BJP altering education system to promote Hindutva across India

The Bald Eagle

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 25, 2023
Runs
15,260

BJP altering education system to promote Hindutva across India​


The BJP-led state governments in India are attempting to revise school syllabuses in a bid to align educational content with the party’s Hindu nationalist agenda.

According to Kashmir Media Service, under the new curriculum revisions, BJP-led state governments have removed chapters on prominent Indian reformers and added content about the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) founder K.H. Hedgewar. Gujarat and Uttarakhand have incorporated religious texts such as the Bhagavad Gita and Vedic scriptures into school curricula, emphasizing a Hindu-centric education.

Educationists and experts have raised concerns, stating that these changes are politically motivated and aimed at rewriting Indian history with a communal lens. The revisions downplay the contributions of figures like the Mughals, whose historical influence on Indian architecture, culture, and heritage is being omitted. These leaders are instead being portrayed as invaders rather than as significant figures in India’s diverse legacy.

Minority-run schools, including those managed by Christian and Muslim communities, are facing increased scrutiny and allegations of forced conversions. At the same time, RSS-affiliated schools are promoting Hindu practices, further polarizing the educational environment.

In a controversial move, scientific subjects are also being altered. Darwin’s theory of evolution and core concepts like electromagnetism is being replaced with Vedic science and Vedic mathematics, emphasizing Hindu mythological ideas over established scientific principles.

Educationists state that these revisions are part of a broader educational reform strategy by the BJP, aimed at aligning India’s education system with Hindutva narratives and values. The alterations not only seek to promote Hindu nationalist ideals but are also seen as an effort to marginalize Muslim cultural identity, particularly in areas like Indian illegally occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK).

Experts have alarmed that by shaping the educational content to reflect its political agenda, the BJP seeks to instill these Hindu nationalist ideals in the youth, ensuring long-term ideological alignment with its policies and securing political dominance.

 
It’s much needed.

Because we had a Muslim party in power for 70 years, the school text books our kids have been taught are a revisionist history where Mughals are shown as sons of the soil and celebrated, not teaching the kids how these foreign invaders brought large scale destruction, plunder, loot, forceful conversions, brothel culture etc on these lands.
 
India is basically becoming Pakistan 2.0

We used to be told Pakistan syllabus was basically Islamic brainwashing, I guess Indians have decided they need a hindutva version.

Fair enough, maybe they need it. They must feel the everything goes Hindu approach of history has suffered badly in comparison to Islam's codified certainties.
 
It’s much needed.

Because we had a Muslim party in power for 70 years, the school text books our kids have been taught are a revisionist history where Mughals are shown as sons of the soil and celebrated, not teaching the kids how these foreign invaders brought large scale destruction, plunder, loot, forceful conversions, brothel culture etc on these lands.

Also making it richest land in the world.

Not to mention shaping everything in indian culture today , inc the hindu language.

But let's fool kids with orange
 
It’s much needed.

Because we had a Muslim party in power for 70 years, the school text books our kids have been taught are a revisionist history where Mughals are shown as sons of the soil and celebrated, not teaching the kids how these foreign invaders brought large scale destruction, plunder, loot, forceful conversions, brothel culture etc on these lands.

Looks like you are ignorant about positive contributions of the Mughals. You can read about it here (first post): https://ppforum.pakpassion.net/thre...-in-indian-subcontinent.312941/#post-12045538.
 
Also making it richest land in the world.

Not to mention shaping everything in indian culture today , inc the hindu language.

But let's fool kids with orange

Made it the richest land by looting gold, by burning down our ancient universities and thousands of years of accumulated intellectual wealth, by destroying temples?
 
Source: Kashmir Media Service

Place of Happening: India

I don't understand what's pakistanis issue with what we do in our country.

They have their country, they do whatever they want there. But have problems if Indians do the same in theirs.

Strange people.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Also making it richest land in the world.

Not to mention shaping everything in indian culture today , inc the hindu language.

