What's new

Brendon McCullum appointed as England Head Coach across all formats - The BazBall Saga continues in white-ball format too [Post Updated #141]

I was mainly referring to Fleming and now McCullum while early days seems to be pretty good.

Stead while has gotten results, is mainly due to what he inherited from McCullum-Hesson.

Fleming would actually be a great coach to have. And I'm guessing he would be more open to coaching NZ than he would be to coaching say a South Asian team. But I don't know what the deal is between him and CSK.

As for McCullum, if England were able to get him, I find it hard to believe that he wouldn't have been open to coaching New Zealand if he was offered the job.
 
Fleming would actually be a great coach to have. And I'm guessing he would be more open to coaching NZ than he would be to coaching say a South Asian team. But I don't know what the deal is between him and CSK.

As for McCullum, if England were able to get him, I find it hard to believe that he wouldn't have been open to coaching New Zealand if he was offered the job.
He's the dream. Having Fleming, McCullum, Vettori and Bond would be amazing for us in the next cycle for the team. Would love to see them around once the likes of Kane, Boult and Southee are gone.
 
Fleming would actually be a great coach to have. And I'm guessing he would be more open to coaching NZ than he would be to coaching say a South Asian team. But I don't know what the deal is between him and CSK.

As for McCullum, if England were able to get him, I find it hard to believe that he wouldn't have been open to coaching New Zealand if he was offered the job.
He's the dream. Having Fleming, McCullum, Vettori and Bond would be amazing for us in the next cycle for the team. Would love to see them around once the likes of Kane, Boult and Southee are gone. Problem would be paying them all, they'll all have bigger offers from other teams.
 
Idk whether it's him or Stokes, but this England team seem a lot different to previous ones who meekly surrendered and crumbled under the slightest amount of pressure.

Either way, it's cool that a lot of the best coaches in the cricket are Kiwis. A shame we don't get them coaching the NZ team, would go a long way to winning a ODI WC or T20 WC.

Truth be told, this series was more about New Zealand playing ordinary cricket than England pulling off something spectacular.

McCullum is a maverick - it appears that he wants England to play in Tests like they do in ODIs, but that is not a solution to England’s problems in Test cricket. It is putting a band-aid on a band-aid.

This aggressive style of play doesn’t address England’s number one problem in Test cricket - frequent batting collapses.

The shot that Stokes played in the second innings was a joke. This is not how you are supposed to play Test cricket.

You can’t just smash your way out of trouble every time. This is not a recipe for long-term success in Test cricket. Defensive resilience is a big part of Test cricket and this England team is completely devoid of that trait.

I don’t want to take credit away from Bairstow but New Zealand have made it very easy for him. They have bowled to his strengths and have appeared clueless against counterattack.

If anything, the biggest take away from this series is that New Zealand’s bowling unit is short of a genuine pacer like Ferguson and a proper spinner. Also, Overratedson’s captaincy has been badly exposed. [MENTION=147292]RedwoodOriginal[/MENTION]

This bang bang stuff looks exhilarating when it comes off but the same people who are thrilled with this approach will be criticizing England after two batting collapses and highlight the lack of temperament and discipline of the batting lineup.

They have the world’s best batsman but apart from him, there isn’t any batsman in the team that doesn’t look like getting out any time.
 
Truth be told, this series was more about New Zealand playing ordinary cricket than England pulling off something spectacular.

McCullum is a maverick - it appears that he wants England to play in Tests like they do in ODIs, but that is not a solution to England’s problems in Test cricket. It is putting a band-aid on a band-aid.

This aggressive style of play doesn’t address England’s number one problem in Test cricket - frequent batting collapses.

The shot that Stokes played in the second innings was a joke. This is not how you are supposed to play Test cricket.

You can’t just smash your way out of trouble every time. This is not a recipe for long-term success in Test cricket. Defensive resilience is a big part of Test cricket and this England team is completely devoid of that trait.

I don’t want to take credit away from Bairstow but New Zealand have made it very easy for him. They have bowled to his strengths and have appeared clueless against counterattack.

If anything, the biggest take away from this series is that New Zealand’s bowling unit is short of a genuine pacer like Ferguson and a proper spinner. Also, Overratedson’s captaincy has been badly exposed. [MENTION=147292]RedwoodOriginal[/MENTION]

This bang bang stuff looks exhilarating when it comes off but the same people who are thrilled with this approach will be criticizing England after two batting collapses and highlight the lack of temperament and discipline of the batting lineup.

They have the world’s best batsman but apart from him, there isn’t any batsman in the team that doesn’t look like getting out any time.

The approach is working at the moment and gives fans and England a much needed boost, I don’t think there is anyone in the country who’s backside is hurt by Brendan especially with him doing well, maybe Australian or Indian fans?
 
Truth be told, this series was more about New Zealand playing ordinary cricket than England pulling off something spectacular.

McCullum is a maverick - it appears that he wants England to play in Tests like they do in ODIs, but that is not a solution to England’s problems in Test cricket. It is putting a band-aid on a band-aid.

This aggressive style of play doesn’t address England’s number one problem in Test cricket - frequent batting collapses.

The shot that Stokes played in the second innings was a joke. This is not how you are supposed to play Test cricket.

You can’t just smash your way out of trouble every time. This is not a recipe for long-term success in Test cricket. Defensive resilience is a big part of Test cricket and this England team is completely devoid of that trait.

I don’t want to take credit away from Bairstow but New Zealand have made it very easy for him. They have bowled to his strengths and have appeared clueless against counterattack.

If anything, the biggest take away from this series is that New Zealand’s bowling unit is short of a genuine pacer like Ferguson and a proper spinner. Also, Overratedson’s captaincy has been badly exposed. [MENTION=147292]RedwoodOriginal[/MENTION]

This bang bang stuff looks exhilarating when it comes off but the same people who are thrilled with this approach will be criticizing England after two batting collapses and highlight the lack of temperament and discipline of the batting lineup.

They have the world’s best batsman but apart from him, there isn’t any batsman in the team that doesn’t look like getting out any time.

What's makes me laugh is that you keep making these bold claims time and time again. And then when you're proven wrong and have egg on your face you just stop responding. That for me is the very definition of being spineless.

One series does not prove anything. It neither tells us that England is a completely different side, eventhough they look like one. Nor does it take anything away Williamson's track-record built over years of being an outstanding captain and an amazing batter. The only captain to even win a series in England in the last eight years is Williamson. So only someone who is completely deluded and has a very poor understanding of cricket would even say he is overrated. But then again that's nothing coming from someone who called McCullum a "suicidal maverick" a week ago.

Yet another thing you are completely wrong on though is that this series was more about England just running over New Zealand than New Zealand playing particularly poor cricket. in every single game England chased down close to 300 and did so with remarkable ease. These kind of totals are considered challenging totals and are simply not chased down these days the way England chased them down. It also goes without saying that if a team is setting you targets close to 300 chances are they are in the game for atleast half the time.

New Zealand did bowl to Bairstow's strengths at many points. But fact is, when you are literally being smashed to all parts in a test match it tends to shatter your confidence. And that applies to pros like Boult and Southee. Ofcourse had you played any serious cricket in your life you might know this. But I highly doubt that you have.

Whenever New Zealand were be on the ropes, they found a way to come back. Usually through Mitchell and Blundell. But it wasn't enough. Because no matter what target New Zealand set England, they were run over and flattened.
 
Last edited:
McStokes!

They have completely transformed the mentality of the England team in a very short window.

Hopefully they can now push on and look towards some more series wins, particularly a few away from home.
 
What's makes me laugh is that you keep making these bold claims time and time again. And then when you're proven wrong and have egg on your face you just stop responding. That for me is the very definition of being spineless.

One series does not prove anything. It neither tells us that England is a completely different side, eventhough they look like one. Nor does it take anything away Williamson's track-record built over years of being an outstanding captain and an amazing batter. The only captain to even win a series in England in the last eight years is Williamson. So only someone who is completely deluded and has a very poor understanding of cricket would even say he is overrated. But then again that's nothing coming from someone who called McCullum a "suicidal maverick" a week ago.

Yet another thing you are completely wrong on though is that this series was more about England just running over New Zealand than New Zealand playing particularly poor cricket. in every single game England chased down close to 300 and did so with remarkable ease. These kind of totals are considered challenging totals and are simply not chased down these days the way England chased them down. It also goes without saying that if a team is setting you targets close to 300 chances are they are in the game for atleast half the time.

New Zealand did bowl to Bairstow's strengths at many points. But fact is, when you are literally being smashed to all parts in a test match it tends to shatter your confidence. And that applies to pros like Boult and Southee. Ofcourse had you played any serious cricket in your life you might know this. But I highly doubt that you have.

Whenever New Zealand were be on the ropes, they found a way to come back. Usually through Mitchell and Blundell. But it wasn't enough. Because no matter what target New Zealand set England, they were run over and flattened.

Williamson is not an 'amazing batter' by any measure; you can repeat yourselves a dozen times, it will not change the reality. You can beat around the bush all you want, but the reality is that he averages 32 after 31 Tests in Australia, England, India, South Africa and Sri Lanka.


That is an atrocious record for a batsman touted as one of the modern greats of the game. He should be compared with the likes of Pujara, Rahane, Azhar etc. He is not even in the same ballpark as the Smith, Root and Kohli. He is not fit to tie their shoelaces.

You can perform all the mental gymnastics you want but these are cold, hard facts.

As far as McCullum is concerned, he is a maverick. He is basically a rich man's Afridi. His gung ho approach looks great when it comes off but his aggression is self-destructive when it doesn't come off.

McCullum is a suicidal maverick. He decided to hit the best bowler in the world out of Melbourne in the 2015 World Cup Final on the third ball. When he got clean bowled, he stated that he wasn't even watching the ball.

That is the type of attitude McCullum has. The fact that someone thought he is the mean to revive England's Test fortunes is a joke. What has been England's biggest problem in Tests over the last few years? Too many batting collapses. What is McCullum's fix for that? go bang bang.

It is great when it comes off but it does not resolve England's crisis. This is not a recipe for long-term success in Test cricket, it is not sustainable.

Williamson and New Zealand bowlers were badly exposed. They had no answer to England's aggression. England can never do this against India, Australia etc. Their captain and bowlers will find a way to at least go on the defensive and slow down the run flow. Heck, even a rubbish team like Pakistan with a weak captain like Babar and pathetic bowlers like Naseem and Hassan can find a working plan to restrict the run flow.

