What's new

“Was captured by Indian special forces and tranquilised”: Dubai Princess

If she wasn't privileged, how would she have sustained a lifestyle outside of the royal family once she was abroad?

Privilege comes in all forms of guise, of course she would have needed some help intially to sustain her life, everything she has , has been given to her from the day she has born, once she starts her own independent life then of course im sure she won't be leeching of daddy.. These are the kind of privileges one is not born with, and until you are born in and live in these shoes its easy to pass judgement.

Similar thing is happening with Prince Harry in the UK at the moment, yet he gets praised for chasing an independent lifestyle in most quarters?
 
Have you lived with her to say that she could be going through all sorts of abuse and persecutions? If you want to play the game of imagination, then nothing to say.

Her life belongs to her parents as well who brought her to this world. Parents don't wish bad for their kids. This is the new woke culture which teaches kids to rebel against their parents and not taking personal responsibility for their own actions. Thankfully some old school morals still exist which led her to be reunited with family.

Neither of us have lived with her, therefore we can only make our judgement based on her story, and the evidance SHE has provided.

Parents are important to ones life, however are you saying everyone should live there life by doing exactly what their parents say, cannot think for themselves etc. or if you disagree with your parents they have the power to abduct and imprison you? Forget about woke sounds like your living in the stone ages.
 
Neither of us have lived with her, therefore we can only make our judgement based on her story, and the evidance SHE has provided.

Parents are important to ones life, however are you saying everyone should live there life by doing exactly what their parents say, cannot think for themselves etc. or if you disagree with your parents they have the power to abduct and imprison you? Forget about woke sounds like your living in the stone ages.

Of course, parents should not keep her against her wishes for ever. But they deserve a try. If even after all that, she proves to be a gone case, then they have to accept their failure in providing her a good upbringing and should let her go. But disciplining your kids, no matter how adult, is a fair right of parents. Many girls run away disobeying their parents only to end up ruing their decisions later, but it is too late, and it is no consolation for the parents to be proven right. That is why parents should not care what the woke crowd says, and do what they know is best for the kid.
 
Of course, parents should not keep her against her wishes for ever. But they deserve a try. If even after all that, she proves to be a gone case, then they have to accept their failure in providing her a good upbringing and should let her go. But disciplining your kids, no matter how adult, is a fair right of parents. Many girls run away disobeying their parents only to end up ruing their decisions later, but it is too late, and it is no consolation for the parents to be proven right. That is why parents should not care what the woke crowd says, and do what they know is best for the kid.

lets not forget the parents in this case are no angels. This is not her first attempt at breaking away from her family, so clearly she is being held against her will, if this was happening in any other family they would be arrested for kidnap, you can blame "Woke" culture as much as you want.

Lets play devils advocate if her parents have decided she bought to much shame on them, and she deserves to be killed , they should not care what the woke crowd says and go ahead?
 
lets not forget the parents in this case are no angels. This is not her first attempt at breaking away from her family, so clearly she is being held against her will, if this was happening in any other family they would be arrested for kidnap, you can blame "Woke" culture as much as you want.

Lets play devils advocate if her parents have decided she bought to much shame on them, and she deserves to be killed , they should not care what the woke crowd says and go ahead?

That is not devils advocate. that is a strawman. Means you have run out of any arguments.
 
That is not devils advocate. that is a strawman. Means you have run out of any arguments.

Its a very valid argument, like i mentioned before this is not the first time she has run away, why is she running away, is she not happy? how much longer do the parents want to wait before they "accept their failure" and let her go. How many more yachts will they kidnap her from in the middle of the ocean, with tranquilizers and special forces ops?

"Parents should not care what the woke crowd says and go ahead" - she could be dead for all we know right now, i am asking if you think the parents would be justified if they killed her ? Her life belongs to her parents? Save all your strawmen cop outs, your just as bad as the mobs who believe in honor killings.
 
Privilege comes in all forms of guise, of course she would have needed some help intially to sustain her life, everything she has , has been given to her from the day she has born, once she starts her own independent life then of course im sure she won't be leeching of daddy.. These are the kind of privileges one is not born with, and until you are born in and live in these shoes its easy to pass judgement.