But let's fool kids with orange

You teach whatever you want to your kids. What we teach ours shouldn't give you so much concern.
 
Its good they are reviving these ancient sciences. Rig Veda detailed the speed of light many centuries ago.

A reanalysis of these ancient texts using modern analytics methods will help to propel India forward.

The ancient Hindus were conducting plastic surgery and even traveled into space. Unfortunately they lost all that knowledge and advanced weaponry when the mughals invaded with some rudimentary weapons and forced hIndus to convert to Islam, as soon as they were forced to recite the shahada under the blade of a sword they sadly forgot this knowledge.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The painful memories of those subhuman and barbaric savages should be permanently buried in our country.

Pakistan and Bangladesh are however free to name roads after them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Source: Kashmir Media Service

Place of Happening: India

I don't understand what's pakistanis issue with what we do in our country.

They have their country, they do whatever they want there. But have problems if Indians do the same in theirs.

Strange people.
O yes below sources are not Indians and of international credibility and this issue has never been raised before 😂😂. But but.....they are all biased



 

How are Congress and BJP different? Rahul Gandhi responds​


Giving a differentiation between the Congress and the BJP, Congress MP Rahul Gandhi asserted that his party believed that the distribution of resources should be done more fairly, and growth should be wider and inclusive. In a freewheeling conversation with IIT Madras students on Saturday, Rahul Gandhi said the BJP was more aggressive on "triple-down" growth.

"They believe in what in economic terms is 'triple-down'. On the social front, we feel that the more harmonious society is, the less people are fighting, the better it is for the country," he said.

Rahul Gandhi said he had "serious problems" with the country's education system, saying it had a "very narrow, restrictive and a top-down" approach.

"You might not agree with me. I think it is a very restrictive and a top-down system. It is very narrow. I don't think our education system allows the imagination of our children to thrive," he said.

He strongly batted for innovation by children, saying it could only come if they started production and their skill was respected, and investment was made in it.

"One of the things that I want to push is moving more into the physical production space. To me, real innovation comes from that space. Put as much money you want in research and development, if you are not actually producing the thing, it will just be a budget," he said.

Recalling his 2022-23 Bharat Jodo Yatra, Rahul Gandhi said he spoke to thousands of children about their aspirations and they told him that they wanted to become a doctor, lawyer, engineer or an army soldier.

"It can't be that there are only five things to do in this country. But that's what our system is pushing," he said, noting that the country's education system measures success only if one becomes an engineer or a doctor, or join the IAS/IPS or get into the forces, "which is just one percent or two percent of our population and 90 percent of our population is never going to do this".

Source: India Today
 
Made it the richest land by looting gold, by burning down our ancient universities and thousands of years of accumulated intellectual wealth, by destroying temples?

Simply not true, showing the education in history is already fabricated, if you learned this in Jnr school.

The muslim arabs were trading with Hindus for years, until the hindus decided to raid , loot and kill, hence why they retaliated and eventually took over. There were more temples than mosques under their rule .
 
O yes below sources are not Indians and of international credibility and this issue has never been raised before 😂😂. But but.....they are all biased




Yes AL Jazeera is joke.

DW read their coverage of Trump election campaign.

Now what is Pakistan's problem in what Indians teach their children?

Why this type of attitude of poking your noses where it doesn't belong?
 
The painful memories of those subhuman and barbaric savages should be permanently buried in our country.

Pakistan and Bangladesh are however free to name roads after them.
If you never want a history lesson on India, your best bet is to stay put. Better yet, cancel your internet, swap your smartphone for a flip phone, and hibernate indoors, because, heaven forbid, you might accidentally bump into a Muslim on the way to buy groceries.
 
If you never want a history lesson on India, your best bet is to stay put. Better yet, cancel your internet, swap your smartphone for a flip phone, and hibernate indoors, because, heaven forbid, you might accidentally bump into a Muslim on the way to buy groceries.

Some of these BJP Indians are like little children.

