Too bad then. Looks they want the cake and eat it too! Result is the idiotic mess that is ongoing.renegotiate is what ICC does not want.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Too bad then. Looks they want the cake and eat it too! Result is the idiotic mess that is ongoing.renegotiate is what ICC does not want.
3 Billion $ contract is over priced anyway.. and Broadcasters know this after t20 wc 2024… so for them any excuse that can let them off the hook.. no Ind vs Pak can be that excuseToo bad then. Looks they want the cake and eat it too! Result is the idiotic mess that is ongoing.
and its thew perfect for cricket to go back to the good old days. your sport punches to the level what your economy can support.3 Billion $ contract is over priced anyway.. and Broadcasters know this after t20 wc 2024… so for them any excuse that can let them off the hook.. no Ind vs Pak can be that excuse
Please make it a political issue. Empty threats don't suffice. Why is PCB moaning about asking India to come to Pakistan? Host the tournament without India and ask ICC to proceed with that.
Hosting rights are awarded after all the parties have signed onWhat laws are we breaking? Simply stated that Indian team will not come to Pakistan. Proceed with tournament without India.
Playing sports is not a legal binding. Teams can skip tournaments based on their situations.
The point is to stop moaning and just host the tournament without India.
Well that file a case against India as they ain't coming.Hosting rights are awarded after all the parties have signed on
Vikrant is sympathetic to Pakistan in general. He has some inside sources in BCCI but lets see.
Did not know that teams have signed something. What have they signed? Is it legally binding?Hosting rights are awarded after all the parties have signed on
Of course it’s signed. How can it not be signed. Why do you thinkDid not know that teams have signed something. What have they signed? Is it legally binding?
If things are legally binding, ICC/PCB do not need to hold up things. Why not just get SL in place of Ind and get CT all setup to go. This way there is none of the ongoing issues/headaches and the CT is held in its entirety in Pakistan. Which is what PCB wants and will get.Of course it’s signed. How can it not be signed. Why do you think
Pak keeps on asking for reason in writing and India won’t provide it? Because of the legal issues. What is weird is that BCCI happily signed in likely in change for some benefit (support for big 3) but are now backing off from the agreement:
But this is the law of the jungle so who cares?
The world doesn’t work as per law. We live in law of the jungle where money talks and BS walks. This solution while legally the right next step isn’t financially feasible for ICC which is funded and therefore controlled by India.If things are legally binding, ICC/PCB do not need to hold up things. Why not just get SL in place of Ind and get CT all setup to go. This way there is none of the ongoing issues/headaches and the CT is held in its entirety in Pakistan. Which is what PCB wants and will get.
Since there is legal recourse, the ICC and PCB can go the legal route, seek and recover damages. This way PCB gets what it wants (CT in Pakistan), ICC gets its $$$$, fans get to watch a tournament, Pakistan fans get to watch live ICC tournament.
See, solution right in ICC's lap. Just need to do it.
Then this whole saga falls solely on the ICC. They are responsible for the current state of things entirely. Their inability to solve problems, make decisions, take a stand. ICC is at fault.The world doesn’t work as per law. We live in law of the jungle where money talks and BS walks. This solution while legally the right next step isn’t financially feasible for ICC which is funded and therefore controlled by India.
The ICC holds little real power and functions mostly as a glorified scheduler. The real issue is that cricket is effectively being run by India, which, unfortunately, has not shown the maturity or sensibility required to lead the sport responsibly. Many Indians boast that they don’t need the ICC or even an India vs. Pakistan rivalry. However, bringing politics into cricket is threatening the very fabric of international cricket. This ego-driven approach risks driving the sport into decline.Then this whole saga falls solely on the ICC. They are responsible for the current state of things entirely. Their inability to solve problems, make decisions, take a stand. ICC is at fault.