However, New Zealand were made to look like complete clowns.
 
McStokes!

They have completely transformed the mentality of the England team in a very short window.

Hopefully they can now push on and look towards some more series wins, particularly a few away from home.

Yes. I would say the true difference would be if McCullum can turn the tide in India.
 
Williamson is not an 'amazing batter' by any measure; you can repeat yourselves a dozen times, it will not change the reality. You can beat around the bush all you want, but the reality is that he averages 32 after 31 Tests in Australia, England, India, South Africa and Sri Lanka.


That is an atrocious record for a batsman touted as one of the modern greats of the game. He should be compared with the likes of Pujara, Rahane, Azhar etc. He is not even in the same ballpark as the Smith, Root and Kohli. He is not fit to tie their shoelaces.

You can perform all the mental gymnastics you want but these are cold, hard facts.

As far as McCullum is concerned, he is a maverick. He is basically a rich man's Afridi. His gung ho approach looks great when it comes off but his aggression is self-destructive when it doesn't come off.

McCullum is a suicidal maverick. He decided to hit the best bowler in the world out of Melbourne in the 2015 World Cup Final on the third ball. When he got clean bowled, he stated that he wasn't even watching the ball.

That is the type of attitude McCullum has. The fact that someone thought he is the mean to revive England's Test fortunes is a joke. What has been England's biggest problem in Tests over the last few years? Too many batting collapses. What is McCullum's fix for that? go bang bang.

It is great when it comes off but it does not resolve England's crisis. This is not a recipe for long-term success in Test cricket, it is not sustainable.

Williamson and New Zealand bowlers were badly exposed. They had no answer to England's aggression. England can never do this against India, Australia etc. Their captain and bowlers will find a way to at least go on the defensive and slow down the run flow. Heck, even a rubbish team like Pakistan with a weak captain like Babar and pathetic bowlers like Naseem and Hassan can find a working plan to restrict the run flow.

However, New Zealand were made to look like complete clowns.

You can perform all the mental gymnastics you want. Won't make me forget about Root's mountain of meaningless 50s and inconsequential tons. Or the fact that he is yet to score a century in Australia.

He's a great player but heavily overrated by deluded posters such as yourself and the English media who are just amazed that they finally have a world-class English batter that they can put on a pedestal.

He still ain't good enough to lace Williamson or Smith's boots.

McCullum radically changed the way he played cricket during the latter part of his career. From 2014 onwards he averaged 52 in tests with a SR of 72. But ofcourse you being the edgelord that you are, are going to call him a suicidal maverick based on one innings. Because that's what you do. You cherrypick things to pass blanket judgments on players.
 
I’d say a rollicking has just been doled out. McCullum looked thoroughly unimpressed with the England bowling performance on the team balcony this morning. First time I’ve seen our new Head Coach show some transparent emotion.
 
Baz getting a taste of Bazball from Pant and co.

What as worrying was how poor Stokes was when India counter-attacked - he looked like a rabbit caught in the headlights.
 
Truth be told, this series was more about New Zealand playing ordinary cricket than England pulling off something spectacular.

McCullum is a maverick - it appears that he wants England to play in Tests like they do in ODIs, but that is not a solution to England’s problems in Test cricket. It is putting a band-aid on a band-aid.

This aggressive style of play doesn’t address England’s number one problem in Test cricket - frequent batting collapses.

The shot that Stokes played in the second innings was a joke. This is not how you are supposed to play Test cricket.

You can’t just smash your way out of trouble every time. This is not a recipe for long-term success in Test cricket. Defensive resilience is a big part of Test cricket and this England team is completely devoid of that trait.

I don’t want to take credit away from Bairstow but New Zealand have made it very easy for him. They have bowled to his strengths and have appeared clueless against counterattack.

If anything, the biggest take away from this series is that New Zealand’s bowling unit is short of a genuine pacer like Ferguson and a proper spinner. Also, Overratedson’s captaincy has been badly exposed. [MENTION=147292]RedwoodOriginal[/MENTION]

This bang bang stuff looks exhilarating when it comes off but the same people who are thrilled with this approach will be criticizing England after two batting collapses and highlight the lack of temperament and discipline of the batting lineup.

They have the world’s best batsman but apart from him, there isn’t any batsman in the team that doesn’t look like getting out any time.

I think the Bazball approach is purely about maximising England's available assets rather than looking for high quality traditional test batsmen who simply are not available in county cricket .

This season, there hasnt been as much seam movement in England as we have seen in recent years . With the new ball, it has been 30 % less than it was in the 2020 season let alone the 2018 season.

The current batch of Dukes hasnt swung that much either. Going out of shape quickly as well. So, Baz has backed the likes of Bairstow to play their natural white ball game and succeed rather than trying to make an orthodox test lineup.

This will be sustainable in England atleast if we continue to see relatively docile pitches and Dukes balls.

Overseas will be the real test of Bazball.
 
NZ was the ideal opposition to start with BazBall - they looked like a team who didn't want to be in England, injuries, Covid, players out of form.

Sterner tests to come for the BazBall approach.
 
Anderson: Attack is the best form of defence

England seamer James Anderson…

"The way Brendon McCullum and Stokesy have gone about the last few weeks, the way we've got ourselves out of sticky situations, has been by trying to put pressure back on the opposition.

"I don't see this being any different. I've got a fair feeling that our best line of defence will be attack. Our batters are naturally aggressive.

"We want to score, we want to move the game forward and that's what we're trying to do. Unless we get a message otherwise, I think that will pretty much be it."
 
Pictures of England head coach Brendon McCullum plotting the dismissal from the balcony has gone viral as he was seen gesturing towards England players to bowl short deliveries at Iyer.

FW0QhOlaIAEiY2u
 
Think he's an excellent choice for England. England has a good team but is incredibly low on confidence and tactics since last couple of years. McCullum a bit like Shastri should be able to address that and the first victim would be India. India had thr golden chance to win a test series in England but thanks to their greed of IPL and not risking missing out even one day of IPL, Kohli and co ran away from England while being one test match up. It could have defined Kohli's legacy but now post the July test match, series will be a drawn series.

I repeat... As a cricket loving fan, while i am disappointed for us to loose important game but at the same time happy that these bunch of overrated Indian cricketers are getting what they deserve. Unfortunately, people will forget and they will again be worshipped in a few months when they will win some meaningless bilateral odi series.
 
McCullum will break the WC drought for NZ.

It's destined :bm
 
A decision that only ECB can explain and justify, not sure what was the thought process behind this left-field move.

- He was one of the most aggressive cricketers of his era and transformed New Zealand cricket with his expansive approach. Why is he not fit to be the England LOI coach as well?

- England’s struggles in Test cricket have been put down to the lack of discipline in their batting approach - except Root and Stokes, no batsman seems to have the concentration to play long innings.

How is McCullum going to rectify that? As a batsman, he was the total opposite of what the England Test side needs right now and he has no tangible coaching experience at FC level.

This seems to be a disastrous that could go south very quickly.

This aged well.
 
As much as this a testament to England's new management and captain, 4/4 record breaking chases, until England perform like this in an away series, I will hold on to the fireworks.

But still, to play like this at home, is super refreshing and promising!
 
<b>England’s top five run chases in Test history</b>

England stunned India with their highest successful run chase in Test history as they surged past the target of 378 runs to secure a rousing seven-wicket victory.

As England celebrate one of their most thrilling Test triumphs, we look at their five most successful run-chases ever.

<b>5. Target 305: New Zealand v England, Christchurch, 1997</b>
England relied heavily on Mike Atherton in their first innings as the captain carried his bat for 94 runs off 346 balls in a total of 228.

New Zealand built on their 118-run first-innings lead by adding 186 in their second, which seemed likely to be enough until Atherton built on his inspirational form.

The opener had enough support this time to reach a ton (118) and guide England to 226 before departing as the fourth wicket and sparking a mini-collapse when Nasser Hussain (33) and Graham Thorpe (2) were also dismissed.

John Crawley (40*) and Dominic Cork (39*) then stepped in to put on the remaining runs while Atherton was rightly hailed as Player of the Match.

<b>4. Target 315: England v Australia, Leeds, 2001</b>
Australia had already tightened their grip on the Ashes by winning the first three Tests of the five-match series but England would deliver an upset in the fourth clash.

Australia took a 138-run lead into the second innings then looked for quick runs until declaring on 176/4 to give the likes of Shane Warne, Glenn McGrath, Brett Lee and Jason Gillespie plenty of time to bowl England out.

Mark Butcher had a Test batting average of 25.89 heading into the match and had not scored a century at the highest level since 1998, but played the innings of his international career while smashing 23 boundaries and a six.

Butcher’s 173 not out would be his highest score in Test cricket and led England to a win against the odds over their arch-rivals.

<b>3. Target 332: Australia v England, Melbourne, 1928</b>
The third Test in the infamous Bodyline series saw both teams plunder the runs.

Australia skipper Jack Ryder, Alan Kippax, Bill Woodfull and the incomparable Don Bradman scored tons for the home team, while Wally Hammond hit a double century in the first innings for England.

The visitors’ top-order took a slow and steady approach to the chase on a flat track as openers Herbert Sutcliffe (135) and Jack Hobbs (49) ticked off the runs then captain Douglas Jardine (33), Hammond (32) and Patsy Hendren (45) maintained the momentum.

A mini-collapse of three wickets for two runs when England needed only six more gave them a fright, but tailender George Geary was able to finish the chase with three wickets in hand.

<b>2. Target 359: England v Australia, Leeds, 2019</b>
After Australia made 179 on a tricky wicket England were embarrassed by a score of just 67 with Joe Denly (12) their only batter to reach double-figures.

Australia pulled away to a 358-run lead as Marnus Labuschagne (80) led them to a score of 246 on an improving pitch but there was little hint of what was to come.

Denly (50) and skipper Joe Root (77) came together with the score on 15/2 then put on a stand of 126 before Ben Stokes arrived to deliver a remarkable Test innings.

Stokes (135*) would be the hero as he calmly piled on the runs while at the same time holding the innings together even after Stuart Broad was the ninth batter dismissed with England still 73 runs short.

The last man to come in, Jack Leach (1*), dug in at one end while Stokes gradually chipped away at Australia’s lead to complete arguably England’s sweetest ever success in Tests.

<b>1. Target 378: England v India, Birmingham, 2022</b>
Centuries from Rishabh Pant (146) and Ravindra Jadeja (104) helped India to a 132-run first-innings lead, which might have been much more if not for Jonny Bairstow (106) guiding England to 284.