If they like a piece of history, they want to keep it.
If they don't like a piece of history, they want to distort it or remove it.

They don't have the maturity to treat history as history.
 
Another article from Kashmir Media Services :vk2

Of course the separatists backside has been burning ever since Modi came to power. So they have to write these articles to vent out their frustration.

Its rich coming from neighboring country considering they believe that Bin Qasim was the first Pakistani and created Pakistan. As if that area has no history before the Arab marauder. :rolleyes:
 
Another article from Kashmir Media Services :vk2

Of course the separatists backside has been burning ever since Modi came to power. So they have to write these articles to vent out their frustration.

Its rich coming from neighboring country considering they believe that Bin Qasim was the first Pakistani and created Pakistan. As if that area has no history before the Arab marauder. :rolleyes:
Do they teach that in India?
 
If you never want a history lesson on India, your best bet is to stay put. Better yet, cancel your internet, swap your smartphone for a flip phone, and hibernate indoors, because, heaven forbid, you might accidentally bump into a Muslim on the way to buy groceries.
Indian muslims have nothing to do DNA wise with those barbaric savages, and hence I have no issues with them.
 
Nah, in your fav country. :dw
Never knew Bin Qasim was the OG Pakistani, especially since Pakistan didn't exist until 1947.

What a groundbreaking discovery. Bin Qasim, the first Pakistani, centuries before Pakistan was even a thing. Someone, please sue the schools for this catastrophic failure in history education.

Good thing the Indian school system exists, or most Pakistanis would never get a dose of actual history.

Imagine the history lesson on Hindutva, probably a wild mix of mythology, time travel, and alternative facts, where ancient India had WiFi, nuclear weapons, and apparently, everyone was a bodybuilder. Can't wait to read the comment sections.
 
Never knew Bin Qasim was the OG Pakistani, especially since Pakistan didn't exist until 1947.

What a groundbreaking discovery. Bin Qasim, the first Pakistani, centuries before Pakistan was even a thing. Someone, please sue the schools for this catastrophic failure in history education.

Good thing the Indian school system exists, or most Pakistanis would never get a dose of actual history.

Imagine the history lesson on Hindutva, probably a wild mix of mythology, time travel, and alternative facts, where ancient India had WiFi, nuclear weapons, and apparently, everyone was a bodybuilder. Can't wait to read the comment sections.
Tell that to your Jammat run schools who teach their gullible students about the great truth.

 
Tell that to your Jammat run schools who teach their gullible students about the great truth.


LOL, I guess schools run by Hindutva and Jamat aren’t exactly the gold standard for education. Lucky me, I get to dodge that mess. Unlucky for you (and most Indians), you'll happily enroll and call it quality learning.

I haven't read the article, nor do I plan to, since no one in my friends or family has ever entertained the hilarious idea of Bin Qasim being the first Pakistani. LOL
 
LOL, I guess schools run by Hindutva and Jamat aren’t exactly the gold standard for education. Lucky me, I get to dodge that mess. Unlucky for you (and most Indians), you'll happily enroll and call it quality learning.

I haven't read the article, nor do I plan to, since no one in my friends or family has ever entertained the hilarious idea of Bin Qasim being the first Pakistani. LOL
Which schools are run by Hindutva in India? Care to enlighten us.

Now with Jamaat run schools, it is clear millions of kids in Pakistan study at Madrassahs. According to below document, 33% of Pakistani students study in Madrassahs.
 
Historians tell us that it was the British who looted India, whereas the Mughals had established it as one of the world’s leading economies. If we were to follow the current Hindutva narrative of revering those who brought economic prosperity, then logically, they should admire the Mughals. However, instead of acknowledging this, they seem to align with groups like the EDL, a racist organization largely composed of unemployed, indoctrinated extremists.
 
Looted and took them where ? Mughals are buried in India itself.
They looted the poor farmers of India to fill their coffers. Their wealth was eventually taken by Brits. Mughals were constantly fighting to expand their empire in India and the wealth they conquered was distributed among its Muslim subjects and Hindu/Afghan/central asian army.

