Chokli
First Class Captain
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2018
- Runs
- 5,468
Can England defeat Australia?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Its England’s game to lose.Can England defeat Australia?
1.Aaron Finch
2.David Warner
3.Steve Smith
4.Peter Handscomb
5.Alex Carey (wk)
6.Glenn Maxwell
7.Mitchell Marsh
8.Mitchell Starc
9.Pat Cummins
10.Behrendorf
11.Nathan Lyon
England is going to hammer Australia my gut says.
However only Mitchell Starc and David Warner can stop the Poms in this semi-final.
They've lost the Warm Up and the Group Match vs Australia.
Can they defeat them in a Knockout?
This should be a cracker. I think Australia will win this game.
1.Aaron Finch
2.David Warner
3.Steve Smith
4.Peter Handscomb
5.Alex Carey (wk)
6.Glenn Maxwell
7.Mitchell Marsh
8.Mitchell Starc
9.Pat Cummins
10.Behrendorf
11.Nathan Lyon
I'll be backing the Aussies, hate the English whiners. I hope for a rematch final between NZ and Australia.
I don't mind if England win it.
But I think Australia have the bowling to stop England even if it's a flat track. If a slow track , I expect Smith and Warner to adjust their game to the conditions.
The only reason I would want England to win the cup is just so someone new wins it, tired of the Aussies winning it. But with that logic, I'd rather go with the kiwis because they're a pleasant cricket team unlike England.
I don't see NZ middle order lasting against Indian bowling attack. Kane Williamson can't save them everytime.
The three lions will roar and the kangaroos will run for their lives.
The three lions will roar and the kangaroos will run for their lives.
For aussies its win the toss ,win the match.
While aussies can chase with few early hits,england would never chase anything.
For aussies its win the toss ,win the match.
While aussies can chase with few early hits,england would never chase anything.
For aussies its win the toss ,win the match.
While aussies can chase with few early hits,england would never chase anything.
Only if they bat first...
Win the Toss, Win the Cup.
Before CWC, World ranking 1)Eng 2) India 3)Aus 4) NZ
CWC Ranking till date 1) India 2) Aus 3) Eng 4) NZ
India and Aus are performing better than expected, while Eng is underperforming
I expect India vs Aus finals, unless some individual fireworks overpowers the favourites as in CT17.
Aus and India are almost unbeatable in knockouts even when they have wacky playing XIs.
England are not a ruthless side. They will crumble under pressure.
Aus has it even tho on paper England look stronger.
I dont know why Eng would be happy dodging India when the other team is Australia. India, for the last four years consistently get choked in KOs. I mean anybody can get beaten but they get obliterated be it 2015 WC, 2016 T20, 2017 CT etc.
If England bat first it’s game over
I dont know why Eng would be happy dodging India when the other team is Australia. India, for the last four years consistently get choked in KOs. I mean anybody can get beaten but they get obliterated be it 2015 WC, 2016 T20, 2017 CT etc.
2015 WC. See the match threads. Right after the toss almost Indian fans gave up they would lose. If anything India was an outsider. Those days Australia was considered to be a mother of all FTBs. Our only chance was to bat first which didn't happen. 2017 CT choked at the toss itself. 2016 T20 old useless players played dreadful cricket. That's it. Nothing much to choke.
2015, India was the only unbeaten, clinical team in the SF. Plus, they were the defending champions with Rohit, Kohli, Dhawan and Dhoni at their peak. Bowling wise, they had got 10 wickets in all their matches until SF. Come SF, they massively choked. Even while chasing, although it was unlikely, they surrendered meekly.
CT17, mother of all chokes. A no ball shouldn't derail a team. That too against a team they demolished at the group stage. Again during chase, they were like sitting ducks.
T20 2016 - Had got a very good score in a SF at the home ground. Choked against a nobody like Lendl Simmons.
You can deviate the logic to make it seem like the world conspired against Ind. But then you will not be different from a lot of Pak fans. If it was SA, there will be people queuing up with the C tag.