Skipper Ben Stokes (4/33) gave England what seemed to be a slim chance of victory as India were restricted to 245 in their second innings, leaving the hosts with an ominous target of 378.

Openers Alex Lees (56) and Zak Crawley (46) got England off to a positive start until the latter was bowled by India stand-in skipper Jasprit Bumrah with the score on 107.

Ollie Pope then fell for a three-ball duck and Lees was run out just two runs later as England slumped to 109/3 and looked set to fall well short in their chase.

But rather than handing the WTC points to India, the in-form duo Joe Root (142*) and Bairstow (114*) got together and took it away from the visitors with an unbeaten stand of 269*.

England secured a seven-wicket victory, completing a daring and game-changing chase that will surely be spoken of by Test cricket fans for generations to come.

https://www.icc-cricket.com/news/2667830
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">A new era of Test cricket 🎸🤘<br><br>🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ENGvIND?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ENGvIND</a> 🇮🇳 <a href="https://t.co/lLpAtG4fgR">pic.twitter.com/lLpAtG4fgR</a></p>— England Cricket (@englandcricket) <a href="https://twitter.com/englandcricket/status/1544335299865710593?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 5, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Interesting times ahead for test cricket , congratulations on the win, now to see how it goes overseas!
 
England's next assignment is against South Africa (at home). England can win it 3-0.

So, it can be 7 wins from 7 games.
 
Stuart Broad has been padded up in the evening session of their chases, and England have been calling him the Nighthawk, not Nightwatchman. Idea is to look for boundaries not play for stumps. (Evening Standard.)
 
England's next assignment is against South Africa (at home). England can win it 3-0.

So, it can be 7 wins from 7 games.

Woooahh there. One game at a time. :)

Any series win against South Africa, if England can get there, would be fantastic.
 
Bazball requires the players with the skills, talent to execute as well. Imagine Brendon Mccullam coaching Azhar Ali, no matter how much he tries, Azhar Ali cannot execute Bazball prettily.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">A new era of Test cricket ����<br><br>�������������� <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ENGvIND?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ENGvIND</a> ���� <a href="https://t.co/lLpAtG4fgR">pic.twitter.com/lLpAtG4fgR</a></p>— England Cricket (@englandcricket) <a href="https://twitter.com/englandcricket/status/1544335299865710593?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 5, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Kaptaan-esque statement! :ik

4 test 4 wins.

This is (potential) 20 days of test cricket against arguably top 2 teams in the world.

And when all was said and done, England won all 4 matches.

Chasing 220+ in 4th innings is a rare feat.

England have chased down 277, 299, 296 and 378.

And we are not talking about Ramiz Raja's lifeless tracks here.

Wickets fell. Bowlers dominated batters.

Bazball mentality for the win.

Who knows how this test test team will fare in future, but it is gonna be a fun ride! :afridi
 
Bazball requires the players with the skills, talent to execute as well. Imagine Brendon Mccullam coaching Azhar Ali, no matter how much he tries, Azhar Ali cannot execute Bazball prettily.

He did chase down a 300+ target against SL.

But we had 4th innings' atg YK and a skinnier Sarfaraz!
 
Stuart Broad has been padded up in the evening session of their chases, and England have been calling him the Nighthawk, not Nightwatchman. Idea is to look for boundaries not play for stumps. (Evening Standard.)

Wow!

Nighthawk.

Never heard of this term before.
 
He did chase down a 300+ target against SL.

But we had 4th innings' atg YK and a skinnier Sarfaraz!

Big difference b/w the Sri Lankan attack that day and an Indian, NZ attack. These teams will find a way to close down Azhar Ali's scoring zones and Azhar Ali will not be able to come up with a release shot on the spot.
 
I have no idea what's going to be England's performance in tests like in future but I am eager to enjoy the ride.
 
When Key was appointed. I did suggest that he is going to have a fairly easy ride early on as it was at home and NZ are simply not a top side anymore, and India will be coming in cold for the sole test.

But you have to credit him with Stokes' and Baz's appointment. I remember being so frustrated (as a neutral, can't imagine being an england fan) last year when Root and Sibley batted out day 5 on a placid pitch refusing to even try and chase down 260-270. Watching England led by Root was miserable. And the current performance just emphasizes that feeling even more.

I don't know how England will perform away, maybe there will be suicidal <100 all out trying to do the bazball chase. But I think in the long run, this will do to their test team what it's done to their ODI teams. They will be competitive away. Win or Lose is just a result, but I am excited for the next time England tour India, because I know they won't be meek and crying foul about pitches, rather they'll try and take on whatever is put in front of them.
 
As a player and a leader, Brendon McCullum was never backwards in coming forward.

Adam Gilchrist might have changed the role of a wicket-keeper batter, but McCullum changed the perception of leadership. That is, you could be aggressive but play the game respectfully and within the “spirit of the game”.

Now, in his first foray into Test cricket as a coach, McCullum has changed English cricket - and perhaps the five-day version of the game, too.

After four successful run chases, including Monday’s seven-wicket demolition of India, England are breaking the rules of cricket’s conservative game by the way are motoring down totals.

Their methods, spearheaded by Jonny Bairstow’s astonishing summer where he has four centuries in his past five knocks, have flipped the script overnight.

It was only in January that England were blasted from pillar to post, as Chris Silverwood’s men were smashed four-nil Down Under. His side were hardly the first to lose in Australia, but their inability to challenge Pat Cummins’ side and post a total of any substance led to a full scale “root and branch” review of the entire England cricket system.

Ultimately, the coach and his assistants were sacked, the director of cricket Ashley Giles was given his marching orders and, following yet another embarrassing result in the West Indies, Joe Root resigned under a barrage of criticism.

In the wake of the humiliation, England are rising from the Ashes. Or, at least, that is the perception four Tests into McCullum’s reign.

The Telegraph’s chief cricket writer Nick Hoult said Australia will have noticed the changing in the winds off the Indian Ocean as they prepare for the second Test against Sri Lanka on Friday.

“As they prepare for the second Test of their series against Sri Lanka halfway across the world, Australia will have taken notice - and perhaps with some alarm,” he wrote.

Former England captain Michael Atherton, too, wrote the “transformation” was well and truly underway.

“Right now, opponents such as Australia will have taken note of what is happening and may be wondering how to accommodate this shift when they arrive for the Ashes next summer,” Atherton wrote in The Times, having watched their Ashes embarrassment closely as one of the press touring party last Australian summer.

“That anyone may even be thinking about the approach of England’s Test team right now is a triumph of leadership in itself. They are a team transformed.”

The question is though, is England indeed the real deal or is the fine prose covering over the cracks that still appear to be lingering under the surface?

BAZBALL

One thing is for sure, England’s mentality is different to the soft, tepid approach under Root and Silverwood.

Neither were hard leaders.

Silverwood placed his trust in those around him and Root led by numbers, not authority.

His charming youthful looks and baby face, even with the attempt of a stubble, did little to put fears in his opponents.

In their place has stepped Ben Stokes, a follow me kind of leader who delivers when all else seems lost.

The New Zealand-born Stokes appears to have met his match with McCullum, who encourages his players to play without fear and, importantly, they do because they believe it - after all, it was the same he went about his cricket.

Case in point is the difference in mentality between England in the space of 13 months.

Against New Zealand at Lord’s last year, England chose not to try and chase down 273 and, instead, crawled to 3-170 at 2.42 runs per over, before no result was deemed a possibility. England, playing at the home of cricket, were smashed for the dour, defensive mindset.

On Monday, Bairstow and Root motored down the target of 378, scoring at 4.93 runs per over.

Naturally, they won praise for their development.

“Brendon does not have any negative thoughts. He just makes it simple, clears people’s minds. He does not clutter them up with plans or technical ideas. He just tells them to be positive, express themselves and don’t be intimidated by anybody,” former England opener Geoffrey Boycott said.

“Once you unclutter a player’s mind and give a clarity of purpose and a positive attitude they are going to play their best. Every team will always follow the lead of the character of the captain and coach. Stokes and McCullum are similar: aggressive and belligerent. It is a breath of fresh air and we should just enjoy it.

“Brendon and Ben are not going to change their way of playing Test match cricket, so it’s going to be a fun ride watching this England team.”

Stokes, meanwhile, is wanting his team to express themselves and be “entertainers”.

Fresh from his batting heroics, Root lifted the lid on what was being said in the inner sanctum.

“Ben wanted us to be entertainers. He’s mentioned trying to be rock stars on the field,” Root said.

“It’s about trying to have fun and really relishing every opportunity you get to showcase what you’re about and put on a show for everyone. It’s like being a kid again, it’s great.

“I don’t think I’ll ever be able to feel or look like a rock star but for 10 seconds out there I might have done. That’s what the little pinkie celebration was about. Ben watched the Elvis film the other day and he’s been doing that all week. It was a little tribute to him.”

IS IT SUSTAINABLE?

Stokes’ 36-ball stay at the crease was an interesting case study when casting a judgment over England’s sudden turnaround.

The new England captain, whose match-winning century at Headingley in 2019 will forever be remembered, was dropped twice and caught during his brief innings in the first innings of the fifth Test.

Kevin Pietersen, of all people, encouraged Stokes not to “devalue his wicket” moving forward.

“Test match hundreds are valuable commodities, they mean a hell of a lot because of the stress, tension, patience and discipline that goes into them. That devaluing of his wicket is something I think may not be a good thing,” he said in commentary for Sky Sports.

“I would tell Ben that he doesn’t need to try and prove a point by being ultra-aggressive. The bowler needs to be bowling his best deliveries in order to get Stokes out. At the moment, I see Stokes trying to command authority by running at bowlers.

“He doesn’t need to lose his head and slog the ball up into the air when England are in strife. Stokes can stand still and do what Bairstow is doing. I wouldn’t tell him at all not to go after the bowlers but please stand still. He is too good a player to be doing what he is doing.”

Mark Butcher, who scored a fine century against Australia during the 2001 Ashes, said Stokes needed to keep in mind Bairstow’s form - where the middle-order batter was enjoying “batting nirvana” because his decision-making was “laser sharp” - and find the right balance in going after the bowling.

“I played under Adam Hollioake [at Surrey] and he would never ask anyone in his team to do something he was unwilling to do himself,” Butcher said.

“Stokes is trying to lay down a marker and say ‘if I can go out there and give my wicket away, be selfless in pursuit of a team goal, then you can, too’.