Mughals did not send money as tribute to Ottomans as they felt they were too powerful to be subordinate to an empire thousands of kilometers away. Why send money to a foreign power when they can use that to enjoy themselves and expand their empire even further.... If not for Brits, Myanmar, Thailand and perhaps Vietnam would also be Islamic nations.
Mughals donated millions to Arabs and the holy cities while the majority Hindu population languished in poverty. They were happy to not be killed by Mughal armies and dared not to rebel.

Mughals were also clever to not use their own foreign army to conquer most of India. Only the commanders were foreigners as majority of their army consisted of Hindu Rajput Vassals who were happy to conquer the land for their overlords. Total traitors. Mughals needed the money and gold/silver to maintain the Rajput armies. They did not even spare their own fellow Rajput Kingdoms. These Rajputs were lapping up the titles of Khan granted by Mughals and many eventually converted to Islam to keep their kingdom as new Muslim rulers while being vassal to Mughals. The power hierarchy is interesting.
 
They looted the poor farmers of India to fill their coffers. Their wealth was eventually taken by Brits. Mughals were constantly fighting to expand their empire in India and the wealth they conquered was distributed among its Muslim subjects and Hindu/Afghan/central asian army.

Mughals did not send money as tribute to Ottomans as they felt they were too powerful to be subordinate to an empire thousands of kilometers away. Why send money to a foreign power when they can use that to enjoy themselves and expand their empire even further.... If not for Brits, Myanmar, Thailand and perhaps Vietnam would also be Islamic nations.
Mughals donated millions to Arabs and the holy cities while the majority Hindu population languished in poverty. They were happy to not be killed by Mughal armies and dared not to rebel.

Mughals were also clever to not use their own foreign army to conquer most of India. Only the commanders were foreigners as majority of their army consisted of Hindu Rajput Vassals who were happy to conquer the land for their overlords. Total traitors. Mughals needed the money and gold/silver to maintain the Rajput armies. They did not even spare their own fellow Rajput Kingdoms. These Rajputs were lapping up the titles of Khan granted by Mughals and many eventually converted to Islam to keep their kingdom as new Muslim rulers while being vassal to Mughals. The power hierarchy is interesting.

How they looted the farmers , are you calling taxation as loot ?

The Mughal army did not go beyond subcontinent . The army also had Indian people , so the money was looted and given back to them?

Also , I would like to understand how you formed this termed invaders . India came into being in 1947 , before that Hindus themselves claim it was Akhand Bharat , and it consisted of Afghanistan to burma. So how Mughals are outsiders ?
 
How they looted the farmers , are you calling taxation as loot ?

The Mughal army did not go beyond subcontinent . The army also had Indian people , so the money was looted and given back to them?

Also , I would like to understand how you formed this termed invaders . India came into being in 1947 , before that Hindus themselves claim it was Akhand Bharat , and it consisted of Afghanistan to burma. So how Mughals are outsiders ?
Yes. Its their land and why would they pay taxes to a foreign power? A power that has nothing in common with the local culture and religion. Is it because the foreign power conquered them?

If US conquers Pakistan and puts taxes on Pakistanis, will Pakistanis be happy to pay taxes to them?
 
Yes. Its their land and why would they pay taxes to a foreign power? A power that has nothing in common with the local culture and religion. Is it because the foreign power conquered them?

If US conquers Pakistan and puts taxes on Pakistanis, will Pakistanis be happy to pay taxes to them?
Lol....did the concept of nation state existed back then?
 
How they looted the farmers , are you calling taxation as loot ?

The Mughal army did not go beyond subcontinent . The army also had Indian people , so the money was looted and given back to them?

