If you are going to give examples then make sure it is an apples to apples comparison. This is typical of what I say your cousin
@Devadwal does... and you are at it too.
So basically, what you are saying is that , if it was just recapitalised, its going to produce a wall of cash.. lovely Jubly, everyone is a winner.
Here is where you have gone wrong, whether intentionally or lack of sufficient cognitive capacity, you have not addressed why the business is not making money, that is the fundamental issue that needs to be dealt with. The answer is liabilities.
Here is the actual example you should have given that is somewhat depicts whats happening here.
I own a business, it was making money but then I recruited 6 times the staff required for no good reason other than give people I know jobs. This has made the business insolvent as the incomings do not cover the outgoings and I took a punt and took on debt to keep the business going to the point that the debt is now over $2 billion dollars.
I now look to offload this business, but me having to keep all the liabilities of over $2 billion. My friends have come in and offered to take all the assets for 10% cash of the valuation/"sale" price, the remaining they promise they will spend on the business without any firm guarantees or time lines. But I will still tell everyone that it I sold it for the full valuation price, even though I did it for only 10% of that.
My friends are really happy that I have kept all the liabilities for myself as that was the part that was making it into a loss making business. They will now inherit a profitable business almost immediately and even more so if they get rid of the excess staff. As part of this deal, I will offload my remaining 25% share in the business on same terms within 90 days. Therefore, when the business starts to make money, I will not have any share of that... God knows how I will pay the debt off. But hey, as long s my friends are happy, I am happy....
One of the most absurd privatisation deals that makes only a modicum of sense if they retain 25% shares, which they do not intend to as that is probably ring fenced for the army.