“My misgiving with that is that, as we saw in that incredible Test innings against Australia at Headingley [in 2019] when he was on about two off 60 balls, Stokes can hold off pressure.

“England are going to have to find the line between being hyper-aggressive and taking the game forward, and then sometimes taking a tiny step back, being smart and then piling in again later on.”

TOP ORDER STRUGGLES

England’s openers saved the best until last, but the jury is still very much open for debate.

New man Alex Lees hit one half-century and averaged 28.36 against New Zealand, while Zak Crawley - for all his shot making and potential - continues to frustrate and averaged just 14.50.

Ollie Pope had a stronger campaign by averaged 44.5o and hit a century.

All three men missed out in the first-innings against India, while the openers (Lees 56, Crawley 46) put on 107 to give the home side the momentum before Root and Bairstow finished the job.

“At Edgbaston England’s highest run-chase was built upon their fastest ever century opening partnership by Alex Lees, in only his seventh Test, and Zak Crawley,” Scyld Berry wrote in The Telegraph.

“Lees used his feet from the start against pace and spin. If India had a match-winner after the new ball, it was going to be India’s left-armer Ravi Jadeja, but he was nullified a) by himself, bowling almost entirely over the wicket and b) by England’s enterprise from the moment Lees clubbed his first ball for four and made India spread their field.”

Yet, for all the excitement from England’s winning start under McCullum and Stokes, the top three still remains a major concern.=

Bairstow and Root’s incredible form has completely papered over the cracks of the top three, where the duo came to the crease after England lost 3-2.

The top order collapses still remain a thing.

COME IN SPINNER

One other change would seem England’s change of approach with spinner Jack Leach.

The left-arm spinner was an afterthought in Australia.

Having been looked over for last year’s home summer, Leach was thrown in the deep end by playing at the Gabba for the first Test.

After being taken to the cleaners, he was dropped for the second Test despite conditions calling for a spinner.

Under the new guard, Leach has been used and used regularly.

It hasn’t always worked, but that’s spin bowling.

In the third Test against New Zealand, he took 10 wickets in the innings and his success came after their opponents took the defensive option by leaving out first-choice spinner Ajaz Patel.

Nor did Stokes turn away from him after being belted in the first-innings against India.

Instead, he bowled well and took the prized-wicket of Rishabh Pant.

For England to beat Australia, just as they did with Giles in 2005 and then Monty Panesar and Graham Swann, they need variation and to trust their spinners.

ARE THE AUSSIES BEING TAKEN FOR GRANTED?

When Michael Vaughan took over from Nasser Hussain, he took the team in a new direction.

Together with Duncan Fletcher, the duo were formidable. They were fresh in their thinking and their approach. There are similarities with Stokes and McCullum.

They took on Australia and Ricky Ponting’s formidable team, with the exception of the late, great Shane Warne and Glenn McGrath, struggled.

Which brings us to Australia. Under Pat Cummins, Australia are going from strength to strength and growing as a team too. The Ashes of 2021-22 was just the beginning for Pat Cummins’ team, with most, perhaps excluding Steve Smith and David Warner, building their reputations.

When the fast bowler took over, there were questions from the top of the order through to the middle, the all-rounder was exciting but raw, a new wicket-keeper had replaced Tim Paine and Cummins was the first Australian captain in more than half-a-century.

Then-coach Justin Langer was garnering headlines throughout the series with his future unclear, too.

Those questions, one year out from the Ashes at least, are no longer up for discussion.

Usman Khawaja has found himself at the top of the order, Travis Head has come through and took a part England, Cameron Green and Alex Carey are growing with every Test and Cummins has flourished.

If anything, Australia is getting stronger by the day.

By winning in Pakistan and demolishing Sri Lanka in the first Test, they too have sounded warning shots to the world.

https://www.foxsports.com.au/cricke...d/news-story/3a0daf02d4b0f1b9f32ccaea017f38c9
 
Brendon McCullum says 'Bazball', the playful term coined in homage to England's new Test head coach and the team's new approach, is "silly".

McCullum and captain Ben Stokes took charge of a misfiring side that had one just once in their prior 17 Tests and have quickly transformed their fortunes, with a bolder approach steering England to three-straight wins against New Zealand and one over India.

On each occasion, England overhauled targets of greater than 275 in the fourth innings with relative ease, while they chased down a record 378 with seven wickets to spare against India at Edgbaston this week.

While positivity has been a central theme in the early stages of the McCullum era, the former New Zealand skipper, nicknamed 'Baz', insists there is deeper thinking behind the strategy.

"That's why I don't really like that silly term that people are throwing out there," McCullum said on SEN Radio.

"Because there's actually quite a bit of thought that goes into how the guys manufacture their performances and when they put pressure on bowlers and which bowlers they put pressure on.

"There's also times where they've absorbed pressure beautifully as well."

Former Australia captain Steve Smith this week questioned whether England's dynamism is sustainable and was overheard by reporters shouting 'Bazball' in net practice ahead of a Test against Sri Lanka.

While McCullum has been overjoyed at how the early part of his reign has unfolded, he knows stiff tests await, with South Africa touring later this summer and Australia in the Ashes in 12 months' time.

"I certainly wouldn't say that we've changed the face [of Test cricket]," McCullum added.

"All we try and do is play a brand of cricket which gives the guys the greatest amount of satisfaction and gives them the best opportunity. We've also got an obligation to entertain.

"It's been a tremendous month, [but] we know that there's big challenges to come, one of which will be the Aussie boys, but we've just got to keep doing what we're doing.

SKY
 
Brendon is modest and realistic about the England progress. It’s the pundits and the media who won’t stop going on about “BazBall”.
 
The England men's cricket team is "leaner and fitter" than has ever been recorded before, a team of University of Essex researchers has revealed.

The academics were granted access by the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) to explore how players' physical profiles changed from 2014 to 2020.

A total of 52 senior players, who took part in at least one Test, one-day or T20 match, were analysed.

Their physique, power and speed were monitored across the period.

Researchers, led by Dr Jamie Tallent, found there had been a decline in body fat, but body mass did not fall as players had developed leaner muscle.

Academics were granted access to monitoring skin-fold thickness and found 18% less body fat than at the start of the study, while fitness levels substantially increased.

In a test which measured cardiovascular capability, the distance the players were able to run increased by 19%.

Dr Tallent said: "For the first time we have evidence of improvement in the athleticism of the England men's cricket team."

He added it was "great" to see investment in sports science and medicine was having a "real benefit" on the players' fitness.

He also claimed England's dramatic 2019 Cricket World Cup win against New Zealand was "in no small part was due to their incredible conditioning".

Dr Tallent and his team are extending the study to the women's team and looking at the match demands of international cricket.

Rob Ahmun, ECB lead strength and conditioning coach, said: "It's been a pleasure to have Dr Tallent and his colleagues assist the ECB with this project.

"The physical demands of the game have increased considerably in recent years and it's important that players are able to not only cope but thrive under the physical pressures of playing international cricket."

The paper, written alongside St Mary's University in Twickenham, London, has been published in the International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching.

BBC
 
The England men's cricket team is "leaner and fitter" than has ever been recorded before, a team of University of Essex researchers has revealed.

The academics were granted access by the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) to explore how players' physical profiles changed from 2014 to 2020.

A total of 52 senior players, who took part in at least one Test, one-day or T20 match, were analysed.

Their physique, power and speed were monitored across the period.

Researchers, led by Dr Jamie Tallent, found there had been a decline in body fat, but body mass did not fall as players had developed leaner muscle.

Academics were granted access to monitoring skin-fold thickness and found 18% less body fat than at the start of the study, while fitness levels substantially increased.

In a test which measured cardiovascular capability, the distance the players were able to run increased by 19%.

Dr Tallent said: "For the first time we have evidence of improvement in the athleticism of the England men's cricket team."

He added it was "great" to see investment in sports science and medicine was having a "real benefit" on the players' fitness.

He also claimed England's dramatic 2019 Cricket World Cup win against New Zealand was "in no small part was due to their incredible conditioning".

Dr Tallent and his team are extending the study to the women's team and looking at the match demands of international cricket.

Rob Ahmun, ECB lead strength and conditioning coach, said: "It's been a pleasure to have Dr Tallent and his colleagues assist the ECB with this project.

"The physical demands of the game have increased considerably in recent years and it's important that players are able to not only cope but thrive under the physical pressures of playing international cricket."

The paper, written alongside St Mary's University in Twickenham, London, has been published in the International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching.

BBC

There is active monitoring of body fat percentages. Rumour has it that Ollie Robinson is being kept out of the team because he has to “prove his fitness” — they do not consider him lean enough. (His later spells also tend to be far slower than his efforts with the new ball.)
 
Since Brendon McCullum took over as England's Test coach, the side clean-sweeped New Zealand 3-0 at home and then went on to win the fifth rescheduled Test against India, thus drawing the series 2-2. In both the contests, what stood out was the aggressive brand of cricket that England displayed. Against India, England registered their highest successful chase ever in Tests of 378 runs. This aggressive brand of cricket has been called 'Bazball', derived from McCullum's nickname Baz as he too played the same aggressive brand of cricket during his playing days.

However, Indian cricket team spinner Ashwin has said that players 'need to be careful about this brand of cricket.'

“It was amazing to watch, but as a bowler it is quite scary to think where the game is headed,”he said on the Vaughany and Tuffers Cricket Club podcast. “I definitely think the ball and the pitches have a role to play in how England are playing, permitting a certain brand of cricket.

“I think we need to be careful about this brand of cricket being the way forward. Test cricket has been the same for hundreds of years and there will be games and series that are played like that. Whether it's the same brand of cricket you play all along is very debatable.”

Ashwin also commented on how there is no longer balance between bat and ball in the ODI format.

“The one-day format used to be a format where bowlers had a say. Even me, as a cricket badger and a cricket nut, I switch off the TV after a point and that's frankly very scary for the format of the game. When those ebbs and flows go missing, it's not cricket anymore. It's just an extended form of T20,” said Ashwin.

“It's a question of relevance and I think ODI cricket needs to find its relevance. It needs to find its spot.”

Ashwin has played 86 Tests, 113 ODIs and 51 T20Is for India picking 442, 151 and 61 wickets in the formats respectively.

NDTV
 
Last edited:
Rok Key: 'Bazball' term devalues England Test team's achievements under Ben Stokes and Brendon McCullum
Rob Key, managing director of England men's cricket: "I loved the fact that it seemed to capture the imagination of the public. That was not part of the plan, but Stokes and McCullum have somehow managed to do that"

Rob Key, England's new managing director of men's cricket, has admitted the speed of the turnaround in the Test team's fortunes has taken him by surprise.