Also , I would like to understand how you formed this termed invaders . India came into being in 1947 , before that Hindus themselves claim it was Akhand Bharat , and it consisted of Afghanistan to burma. So how Mughals are outsiders ?
Mughals are outsiders due to the fact that they promoted a foreign religion and language(Farsi). They never mingled with locals and happy to live in garrisons and heavily fortified palaces.
If a force comes in, occupies a land and continues to follow its own religion, culture and language, they are invaders.

India does not consider Kushans as invaders even though they were central asian. They adopted Buddhism/local cults and spoke local language and changed their names to local ones. Kushans famous emperor is Kanishka which is a clear cult Hindu/Buddhist name. Now show me what Mughals have done?
 
Lol....did the concept of nation state existed back then?
The concept of Bharat existed millennia before Islam came into existence. Though the land was divided into several kingdoms, the idea of Bharat always existed. People from all over subcontinent used to travel to holy sites of both Hindu, Buddhist and Jain religions. Similar culture, deities, looks is enough for them to have a concept of bigger bharat.
 
The concept of Bharat existed millennia before Islam came into existence. Though the land was divided into several kingdoms, the idea of Bharat always existed. People from all over subcontinent used to travel to holy sites of both Hindu, Buddhist and Jain religions. Similar culture, deities, looks is enough for them to have a concept of bigger bharat.
Hahahah...you dodged my bullet anyways who were Aryans the son of the soil or migrants from central Asia?
 
Not in the modern sense. But the concept of Bharat existed for over 3500 yrs. Mentioned in Rigveda as Bharatvarsha or the land of Bharat.
May be if you guys knew the history, you would not talk like that👍
Lol...no offense at one place one of your atheist friend show disgust on things that are 1400 years old and then you in the same breath justify a thing 3500 years old
 
Hahahah...you dodged my bullet anyways who were Aryans the son of the soil or migrants from central Asia?
There were no Aryans. Aryans was just a title meaning noble. There was no central Asian or white invasion in india and it never happened.
Many groups settled in India for millennia and were absorbed into the society. They all learned local language and did not impose any foreign culture and language on the locals. Can you point me to any group that speaks a central Asian language in India other than wannabe Arabs in India?
 
Lol...no offense at one place one of your atheist friend show disgust on things that are 1400 years old and then you in the same breath justify a thing 3500 years old
I don’t speak for others. I only pointed out the claim that Bharat or a concept of a nation did not exist. It existed and always did for most of the sanatan history.
 
There were no Aryans. Aryans was just a title meaning noble. There was no central Asian or white invasion in india and it never happened.
Many groups settled in India for millennia and were absorbed into the society. They all learned local language and did not impose any foreign culture and language on the locals. Can you point me to any group that speaks a central Asian language in India other than wannabe Arabs in India?
Ok seems you are better history students than all of us rest, what is this 👇? 🤔

 
Ok seems you are better history students than all of us rest, what is this 👇? 🤔

Aryan invasion theory has been debunked and you are pointing me to a wiki article on it:facepalm:

India is a mix of ancient Indo Iranian farmers and local hunter gatherers. The way Indians look depends on how much percentage of each of those mixes an individual has. There were no white people coming from Russian steppes or Eastern Europe into India.

The Indo Iranians were a large group extending from north India all the way to the borders of modern day Iran.
 
Yes. Its their land and why would they pay taxes to a foreign power? A power that has nothing in common with the local culture and religion. Is it because the foreign power conquered them?

If US conquers Pakistan and puts taxes on Pakistanis, will Pakistanis be happy to pay taxes to them?

US and Pakistan have well defined International boundaries , India itself did not exist at that time.
 
Not in the modern sense. But the concept of Bharat existed for over 3500 yrs. Mentioned in Rigveda as Bharatvarsha or the land of Bharat.
May be if you guys knew the history, you would not talk like that👍

Do you have authentic manuscript of complete Rig Ved ? And what does term Bharat mean , what land mass it denoted.
 
Pakistanis can decide to make their country a Islamic republic. Bangladesh can make Islam the state religion.

