Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
The thing about people who get excited about one innings is it is a knee jerk. When he consistently fails it becomes the narrative "just wait until he comes good", then one good innings and it is "see I was right!!!!"
How about you wait until he does it for 5 matches, not one innings..
And I don't mean 100 every innings, just play the ball on merit and get easy 50s and build to centuries where you can.
"Criticizing a player from the team you cheer for, you must be a hater!"
I have seen enough of Shafiq to know he is inconsistent and has done nothing to disprove that. People don't care for one innings from anyone else, they need to see it in 5-10 consistent innings, but Shafiq does it once and all of a sudden the knives are out as though you were right. One innings need not define a career. An adage I continuously refer to when people get excited about these kinds of performances.
Same thing with Azhar and his SL century.
Went missing first innings.
These runs are good for his personal record.
Just like that ton vs sa.
I think average of around 39-40 is good enough, not every batsman in your team can average 50+, unless you think Haris and Fawad along with Misbah and Younis would have made this a world class formidable middle order.
Why do you always underrate Haris Sohail? I know he isn't one of the fittest guys around but he is a consistent performer in tests and has done well in the both warm up matches. .will you ever speak for the unfair treatment poor bloke has been getting from Misbah who might be afraid of him becoming his replacement but Misbah can try his best this will be his final test mqtch iA. We don't need a batsman who can't perform anymore when the going gets tough.
I have an idea we should discount all bowling and batsmens records if ther team loses. What do you think?
C
Hater it is, then
. If I follow what he has done since the first innings against Australia, including playing out a tense draw, I see no reasons to complain.
But wait, you are probably upset about the past before that.
Maqsood, Fawad and Akmal should be next in line for a test chance/recall. Sohail doesn't seem like anything more than a "30 averaging" player.
His knocks over the last 5 Tests:
89 vs Australia
DNB
21 vs Australia when we were looking for some quick runs and declare.
DNB
DNB
44
41* (helped play out the draw)
11
137
His only genuine failure came in the first innings of this Test where everyone barring Hafeez failed.
Could he have done better? Perhaps
Was he poor by any means? Not at all and fairly consistent in my view.
Just talking the truth.
I remember his ugly shot vs tahir in 1st innings and also here when pressure was on he couldnt deliver.
this knock doesnt mean much as we lost the test and didnt win the series.
a player should deliver when it matters.
thats why i rate sir fraz 2 100s much higher vs all those runs scored by the other batsmen.
His knocks over the last 5 Tests:
89 vs Australia
DNB
21 vs Australia when we were looking for some quick runs and declare.
DNB
DNB
44
41* (helped play out the draw)
11
137
His only genuine failure came in the first innings of this Test where everyone barring Hafeez failed.
Could he have done better? Perhaps
Was he poor by any means? Not at all and fairly consistent in my view.
Miles better than Misbah who takes 200 balls to score his fifty when the pitch is flat and no pressure and goes missing underpressure.
You need to put him side by side with every Pakistan bat and he will fall below every other player.
It was just an easy wicket to bat on all the way through and he mustered out a few decent innings and a couple of good ones meanwhile others were thrashing away.
Oh well. Time will tell the story that I know he will write. He will go down as talent who could never find consistency, similar to Umar.
He gives you a glimmer and then nothing for 5 innings. He did this once against SA.
You also said that these were flat pitches and we shouldn't get excited about anyones batting, but all of a sudden Shafiq does it and everyone is giving him all this kudos.
To each their own I guess.
Well done Shafiq today, no one came to play with you unfortunately and it might have been a match saving knock.
Still not convinced by you but this argument is going no where. I just agree to disagree.
It definitely mattered today and he was under a lot of pressure. Had Misbah and Sarfaraz given him company, this test could have been drawn. Nonsensical arguments.
There was less pressure in the first innings since the players couldn't have seen that McCullum assault coming and we already had a good score on the board when he came on to bat.
steelo green's point is fair that Shafiq so far in his career has lacked consistency. I don't understand why he is getting patronized for it but yes the criticism here overall is a little harsh because Shafiq has had very few opportunities to bat and pile up the runs compared to other batsmen.
Nopes after the no show today by the top order the game was over.
The field settings helped him as well.
He scored 5 100s how many of those games did we win?
Nopes after the no show today by the top order the game was over.
The field settings helped him as well.
He scored 5 100s how many of those games did we win?
You have an inordinate soft spot for Shafiq and you shift goal posts and use a narrative only for Shafiq and will jump on others for doing the exact same thing you are defending him for.
He deserved that century, good to see he was capable of batting with some aggression too, nearly a 100% strike rate. He's not a fantastic player by any means but he's a good solid middle order batsman. He should perhaps be coming up the order a bit, I think he should swap places with Misbah.
steelo green's point is fair that Shafiq so far in his career has lacked consistency. I don't understand why he is getting patronized for it but yes the criticism here overall is a little harsh because Shafiq has had very few opportunities to bat and pile up the runs compared to other batsmen.
Just talking the truth.
I remember his ugly shot vs tahir in 1st innings and also here when pressure was on he couldnt deliver.
this knock doesnt mean much as we lost the test and didnt win the series.
a player should deliver when it matters.
thats why i rate sir fraz 2 100s much higher vs all those runs scored by the other batsmen.