England, under the new leadership team of captain Ben Stokes and head coach Brendon McCullum, have romped to four Test wins in four this summer - chasing fourth-innings targets in excess of 275 in each of those victories - after having won only won one of their prior 17 games.

The exhilarating, aggressive cricket in which they've achieved those wins has led to the coining of the term 'Bazball' in homage to England's new head coach, though it's not a term Key particularly enjoys.

"I'm not mad on 'Bazball'," Key told Sky Sports during England's second one-day international win over India at Lord's.

"It's not our term and it devalues a little bit what those guys have done, and those two [Stokes and McCullum] in particular.

"It's not about going out there and just looking to play shots. I don't think Joe Root has gone out there and just looked to play shots. They have soaked up pressure as well.

"It doesn't mean that you can only play in the Test team if you're someone who is going to play a shot a ball. That's not what it is about.".

Key added: "The way the Test series went was really pleasing. I never thought it would go like that, you just have your views on the way you want to do things and the people you want to bring in, like Brendon [McCullum] obviously.

"I just loved the way they went about it. I loved the fact that it seemed to capture the imagination of the public. That was not part of the plan, but Stokes and McCullum have somehow managed to do that.

"And the way the guys played, they've got the best out of so many of those guys."

Reflecting on the impact he has made in the role since his appointment in April, Key said that making the right appointments to lead the Test and white-ball teams was crucial.

He said: "I had a choice, where you could have someone who was going to be a hard taskmaster, really tough on the players, or someone who was going to try and free them up and get them to express themselves and reach their full potential by doing it that way. That's what Brendon has done.

"You said it [to Nasser], England have four of our greatest-ever cricketers, and some of the most talented players we've ever had, you can't tell me they can't be a good side.

"We live in this culture in England where it's like, 'be careful of this, you can't do that' and that creates a world in English cricket where you can't do stuff - 'you can't drive on the up' - whereas what they focus on is what you can do.

"And then it was, 'well you can't do that against India, you can't play that way against India… or Australia'.

"Alright, that might be the case, but let's just live for now, play as well as we can and deal with what's in front of us."

England's Test team are next in action against South Africa in a three-Test series starting on August 17 at Lord's.

SKY
 
Former Australia captain Ricky Ponting has used the latest episode of The ICC Review to provide his thoughts on England's brash style of play under new coach Brendon McCullum and revealed who he thinks would be favoured to win if an Ashes series was held next month in England.

McCullum has made a superb start to his international coaching career, with the New Zealander helping England to four straight Test victories since his appointment in May on the back of a more attacking and aggressive approach in all aspects of the game.

It's come as no surprise to Ponting, with the Australian legend well aware of McCullum's strengths as a player and a coach given the duo’s longstanding relationship as opposing captains and coaches on the field, their work together as cricket commentators and their mutual love of other sports like golf and horse racing.

Did McCullum speak to Ponting before taking the England job?

Ponting revealed to the host of The ICC Review, Sanjana Ganesan that he spoke with McCullum about the England job while they both worked at the IPL earlier this year.

But it's been a different story for Ponting since McCullum accepted the role with Australia’s fierce rival, with the former Australia captain instead watching on from afar.

"It might be the Australian coming out in me, but I haven’t reached out to him to say congratulations," Ponting laughed.

"It’s just a little bit hard for me to sit back and watch England play so well.

"When the Ashes starts I’m sure there’ll be a bit of banter starting between him and I and I will start it up then."

Brendon McCullum stuns England scoring the fastest 50 in World Cup history in Wellington in the CWC15 Pool A match on February 20.
How would Ponting stop England's onslaught?

While Ponting was a hugely successful captain for Australia with two World Cup victories in 2003 and 2007 and leading his country to a 5-0 Ashes whitewash of England in 2006/07, the champion batter is now considered one of the best tactical coaches in the game and had led Delhi Capitals to three consecutive playoff appearances prior to this year's fifth-placed finish.

So, what would he do to try and combat England's attacking prowess if he was still captain of an opposing Test nation?

"You really just have to stay patient, stick to the basics of the game," Ponting noted.

"Once you get put under pressure as a player, you get away from the basics and the things that have made you successful.

"England made it look easy chasing those big fourth innings totals and that says to me the opposition probably got away from what made them successful and probably weren’t focused enough on what they were doing and focused too much on what the opposition were doing.

"As soon as you start to feel the momentum of the game or the innings changing, maybe change things up drastically as a fielding captain – put a few more men back, or go the other way, be ultra-aggressive and not be scared of what the opposition is doing.

"That’s the art of captaincy, to identify momentum shifts and momentum moves in the game to make sure that you are ahead of the curve and not behind it."

Can England remain ‘strong enough mentally’?

England host World Test Championship leaders South Africa in a three-match series starting next month and then travel to New Zealand for two more Tests early next year.

They then battle it out against Australia at home in the United Kingdom in the middle of 2023 in a bid to reclaim the Ashes and Ponting will be eyeing off how McCullum's team faces its upcoming schedule of matches.

"It comes down to skill, obviously, but it also comes down to attitude," Ponting said.

"If these current players are willing to play the same way all the time, regardless of the scenario, regardless of the situation, then it is sustainable.

"I think if you look back through probably the best teams in cricket’s history, I think they have been able to keep pretty much a good, solid core group of players together.

"And what England have got right now is a good balance of youth and experience. Some of the younger guys they have brought into that team for that last series obviously didn't have the mental scars that some of the older other guys might have had.

"The emergence of (Jonny) Bairstow in the middle order and Joe Root continuing on what has been an amazing 18 months, it’s going to come down to the attitude.

"The players are not going to lose their skills in the next few months, but if they just happen to have a few bad games where this really positive, aggressive approach doesn’t pay off, are they going to be strong enough mentally to keep playing that way?

"That is the challenge that Brendon and the players are going to have, and it is going to be intriguing for me and a lot of others to sit back and watch.”

Is ‘Bazball’ an Ashes-winning formula?

While Ponting has been impressed with what McCullum and England have produced in recent times, the Australia legend wonders whether such an attacking style of play will stand up under a high-intensity Ashes series.

"So far it has been unbelievable, and it has actually almost reinvigorated Test match cricket again, hasn’t it?" Ponting said.

"It’s not just coaching, but to be able to change the attitude of some of the English players to not be scared about getting out and to be fully committed to thinking about scoring runs and when you get the ball in your hand to be as aggressive as you can and set nice and aggressive fields.

"The interesting thing is going to be Australia over there (in England) in the middle of next year for an Ashes series.

"When the real pressure of an Ashes series comes around, it’ll be interesting to see if this England team is willing to play the same way. "

Who would win an Ashes series in the UK if it started next month?

While Ponting was reluctant to give a simple one-word answer on this intriguing hypothetical, he did say England would start favourites based upon their current form.

"I don’t think there is much between the teams right now," Ponting said.

"I think there was a big gap between the England team that toured Australia last summer and the current Australian team. I thought there was a big gap in class.

"Just on the back of what they have done in their home conditions, England would probably start slight favourites if it was to happen next month."

https://www.icc-cricket.com/news/2685283
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">South Africa shows that Bazball doesn't work against world class bowling attack with variety and a sharp captain who sets smart fields. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/SAvsENG?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#SAvsENG</a></p>— Mohammad Kaif (@MohammadKaif) <a href="https://twitter.com/MohammadKaif/status/1560646786058174464?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 19, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">South Africa shows that Bazball doesn't work against world class bowling attack with variety and a sharp captain who sets smart fields. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/SAvsENG?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#SAvsENG</a></p>— Mohammad Kaif (@MohammadKaif) <a href="https://twitter.com/MohammadKaif/status/1560646786058174464?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 19, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Worked against India though…
 
Boycott unhappy with Bazball

==

The way our batsmen dealt with the South Africa pace attack does not augur well for the Ashes next year in England.

In the past three Ashes series - one home and two away - Australia’s quicks have blown us away.

So don’t tell me we are going to beat Australia next year after we play like that against South Africa at Lord’s. I watch people’s feet and hands when they face fast bowling. I don’t listen to what the coaches or players say. Talk is cheap but runs win matches.

At the moment when you watch England face fast bowling you don’t want to get up and make a cup of tea or go for a pee because if you do by the time you get back they will be all out.

There is no substitute for nasty, hostile fast bowling mixed up with the odd throat ball that makes batsmen jump around and gets them outside their comfort zone. It takes courage, good technique and a method to survive.

Also let’s have no more talk about Bazball otherwise there will be more days like Friday. Anyone who thinks our batsmen, or any batsmen for that matter, can consistently whack top-class fast bowlers around when they have a new ball in their hand has never played Test cricket and is talking rubbish.

I’ve only seen two batsmen in my life make a successful career out of attacking the new ball: Michael Slater and Matthew Hayden of Australia.

Turn it around and ask our best two bowlers, James Anderson and Stuart Broad, would they like to see the opposition batsmen taking chances with outrageous strokes when they bowl with the new ball? I’m confident they would love it.

Trying to attack Kagiso Rabada, Lungi Ngidi and Anrich Nortje bowling over 90mph with a new conker when it was zipping around in the first innings was madness. Just staying in would have been tough for most of us batsmen.

Alex Lees tried an attempted stupid drive on the up to a wide ball. Zak Crawley hung his bat outside to dry away from his pad. Jonny Bairstow was driving on the up with his feet stuck in cement. Ben Foakes could not play the short ball and even Ollie Pope, who scored runs, was playing and missing when he attempted to drive sucker wide balls.

Brendon McCullum and Ben Stokes want everyone to buy in to attacking the opposition bowlers. It sounds great and is entertaining and exhilarating when it comes off like in the two run chases in the fourth innings on dry flat pitches at Nottingham and Edgbaston.

I wouldn’t say change your belief in positive batting because that is laudable. But let’s have positive batting mixed with common sense.

If England keep going gung ho at top-class fast bowlers, bowling 90mph, then most of the time there will only be one winner - and it will not be our batsmen.

It is not a crime to defend or be patient and see off the new ball, or for middle order batsmen to play themselves in before they start to attack. It is what people have been doing for 200 years and it seemed to work pretty well for a reason.

Surely England have to adapt to conditions, the quality of the bowling, or the situation of a match. Hell, this England team are not even a good batting side, yet they expect to smash the best bowlers around.