Similar thing is happening with Prince Harry in the UK at the moment, yet he gets praised for chasing an independent lifestyle in most quarters?

Prince Harry gets no praise from me, you can check the thread. All very well for these priveleged rich kids to indulge their fantasies, unless the same opportunities are available to someone who hasn't those advantages I am not impressed.
 
Its a very valid argument, like i mentioned before this is not the first time she has run away, why is she running away, is she not happy? how much longer do the parents want to wait before they "accept their failure" and let her go. How many more yachts will they kidnap her from in the middle of the ocean, with tranquilizers and special forces ops?

"Parents should not care what the woke crowd says and go ahead" - she could be dead for all we know right now, i am asking if you think the parents would be justified if they killed her ? Her life belongs to her parents? Save all your strawmen cop outs, your just as bad as the mobs who believe in honor killings.

So parents who discipline their erring kids and those who support it as as bad as the mobs who support honour killings? Typical woke tactics to liken something to racist, fascist, nazi, bigot, murderer. Sorry for the strawman cop out, should have said straw-woman to meet the woke standards.
 
So parents who discipline their erring kids and those who support it as as bad as the mobs who support honour killings? Typical woke tactics to liken something to racist, fascist, nazi, bigot, murderer. Sorry for the strawman cop out, should have said straw-woman to meet the woke standards.

So now your comparing disciplining your children against holding a 35 year old women against her will? what category does that fit into?

I like how your not actually addressing any of my points or providing your own valid argument apart from she has to listen to what her parents say, and blaming "woke" culture , seems like your the one who needs to wake up with your out dated views.
 
So now your comparing disciplining your children against holding a 35 year old women against her will? what category does that fit into?

I like how your not actually addressing any of my points or providing your own valid argument apart from she has to listen to what her parents say, and blaming "woke" culture , seems like your the one who needs to wake up with your out dated views.

She may be 35, but still a kid for the parents. This comparison is more valid than yours of comparing disciplinarians as honour killing supporters.
 
I didn't realise this girl was just a small child.. I don't know why but I was under the impression that she was an adult and thus being kept against her will...
 
She may be 35, but still a kid for the parents. This comparison is more valid than yours of comparing disciplinarians as honour killing supporters.

People who carry out honor killings "kidnap" girls from wherever, drug them, imprison them, hold them against their will .... very similar to the situation with princess of Dubai. which your condoning btw.

Disciplining a 10 year old and discipling a 35 year old as a parent are two completely different things believe me. when you become a parent you will realize.

I am not sure where the validity of the comparisons come into play, but your still deflecting from the actual point, a 35 year old women is being held against her will and you think that is ok? says a lot about your character.
 
Yeah, US won't let a neighbour be a Chinese slave...

exaggeration of the highest order

Not to mention Canada has detained the CFO of the Chinese tech giant (Huawei) for almost 2 years now who is also the daughter of the founder and in retaliation Chinese have arrested two Canadians on charges of "spying." The bilateral ties have taken a nosedive since this happened.

Some people just hate Trudeau so they will do and say anything to make Canada look bad.
 
People who carry out honor killings "kidnap" girls from wherever, drug them, imprison them, hold them against their will .... very similar to the situation with princess of Dubai. which your condoning btw.

Disciplining a 10 year old and discipling a 35 year old as a parent are two completely different things believe me. when you become a parent you will realize.

I am not sure where the validity of the comparisons come into play, but your still deflecting from the actual point, a 35 year old women is being held against her will and you think that is ok? says a lot about your character.

If the royal family believed in honour killing, why didn't they do it when she has already embarrassed her family? I don't support honour killing ( I have known two honour killing victims), and don't believe the royal family wants to kill her. Most likely it is some first world problem for her. Strange to see people so much concerned about a pampered princess individual freedom, yet don't speak about areas where honour killings actually happen.
 
What do our RSS Fascist members have to say about the latest developments?
 
What do our RSS Fascist members have to say about the latest developments?

Not a fascist, but is it about the extradition of the british arms dealer? This is old and public news. UAE repaid india's act of friendship by extraditing the wanted arms dealer.
 
What a dimwit this woman (former PM) is .. she didn't even bother to properly investigate the case.


 
Not a fascist, but is it about the extradition of the british arms dealer? This is old and public news. UAE repaid india's act of friendship by extraditing the wanted arms dealer.

