BCCI President, Sourav Ganguly, if he desires to be the ICC Chairman; and, if he doesn’t wish to be appointed to the position and the BCCI nominates anyone from India, we will continue to favour anyone with our support,” a top SLC official told the Daily News yesterday.

Earlier, the SLC said that they would promote Kumar Sangakkara for this post. However, the former Sri Lankan Captain and current MCC President stated that he holds no interest in being promoted by anyone.

Former BCCI President Shashank Manohar is the current Chairman of the ICC, but he has previously said that he doesn’t wish to seek any further extension.

However, the BCCI is yet to reveal their candidate for ICC top post, with two top board members, Anurag Thakur and N. Srinivasan, also in contention for the title.

Moreover, a couple of top names from other ICC Member Countries have been put forward by the Board Members for this post.

Cricket South Africa (CSA) Director of Cricket, Graeme Smith, had also expressed his support for Ganguly to be the next ICC Chairman.

Former President of the Singapore Cricket Association and ICC’s Deputy Chairman, Imran Khawaja; England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) Chairman, Colin Graves; and former Chairman ECB, Giles Clarke; are believed to be in contention and have backing from a few other Board Members.

http://dailynews.lk/2020/06/19/sports/221060/slc-back-indian-nominee-icc-top-post
 
Why would Ganguly resign as president of the BCCI? Isn't the BCCI seat more powerful and the ICC post just a ceremonial one?
 
Deliberation on the nomination process for its next chairman will top the agenda when the International Cricket Council's all-powerful Board converges via video-conference on Thursday. With the ICC already making it clear that a final decision on the fate of this year's T20 World Cup will be taken next month, the primary agenda of discussion will be the nomination process for the chairman's election. The post is currently held by India's Shashank Manohar.

"I am still not sure whether the date of election (or selection) will be announced tomorrow or not. Obviously the primary agenda is discussion on the nomination process for Shashank Manohar's replacement," an ICC board member, privy to the developments, told PTI on conditions of anonymity.

"Obviously, since the members will meet, they will update (the board) about the situation in their respective countries. However, no concrete announcement is expected," the source added.

Also, the board could be briefed on the investigations being carried on the leaks of classified e-mails, a member said.

For being in the running for the chairman's post, a member is required to have attended a minimum of two board meetings and also needs to be nominated by a current or past director (board member) of the representative country.

An ICC Board comprises chairman, 12 Test playing nations, three associate members (Malaysia, Scotland and Singapore as per this turn), independent female director (Indra Nooyi) and chief executive Manu Sawhney.

The Chief Executive doesn't have a vote in case of election. As of now, former ECB chairman Colin Graves is the front-runner to replace Shashank Manohar as the chairman of the world body but one can't rule out BCCI president Sourav Ganguly either.

Neither Ganguly nor BCCI have outrightly negated the possibility of his candidature.

But a lot would depend on whether the Supreme Court of India accepts the Interim Application of the BCCI which pleads that the mandatory cooling off period after six years in office be waived off for Ganguly and secretary Jay Shah.

Pakistan Cricket Board chairman Ehsan Mani has already ruled himself out of contention during a media interaction earlier in the week where he said that his priority is cricket in his country.

It is learnt that it won't be a bad idea for Ganguly to throw his hat in the ring in case the cooling off period is not waived off.

"We still don't know whether Sourav Ganguly has any political ambitions or not. If he has, he can always be the ICC chairman for a year and then be a BJP chief ministerial candidate for the state assembly elections in West Bengal in 2021," a BCCI insider said.

However, as of now Ganguly is unlikely to contest if he is not a unanimous choice for the post.

https://sports.ndtv.com/cricket/icc...hairman-is-primary-agenda-says-report-2251410
 
The International Cricket Council (ICC) Board members had a virtual meeting on Thursday to discuss ‘regular and administrative’ matters. With the current ICC chairman, Shashank Manohar, unwilling to seek another extension, the Board members need to finalise the nomination process for Manohar’s replacement.

But Sportstar understands that the members had a discussion about the chairmanship election process and things could be finalised in the next few days. However, no decision has been taken on the matter yet.

As things stand now, England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB)’s Colin Graves appears to be the front-runner, with Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) chief Ehsan Mani already ruling himself out of the race. There is a speculation that BCCI president Sourav Ganguly could emerge as a strong candidate, in case he throws the hat in the ring. However, there is no clarity on whether he would be keen on joining the race.