The top three are fragile and England have had so many collapses over the past few years that hardly any supporters have confidence in them.

When you face quality bowlers, if you cannot judge what to play and what to leave in the corridor of uncertainty around off stump then you will have many more failures than successes playing international cricket.

I came up with that phrase, corridor of uncertainty, because all batsmen are vulnerable in that area, especially at the start of the innings. That is why great fast bowlers repeatedly exploit that vulnerability.

Crawley has not improved one iota around off stump and every batsman’s currency is runs. I don’t care how much confidence is given by remarks from the head coach and the batting coach.

In the end runs are a batsman’s life blood and he is not making any. For my money he has to go. It would be better for him as well as England. They have to find another opening batsman, even if he is just a stop gap.

England’s batting would be stronger if Bairstow took the gloves instead of Foakes and that would make space for Harry Brook, who has not had a chance yet.

It is alright telling me that Foakes is a good keeper. But he is not too clever against short, fast bowling. Bairstow has been a good keeper for England anyway.

We have to find a balance between McCullum and Stokes’s refreshing idea of attacking and positive batting. Our top three need to go back to seeing off the new ball, get the innings off to a good start and lay a platform for the middle order stroke players to come in and take the game away from the opposition.

To do that they need a better defensive technique. That is not telling people to bat defensive, not at all, but if you cannot stay in how do you score runs?

Nobody wants to bat at the top of the order these days. All coaches are teaching kids to whack fours and sixes for T20. They don’t want people to stay in and be careful so we should not be surprised that we don’t have people playing in the old fashioned way.

Youngsters know if you play shots and have to score quickly it is easier to whack the old ball down the order than the new ball up front. You don’t see Joe Root queuing up to bat three or Bairstow or Stokes.

But many times the opposition are getting through us like knives through butter and are into the middle order quickly because everyone has trained their brain to whack the ball in T20. It just will not work consistently. Sorry. You might get away with it on a slow pitch that takes the sting out of the fast bowlers but as soon as there is any pace, you are not going to whack them around.

DailyTelegraph
 
Sorry Geoffrey, McCullum does not agree!

==

One message will be 'can we go a little harder?'," McCullum said as he reflected on the game. "That will be the approach and the language that we use in the dressing room.

"Did we go hard enough with our approach? Could we maybe go a little harder and try to turn some pressure back on the opposition as well?

"When the game was in the balance and a couple of spells from their boys were testing, we could maybe have been a little braver to be able to turn some pressure back on the opposition in both innings.

"But it's always the way, right? You have to try to absorb pressure at times and get yourself back to a position of parity to then put some pressure back on the opposition. We weren't able to do that.

"South Africa had some reasonably helpful conditions with the toss, which is fair enough. We did what we could in those conditions but weren't quite able to get enough runs in the first innings.

"But they were able to bowl some very demanding spells and bowled some outstanding deliveries to get some of our world-class players out. You look at it and see a huge margin but I look back on those four Test matches and we were in similar situations to what we found ourselves in, in this Test match. Only this time we weren't quite able to come out of it."

"You want opposition sides around the world to know when the tail comes in you're going to go after them. You want to try and make it uncomfortable out there and hopefully, that will bear the results"

McCullum's consistency as coach appears to extend to selection. Despite Crawley averaging just 15.64 in his seven most recent Tests, it seems there is every chance he will retain his place in the side.

"I look at a guy like Zak and his skill set is not to be a consistent cricketer," McCullum said. "He's not that type of player but he is put in that situation because he has a game which means, when he gets going, he can win matches for England.

"We have got to be really positive around the language we use with him and be really consistent with the selections around that as well, and keep giving guys opportunities.

"Would he be better taken out of the firing line? That's not how I think. You want to keep giving guys opportunities, right? Then, their skill and talent can come out. I thought he looked quite composed until he got out.

"He's a talent, and there are not too many of those guys floating around. He's still learning his game at this level and that's ok, that's going to take a bit of patience and a bit of persistence as well.

"There have been some fine players over the years who have had periods where they haven't quite nailed it as well but then have ended up as great commodities for their sides. We have just got to work that out but I believe in him, that's for sure.

"He's a tough fella, Zak. He loves doing what he's doing, playing for England and you will see him around the group and with the contributions he makes inside the dressing room. There's stuff that goes beyond runs.

"I think selection loyalty is really important because not only does it build loyalty with the guys that are in the side but also it builds loyalty for the guys on the outside knowing that when their time and their opportunity does come they are going to be afforded the same sort of loyalty."

McCullum also sought to justify England's short-ball approach to opposition tailenders. It appeared to backfire at Lord's, with South Africa plundering 72 in 12 overs for the seventh wicket to take the game beyond England. In a low-scoring game, it was a crucial period of play.

"Sometimes you pitch it up and you get smacked as well," McCullum said. "You've got to settle on something and for us, it's a positive option. You want opposition sides around the world to know when the tail comes in you're going to go after them. You want to try and make it uncomfortable out there and hopefully, that will bear the results.

"It doesn't always work but it's an approach that, if you have total buy-in, can work. It puts pressure on the opposition's top order too, because they know their lower order could be under pressure.

"I guess in the end you've got to make decisions and tactical plays which you think will work. It doesn't mean they're going to work but you've got to make decisions that you think will work and try and be consistent with the implementation of them."
 
Brendon McCullum strikes me as a pretty level-headed, experienced, and intelligent guy. He has just delivered four Test wins on the bounce as Head Coach, so he certainly won’t be having any knee-jerk reactions to one loss.

England had a bad game all round here. It happens.

Brendon did acknowledge in his immediate post match comments that there are some things to consider and possibly a few tactical tweaks also.

But the core plan (rightly) will remain the same.
 
Manchester: England great Ian Botham believes skipper Ben Stokes will not deviate from their attacking approach when the second Test against South Africa begins at Old Trafford on Thursday, saying the charismatic all-rounder is “highly competitive” and “wants to push the game to new limits”.

England had a humbling outing at Lord’s in the opening Test, losing to the Proteas by an innings and 12 runs, but former skipper Joe Root and Stokes have said there is no looking back from the attacking and fearless style of play adopted by the team.

“I didn’t expect anything else from Ben,” Botham was quoted as saying by Daily Mail. “When you spend time with him you see he is a winner, highly competitive and wants to push the game to new limits.

“It’s going to be exciting with him (Stokes) and (head coach) Brendon McCullum in charge. What more could you want if you are walking into that dressing room than to see them in there?” he added.

On whether Stokes deserves the label of the “new Botham”, the all-time England great said it would be farfetched to compare the two eras, but added, he loves “watching Ben play”.

“Look, you can’t compare yesteryear to today. It’s all so different. Put it this way, I love watching Ben play. The one thing we have in common is we both emptied bars rather than filled them!” said Botham.

“It (team environment with Stokes at helm) has got to be a magnificent boost. Everybody would like to play in that sort of environment and to a degree we did in my day. It (England dressing room) must be like the West Indies dressing room of the 1980s. Can you imagine walking into that? The atmosphere? I think that’s what will be happening with this England side. Guys will want to be there, they will want to be part of it and will want to play for England,” added Botham.

Botham conceded England will lose a game or two along the way in their pursuit of fearless cricket but the way they are playing has come as a “breath of fresh air” and is crucial for the future of Test cricket.

“The way England are playing is absolutely important to the future of Test cricket. Go out there and believe, with the sole object of winning the game. You will lose the odd one playing like that, as we saw at Lord’s, but we have also seen already that even if they concede a big first-innings lead, they can sail past it. I just think it’s a breath of fresh air.

“I don’t think they will have any problems hitting back at Old Trafford. They have a different mentality now and let things go; they don’t hang on to negative stuff. If you look at the England side of the last couple of years the mindset was so poor. I keep on thinking back to that Lord’s Test last year against New Zealand when we had a chance to chase a score down and didn’t even make an attempt at it,” added the legend.

https://www.cricketcountry.com/news...te-loss-in-lords-test-says-ian-botham-1038035
 
It’s BazBall time…

———

Day 3: 2nd Session - England trail by 50 runs

RSA - 118
ENG - 68/2 (11.5)

<b>CRR: 5.75</b>

Ollie Pope 30* (24)
Joe Root 15* (12)
 
England's Head Coach of the Test side Brendon McCullum believed in taking a leaf out of franchise cricket, and giving more freedom to players involved in Test cricket.

England’s Test fortunes have seen a massive upswing ever since McCullum took over the reins of their red-ball side last year. In the McCullum era, England have won nine out of their last 10 Tests including a historic series win over Pakistan.

The side is all set to play an away two-Test series against New Zealand, starting 16 February.

Speaking on the second day of England’s warm-up game, McCullum discussed the need to make Test cricket “enjoyable” in a jam-packed cricketing calendar, to ensure that the players understood that they were getting something in return for their investment.

“There's so many options these days that Test cricket you've got to make enjoyable, not just on the field but off the field too,” McCullum said. “Try and get those guys to know when they board the plane to head overseas, or jump into the car to head down to Lord's, or whatever it is to join up with the team, they know they're going to have a great time. The results will hopefully follow.”

McCullum wanted to move towards an approach which prioritised enjoying the game over an approach where cricket was the center of all attention. According to him, this could also lead to an improvement in the player’s game.

“You can't guarantee that, but what you can do is ensure you put some money in the bank when it comes to experiences and relationships. I think for too long, I always felt when playing anyway, that everything was based around the cricket and sometimes you forgot to enjoy yourself,” McCullum added.

“It's not until the back-end of your career you go 'aw, I can actually have a good time now'. That's when you really enjoy it and somehow you end up becoming better as well. So that's the theory, we'll see how it works out, but it's worth a crack."

This belief system came from McCullum’s experience as a player in various franchise leagues.

“I think the back-end of my career was most enjoyable because of the freedom you generated, you were a bit more comfortable. You realise you can enjoy yourself a bit more, can invest some more time with your team-mates and management and you end up with more stuff in your life. The results seem to work out okay and you have more fun. Franchise cricket is not all fun, but the teams that have that sort of mentality, I think they are enjoyable experiences as well."

ICC
 
The England and Wales Cricket Board is talking to England Test coach Brendon McCullum over his involvement with betting organisation 22Bet.

The New Zealander joined the company as an ambassador in January and has appeared in advertisements online.

"We are exploring the matter and are in discussions with Brendon around his relationship with 22Bet," said the ECB.

"We have rules in place around gambling and will always seek to ensure these are followed."