The women asked for asylum and instead they used her as a pawn.
Well done
 
The women asked for asylum and instead they used her as a pawn.
Well done

Asylum isn't a right, and it wasn't a genuine case either of someone escaping religious persecution or war. UAE repaid the good deed with another. Well done to both sides indeed. Hope the princess reconciles with her family and takes on the responsibilities suitable for a princess. Like Princess Diana had taken the cause against landmines.
 
Asylum isn't a right, and it wasn't a genuine case either of someone escaping religious persecution or war. UAE repaid the good deed with another. Well done to both sides indeed. Hope the princess reconciles with her family and takes on the responsibilities suitable for a princess. Like Princess Diana had taken the cause against landmines.

You're making idiotic points now..

The women shouted asylum, your sick military did not listen.
Sick sick sick


https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.time...t-dubai-princess/amp_articleshow/81079487.cms
 
I can understand Indian reluctance to grant asylum to be honest. Why would she have privilege to asylum when women under much worse conditions in Somalia or Myanamar wouldn't? Where would it end? If India refused asylum to women of lesser background then they would be accused of granting asylum selectively for PR purposes.
 
https://help.unhcr.org/india/applying-for-asylum-india/

I don't think military or police can judge on spot. That is illegal. According to UN/Geneva convention aand I'm sure even India's own constitution they should have put her in front of a judge who then had legitimacy to decide her future.

Don't stress, just accept India is a banana republic.

India is a non signatory to the UN convention on refugees. So UN has no jurisdiction on this. Our constitution has no law on refugees and leaves it on the government to decide.

So the government of India worked within the laws.
 
I can understand Indian reluctance to grant asylum to be honest. Why would she have privilege to asylum when women under much worse conditions in Somalia or Myanamar wouldn't? Where would it end? If India refused asylum to women of lesser background then they would be accused of granting asylum selectively for PR purposes.

I doubt she was seeking asylum in India itself.
Her intention was to claim it in the US but it had to start that at the port or country she was captured in.
Just like that Saudi girl in Thailand who ended up in Canada.

Right course would have been to hold the woman and hear her side of the story.
Instead they used her as collateral.
 
I doubt she was seeking asylum in India itself.
Her intention was to claim it in the US but it had to start that at the port or country she was captured in.
Just like that Saudi girl in Thailand who ended up in Canada.

Right course would have been to hold the woman and hear her side of the story.
Instead they used her as collateral.

What kind of collateral is released before you get the ransom? It shows the friendship and trust between the two nations, that india protected the royal family's honour, no questions asked, and UAE reciprocated the kind gesture by expatriating a wanted man, no questions asked again. Beautiful synergy.
 
I doubt she was seeking asylum in India itself.
Her intention was to claim it in the US but it had to start that at the port or country she was captured in.
Just like that Saudi girl in Thailand who ended up in Canada.

Right course would have been to hold the woman and hear her side of the story.
Instead they used her as collateral.

What collateral? Another cock bull story.

Christian Michel was arrested in Dubai in 2017, 1 year before this incident. He was extradited to India in December 2018, 9 months after this incident.
 
What collateral? Another cock bull story.

Christian Michel was arrested in Dubai in 2017, 1 year before this incident. He was extradited to India in December 2018, 9 months after this incident.

What so whats your point?
 
Looks like india sold itself out

All this talk about being the largest democracy is nonsense

Its like any third world state Money and power talks and thats it
 
Looks like india sold itself out

All this talk about being the largest democracy is nonsense

Its like any third world state Money and power talks and thats it

Deporting an illegal foreigner is selling itself? Guess every country is selling itself then.
 
Yes it is a country’s choice. And that choice reveals a lot about the country.

When someone says it is my choice, it is my right, then he doesn't have a compelling argument to show why that choice was right.


Which is why I have focussed on the ethical nature of this decision. Dalai Lama escaping oppression, give him shelter without worrying about the bully. Prima donna princess running away from luxury and family and asking for asylum, send her back respectfully and safely to her family. Both times the absolute correct moral decision was made.
 
Deporting an illegal foreigner is selling itself? Guess every country is selling itself then.