But if Indians decide to teach something in India its a Problem. A country of 80 per cent Hindus cannot have a political party with Hindutva ideology.


Now central Asian countries or arabs are not bothered about how Indians look at Mughals or arab invaders. But pakistanis and Bangladeshis are. Why?

I don't get why pakistanis feel the need to be bothered about who India elects, what we teach, what we think about which invader?

This is just the usual mentality that these people have that Muslims are superior to others and whatever they do is ok. They feel the need to tell non muslims how they must rule, what they must teach etc etc.
 
Historians tell us that it was the British who looted India, whereas the Mughals had established it as one of the world’s leading economies. If we were to follow the current Hindutva narrative of revering those who brought economic prosperity, then logically, they should admire the Mughals. However, instead of acknowledging this, they seem to align with groups like the EDL, a racist organization largely composed of unemployed, indoctrinated extremists.


That is the whole point of hindutva re-education. Hindu religion at the advent of Mughal dynasty had led to caste division and widow burning just to name some of the practices of the time. I guess the Hindus need to renivent the Mughals as the bad guys to cover up their own failures. This narrative has been developing for decades now, the idea is probably throw enough mud, and it will some of it will stick. Then the you wipe clean and present a new version, hindutva 2.0.
 
US and Pakistan have well defined International boundaries , India itself did not exist at that time.
Old Bharatvarsha was from Afghanistan in the West all the way to Myanmar in the East. Kashmir in the North to Kanyakumari in the South. The modern day Srilanka was also once part of the same culture. With the passage of time and attacks from the west, the size slowly reduced. Land was lost due to change in the culture and religion.

British has no idea of Bharatvarsha. When they arrived, India was firmly under Islamic rule. The North Western part of Bhrat was majority Islamic and appeared vastly different from the peninsula of India. The modern day Afghanistan completely lost its old Buddhist/Hindu past. Bharat at that time only started from Pakistan in the Northwest. Then partition happened and Bharat has become modern day India. Anyone who knows Indian religious and cultural texts knows what original Bharat is. It is history now. Long gone history.

I am no proponent of Akhand Bharat nonsense. You cannot turn back clock and live in fantasy world. What India can do now is not lose anymore territory to foreign incursions. History has not been kind to wimps.
 
Pakistanis can decide to make their country a Islamic republic. Bangladesh can make Islam the state religion.

But if Indians decide to teach something in India its a Problem. A country of 80 per cent Hindus cannot have a political party with Hindutva ideology.


Now central Asian countries or arabs are not bothered about how Indians look at Mughals or arab invaders. But pakistanis and Bangladeshis are. Why?

I don't get why pakistanis feel the need to be bothered about who India elects, what we teach, what we think about which invader?

This is just the usual mentality that these people have that Muslims are superior to others and whatever they do is ok. They feel the need to tell non muslims how they must rule, what they must teach etc etc.
They want theocracy in their country, but want full secular apologetic government in India.
 
The problem with both BJP and Congress is that they portray history based on their vote bank instead of factual history.

Science, Math, History, Geography etc are all fact based subjects which should be taught according to facts and not “opinions”.

Mughal history during congress time was romanticised in books instead of showing the wrongdoings/bad side of Mughal empire and now BJP wants to show only the wrongdoings/bad side.

Till politics interferes in education the education system won’t reach its full potential.
 
Why is the concern about Indian education system than Pakistani studies textbook?

Is there a concern here that India’s education system is becoming like Pakistan’s with a narrative type of history?

Because topic of “BJP might change texbooks” is more speculative. We should be concerned about existing material that propagates hate.
 
How does that affect a Pakistani?

What is pakistanis problem with it?

How does me commenting affect you on a forum?

If you are going to tag me than at least counter it, make it educational, or funny, otherwise you are asking individuals not to comment on a forum because you do not like it. No one is here to cater your feelings.
 
They want theocracy in their country, but want full secular apologetic government in India.
You spent whole lot of time to create 'alternative facts', hope you are getting paid, otherwise seem such a waste of time.
 