McCullum posted a video on his own Facebook page on 27 March promoting 22Bet's markets on the Indian Premier League.

The ECB's anti-discrimination code says "directly or indirectly soliciting, inducing, enticing, instructing, persuading, encouraging, facilitating or authorising any other party to enter into a bet in relation to the result, progress, conduct or any other aspect of any match or competition" is an offence.

The code suggests such an offence would carry a minimum one-year period of "ineligibility".

The ECB clarified that McCullum is not currently under investigation.

The former New Zealand captain took over as England Test coach at the start of last summer and, in conjunction with captain Ben Stokes, sparked a dramatic upturn in results.

England have won 10 of their past 12 Tests, having won only one of the previous 17.

McCullum is due back in the UK at the end of May, before England's first Test of the summer against Ireland on 1 June.

BBC
 
From ECB:

Brendon McCullum relationship with betting operator 22Bet.

The matter has been looked at from a regulatory and employer perspective and the view is that no further action is required.

The anti-corruption code does not prevent players/coaches becoming brand ambassadors for betting organisations and the application of rules within the code relate to anti-corruption as opposed to prohibiting these types of relationships and content creation.
 
The Ashes may be a series like no other but England will be treating it as a series like every other. They will continue to play a positive brand of cricket.

That's not because they are downplaying the magnitude of the five-Test contest against Australia, far from it.

For coach Brendon McCullum, the fact England are coming up against such a powerful opposition in a series that will have a huge number of people watching it gives them an even greater platform to help promote Test cricket and ensure it has a rich future.

"It shouldn't change, surely?" McCullum told Sky Sports' Ian Ward when asked whether England would adapt a blistering brand of cricket that has yielded 10 wins from 12. "The fact that it is the biggest stage you can play in is great. It's better.

"You have to be prepared to marry yourself to a position and that for us is freeing guys up to play the style of cricket that gives them the greatest amount of satisfaction and could transfer to results.

"You want to have fun, you want to enjoy yourself, you want to lose yourself and be part of something. You might not achieve it but what a great opportunity. What better stage?

"Think of all the kids around the world who are going to be watching over the next two months. All those who have football, rugby, athletics or any other sport that they could choose from - or cricket.

"We have an opportunity to captivate them and grab them to not just cricket but Test cricket, a game which needs that relevance and has been around for a hundred years.

"How do we provide that next shot in the arm to ensure we get people wanting to play Test cricket? You do it by providing the greatest entertainment on the biggest stage while everyone is watching. That's what's in front of us. Bring it on. If it doesn't work, it's okay. We'll get up and go again."

'Stokes write his own scripts but we will monitor his fitness'

On the grandest stage, captain Ben Stokes will once again be England's leading man.

There was the 2019 50-over World Cup final. The 2023 T20 World Cup final. That Test at Headingley four years ago. Now the most eagerly-anticipated Ashes series since 2005 awaits.

There remain doubts over whether Stokes will be able to play a full part with the ball against Australia. He is managing a longstanding knee issue and did not bowl on the opening day of the Ireland Test at Lord's on Thursday.

McCullum hopes the 31-year-old will be able to carry out his all-rounder role in the Ashes but is not willing to put his long-term health at risk.

"The skipper writes his own scripts and this is the biggest stage you can probably get. He has got something up his sleeve.

"He is going to have to push through the pain barrier at times but we know he is not afraid of that.

"We just have to make sure we monitor it. If anything, it might be that we have to pull him back at times and make sure there is longevity in there as well. He has a long life to live after cricket and I want to make sure he can do all the things he can.

"If he doesn't bowl a ball he will still have a tremendous impact in this series. He is an absolute beauty and we are so lucky to have him as our captain."

Stokes' imprint is all over this England cricket team. Positive, selfless, always looking to take the game on, always looking to win, not interested one iota in the draw.

Jonny Bairstow, Harry Brook and Ben Duckett are among the batters to have prospered under his tenure but it is the development of left-arm spinner Jack Leach that has perhaps been the most notable.

'Stokes' backing has been the making of Leach'

A man Sky Sports pundit Mark Butcher said had once seemed like England's "last resort" has flourished over the last year after being given confidence and aggressive fields by Stokes.

Only Australia spinner Nathan Lyon and South Africa seamer Kagiso Rabada (47) claimed more Test wickets than Leach's 46 in 2022.

The England man then struck 12 times in two games in New Zealand in February while on Thursday he picked up three scalps on the opening day against Ireland.

Stokes' fields encouraged Paul Stirling and Lorcan Tucker to take on the sweep against Leach and they ultimately perished to that shot, before the spinner bowled Curtis Campher later in the day to claim his 123rd Test wicket.

Leach said over the winter that he wished his bowling average was lower - he took his wickets at 38.28 last year - but his stock as an England bowler has probably never been higher.

McCullum said: "Leachy has quite an amazing skill of being able to make the group laugh in a pressure moment with a quick one liner and that sort of stuff is invaluable to the team.

"He has been a huge player for us on the field but also in the dressing room. What he has done with the ball in the last 12 months has been real growth.

"The skill has always been there but his acceptance that the skipper believes in him, wants him to try and take the game on, put the pressure back on the opposition rather than just operate, has been the making of him.

"The impact that mentality has for the overall package is significant."

'Results are secondary, real fun is watching people grow'

The fact that McCullum spoke about Leach's love of a gag before his bowling exploits reiterates what this side is about. Results matter but relationships matter more.

Speaking about his philosophy, McCullum added: "Cricket has been everything to me. It has given me a great life and I will forever be thankful for that.

"It is worth remembering that and having that sincere gratitude towards the game whether you are succeeding or failing.

"The real fun for us as coaches is working with the guys, building those relationships and getting to know them as people. Seeing what their life is like and working with them on their skills.

"Whatever happens on the field happens - it's not like we don't care but it's almost secondary.

"There will be times where the players succeed and times where they fail but it's other stuff where you see them grow as cricketers and humans which is where the real fun is."

SKY
 
Shouldn't even be called bazball
Shahid afridi is the one who invented this type of cricket in tests. Still remember him opening at the strike rate of 150+ in tests
 
ECB Announces Brendon McCullum as England Men’s White-Ball Head Coach in Senior Team Restructure

The England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) today confirmed that Men’s Test Head Coach Brendon McCullum will also take on the role of England’s White-Ball Head Coach as part of a strategic restructure of the England Men’s senior set-up.

McCullum, who has been at the helm since May 2022, has extended his contract until the end of 2027. He will assume leadership of both the Test and white-ball teams starting January 2025, coinciding with England’s white-ball tour of India and the ICC Champions Trophy.

In the interim, Marcus Trescothick will serve as Interim Head Coach for the upcoming series against Australia and the tour of the Caribbean later this year.

Commenting on the restructure, Rob Key, Managing Director of England Men’s Cricket, said:

“I’m delighted that Brendon has chosen to do both roles now with England. I believe we are incredibly fortunate that a coach of his quality is prepared to commit wholeheartedly to English cricket.

“Being able to align all teams now is particularly exciting and we look forward to taking on all challenges that come our way.

“For the last two years, constant clashes between formats have made it challenging for the white-ball environment; fortunately, these are easing starting from January.

“The timing of the schedule (from January) will allow him to dedicate the necessary focus to both roles, and we’re confident this restructure will bring out the best in our players and coaching staff.”

Brendon McCullum, England Men’s Head Coach, added:

“I’ve thoroughly enjoyed my time with the Test team, and I’m excited to extend my role to include the white-ball sides. This new challenge is something I’m ready to embrace, and I’m eager to work closely with Jos (Buttler) and the team to build on the strong foundations that are already in place.

“Rob Key’s vision for the future of English cricket is something that really resonated with me. The idea of a unified coaching structure, especially with the schedule easing next year, made perfect sense. I’m energised by the prospect of guiding both teams and am grateful for the support from the ECB and my family as I take on these added responsibilities.

“The talent within English cricket is immense, and I’m looking forward to helping these players reach their full potential. My goal is to create an environment where everyone can thrive and where we can continue to compete at the highest level across all formats.”

After the Test series ends against Sri Lanka at the Kia Oval next week, McCullum will take a short break at home in New Zealand before joining the Test team for their winter tours of Pakistan in October and the three-match Test series against New Zealand in December.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ECB Announces Brendon McCullum as England Men’s White-Ball Head Coach in Senior Team Restructure

The England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) today confirmed that Men’s Test Head Coach Brendon McCullum will also take on the role of England’s White-Ball Head Coach as part of a strategic restructure of the England Men’s senior set-up.

McCullum, who has been at the helm since May 2022, has extended his contract until the end of 2027. He will assume leadership of both the Test and white-ball teams starting January 2025, coinciding with England’s white-ball tour of India and the ICC Champions Trophy.

In the interim, Marcus Trescothick will serve as Interim Head Coach for the upcoming series against Australia and the tour of the Caribbean later this year.

Commenting on the restructure, Rob Key, Managing Director of England Men’s Cricket, said:

“I’m delighted that Brendon has chosen to do both roles now with England. I believe we are incredibly fortunate that a coach of his quality is prepared to commit wholeheartedly to English cricket.

“Being able to align all teams now is particularly exciting and we look forward to taking on all challenges that come our way.

“For the last two years, constant clashes between formats have made it challenging for the white-ball environment; fortunately, these are easing starting from January.

“The timing of the schedule (from January) will allow him to dedicate the necessary focus to both roles, and we’re confident this restructure will bring out the best in our players and coaching staff.”

Brendon McCullum, England Men’s Head Coach, added:

“I’ve thoroughly enjoyed my time with the Test team, and I’m excited to extend my role to include the white-ball sides. This new challenge is something I’m ready to embrace, and I’m eager to work closely with Jos (Buttler) and the team to build on the strong foundations that are already in place.

“Rob Key’s vision for the future of English cricket is something that really resonated with me. The idea of a unified coaching structure, especially with the schedule easing next year, made perfect sense. I’m energised by the prospect of guiding both teams and am grateful for the support from the ECB and my family as I take on these added responsibilities.

“The talent within English cricket is immense, and I’m looking forward to helping these players reach their full potential. My goal is to create an environment where everyone can thrive and where we can continue to compete at the highest level across all formats.”

After the Test series ends against Sri Lanka at the Kia Oval next week, McCullum will take a short break at home in New Zealand before joining the Test team for their winter tours of Pakistan in October and the three-match Test series against New Zealand in December.