It wasnt a deportation by India, was due legal process followed? She shouldve been took to india her case processed and a legal judgement made followed by deportation if necessary

Instead she was sedated n tranquilised on the boat and passed over to uae agents who forcibly took her back and now shes forcibly living under lock and key heavily drugged with no access to the outside world or help

Its disgusting what india did
 
Last edited:
So much criticism of India, while nothing is said to the father of the princess who got his daughter kidnapped, brought back against her will and has since imprisoned her without access even to medical care.

Guess that for some people, belonging to a certain religion ensures that all your actions are forgiven and the fault is always someone else's.
 
So much criticism of India, while nothing is said to the father of the princess who got his daughter kidnapped, brought back against her will and has since imprisoned her without access even to medical care.

Guess that for some people, belonging to a certain religion ensures that all your actions are forgiven and the fault is always someone else's.

Isn’t criticism of India for sending her back to ‘hell’ clearly imply that the father (and his family) was in the wrong in the first place? Or does that require too much comprehension skills for you? Though I would say in case of most people with some basic intelligence, it is easy enough to understand.
 
Last edited:
It wasnt a deportation by India, was due legal process followed? She shouldve been took to india her case processed and a legal judgement made followed by deportation if necessary

Instead she was sedated n tranquilised on the boat and passed over to uae agents who forcibly took her back and now shes forcibly living under lock and key heavily drugged with no access to the outside world or help

Its disgusting what india did

Legal judgement? Indian laws give the government the power to deal with illegal immigrants. India is also not a signatory to the convention and protocol on refugees.

So Indi followed the law.
 
Isn’t criticism of India for sending her back to ‘hell’ clearly imply that the father (and his family) was in the wrong in the first place? Or does that require too much comprehension skills for you? Though I would say in case of most people with some basic intelligence, it is easy enough to understand.

An illegal immigrant is deported to their country of origin.
 
Legal judgement? Indian laws give the government the power to deal with illegal immigrants. India is also not a signatory to the convention and protocol on refugees.

So Indi followed the law.

So dealing with a royal princess who is escaping persecution from her father is to apprehend her, forcibly drug her and hand her back to her persecutors to be violated n imprisoned from where shes fleeing

If thats the indian law then no more needs to be said tbh
 
So dealing with a royal princess who is escaping persecution from her father is to apprehend her, forcibly drug her and hand her back to her persecutors to be violated n imprisoned from where shes fleeing

If thats the indian law then no more needs to be said tbh

Where is the proof that the father was persecuting? Cannot be taken seriously till some evidence is shared.
 
It wasnt a deportation by India, was due legal process followed? She shouldve been took to india her case processed and a legal judgement made followed by deportation if necessary

Unfortunately there is no real legal judgements required because India are one of the few remaining countries in the world who still don't agree to the UNs conventions and protocols on refugees. The government can therefore discriminate against and deal with refugees with no consistency or proper oversight. For what it's worth it appears Pakistan aren't a signatory to these agreements either.
 
Last edited:
A runway princess returned back to her family with utmost safety. At least don't dehumanize her with terms like illegal immigrant.

Shes not a child Its an adult whos been forcibly imprisoned and inhumanely treated by her family and not seen in public since

I along with most find it laughable how some posters are justifying the unjustifiable
 
Shes not a child Its an adult whos been forcibly imprisoned and inhumanely treated by her family and not seen in public since

I along with most find it laughable how some posters are justifying the unjustifiable

Can you share some evidence about being imprisoned and the inhumane treatment? I hear she is in a villa facing a private beach. Can only wonder about the food and other luxuries she must be having. Wish everyone in the world gets this imprisonment and inhumane treatment if what I hear is true.
 
So dealing with a royal princess who is escaping persecution from her father is to apprehend her, forcibly drug her and hand her back to her persecutors to be violated n imprisoned from where shes fleeing

If thats the indian law then no more needs to be said tbh

Thats a issue between two emiratis. Its for the UAE law to handle it. It doesn't give the person the right to enter India illegally.
 
Can you share some evidence about being imprisoned and the inhumane treatment? I hear she is in a villa facing a private beach. Can only wonder about the food and other luxuries she must be having. Wish everyone in the world gets this imprisonment and inhumane treatment if what I hear is true.

