Thousands of spectators are raising complaints about the standards of these wickets.
And there is nothing wrong with what he has produced for the turfies. Some other factors make things impossible and trainers want ideal perfect tracks and whinge every year.
You know, [MENTION=132373]Convict[/MENTION] [MENTION=732]Gilly[/MENTION] [MENTION=100030]trogger[/MENTION] [MENTION=104233]RA[/MENTION]ndomAussie,
A significant part of my decision to emigrate from the UK to Australia was driven by sport.
[MENTION=7774]Robert[/MENTION] enjoys pointing out the northern English chip on my shoulder (and he's right) but it made New South Wales and Queensland into obvious future homes for me, given that I grew up on Rugby League and cricket (as well as soccer).
My earliest memory of cricket in Australia was the 1976-77 Centenary Test, with highlights on English TV each morning. I then saw ABC highlights of the crappy "official" Ashes in 1978-79 and then Channel Nine highlights of the 1979-80 Test series between Australia and the West Indies and England.
I loved it.
I loved the bouncy wickets and the flair of Lillee, Thommo and Lennie Pascoe.
That - and "Neighbours" - is why I immigrated here.
I'm perfectly happy to see Australia smash all comers on lively wickets. It's fine by me.
But for half a decade the wickets here have been delivering boring Test cricket with horribly bloated scores, whether it's England making 517-1 at the Gabba or Australia and South Africa both scoring 500+ in their first innings and now finally even the Kiwis making 600 in reply to 500.
It's a horrible spectacle.
And the toil that the quicks have to do on flat tracks with a ball with no seam looks like it is going to make Mitchell Johnson join Ryan Harris in premature retirement any day now.
I love Australian cricket. It's a large part of why I chose to live here. But not this crappy spectacle on dead wickets.