Thursday’s meeting was all about discussing the regular matters and there was no word on the future of the T20 World Cup -- scheduled to be held in Australia later this year. While the ICC had earlier clarified that a call on the matter would be taken only in July, there were speculations that the Board could make an announcement. However, as things stand now, a decision could be expected on the future of the tournament around July 15.

https://sportstar.thehindu.com/cric...sourav-ganguly-ehsan-mani/article31916864.ece
 
PCB Chairman Ehsan Mani briefed the BoG on matters relating to the ICC and the ACC. Mr Mani confirmed that he had been approached by some ICC Directors for the ICC Chairman’s role, but reiterated his commitment to Pakistan cricket.
 
Dubai: Whycliffe ‘Dave’ Cameron, former president of Cricket West Indies (CWI) is the only official to have made his plans public to run for the post of chairman of International Cricket Council (ICC) to succeed India’s Shashank Manohar. However, the Jamaican who is unlikely to garner the support of his own board for the nominations, is under no illusions.

The ICC is expected to announce the guidelines for the elections by next week, but the world governing body of cricket may not be exactly in a hurry to do so as their Annual General Meeting scheduled to be held in Cape Town later this month, has been postponed with the global travel restrictions yet to be eased due to the coronavirus pandemic. While Imran Khwaja, the erstwhile vice-chairman to Manohar, is now officiating ever since the latter’s resignation on July 1, the two names which have been doing the rounds as frontrunners are that of Colin Graves (chairman of England & Wales Cricket Board) and Sourav Ganguly, the charismatic former Indian captain and now president of the Indian board.

‘‘Let me admit that I am no comparison to Ganguly. If ‘Dada’ eventually decides to announce his candidature, he will get Asia’s support and he has been an awesome character for the things he has done for the sport. However, if he is not in the running, then it will be a great opportunity for me,’’ said a candid Cameron, the 49-year-old who was served at the helm of West Indies cricket for six years between 2013 and 2019.

Speaking to Gulf News during an exclusive interview over phone from Jamaica on Friday, Cameron reserved strong words of praise for Manohar - who had rubbed the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) the wrong way by scuttling their plans of a ‘Big Three’ hegemony in the ICC. ‘‘I would like congratulate him (Manohar) as he followed an ideal during his tenure. If there was any difference in opinion in the board, he always wanted us to come around through discussion,’’ he said, before adding that it’s not possible to win a popularity contest if one is in a position of power.

‘‘I believe in the theory that everyone starts liking you in a position of responsibility, then there’s something wrong in you while if everyone starts hating you, then also you are not getting it right. However, I had been running businesses since the age of 22 years and have the experience in man-management,’’ he said.

As per the ICC norms, Cameron needs two nominations for his candidature to be valid and he is expected to approach his own board for its nomination. However, the current CWI president Ricky Skerritt - who in March 2019 had ended the six-year reign of Cameron - got into a public spat with the Jamaican following an audit conducted by external and independent auditors Pannell Kerr Foster (PKF) which was released in May.

In the run-up to the CWI presidency last year, Skerritt, a former cabinet minister for St Kitts and Nevis, had stated that the “insensitivity and stubbornness” of Cameron had created a poor relationship with West Indies’ players and coaches.

‘‘Yes, the West Indies board is not supportive at the moment. I will continue to appeal to all Boards and if they feel that they need an independent chairman in true sense of the term, then hopefully I can garner their support,’’ said Cameron, under whose regime the country saw the introduction of the popular Caribbean Premier League.

What would be Cameron’s agenda should he be given a chance to govern world cricket? ‘‘See, world cricket has to change the way it’s run now. We have to think about the interest of countries like the West Indies, Zimbabwe or Sri Lanka. My agenda will be to make cricket a truly global sport with 200 countries playing it, not 104 (the current number of members),’’ he said.

However, the West Indian is pragmatic enough to appreciate that the support of Asian block is a necessity to prevail in these elections and he had already approached Ganguly and Ehsan Mani, the chairman of Pakistan Cricket board (PCB). Asked if his feelers are not contradictory to his stance of expanding the game beyond the clutches of India, England and Australia, Cameron had his reply ready: ‘‘You see, elections are elections as you need to win votes. However, once it’s over, it boils down to governance.’’

https://gulfnews.com/sport/cricket/...y-decides-to-run-says-dave-cameron-1.72537403
 
Finalising the nomination process to elect Shashank Manohar’s successor as the next independent chairman of the International Cricket Council will be the sole agenda for the ICC board when it virtually meets on Monday. It is expected that the entire process - irrespective of whether it’s an election or a unanimous selection - will be over by four weeks.