Then ICC needs to be dismantled. No point in having a bunch of people with fat paychecks doing nothing.The ICC holds little real power and functions mostly as a glorified scheduler. The real issue is that cricket is effectively being run by India, which, unfortunately, has not shown the maturity or sensibility required to lead the sport responsibly. Many Indians boast that they don’t need the ICC or even an India vs. Pakistan rivalry. However, bringing politics into cricket is threatening the very fabric of international cricket. This ego-driven approach risks driving the sport into decline.
you got this wrong, PCB don't care if India come or not, its your Indian broadcasters moaning about an Indian vs Pakistan match.
Keep the tissues ready as Indian team ain't coming.All BCCI needs now is a jingle!
When ever Indians say they don't need something, or don't care about something, it means that something is living rent free in their minds and future generations.So Indian fans do bhangra over pathetic point scoring from their government.
You would actually think as cricket fans you want to just play cricket.
But hey, "India doesn't need pakistan"
So sold for 15 millions approx is what you are sayingReport - PCB has accepted the hybrid model .
PCB has demanded two things from ICC:
1. Increase in hosting rights from 65M$ to 70M$
2. Increase in annual revenue from ICC from 5.75% to 6%(approx. 2M$ per year)
"We will not sell ourselves for money" - Naqvi
As an Indian cricket fan, I strongly believe India should tour Pakistan for the Champions Trophy and set aside unnecessary drama. True cricket fans prioritize the love of the game over politics and business interests. Those fixated on the political and commercial aspects of cricket should stop calling themselves fans of the sport.So Indian fans do bhangra over pathetic point scoring from their government.
You would actually think as cricket fans you want to just play cricket.
But hey, "India doesn't need pakistan"
Report - PCB has accepted the hybrid model .
PCB has demanded two things from ICC:
1. Increase in hosting rights from 65M$ to 70M$
2. Increase in annual revenue from ICC from 5.75% to 6%(approx. 2M$ per year)
"We will not sell ourselves for money" - Naqvi
No, he’s not. He just did a press conference and clearly stated there will be no hybrid model.So, for 0.25 % increase in revenue , Naqvi sa'ab is OK with hybrid model?
Nice fantasyReport - PCB has accepted the hybrid model .
PCB has demanded two things from ICC:
1. Increase in hosting rights from 65M$ to 70M$
2. Increase in annual revenue from ICC from 5.75% to 6%(approx. 2M$ per year)
"We will not sell ourselves for money" - Naqvi
Beauty!Mohsin Naqvi addressing the media at Dubai cricket stadium
Journalist: There are rumors circulating among India media that Pakistan is ready for the hybrid model? Are you still firm on your stance of no hybrid model?
Naqvi: We'll do what's best for cricket, whatever formula it will be, definitely NOT hybrid model but maybe something new on EQUAL grounds.
@Giroux28
Time for indians to go back in their hole
Allow them, the tears in their eyes have clouded their judgement and even their inability to read. I personally love it. India imploding and not a single ammunition fired, other than a press conference.No, he’s not. He just did a press conference and clearly stated there will be no hybrid model.
Sponsor has already made it clear that they will withdraw without India's participation in the tournament.Report - PCB has accepted the hybrid model .
PCB has demanded two things from ICC:
1. Increase in hosting rights from 65M$ to 70M$
2. Increase in annual revenue from ICC from 5.75% to 6%(approx. 2M$ per year)
"We will not sell ourselves for money" - Naqvi
Any source or your just saying to satisfy your ego?Sponsor has already made it clear that they will withdraw without India's participation in the tournament.
PCB might have to start another round of IMF begging talks to conduct the tournament.
Interesting . Naqvi is not reneging on his words after allNo, he’s not. He just did a press conference and clearly stated there will be no hybrid model.
If India are not visiting Pakistan then Pakistan won't visit India either and force all tournaments hosted by India in hybrid modelI wonder what this long term decision is?
How did Pakistan manage to lose what was their full hosting rights?So after this decision by the ICC i would say it's a win for Naqvi as he didn’t surrender and kept fighting for what was right.
Honestly speaking we couldn’t have expected that level of courage from any other PCB chairman.