She says Isnt that enough for you? Her friend has also stated the same
Shes not been seen in public bar that one staged video

If she isnt under detention why isnt she seen in public properly since that incident?

Shes not a child so this rubbish that shes been returned to her family doesnt work Shes an adult and should be free to do and go as she pleases

In regards to this villa she is staying no matter how luxurious it is Nobody would like to be detained against their will there with no access to the outside world for years on end nor able to leave or come and go as they please so lets not even go there with that rubbish
 
Last edited:
She says Isnt that enough for you? Her friend has also stated the same
Shes not been seen in public bar that one staged video

If she isnt under detention why isnt she seen in public properly since that incident?

Shes not a child so this rubbish that shes been returned to her family doesnt work Shes an adult and should be free to do and go as she pleases

In regards to this villa she is staying no matter how luxurious it is Nobody would like to be detained against their will there with no access to the outside world for years on end nor able to leave or come and go as they please so lets not even go there with that rubbish

So the only evidence is that she said. If she was being persecuted, she wouldn't be in a luxurious villa with private beach, but would be rotting in a cell. Should be careful when using the term persecution, because it has a different meaning for a pampered princess.
 
She says Isnt that enough for you? Her friend has also stated the same
Shes not been seen in public bar that one staged video

If she isnt under detention why isnt she seen in public properly since that incident?

Shes not a child so this rubbish that shes been returned to her family doesnt work Shes an adult and should be free to do and go as she pleases

In regards to this villa she is staying no matter how luxurious it is Nobody would like to be detained against their will there with no access to the outside world for years on end nor able to leave or come and go as they please so lets not even go there with that rubbish

Is any other woman in Asia free to do what she did? There would be a line of millions getting on boats headed for Greece, Canada, France and the rest if the only requirement to getting a new home abroad is wanting something a bit different. How come a Princess should be expected support where a Filipina maid wouldn't?
 
Can you share some evidence about being imprisoned and the inhumane treatment? I hear she is in a villa facing a private beach. Can only wonder about the food and other luxuries she must be having. Wish everyone in the world gets this imprisonment and inhumane treatment if what I hear is true.

Attacking a boat with warning, sedating with tranquillisers, not giving access to legal advice and asylum services when clearly demanded is definitely inhumane treatment.

What emarati royals were doing doesn’t need to be commented as their past actions and history is well known. No surprises there.
 
Legal judgement? Indian laws give the government the power to deal with illegal immigrants. India is also not a signatory to the convention and protocol on refugees.

So Indi followed the law.
Baseless claim that India has no law and procedures to properly deal with asylum seekers. Indians even not not knowing that army commandoes cannot even make a legal arrest. Maritime patrol agencies are for that purpose and they have due legal procedures for deportation.

Also, Indian fans making baseless claims much in the mould of Trump while having no knowledge of local or international law is again very visible here for everyone to see.
 
Baseless claim that India has no law and procedures to properly deal with asylum seekers. Indians even not not knowing that army commandoes cannot even make a legal arrest. Maritime patrol agencies are for that purpose and they have due legal procedures for deportation.

Also, Indian fans making baseless claims much in the mould of Trump while having no knowledge of local or international law is again very visible here for everyone to see.

Please substantiate the claims you just made.
 
Attacking a boat with warning, sedating with tranquillisers, not giving access to legal advice and asylum services when clearly demanded is definitely inhumane treatment.

What emarati royals were doing doesn’t need to be commented as their past actions and history is well known. No surprises there.

1. Boat was within Indian territorial waters illegally and hence it was boarded.

2. India is not a signatory to UN protocol on refugees and hence isnt bound to give asylum to illegal immigrants.

3.Every day scores of illegal Bangladeshis etc are apprehended and deported back. Same happened here.

4. No one asked the emirati princess to come to India. She was dealt as per our laws.
 
1. Boat was within Indian territorial waters illegally and hence it was boarded.

2. India is not a signatory to UN protocol on refugees and hence isnt bound to give asylum to illegal immigrants.

3.Every day scores of illegal Bangladeshis etc are apprehended and deported back. Same happened here.

4. No one asked the emirati princess to come to India. She was dealt as per our laws.

Where was she deported please explain?

She was dealth with as per the emirates Why dont u be honest with yourself?