“The meeting tomorrow only has nomination process in the agenda. Normally, it is a two-week window that is provided for filing nominations,” a senior Board member told PTI on the condition of anonymity.

Usually, a two-thirds majority is required but there could be a few board members who would want it to be a case of simple majority among members. The 17 board members of the ICC comprise 12 Test playing nations, three Associate nations (Malaysia, Scotland, Singapore), and chairman - in this case interim - and independent director, Indra Nooyi.

ICC CEO Manu Sawhney is also part of the ICC board but does not possess voting rights.

A candidate can be nominated by a past or present director of the ICC but it has to be seconded compulsorily by two current directors. Only then can one enter the election fray. There have been discussions on whether a former director nominating an incumbent should remain valid.

Graves the frontrunner

As far as the candidates are concerned, a few names - including that of current interim chairman from Singapore, Imran Khawaja - are doing the rounds. There is no unanimous candidate which is why the announcement is taking so long.

Former ECB head Colin Graves is the frontrunner to replace Manohar. Former Cricket West Indies boss Dave Cameron has also claimed he has the numbers to contest the polls even though his own cricket board is against him.

Cricket South Africa’s Chris Nenzani has expressed his interest as well. That was why Director of Cricket Graeme Smith’s open backing of BCCI president Sourav Ganguly didn’t go down well with Nenzani. CSA then made it clear that Smith made his comments on the matter in his personal capacity.

All eyes will be on Ganguly. It will be interesting to see if BCCI wants him at the ICC.

Ganguly’s cooling off waiver plea is lying with the Supreme Court. The next date of the hearing is 17 August. Ganguly has time and again made clear that at 48, his best days as an administrator are ahead of him and that he has time at his disposal. In case he has to leave the BCCI, the Board will not mind him heading the ICC.

https://sportstar.thehindu.com/cric...ly-graves-cameron-nenzani/article32309292.ece
 
Why would Ganguly resign as president of the BCCI? Isn't the BCCI seat more powerful and the ICC post just a ceremonial one?

ICC chairman's powers are curtailed because of BCCI. When they are able to Plant one of their own in that position then the power BCCI can world in world cricket is at another level.
 
New Delhi, Aug 10 (PTI) The ICC Board of Directors meeting on Monday ended up being a damp squib after they failed to reach consensus over Shashank Manohar''s replacement as the next chairman of cricket''s global governing body.

The sole agenda of Monday''s meeting was to finalise the nomination process for the election but no breakthrough could be made over a unanimous choice to lead the International Cricket Council (ICC).

"Yes, there was no unanimity on a number of issues. Firstly, there is a divided house on whether there should be simple majority or the existing 2/3rd majority in a house of 17," an ICC Board member told PTI.

However, the bigger issue is lack of an acceptable face and there is no clarity yet over BCCI president Sourav Ganguly throwing his hat in the ring.

While Pakistan Cricket Board''s chief Ehsan Mani has already made it clear that he would not leave his home board as instructed by Prime Minister Imran Khan, there are multiple candidates who are harbouring ambitions of leading the ICC.

"Colin Graves (England) is a strong candidate but it can''t be said that he is favourite anymore. There are countries which won''t support Graves.

"Similarly, someone like Dave Cameron (former Cricket West Indies president) may enter the fray with support of two independent directors but may not get enough numbers. Ditto for Chris Nenzani (South Africa)," a former ICC Director, who is abreast of the latest developments, said.

The veteran administrator made it clear that at this point, no potential candidate has numbers to go the distance and that''s the precise reason that the board is not able to come up with an uniform election process.

"The best solution is to have a candidate acceptable to all and avoid an election which creates a tense atmosphere between member nations. But yes, I agree that by now, we should have been able to finalise the nomination process," the official said

https://www.outlookindia.com/newssc...-found-in-bihars-gaya-district/1913241?scroll
 
An India-Pakistan clash building up in the ICC boardroom

MUMBAI: An India versus Pakistan contest appears to be building up at the International Cricket Council as the governing body takes one step forward and two steps back to put an election process in place.

A section of the ICC's members, aided by participants in their ecosystem and the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB), insist that the ICC's new chairperson should be elected on basis of a 2/3rd majority while most member boards - including India, England and Australia - believe election should take place through a simple majority.