You spent whole lot of time to create 'alternative facts', hope you are getting paid, otherwise seem such a waste of time.
84% of Pakistanis want Sharia as the law of their land and you are saying I am making alternative facts. :rolleyes:


1738854843270.png
 
84% of Pakistanis want Sharia as the law of their land and you are saying I am making alternative facts. :rolleyes:


View attachment 150480
LOL. Okay.
The same Pakistanis getting bent out of shape and suddenly pretending to be secular? Never.

The real issue here isn’t even the debate, it’s that y’all are flipping between Secular Superman and Hindutva Hype Man faster than a cricket fan switching teams mid match.

Come on, pick a struggle.
 
LOL. Okay.
The same Pakistanis getting bent out of shape and suddenly pretending to be secular? Never.

The real issue here isn’t even the debate, it’s that y’all are flipping between Secular Superman and Hindutva Hype Man faster than a cricket fan switching teams mid match.

Come on, pick a struggle.
Nah!! This is the issue. When your own overwhelming majority country men want a theocratic Islamic state in your country, all the while crying about Hindutva taking over in India is the issue. It is pretty hilarious to see the flipping on these boards regarding Hindutva.
Most of your do not even know what Hindutva is. It is centered around nation and culture. Not about worshipping Hindu Deities like most of you believe it to be. But you can carry on with your propaganda against it.
 
They want theocracy in their country, but want full secular apologetic government in India.

I thought you were an atheist. You should want a secular government in India as well unless atheist means something different in India. Although of course you don't actually live in India despite it being led by a visionary RSS graduate in Modi.
 
I thought you were an atheist. You should want a secular government in India as well unless atheist means something different in India. Although of course you don't actually live in India despite it being led by a visionary RSS graduate in Modi.
Atheist, Secular and Nationalist. (y)

I love US and it is my first priority. I still have tons of relatives in India and hence care about it and wish good for them.
 
How does me commenting affect you on a forum?

If you are going to tag me than at least counter it, make it educational, or funny, otherwise you are asking individuals not to comment on a forum because you do not like it. No one is here to cater your feelings.

You are talking about my country.

But how are pakistanis affected by what we teach in India?
 
Because I can.

It is a small world, extremist should be condemned, I chose to condemned Hindutva extremists.

Extremists are those who poke their noses in others business. Who think its their right to criticize another religion. Who think people of another religion having any political aspirations are extremists while themselves living or supporting a religious republic.

Thanks to Hindutva ideology and the PM such people have been totally shutout from my country.
 
Extremists are those who poke their noses in others business. Who think its their right to criticize another religion. Who think people of another religion having any political aspirations are extremists while themselves living or supporting a religious republic.

Thanks to Hindutva ideology and the PM such people have been totally shutout from my country.

No one is stopping you from wallowing in your extremist Hindutva delusions in India. But if mere criticism unsettles you to this degree, perhaps disconnecting from the internet, or better yet, confine yourself to an echo chamber where no one dares challenge your fragile fanaticism.
 
No one is stopping you from wallowing in your extremist Hindutva delusions in India. But if mere criticism unsettles you to this degree, perhaps disconnecting from the internet, or better yet, confine yourself to an echo chamber where no one dares challenge your fragile fanaticism.

Question is why do some of these Indians try to dictate what a non-Indian can say or can't say on a non-Indian platform.

It is not like we are on an Indian platform or we are in India.

Seems like entitlement is a nationwide issue in India. :yk
 
Nah!! This is the issue. When your own overwhelming majority country men want a theocratic Islamic state in your country, all the while crying about Hindutva taking over in India is the issue. It is pretty hilarious to see the flipping on these boards regarding Hindutva.
Most of your do not even know what Hindutva is. It is centered around nation and culture. Not about worshipping Hindu Deities like most of you believe it to be. But you can carry on with your propaganda against it.
That may very well be the claim, but actions speak louder than words, Hindutva, in practice, revolves around imposing its beliefs on minorities and asserting religious supremacy. Why would a nation with an overwhelming Hindu majority need to construct its identity around Hinduism unless the goal is domination rather than harmony?