PS: I will be very happy if team India somehow proves me wrong this time. But until then they are softies.
2016 t20 was affected by dew, if inability to bowl in heavy dew is now considered choking sure we choked. Go take your agenda somewhere else.
Australia vs England:-
<B>Australia 472/1(50)</B>
Warner 243*(152)
Maxwell 102*(47)
Rashid 1-106(10)
<B>England 81- all-out (19.4)</B>
Root 32(44)
Starc 8-17(6)
Win toss, win match.
Its England game to lose though.
Given the nature of the pitches in the second half of the tournament, I´m also firmly of the opinion that the team batting first is almost certain to run away with the match.
However, this doesn´t make England the favourites - unless of course they bat first. It´ll be the reverse if Australia bat first. Also, Australia know how to win big matches, whereas it is totally the opposite given England´s Limited-Overs cricket history on the other hand.
It´ll be a good match, especially if the team bowling first is able to restrict the opposition for under 280.
Aren't the pitches going to be brand new for semis?
Australia vs England:-
<B>Australia 472/1(50)</B>
Warner 243*(152)
Maxwell 102*(47)
Rashid 1-106(10)
<B>England 81- all-out (19.4)</B>
Root 32(44)
Starc 8-17(6)
England will win this. Clearly a better suited team for Edgbaston, Australia have a bad record at Edgbaston.
England have proved people wrong already, and now the narrative has changed from “they are chokers who can’t handle pressure” to “they can only win when they win the toss on flat wickets”.
Chokers cannot produce two thumping wins in must-win matches under pressure, especially against a team like India.
The way they took on the best bowling attack in the tournament showed their confidence and that they are up for a fight.
People who think Australia fight till the last ball are ignoring the fact that England will do so as well. It is their golden chance of winning the World Cup and it cannot get better than defeating arch-rivals Australia in the semi-final.
If Australia play better and win, so be it. However, it has nothing to do with the England being chokers and all that crap. They have dispelled that myth already.
Mate, what are you on about?
They haven’t been under pressure once in tournament and come out on top.
The games they had to chase on a tricky pitch (SL) or against a decent attack (PAK), they lost by close margins.
Are you serious? They had a must win match against India of all teams. Pressure isn’t just about chasing.
Any team that faces India is under pressure, let alone in a must win match. Had they lost that match, the same people who now think it wasn’t a must win match would have called them bottlers.
Anyway, it appears that some people will never give England credit. Even if they beat Australia in the semi-final, it will be because the pitch was flat.
They’ll deserve credit only if they come out on top.
They have no excuses for not winning this Cup.
And there was no pressure on ENG because India had already qualified and was protecting their NRR in the process, and not trying to win. That’s evident by their intent in the last 10 overs when they only needed about 110 odd runs to win and chose not lose wickets instead.
Your team lost to “minnows” like SL and PAK; they have lost every match batting second except chasing 212 against WI in this tournament.
If AUS win the toss and elect to bat, it doesn’t matter if the pitch is flat, green, or pink, England will choke in due time.
If they win and go on to win the Final, they will abolish the so far proven “myth” that they can’t chase.
India’s intent in the last 4-5 overs is irrelevant. England didn’t know what their intent was going to be - they took on the best bowling attack in the tournament from ball one and set the tone for the match.
A less gutsy team would have been cautious against the Indian bowling and wouldn’t have backed themselves to tear them apart, but England did that.
Quite a lot of people who are dismissing their massive wins over India and New Zealand under pressure (because of flat pitches and batting first) were adamant that they would slip up in at least one of the games.
All this moaning and sour grapes over the NRR gathered steam once England proved them wrong and won two successive matches under proper pressure, since most people on this forum - and perhaps the Pakistan team itself - were quite hopeful that they would get into the semi-final at England’s expense.
They have proved their ability to win under pressure by producing back to the wall performances in must win situations. There was no room for error and they held their nerve.
Reading reports that both the actual date of the match and the reserve day could both be ruined by rain.
If that's the case Aussies will go through because of the rules of being above England in the final group stage table.