The ICC's board meeting to come to a decision in this regard took place via a teleconference on Monday. However, once again, there was no outcome. "There are 17 votes in the ICC. A 2/3rd majority to elect the new chair will mean any potential contender will require 12 votes whereas in a simple majority, anybody who gets nine votes will win," say sources. The governing body stands divided with 11 members, including India, England, Australia, South Africa and seven others on one side and interim chairman Imran Khwaja, independent director Indra Nooyi, three associated members and PCB on the other.

"Essentially, this is an India vs Pakistan game playing out there in the ICC. Now, it's for the BCCI to take a call on what they should be doing," say those in the know.

The ICC has no clear definition on how the election process should work. "In such a scenario, the board will have to pass a resolution and that can happen by way of a simple majority. That's part of ICC's constitution. So, they can certainly resolve it if they want to," add sources.

EOI on title rights out

The BCCI has come out with an invitation for Expression of Interest (EOI) for title sponsorship of the Indian Premier League's (IPL) 13th edition. The rights will be available to the winning bidder from August 18 onwards to December 31.

Interested third parties (excluding marketing agencies / agents) should submit an EOI in the manner prescribed below, the board said on Monday, clarifying that marketing agencies / agents are not eligible to bid.


BCCI has also underlined that "the turnover of the interested third party must be over Rs 300 crore as per the last audited accounts".


Meanwhile, another e-learning start-up 'Unacademy' is learnt to be interested in coming aboard the IPL bandwagon as an official partner. Unacademy were learnt to be in talks with BCCI before Covid put paid to all plans and will now be eligible only if their direct rivals, Byju's, don't come up with a winning bid for the title rights.


TOI understands that e-commerce giant Amazon, e-learning start-up Byju's and fantasy sports platform Dream 11 are interested in picking the rights. "At what value, that's the question," a leading industry executive, in the know of what a potential bidder is expecting from this space, said.


The board is expecting the new bid to fetch an approx. Rs 300 crore - around 3/4th of Vivo's value. The latter were contracted to pay the BCCI close to Rs 440 crore per season. "Amazon has that kind of money, it's festival season in India and given the rights window, they can stretch it from Dussera to Diwali to Christmas," say those tracking developments.

Source : https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...n-icc-boardroom/articleshowprint/77475151.cms
 
“It would be healthier to have an ICC chairperson not from the ‘big three’” : Ehsan Mani

Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) boss Ehsan Mani believes cricket’s new chairperson should come from beyond the sport’s powerful ‘big three’, as support deepens for progressive reform to address financial inequity among nations.

After the departure of Shashank Manohar, whose two-term tenure was notable for alleviating the stranglehold of the mighty Indian cricket board, the race has been on to find his successor. Two months have passed and yet the International Cricket Council (ICC) board remains at gridlock over whether to stick with a two-third majority needed among the 16 board members or revert to a simple majority.

“It’s unfortunate it has taken so long,” Mani told me. “The politics introduced by Australia, England and India in 2014 to protect their positions - now they are struggling to unwind it because it doesn’t suit them anymore.

“It would be healthier to have someone (the chairperson) not from the ‘big three’.”

Mani, who was the ICC’s chairman from 2003-06, dismissed speculation that he had been interested in making another run.

“I was never interested. A few of the directors asked me but I told them that I’m there to only serve Pakistan,” he said. “I’ve done it all before.”

With so much stonewalling amid the usual politicking that sweeps the game’s suits and ties, the candidates are unknown. Outgoing England chairman Colin Graves had been deemed the frontrunner but his support has seemingly gone lukewarm, while the intentions of interim chairman Imran Khwaja are unknown.

Some voters, according to sources, are dubious of someone from an Associates nation ascending to the top but the pragmatic Khwaja, who was the former president of Singapore Cricket Association, is well respected and has done the hard yards through being a long-time presence on ICC boards and committees.

There is cynicism of the Board of Control for Cricket in India’s (BCCI) motives and Sourav Ganguly’s potential candidacy has dominated headlines in recent months. But the former India captain’s future is currently shrouded by an impending Indian Supreme Court ruling set to determine whether his BCCI tenure extends.

“There is a huge problem of conflict of interest on the board,” Mani said. “I’ve never seen that before, not in 17 years. This sort of conflict of interest is not transparent. The ICC is crying out for more independent directors.”

Mani has supported calls for a review of the ICC’s revenue distribution model marked by India’s large piece of the financial pie. West Indies chief executive Johnny Grave told me last month that inequities had been exposed by large local broadcast deals in India, Australia and England – worth billions – which have widened the financial discrepancies.