All it took is a phone call and yes sir brigade came running and obliged
 
1. Boat was within Indian territorial waters illegally and hence it was boarded.

2. India is not a signatory to UN protocol on refugees and hence isnt bound to give asylum to illegal immigrants.

3.Every day scores of illegal Bangladeshis etc are apprehended and deported back. Same happened here.

4. No one asked the emirati princess to come to India. She was dealt as per our laws.

I am loving it. Once again repeating half- truths while it the illegalities were clearly outlined. This is ditto what Trump and Republican Party does.

List of illegalities

1. Boarding a boat without warning. All maritime agencies give warning even to illegal boats in their territories. This is not international law but rules of operation.

2. Rules of engagement with asylum seekers or anyone for that purpose do not come from international protocols only. It is Indian law that was broken in this case.

3. No. Same did not happened here. Illegals are properly processed according to Indian law and then deported.

4. India has specific acts and laws for people who wish to seek refuge in her. It is national law and just by virtue of its existence persons under duress can opt to go to India to seek asylum.

The problem is India is not a hillybilly state. It is a constitutional democracy that has detailed laws for such scenarios and relevant agencies. And then even those agencies have their rules of operation. So just stop this blind cycle stupid fake claims about which you surely have no knowledge.
 
Princess Latifa: UN 'yet to see proof of life' from UAE

The UN says it has not yet seen evidence that the daughter of Dubai's ruler is alive, two weeks after seeking proof from the United Arab Emirates.

Princess Latifa Al Maktoum tried to flee the country in 2018. In footage shared with BBC Panorama, she claims commandos drugged her as she fled by boat and flew her back to detention.

Contact from her has since stopped.

Dubai's royal family has previously said she is safe and being "cared for at home".

The footage of Princess Latifa prompted calls for a UN investigation. Last month, the UN confirmed it had asked the UAE for proof that Princess Latifa was alive. But on Friday, it said that there had been no progress so far.

Spokesman Robert Colville said there had been meetings with the United Arab Emirates' (UAE) diplomatic mission in Geneva, Switzerland, but when asked if proof of life had been received, he replied: "Not yet, no".

Latifa's father, Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, is one of the richest heads of state in the world, the ruler of Dubai and vice-president of the UAE.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-56293911
 
Where was she deported please explain?

She was dealth with as per the emirates Why dont u be honest with yourself?

All it took is a phone call and yes sir brigade came running and obliged

She was deported to her country of citizenship. Thats what happens when someone is deported.

Just because pakistanis bend over for arab royals, with your PM chauffeuring them aroun, doesn't mean the rest of the world works that way. India isnt a country that needs bailout loans from arabs to survive, thats true for pakistan.
 
I am loving it. Once again repeating half- truths while it the illegalities were clearly outlined. This is ditto what Trump and Republican Party does.

List of illegalities

1. Boarding a boat without warning. All maritime agencies give warning even to illegal boats in their territories. This is not international law but rules of operation.

2. Rules of engagement with asylum seekers or anyone for that purpose do not come from international protocols only. It is Indian law that was broken in this case.

3. No. Same did not happened here. Illegals are properly processed according to Indian law and then deported.

4. India has specific acts and laws for people who wish to seek refuge in her. It is national law and just by virtue of its existence persons under duress can opt to go to India to seek asylum.

The problem is India is not a hillybilly state. It is a constitutional democracy that has detailed laws for such scenarios and relevant agencies. And then even those agencies have their rules of operation. So just stop this blind cycle stupid fake claims about which you surely have no knowledge.

1.Did you make the rules of operation? Dont think you did. Were you present that you are claiming that the boat was boarded without warning? Indian authorities were within their rights to board a boat that had illegally entered Indian Territory.

2.No Indian law was broken. If it was please quote the law.

3.Illegals are caught at the border and handed over back to the Bangladeshi BDR. Happens every day. Almost any person from west Bengal who has visited the border area can confirm this to you. The illegal emirati was handed over to her country.

4. Please show me the act and law in India that deals with refugees and asylum seekers that gives them the right to come into my country illegally and not get deported.


Quote the relevant section Indian constitution that says what you say it says.

India has no laws on refugees and its the government's wish what they want to do with them.

