TheNightWatchman
First Class Star
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2015
- Runs
- 3,440
Why is there no snicko in this series?
Bangladesh can't afford it...so they base their decisions on doubtful umpiring.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why is there no snicko in this series?
That wasn't even close. WHERE WAS THE CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE THAT IT WAS OUT. Similarly WHERE WAS THE CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE that Sami's was out??
That wasn't even close. WHERE WAS THE CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE THAT IT WAS OUT. Similarly WHERE WAS THE CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE that Sami's was out??
Who is 3rd Umpire? Is he local or from other country?
Who is 3rd Umpire? Is he local or from other country?
Who is 3rd Umpire? Is he local or from other country?
Bangladesh can't afford it...so they base their decisions on doubtful umpiring.
Why is there no snicko in this series?
Can't afford it.....
Hafeez was given out, so there has to be conclusive evidence that it was not out, which with the technology available, isn't really possible. I'm not complaining thoughSami's was marginal, but yeah, benefit of the doubt should have gone to him and the umpire's original decision
That wasn't even close. WHERE WAS THE CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE THAT IT WAS OUT. Similarly WHERE WAS THE CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE that Sami's was out??
???????????
This is a Test match. A run rate of 2.6 is normal.
Stop being a moron. Read your earlier post. Where was the conclusive evidence it was not out? Hence why should the on-field decision be overturned?
The conclusive evidence for Hafeez was that there was no deflection. Since there is no snicko or hotspot we can only rely on deflection. Since there wasn't a deflection it was not out.
Sami's wasn't even close to conclusive.Basing his decision on a shadow rather than deflection
The conclusive evidence for Hafeez was that there was no deflection. Since there is no snicko or hotspot we can only rely on deflection. Since there wasn't a deflection it was not out.
Sami's wasn't even close to conclusive.Basing his decision on a shadow rather than deflection
Paul Reiffel from Australia. There are no local umpires in a test match
Cricbuzz says 3rd Umpire is Sharfuddoula who is a former player of Bangladesh
http://www.cricbuzz.com/live-cricke...pak-1st-test-pakistan-tour-of-bangladesh-2015
There not being a deflection is not conclusive evidence. Does the tiniest edge cause a deflection? So why should the on-field umpire's decision be overturned?
Cricbuzz says 3rd Umpire is Sharfuddoula who is a former player of Bangladesh
http://www.cricbuzz.com/live-cricke...pak-1st-test-pakistan-tour-of-bangladesh-2015
Cricbuzz says 3rd Umpire is Sharfuddoula who is a former player of Bangladesh
http://www.cricbuzz.com/live-cricke...pak-1st-test-pakistan-tour-of-bangladesh-2015
Sharfuddoula is the reserve umpire, whose only real job is to bring out the 2nd new ball and drinks for the umpires, or fill in if someone gets injured/sick
Reifell probably got sick listening to Athar's commentary
That's just stupid. As I said not every nick causes a deflection. Just because there isn't a deflection that doesn't confirm the absence of an edge. In the absence of snicko and hotspot you just leave the decision with the on-field umpire that's my point. And I don't know how to respond to your second point. So umpires should now be influenced by player's actions? So everyone around the bat seemed convinced there was an edge as well. Should the third umpire now review their character profiles to see who's more honorable.So what is?? Ofcourse there is no snicko. No hotspot. The only way the umpire could no it is notout is through deflection of the ball which did not happen. Add to that the fact that Hafeez reviewed immediately. Hafeez is not an idiot. If he knew he nicked it he wouldn't have gone for a review.
How are Stuart Broad and Johnson allrounders??
Mr. Ali the tuk tuk, some tuk tuk is find but don't take it a level where hackfeez get furrstated and throw his wicket away so plz get a move on and atleast give strike to minnow basher regularly.
39 overs left today.
That's just stupid. As I said not every nick causes a deflection. Just because there isn't a deflection that doesn't confirm the absence of an edge. In the absence of snicko and hotspot you just leave the decision with the on-field umpire that's my point. And I don't know how to respond to your second point. So umpires should now be influenced by player's actions? So everyone around the bat seemed convinced there was an edge as well. Should the third umpire now review their character profiles to see who's more honorable.
It's a test match genius.
Mr. Ali the tuk tuk, some tuk tuk is find but don't take it a level where hackfeez get furrstated and throw his wicket away so plz get a move on and atleast give strike to minnow basher regularly.
Sharfuddoula is the reserve umpire, whose only real job is to bring out the 2nd new ball and drinks for the umpires, or fill in if someone gets injured/sick
This was cute. Sounded like a little baby wrote it.
and do i ask him to hit 4 or 6 on every ball, just said rotate the damn strike and get singles regulary, is it asking too much Mr. Genius.
Last 10 overs RR of 2.6
and bro. it's compliment or insult?
Strike rotation isn't something you need to do very frequently in tests.
Tajul is chucking.
Strike rotation isn't something you need to do very frequently in tests.
is this saqib or shakib
Bangladeshis often pronounce 's' rather differently. Masrafe they pronounce "Mashrafe", Taskin they pronounce "Tashkin" and Soumya they pronounce "Shoumya". Guess it's the other way around for![]()
not strange because it's coming from a Shehzad fan. So salute you sir, keep your love affair going,