Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not going to repeat the contents of the The Sun newspaper article released today on a Ben Stokes family tragedy.
There is no bottom to their barrel and it's prompted this statement from Stokes:
View attachment 94757
I have very mixed feelings about this.
One of the outstanding things about the UK is the absolute fearlessness of the press - a person with a private life like Boris Johnson is elected or not elected by a public that knows all about his private behavior.
I think that that is a good thing.
Unfortunately it means that a public figure's personal tragedy - whether it is the disability and death of PM David Cameron's son, or this Stokes story - becomes public knowledge. In practice, it only increases the esteem that such people are held in. Everyone I know (on both sides) thinks that Cameron was a fool for calling the Brexit referendum, but being reminded by The Guardian two days ago of his grief at his son's death only enhances his standing.
Perhaps the best example is Margaret Thatcher's favourite cabinet minister, Cecil Parkinson. The married Parkinson impregnated his secretary Sara Keays, then tried to conceal the story as a "private matter". The child, named Flora, turned out to be disabled and after an initial payment was cut off and treated completely differently - and worse - than his "legitimate" children.
When Parkinson died, in a country with a muzzled media "which respects privacy" he would have been lionized on the basis of his political actions. But thankfully the media does not respect any such privacy, and the story of how he discarded and deprived his daughter of money came back to rightfully trash his reputation once and for all, and also destroyed the reputations of his wife and other kids who had led his appalling behavior.
I am very sorry for Ben Stokes and especially for his poor mother.
But British-style press freedom is important, because it is our insurance policy against corruption and misconduct by public figures.
It’s the price of freedom of the press and a fearless media.Uncovering the truth and publishing a sensational story about a cruel personal tragedy which only punishes the victims is different.
What does the society earn from this information? This will only uncover the wounds of a mother.
This is not America with Trump’s threats to sue.Privacy should always be respected. Journalists often cross the line.
Stokes should file lawsuit.
This is not America with Trump’s threats to sue.
What is he going to file a lawsuit for? To complain that The Sun printed a truthful story?
I don’t like it, but these are events which were already in the public domain in the country where it happened.I cannot believe you are actually defending this joke of paper the Sun. And that you don't think that exposing very traumatic parts of Stokes private life is all OK. It's not. If he doesn't want it to be shown thats his choice.
Ben Stokes and family should sue the Sun until it is bankrupt.
Worst piece of journalism I have ever come across
Alas I completely agree.You can’t sue a newspaper for telling the truth.
However I would argue that this story is not in the public interest and therefore should not have been printed.
Stokes’ mother lives in New Zealand, and so this doesn’t directly impact upon her.
Alas I completely agree.
Except, is it a requirement that news that is true must pass a test of being in the public interest?
How is it in the public interest for me to have to read about Katie Price’s latest surgery or Kerry Katona’s latest boyfriend?
These things get published and read because they titillate the public. Same as the awful Ben Stokes story.
I feel awful for what happened and my heart goes out to all involved.
But the only news story that I have seen cross a red line this week was The Guardian accusing David Cameron of not caring about his dead son because he is too privileged.
This is not America with Trump’s threats to sue.
What is he going to file a lawsuit for? To complain that The Sun printed a truthful story?
He can file for unlawful harassment and violation of privacy.
He can file for unlawful harassment and violation of privacy.
Unethical journalism by Sun like on many previous occasions. Ben Stokes is saying there are also inaccuracies in the story and based upon those Sun can be taken to court. While doing unethical journalism is allowed, giving inaccurate facts about someone's life definitely isnt.
Actually it appears there are inaccuracies. The Sun are fake news personified. They have a history of using blackmail and phone tapping in getting these salacious stories.I don't see what's wrong in this story. As long as the article is factual and there is not discrepancy, it's just news. Ben is over reacting here.
I don't see what's wrong in this story. As long as the article is factual and there is not discrepancy, it's just news. Ben is over reacting here.
I hope this paper goes bust one day.
The amount of trash you see on this paper on daily basis is outrageous.
Ben Stokes’s father, Ged, was admitted to hospital on Monday in Johannesburg after suffering a serious illness. He remains in a critical condition.
The all-rounder will not be at England’s training session at SuperSport Park this afternoon so that he can be at his father’s bedside.
The England and Wales Cricket Board, with the support of Ben and his family, request that the media and public respect Ben and his family’s privacy at this time.
The Sun has paid damages to England cricketer Ben Stokes and his mother after the newspaper published a story that detailed a family tragedy.
Deborah Stokes took legal action over the September 2019 front-page article, saying it exposed private information that was not in the public interest.
The Sun initially defended the story, but has now apologised to the family for causing "great distress".
"We should not have published the article," read The Sun's statement.
"We apologise to Deborah and Ben Stokes. We have agreed to pay them damages and their legal costs."
In 2019, The Sun told the BBC it had received the co-operation of a Stokes family member and added the events described in the story were "a matter of public record" and "the subject of extensive front-page publicity in New Zealand at the time".
Stokes was born in New Zealand and moved to Cumbria with his family aged 12.
At the time, he described the article as "utterly disgusting" and the "lowest form of journalism".
"The decision to publish this article was a decision to expose, and to profit from exposing intensely private and painful matters within our family," said Deborah Stokes.
"The suffering caused to our family by the publication of this article is something we cannot forgive.
"Ben and I can take no pleasure in concluding this settlement with The Sun.
"We can only hope that our actions in holding the paper to account will leave a lasting mark, and one that will contribute to prevent other families from having to suffer the same pain as was inflicted on our family by this article."
In July, the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) announced Stokes was to "take an indefinite break from all cricket with immediate effect" to prioritise his mental wellbeing and rest his injured finger.