Post misbahs retirement I suspect
Wish he has not scored this century.
Yes the seniors first culture is alive and well in Pakistan cricket.
Not in this case. Misbah deserves to bat above Shafiq since he's a better batsman.
Another thing you must notice is tat if he plays with freedom he becomes a better batsman. He must be allowed this freedom at number 3 or 4. Number 6 is way too down for him.
Shafiq played an entertaining innings but he clearly had given up on saving the match.
There was no need to play that shot he did to get out, right after he had hit a four.
If Akmal had done that, the same people praising Shafiq would have been after his head.
He does look like the most complete batsman in Pakistan when he is in the zone.
Agreed. Should not have said this. But scoring centuries in a losing cause is not a good feeling.Thats a comment in bad taste.
Averaging 40 in test cricket without a single home game.
4 out of 5 hundreds in losing games. The only 1 hundred in winning game vs Bangladesh.
Still needs to be applauded. Now he must kick on.
Shafiq played an entertaining innings but he clearly had given up on saving the match.
.
Agreed. Should not have said this. But scoring centuries in a losing cause is not a good feeling.
Playing in Pakistan is no different to playing in the UAE from a statistical point of view. Your delusions are well documented, but get that in your head once and for all.
Nothing comes close to playing in front of your family and friends on the same grounds that you have played all your life. It is a big disadvantage for these players to be deprived of home matches.Playing in Pakistan is no different to playing in the UAE from a statistical point of view. Your delusions are well documented, but get that in your head once and for all.
Nothing comes close to playing in front of your family and friends on the same grounds that you have played all your life. It is a big disadvantage for these players to be deprived of home matches.
To be fair, many people perform better in empty stadiums because it is similar to domestic.
I suspect a lot of people fail in international because they can't handle the cameras and the pressure of big crowds that produce lot of noise. Maybe that's why Shafiq fails even more horribly in tournaments and when it matters.
Constant travelling can prove to be mentally taxing.
It's a sentimental disadvantage to everyone associated with Pakistan cricket, we all want to see matches at Lahore, Karachi, Pindi, Multan, Peshawar etc. but playing on these grounds are not going to add +5 to our batting and -5 to our bowling averages, anymore than UAE will.
I am personally sick of playing our 'home' games in UAE. Just doesn't have the same vibe but that's a different aspect.
To be fair, many people perform better in empty stadiums because it is similar to domestic.
I suspect a lot of people fail in international because they can't handle the cameras and the pressure of big crowds that produce lot of noise. Maybe that's why Shafiq fails even more horribly in tournaments and when it matters.
Agreed. Should not have said this. But scoring centuries in a losing cause is not a good feeling.
But it's not a point of merit. To me there is shafiq pre Austria tour and post Australia tour. Folks that think he is inconsistent worship numbers, so for the he is bad until he hits a magical number. The fact that he might go from 37 to 38 to 40 and onwards has no meaning. They will be satisfied when he hits a magical number of 45 or whatever.
If anyone calls his batting record of the last 5 tests as mediocre or inconsistent or befitting his 37 average, then you don't know cricket I am afraid.
The thing with my friend Steelo is that we started a discussion nearly two months ago, and like you he kept on insisting no no no shafiq will not score runs look at his past yada yada and Fawad alam is the real deal. I wagered quite the opposite for both players. As things have panned out exactly as I thought he gets upsetWell clearly you have an issue reading the points brought out by Steelo. Which really just makes everyone mad because rather than looking at the point and understanding it you like to twist everything steelo was saying.
This is what he was saying just for your information. First off, he's batted well for the last 5 tests but so has basically every single Pakistani batsmen on the team other than Taufeeq Umar and Shan Mansood. So the point is that if Mohammad Hafeez can score infinite amount of runs on these wickets maybe the wicket is an easy run scoring wicket which it definitely was.
Steelo was saying he's been inconsistent for his entire career which he has been. You think take stats lightly, I don't understand that. How can you call yourself a cricket fan if you don't take stats into consideration. Is it just a coincidence that all of the great batsman just casually have great statistics? Stats tell a lot of the story especially in a sport like cricket. It basically tells you almost everything you need to know. And by the way you were talking smack about Fawad in test but tell me why Fawad has a higher average in tests, FC and has a higher overall score than Shafiq has in tests? Unorthodox or not Fawad should be selected for the test squad over Shafiq any day of the year.
The thing with my friend Steelo is that we started a discussion nearly two months ago, and like you he kept on insisting no no no shafiq will not score runs look at his past yada yada and Fawad alam is the real deal. I wagered quite the opposite for both players. As things have panned out exactly as I thought he gets upset
Sounds like a case of not being able to get over the past. Current form matters more than anything else. So I repeat, you can focus on the past or like the the rest of us you can wait as that average moves from 40 to 41 to 42 and onwards.
You might not like it, but selectors are not gate keepers just waiting to let through people basis their stats. Why do we need selectors otherwise.
And here's the thing, I watched them both bat, I would not trust Fawad alam to last out against any decent bowling attack that fields well.
Here's what I know, rightfully he won't be part of the World Cup squad. As Pakistan founder in the World Cup, he will be brought back 'justice will be done' and he fill flog some runs against Sri lanka and everyone will celebrate until we play decent opposition and fail again.