Perhaps attempting to reignite his sagging candidacy, Graves, the outgoing England chairman, also said recently that the ICC should “recut its pot”.

Exacerbating all of this, the ICC’s major men’s tournaments from 2015-23 have been rotated among the ‘big three’ countries.

“It’s not only the funding model that is wrong and skewered to India and also to some degree England,” Mani said. “They allocated ICC events to themselves, gave themselves generous hosting fees and the benefits from gate money and hospitality.

“In 2019 (World Cup), (hosts) England would have made what Pakistan, West Indies or South Africa do over an eight-year period. That’s what’s wrong with the system. There are some countries who won’t be able to survive if this funding model continues.

“We survived without playing India (who refuse to play bilateral series against their arch-nemesis). Can you imagine if that happened to Cricket Australia if India didn’t come?”

Mani said the PCB was in the midst of negotiating a new broadcast deal amid hope Pakistan could host a World Cup in the ICC’s next cycle of 2023-31. Under Manohar, there had been a concerted push for cricket’s showpiece events to start being spread around.

USA and West Indies are the frontrunners to co-host the 2026 T20 World Cup, while Malaysia has expressed interest in bidding for a major tournament.

The ICC was expected to announce the hosts for the 2023-31 cycle by the end of the year but it could be delayed due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

“We want to host a World Cup during this cycle,” Mani said. “There are three-four events we have expressed interest, including some to host jointly with the UAE.”

In the meantime, Mani said the PCB was in discussions with a “number of countries” over playing bilateral series in the coming months due to space opening up after the postponement of the T20 World Cup. The Indian Premier League has largely filled the gap but Pakistan players are not allowed to play in cricket’s most lucrative league.

He said Zimbabwe was set to tour Pakistan in October, while Pakistan would tour New Zealand later in the year for Test and limited-overs series. “We are ready to tour and prepared to go there and adhere to the bio-secure environment, which includes 14 days of isolation,” Mani said.

“We feel it’s our responsibility to help other countries and we hope that’s to be reciprocated.”

https://www.forbes.com/sites/trista...ions-says-pakistan-cricket-boss/#34865fbe67a7
 
KARACHI: Chairman, Pakistan Cricket Board Ehsan Mani has emphasised that the PCB is now a stronger, more credible and thoroughly professional institution while he also echoed the fans’ sentiments that it is time that solid team performances be converted into winning results.

In a detailed and exclusive interview with Dawn, the former ICC President reiterated that the return of Test cricket, hosting of the entire HBL Pakistan Super League 2020 matches and visits of Marylebone Cricket Club, Bangladesh U-16 Boys and Women sides in the past 12 months is a testament to the PCB’s global image as a trustworthy and well-reputed cricket board.

On the performance of the national side, Mani expressed optimism that head coach and chief selector Misbah-ul-Haq now had got his feet under the table and, based on his 12-month experience, can now finalise his future strategy.

“You can only pass an accurate and informed judgement on the performance of the PCB when you carry out a comparative study. Although every administration tried their best during their tenures, this management has achieved what others could not, at least, in the past decade,” said Mani, who is one of the most respected and recognised personalities in international cricket.

“International teams were unwilling to come to Pakistan because of the trust deficit. In 2017 and 2018, the PCB paid for the World XI and West Indies players to visit here and while I acknowledge these were ice-breakers, we have hosted four international series as part of the Future Tours Programme without offering any inducements.

“Furthermore, nearly 425 foreign players expressed interest in playing in the HBL Pakistan Super League 2020 with 40-odd spending nearly a month in Pakistan during the 30-match event. These players travelled around the country and returned as our ambassadors.

“These are clear indicators of the reputation and credibility this administration holds in the international cricket community. This is also because previously there were no strong voices at the ICC Board that could present Pakistan’s case effectively.

“The same applies to PCB’s discussions with other cricket bodies,” said Mani as he went on to elaborate about the efforts made on every front to enhance the image and credibility of Pakistan Cricket and the PCB. “For example, Wasim Khan’s outstanding presentation on security in Pakistan to the MCC World Cricket Committee played a crucial part in the world’s most prestigious club to send a team in February. He was believed because they trusted him and there was no doubt about his credibility.

“The involvement of some of the elite former cricketers in Pakistan cricket today is a further endorsement of our vision, strategy, reputation and roadmap for the future. It also indicates the respect we have and give to cricketers who have served this great game with honour and dignity.