You are not going to make up Indian laws on PP.
 
1.Did you make the rules of operation? Dont think you did. Were you present that you are claiming that the boat was boarded without warning? Indian authorities were within their rights to board a boat that had illegally entered Indian Territory.

2.No Indian law was broken. If it was please quote the law.

3.Illegals are caught at the border and handed over back to the Bangladeshi BDR. Happens every day. Almost any person from west Bengal who has visited the border area can confirm this to you. The illegal emirati was handed over to her country.

4. Please show me the act and law in India that deals with refugees and asylum seekers that gives them the right to come into my country illegally and not get deported.


Quote the relevant section Indian constitution that says what you say it says.

India has no laws on refugees and its the government's wish what they want to do with them.

You are not going to make up Indian laws on PP.
If you are lazy enough to deny existence of law without even doing a very basic google search, or arrogant enough to claim otherwise without knowledge then I am not gonna help you. Do it yourself.

I was not present when any legislative body was making laws or agencies were making rules of operation. Doesn’t mean they don’t exist. For boarding without warning, story says so..
 
If you are lazy enough to deny existence of law without even doing a very basic google search, or arrogant enough to claim otherwise without knowledge then I am not gonna help you. Do it yourself.

I was not present when any legislative body was making laws or agencies were making rules of operation. Doesn’t mean they don’t exist. For boarding without warning, story says so..

There is no law on refugees in India. That was repeated umpteen times when India deported Rohingyas.

The same was repeated when CAA was passed.

Now next time please don't tell me about laws in my country that dont exist.
 
Back channel favors from Modi. This is old news. He does what's best for India and Indians abroad. One runaway princess isn't worth fighting oil money and the millions of Indians in that country.
 
The British Horseracing Authority has expressed its "concern" over claims by Sheikh Mohammed's daughter, Princess Latifa, that she has been imprisoned by her father and fears for her life.

Dubai's ruler, Sheikh Mohammed, is racing's biggest benefactor, the owner of global racehorse operation Godolphin and the Newmarket-based stallion breeding operation, Darley.

Nearly three weeks after Panorama revealed secret videos filmed by Princess Latifa, the governing body has addressed the issue for the first time.

Julie Harrington, the BHA's new CEO, said the organisation "shares the concerns" raised by Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab, and described the footage as "clearly distressing".

She confirmed that the BHA has been in contact with the UK Government on the matter.

The United Nations said on Friday it has not yet seen evidence that Princess Latifa is still alive.

A year has passed - without comment from the BHA - since the family division of the High Court found Sheikh Mohammed to have been responsible for a campaign of intimidation against his former wife Princess Haya and for the abduction and forced return of two of his daughters from a different marriage - including Princess Latifa.

The Sheikh insisted he was unable to participate in the court's fact-finding process, resulting in a judgement he said "inevitably only tells one side of the story".

A Dubai Royal Family statement released after the Panorama programme said Latifa was being cared for at home and the media coverage was "not reflective of the actual position".

The Jockey Club - which owns Newmarket Racecourse, of which Godolphin is a sponsor - has also not commented on either matter.

In response to questions from the BBC, Harrington said: "We have heard the public comments made by the Foreign Secretary, Dominic Raab, in which he expressed concern about the distressing pictures shown on television.

"I share his concern - the footage clearly is distressing and we support Mr Raab's position that the UN human rights body should lead this investigation.

"We have taken time to consider the issues since Mr Raab spoke. These are complex matters, involving an overseas state with strategic ties to the United Kingdom. The matters go well beyond the world of racing, and the UN is involved.

"We can confirm that as part of this, we have been in contact with the British government to explain our responsibilities as regulator, as well as to highlight a significant investment and contribution to the British racing industry.

"We cannot discuss contact with government further and we are also not going to confirm whether we are or are not taking any action."

Within the BHA's rules on the suitability of owners, it says: "The criteria to which the authority will have regard in assessing honesty and integrity, include… whether the applicant has been the subject of any adverse finding by a judge in any civil proceedings."

However, the BHA's policy means it will not disclose whether investigations are ongoing.

Harrington - who took the helm of the BHA in January after leaving British Cycling - warned separately that racing is facing an "existential crisis".

