Chief Destroyer
ODI Debutant
- Joined
- May 21, 2016
- Runs
- 10,763
SIF, at least you were right about India doing better in the second innings![]()
6 runs to go.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
SIF, at least you were right about India doing better in the second innings![]()
What i am stressing is in this pitches u should never let a team cross 180 but we had done that in both innings
6 runs to go.
I agree our batsman r equally to be blamedWe wouldn't have let them cross 180 if we hadn't dropped Smith 4 times.
First innings we got Aus around 205-9 before Starc launched into Ishant and Jadeja. Those kind of anomalies happen and you have to account for 50 odd runs in the first innings.
But how are we going to tackle 180+180 =360 runs with 100 all out and 99/6?
Wasting time watching a Test match!!!!!!!!!!!!!
O keefe is running over Indian batting line like a 5 ton roller here.
Horrible batting at home.
First time saw Saha why is he in the team ???
But but he will win u matches with his keeping when our batting tail starts at 5 with rahane in india.Wridhiman Haha is useless with the bat.
Okeefe gets another with his non existent spin.
O keefe is running over Indian batting line like a 5 ton roller here.
Horrible batting at home.
First time saw Saha why is he in the team ???
He is the best keeper but worst batsman in keepers.
I agree our batsman r equally to be blamed
Headline for this match should be: O'Keefe pwns India at Pune.
I always knew Saha cannot bat. Some fan boys of his think that he can catch better than Parthiv.
“This is the weakest Aussie side. There are no Waughs, no Gilchrist, no Hayden or Ponting and McGrath. That was the champion team who dominated the world, won three World Cups,” the 36-year-old Harbhajan said at the inaugural session of sports literary festival Xolo SporTale.
“That Australia in the past had 11 champion players. Everyone had the ability to take on the opposition and win matches from difficult situations.”
Harbhajan sees little strength in Australia’s batting, with the top six for the first Test set to feature inexperienced pair Matt Renshaw and Peter Handscomb, and he says they don’t even come close to previous Australian outfits to have visited India.
“That Australian team in the past had so much will and belief,” he said.
“I don’t think this team has the belief to win in these conditions.
Harbhajan even went on to say that apart from a couple of names he doesn’t even know most the cricketers from the current Australian side.
“This is a namesake Aussie side. Apart from Steve Smith and David Warner, I don’t even know any other cricketer. They have four spinners in the side considering they came to play in India and if they play bad, they will lose 4-0,” he said.
I always knew Saha cannot bat. Some fan boys of his think that he can catch better than Parthiv.
Our top 5 isn't as good as people think it is.
Still dodgy against spin on turners and unproven outside Asia.
All potential...no performance.
For Rahane and Pujara, they don't have potential to be all conditions batsman too.
Ashwin was never genuine number 6 bat anyway. At best 7 or 8.
Keep on posting, this is an inspiration. This guy beats warne hands down, warne failed miserably in India and keeps belittling O Keefe
Question should be asked how bad is Parthiv ??
Saha was like one of those Pakistani surprise selections which reminds you of "Parcha" culture in country.
But but we play 5 batsmen and a tailender keeper isn't it.
This experiment with ashwin at 6 and saha at 7 is going to unravel and it did spectacularly.
U cannot win matches with 4 proper batsman in which one is all or nothing player, another lazu casual opener.
U r basically playing with 2 batsman
Yes he is a good wk but a tailender with the bayLol at Indians bashing Saha. He is the best keeper in the world. Made keeping look easy on this track
Lol at Indians bashing Saha. He is the best keeper in the world. Made keeping look easy on this track
Parthiv is kami 2 but good batsman than saha by miles. Parthiv can open as well
He can catch better than Parthiv.
Thats not even debatable.
Also Parthiv is good for only breezy 30s and 50s in the international level.
Saha is a legend against windies and other minnows. Against good bowling teams, he is a dud.
Lol at Indians bashing Saha. He is the best keeper in the world. Made keeping look easy on this track
Well you dont get keeper batsman's like Dhoni and Sanga everyday.
How's Kohli doing?
Got clean bowled by the one that didn't turn
O'Keefe must feel like he is on an LSD trip or something. The whole Oz must feel this way.)
Really? I thought it was the other one. The one that didn't turn
Convict he got bowled by not offering a shot as wellGot clean bowled by the one that didn't turn
Hahahha he gets another. Best figure any an Australian against India
Atleast monty bamboozled batsman with his fast spin but getting lbw to straight darts of okefee paints pretty dismal picture about indian batsman against spin
Clever from O Keefe. It was the other one that doesn't turn. No wonder one of the best players of spin in the world didn't pick it
Not even close - check Kraiza (%$##$). Also, I think Benaud has a 7 for.
But, O'Keefe can finish with 9/15for
do they call Lyon Gary because of Garry in sponge bob ?? cause he does looks like him![]()
I'm talking about the whole match. Not an innings. This is the best. If he gets anothe rwikcet it'll be the most by any Aussie in a match against India
Lyon needs to stop turning the ball![]()
I love how Lyon has bowled so much better than O'Keefe but only has one wicket compared to the O'Keefe's 6. What a crazy day![]()
do they call Lyon Gary because of Garry in sponge bob ?? cause he does looks like him![]()
Yes, Kraiza got 12 for probably 300 ..
Australia's Man of the Match is basically Monty Panesar. O'Keefe has bowled exactly how he told him to.
It makes me sad about England's recent tour though. For all Monty's problems, we'd have won the First Test in India and who knows what would have happened after that.