“During the difficult Covid-19 period and contrary to the general view, we sent our team to England that further enhanced our reputation internationally. As a result, powerful and respected voices in England cricket have spoken out in our support and favour, urging the England and Wales Cricket Board to honour its commitment to tour Pakistan in 2022,” added Mani, who is the Chairman of the powerful ICC’s Finance and Commercial Affairs Committee and was also approached by a number of ICC Members to again head the global body.

Mani, however, admitted that on the field, Pakistan’s performance has failed to show signs of improvement. The men’s side have stayed sixth and seventh in ODIs and Tests respectively, but have slipped from number-one to fourth in T20Is following the annual ICC update.

In the past 12 months, they have won two Tests and lost three, won two out of three ODIs (one match was rain abandoned) and won three T20Is out of 12 with three washouts.

Separately, Pakistan U-19 finished third in the ICC U-19 Cricket World Cup 2020, while the women’s side achieved fifth position (up by two) in the eight-team ICC Women’s Championship but failed to qualify directly for the ICC Women’s World Cup 2021, having to share points with India after India refused to host them for their scheduled qualifiers.

“To address this problem and bring consistency in the team’s and players’ performance, the PCB has put in place a professional management team with the men’s side whose understanding of the modern game is second to none and has a clear vision of the steps required for Pakistan to perform well consistently at the international level,” said Mani.

“I believe in empowerment and that’s precisely why Misbah was given full authority and support. But he very much remains accountable and as part of his appraisal process, he will be interviewed by the PCB Cricket Committee in the coming weeks in which he will be asked to reflect on his own and team’s performances, and share his vision for the future.”

Speaking about domestic cricket, Mani said his preference was initially for eight Cricket Association sides to replace the 16 Regions. “But after a lot of analysis and strategic reviews, I came to the conclusion that six national teams would provide high level of competitive cricket required to make Pakistan stronger.”

“Too many meaningless matches and events were being organised before, which was costing the PCB a fortune without benefitting Pakistan cricket because the Regions were not generating their revenues,” he observed. “There is also a misperception about unemployment as most of the leading institutions such as the MCB, NBP, UBL, HBL, PNSC, ABL etc had already pulled the shutters on their cricket teams before the new structure was introduced. The PCB’s in-house study further reveals most of the active departments, apart from a very few, were either offering short-term or event-based contracts to cricketers that ranged from Rs10,000 to Rs50,000 per month.”

The PCB chief hoped the interim committees of the six Cricket Associations will soon be announced, following which these bodies will start operating in their respective territories on way to putting in place a transparent and meritocratic Board of Governors. “Full powers will be delegated to the Cricket Associations to organise, develop and promote the game in their respective jurisdictions,” he said.

On the subject of accountability and transparency, Mani said: “It starts from me, and my quarterly expense statements are available on the PCB corporate website. For the first time, the Annual Audited Financial Statements of the PCB are also available for all stakeholders to see on its website. Besides, as part of good governance practices and as per the new PCB Constitution 2019, I have delegated a lot of my powers, which were previously exercised by my predecessors, to Chief Executive Wasim Khan. This ensures proper checks and balances within the PCB.”

Mani also hinted at some key changes in the Board of Governors set up as well. “Four independent members on the Board of Governors, including a female member, will soon be inducted to the Board of Governors, while the Nominations, HR & Remuneration and Risk Management Committees have been set-up, and the PCB Code of Ethics has been introduced.

“All these are basic and fundamental elements for any top-quality corporate organisation but were missing until I assumed charge. These changes have been implemented to transform the perception of the stakeholders, including fans, in an effort to convince them to start trusting and believing in the PCB.

“We are progressing in the right direction and remain confident to achieve all our targets and objectives,” said Mani.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1578103
 
INTERNATIONAL CRICKET COUNCIL PROCESS FOR THE ELECTION OF ICC CHAIRPERSON UNDERWAY

The International Cricket Council Board today confirmed the process for the election of its next Chairperson is underway and is expected to be concluded by early December.

The process, which is being overseen by the Independent Chairman of the ICC Audit Committee, has commenced and the first stage is for the nominations of potential candidates to be made by current Board Directors by 18 October 2020. Any nominee will then need to be seconded by another Board Director to become a candidate in the election.

As outlined in the ICC Constitution, to be eligible, potential candidates must be either a current or former ICC Director.
 
Back
Top