So, if you're offended by criticism of Hindutva bigotry, direct your outrage at those who have twisted and perverted it into an extremist ideology, not at those calling it out for what it is.

Y’all actively elect prominent bigots as leaders, start with not electing such politician who openly suggest to slaughter fellow humans?
 

A glimpse from fag end of last year​

====

Another Gujarat school under scrutiny for urging class 4 students to join BJP​


Administrators of IPS School in Gujarat's Surendranagar sent a message in a Class 4 student group urging students to join BJP. The school is reportedly linked to BJP leader Mahendra Patel.

Incidents of BJP office bearers in Gujarat using students for increasing party membership are on the rise as one more school comes under scrutiny.

On 10 September, students of Kumari MR Gardi Vidyalaya in Surendranagar were reportedly enrolled as BJP members.

Gujarat school sparks controversy by enrolling students as BJP members
The school administration allegedly shared a link in a WhatsApp group named "GUJ 4C IPS," with a message that read: "We request your cooperation in the campaign to enroll as primary members of the Bharatiya Janata Party."

After the message went viral on social media, the school management went silent, avoiding media inquiries. When contacted by The New Indian Express, Mahendra Patel, the BJP leader linked to the school, declined to comment on the matter.

 
That may very well be the claim, but actions speak louder than words, Hindutva, in practice, revolves around imposing its beliefs on minorities and asserting religious supremacy. Why would a nation with an overwhelming Hindu majority need to construct its identity around Hinduism unless the goal is domination rather than harmony?

So, if you're offended by criticism of Hindutva bigotry, direct your outrage at those who have twisted and perverted it into an extremist ideology, not at those calling it out for what it is.

Y’all actively elect prominent bigots as leaders, start with not electing such politician who openly suggest to slaughter fellow humans?
All that is good, but when are you starting the fight for making Pakistan a secular country without any state religion?
 
No one is stopping you from wallowing in your extremist Hindutva delusions in India. But if mere criticism unsettles you to this degree, perhaps disconnecting from the internet, or better yet, confine yourself to an echo chamber where no one dares challenge your fragile fanaticism.

Don't try to beat around the bush.

Tell us how you are affected by what is taught in Indian schools?

Why are you so unsettled what opinion Indians have on Mughals or other invaders?
 
All that is good, but when are you starting the fight for making Pakistan a secular country without any state religion?

That fight will never start.

The fight is to keep other religious sects away from political aspirations. So that only one religion has any political power.
 
It is amusing to know that Pakistanis and overseas Pakistanis care about education in India. The madrassas in Pakistan and other Islamic countries indoctrinate religious extremism.
 
All that is good, but when are you starting the fight for making Pakistan a secular country without any state religion?
For that to materialize, a genuine democracy must be established, something the majority of Pakistanis are already striving for.
 
Don't try to beat around the bush.

Tell us how you are affected by what is taught in Indian schools?

Why are you so unsettled what opinion Indians have on Mughals or other invaders?

I am not, and I have reiterated this time and again, you are entitled to embrace bigotry within India or anywhere else, for that matter.

However, you have no right to dictate that I cannot criticize bigots. Silencing critics may be the norm in Hindutva driven India, but this is not Hindutva India.
 
That fight will never start.

The fight is to keep other religious sects away from political aspirations. So that only one religion has any political power.

Ah, there you have it, you’ve managed to criticize Pakistan. Now, try not to be too fragile when the criticism is directed at you.
 
It is amusing to know that Pakistanis and overseas Pakistanis care about education in India. The madrassas in Pakistan and other Islamic countries indoctrinate religious extremism.


What's more amusing is when hindutvas pretend it is amusing when they are called out for their extremism when really their pants are on fire.
 
Back
Top