@aboveandbeyond @topspin
It seems all the traditional top 6 sides have changed tact and now are wanting to go down the route of looking at young strikers. Main reasons for thar have been
- wanting a player who can develop over a long period of time
- resale value in future with players been young
- more youthful squads
Teams seen more focused on building younger squads for longer term, also having players with resale value. Teams are now thinking more from a buisness point of view then on the pitch
In regards to young strikers, unless your a freak of nature like Haaland, most strikers don't develop into lethal goal scorers or reach peak until mid to late 20s.
We've seen all big clubs sign or target young strikers and in the cases where they are seen to be the "main source" of goals they end up struggling under pressure.
Hjolund at united, Jackson at Chelsea are examples of that. If you look at Liverpool the have sign ekitike but he will have the luxury of having time to settle im, as Salah is there to score the bulk of the goals.
This is why Berta did a good job in seeing sense and swerving sesko. If Arteta the

had his way then sesko would have been signed
Sesko going to united, makes zero sense, its just another hjolund / zirkzee type signing. Asking another young striker to be main source of goals. It didn't make sense when Arsenal were after him either.
Someone like Mateta with proven experience and reaching his peak would be more ideal for united, he would have be a good option if Chelsea wanted him but they have gone down youth route again. I'd have taken him at Arsenal as 2nd striker over donkeys like havertz and Merino, who look like they will be usee as back up options.
Strikers and even goalkeepers tend to peak as they get older, but everyone is more fascinated with "youth projects" at moment.