She made the comments in an interview with the Racing Post, primarily focused on the fallout from the photograph of trainer Gordon Elliott sitting astride the body of a dead racehorse - for which he has been banned for 12 months, with the second 6 months suspended.

However, she has also encountered several other issues in her first two months in the role, including the Panorama allegations about Sheikh Mohammed, the ongoing impact of coronavirus and gambling reforms which could cost the industry more than £60m.

"People use the phrase 'existential crisis' and I don't think that is underestimating it," Harrington told the newspaper.

"To see our sport on the front pages for the wrong reasons, and for the general public to have been given the perception our horses are not cared for, is a crisis for the industry."

https://www.bbc.com/sport/horse-racing/56304866
 
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-emirates-dubai-latifa-un/u-n-awaits-proof-of-life-for-dubai-princess-spokeswoman-idUSKBN2BW1AJ?il=0

The United Nations human rights office has asked the United Arab Emirates for “proof of life” for Sheikha Latifa, one of the daughters of the ruler of Dubai, but has not received one, a spokeswoman said on Friday.

In a video message filmed in a bathroom and obtained by the BBC, the princess said she was being held captive in a barricaded villa. The UAE last month said Latifa was being cared for at home by family and medical professionals.

“We haven’t got any proof of life, and we would like one, one that is clear compelling evidence that she is alive. Our first concern of course is to be sure of that, that she is still alive,” U.N. human rights spokeswoman Marta Hurtado told a briefing in Geneva.

Senior U.N. officials have sought a meeting with the UAE ambassador in Geneva about Latifa, which in principle has been agreed, she said, adding that they also planned to raise case of her older sister Shamsa.
 
Princess Latifa: UN calls for 'concrete' proof of life from UAE

The UN has called for the United Arab Emirates to provide "concrete" proof that Princess Latifa Al Maktoum, the daughter of Dubai's ruler reportedly being held in detention, is alive.

In a statement issued in Geneva on Tuesday, UN human rights experts also said she should be released "urgently".

Princess Latifa tried to flee Dubai in 2018. In footage shared with BBC Panorama, she says commandos drugged her and flew her back to detention.

The UN says it needs more information.

Dubai's royal family has previously said Princess Latifa is safe and being "cared for at home".

On 5 March, the UN said it was still awaiting further details from the UAE - two weeks after an initial request for proof of life.

In Tuesday's statement, the UN experts called on the government of the UAE once again to "provide meaningful information" on Princess Latifa's fate "without delay".

They asked for "independent verification of the conditions under which she is being held, and for her immediate release".

"The statement issued by the Emirates authorities' merely indicating that she was being 'cared for at home' is not sufficient at this stage," the statement said.

It added: "We are alarmed that, following the public release in February of footage in which Sheikha Latifa reported being deprived of her liberty against her will, and the subsequent official request for further information on her situation, no concrete information has been provided by the authorities."

In recordings obtained by BBC Panorama in February, Princess Latifa said she was being held hostage in a "villa converted into a jail" with no access to medical help.

Latifa's father, Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, is one of the richest heads of state in the world, the ruler of Dubai and vice-president of the UAE.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-56820707
 
Yes we do. We are not signatories to any convention. Tibetans are considered refugees. It is an ad hoc process and that's all there is to it

The sheikh mustve handsomely rewarded modi n his stooges

We know the adhoc process that takes place in india Usually involves white paper with ghandis photo being handed over in a briefcase
 
skynews-princess-latifa-uae_5390668.png


A photo that appears to show Princess Latifa is alive has been posted online and shared with Sky News.

It is the first time she has been seen in public since secret video messages were released to Sky News in February.

In the tapes she claimed she was being held "hostage" by her father, the ruler of Dubai.

Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al Maktoum has consistently denied these claims and said she is safe and well.

The image, posted two days ago to Instagram, appears to have been taken in the Mall of the Emirates in Dubai.

Sky News has not been able to independently verify the image but understands it is thought to be legitimate.

Face masks are visible on the table, which suggests the photo has been taken in the last 18 months.

David Haigh, co-founder of the Free Latifa campaign and Detained International, said: "We confirm that there have been several potentially significant and positive developments in the campaign.

"We do not intend to comment further at this stage, a further statement will be issued at the appropriate time".

SKY
 
Back
Top