"Unbelievable Move": Ben Stokes On Brendon McCullum's White Ball Appointment​


England Test captain Ben Stokes has lauded the decision to appoint Brendon McCullum as the new head coach of limited-overs teams, calling it "an unbelievable move" for the future of the sport in the country. McCullum, who has already revolutionised England's Test cricket with his leadership style, will now take charge of all formats, starting in 2025 under a new three-year deal that will extend his tenure until 2027. Since taking the reins of the Test side in May 2022, McCullum, alongside Stokes, has overseen a dramatic transformation, with England winning 19 of their 28 Tests, including six series victories out of nine.

He has been credited with improving the performance of England's Test team through his aggressive and emboldened approach, often known as 'Bazball'.

"I was very surprised by the news. First and foremost, I think it's an unbelievable move for English cricket to go back to having a coach in charge of all the teams. You look at what Baz has achieved with the Test side, it's been amazing," Stokes told ESPNCricinfo.

Matthew Mott, who was appointed to oversee the limited-overs teams alongside McCullum, stepped down in July following underwhelming campaigns in the 2023 50-over World Cup and the T20 edition earlier this year. Now, McCullum set to steer the ship across all formats.

"I'm really excited for the white-ball team to have the opportunity to be able to work with Baz, listen to him speak, and hear his opinions. I think Jos is going to really, really enjoy having him as his coach to work with.

"And you look at all the new faces who are coming into that white-ball team now, I couldn't think of a better person for them to come in and work under at international level for the first time. He just gives everyone the platform to go out and enjoy themselves. Baz never puts any added pressure on anybody's shoulders," Stokes said.

As England's Test team prepares for a busy winter, starting with a series against Pakistan in October, Stokes faces his own challenges. The captain is currently recovering from a torn left hamstring, an injury sustained while playing for the Northern Superchargers in The Hundred. Although, Stokes admitted that his participation in the first Test against Pakistan is still uncertain.

"The recurrence rate of these injuries is 50%, which is quite high. I'd rather take an extra two weeks than run the risk of potentially doing something worse and then putting myself out of the game for longer. I'm just making sure that I'm doing everything right and everything I possibly can to try and give myself a chance to being fit for that first Test," said Stokes.

 
Logical next step. I’m surprised it took so long. Mott or Baz for white ball I mean there was no comparison to begin with
 

McCullum excited by England's white-ball talent


McCullum continued: "I will bring the positivity and style I like to operate with across all formats and I think it will give us a good chance of being successful.

"The white-ball side has been through a dynasty from when [Eoin Morgan] started it. They have won World Cups and some once-in-a-generation players have come through at the same time.

"Now a natural regeneration is required and that's the bit that excites me. I look around at the talent and they have learnt how to play from those once-in a-generation cricketers."

McCullum assumes Test captain Stokes is "all in" in terms of carrying on in that role until 2027 and says he made sure the all-rounder was "at peace" with him taking the white-ball role before he accepted the offer from England managing director of cricket Rob Key.

McCullum is also hopeful Stokes will play limited-overs cricket for his country again despite the 33-year-old - who is currently out of action with a hamstring injury - prioritising Test cricket of late as he recovers from surgery on a chronic left knee issue.

But he stressed that England will have to look after their multi-format players and that rotation will still be required despite the congested nature of the international calendar starting to ease.

On Stokes, McCullum said: "In terms of white ball, why not? We will see where he sits. He loves big moments and big stages [but] our players can't play everything.

"There will be some bilateral series where we can't have all our best players at the same time but when it comes to major events and big series those players are very much in discussions."

McCullum: Other coaches have chance to step up


McCullum says the kinder schedule going forward has allowed England to now have one coach for all formats, with Key initially splitting the jobs when he took charge, handing McCullum the Test gig and Matthew Mott the reins in white-ball cricket.

However, he says there will still be scope for him to take a break and for members of his backroom staff to deputise as a head coach.

McCullum said: "It is going to be an added workload, that's for sure, but I didn't take a whole lot of persuading. I looked at the opportunity and thought, 'what a chance to have a good crack'.

"At times you may be tested but that's the exciting part of doing jobs like this. You are put under pressure at times, your methods and visons are challenged, so it's about remaining firm and getting players to excel.

"Over the last two years it would have been nigh on impossible for someone to do all three formats but with the schedule easing enough it gives you the ability to have one person in the role.

"There will be times where we have to be smart with stepping support staff in and out and that will include myself, but I don't see that as a problem.

"It will give other coaches a chance to step up in a head coach capacity, just like [Marcus Trescothick] is doing [against Australia this month and West Indies in the autumn].

"When I leave in three and a half years, you want the next group of coaches or those you have brought along to be viable head coach candidates."

Source: Sky Sports
 
Last edited:
Extending his contract to the end of 2027 and taking full control across all formats is a huge commitment from a guy who lives in New Zealand like Baz, so hopefully England will reap the rewards. I’m interested to see who he considers to be the next captain when Stokes eventually steps down — I don’t think it should be Ollie Pope.
 
I think Baz should definitely be the LOI coach.

Baz himself was a superb LOI batter.

Good move from ECB.
 
So England are 10-8 against top teams during Bazzball era and they’re celebrating it as a revolution. :yk How cute
 
So England are 10-8 against top teams during Bazzball era and they’re celebrating it as a revolution. :yk How cute
Actually they won 19 tests and lost 9 tests during this Bazball era which does not look very promising TBH.

They lost only 1 series though.
 
Actually they won 19 tests and lost 9 tests during this Bazball era which does not look very promising TBH.

They lost only 1 series though.

They played some soft teams.

Beating NZ 3-0 was their finest achievement and that’s about it.

Bharat hammered them and they cried like girls.
 

'Five reasons why the Baz-Buttler combo is right for England'​


England were desperate for Brendon McCullum to add the white-ball team to his Test responsibilities.

When England were beaten in the semi-finals of the T20 World Cup in June, it completed a dismal year in limited-overs cricket. Change was inevitable and the right call was made for coach Matthew Mott, rather than captain Jos Buttler, to walk the plank.

I've seen first-hand why McCullum and Buttler can work well together. I played 62 England games alongside Buttler, not to mention countless days training, on tour and in the dressing room. I played against McCullum in 20 internationals and he was my T20 captain at Middlesex in 2017.

Now McCullum has five Twenty20s and three one-dayers in India to mould his England team before the Champions Trophy next month. McCullum's mere presence will boost the players and smooth the path for Buttler to concentrate on what he does best: read the game and score runs.

Here are five reasons why I believe the Baz-Buttler combination is ideal for England.

Lightening the load

During the T20 World Cup it was clear Buttler was frustrated to be answering questions on England's white-ball decline. Even when the questions are valid, it can become a daily grind for a captain who also has so many other responsibilities.

It was Mott's nature to be a quiet voice in the background, whereas McCullum will be on the front foot and lightening the load on the captain. McCullum spoke to the media in India on Monday, before Buttler did so on Tuesday.

McCullum's message to the dressing room will be simple. England's best white-ball captain and a great friend of McCullum, Eoin Morgan, was excellent at this. Players always see what the captain and coach say to the press, so it is another way for the leaders to get their message across.

In 2015 we were rebuilding after an awful World Cup, a fresh team in Morgan's image. In an ODI we were bowled out for 302 in 45.2 overs against New Zealand, who then chased them down in 49.

Morgan was asked if we should have tried to bat out the overs, to eke out more runs. He simply responded that he wasn't disappointed and we were just aiming for more. The reinforcement of his message was heard in the dressing room.

These acts of leadership set England on a new course in white-ball cricket, culminating in world titles in both formats. McCullum is of the same mould.

Stripping back


During the T20 World Cup, England had far too many influential voices in the dressing room. Along with Buttler and Mott, Andrew Flintoff and former West Indies captain Kieron Pollard were in there as coaching consultants. It muddied the waters between clarity and confusion.

For Buttler, or any captain, questioning the decisions you have made can lead to energy being wasted. Yes, you want robust debate with trusted allies, but there has to be cohesion and a streamlined approach.

McCullum's coaching methods are very simple. He cut the Test set-up right back, relying on a handful of assistants that have now joined him in the white-ball set-up.

If McCullum were a mechanic, he would be stripping this England sports car of unnecessary parts. No rear spoiler, no loud exhaust, leaving only what is needed and nothing that is not. Everything will run much more smoothly as a result.

Finding the fun

In 2017 I was struggling for form. I was in and out of the various England squads and not playing any games. I was frustrated, chasing my tail trying to force a way back in and carrying a lot of weight on my shoulders

McCullum came to Middlesex, working with his fellow Kiwi Daniel Vettori, who was our coach. Straight away, McCullum made it feel as though the consequences did not matter.

He fully supported the decisions I made at the top of my mark, as if someone had put a pin in all of my anxieties. Most importantly, McCullum helped me focus on having fun whilst I was out there playing. After all, playing cricket is supposed to be enjoyable.

I took 16 wickets in 10 games playing for McCullum. It was the only time that summer I felt fully free from the baggage cricket can bring.

I expect he'll do the exact same thing with the England white-ball team, helping them find the fun that will release their undoubted talent. McCullum is a master at this.

Backing the players

In that same year I had been working on a slower ball delivered from the side of the hand. I would squeeze the ball between my middle finger and ring finger, roll my middle finger down the inside of the ball and it would loop up, all whilst keeping my arm speed the same. That was the plan, anyway.

It is a hard delivery to control and I was a player who liked to feel in control of what I was doing all the time. The unknown of letting a ball come out the side of my hand made me nervous.

I worried about it in my sleep, but McCullum made it sound so simple. He fully backed me trying the ball in a game and reinforced the point that he didn't care what happened.

The first time I tried it in a game was against Gloucestershire at Uxbridge. McCullum had actually left by this point in the season, but had been on at me throughout the competition to try the new slower ball.

I bowled the slower ball in to the pitch and the batter was through the shot way too early. The next ball I bowled a pace-on shorter ball and the batter was caught behind off the glove.

It was the previous delivery that planted the seed of doubt in the batters' mind about whether it could be a slower ball or not, and it got me the wicket. I took 4-24 to be player of the match.

It's not that McCullum doesn't care about the outcome. He does, passionately. But, having played the game, he knows that you have far more chance of succeeding and committing to what you are doing if you are relaxed. This is the basic premise of his coaching, one that will suit Buttler and this England team.

Ruthless edge

The England Test team under McCullum may appear to be a lot of golf and cliches about a friendly environment, but behind that is a ruthless operator.

When McCullum backs players he truly believes in, he is not afraid to make hard decisions and stick by them.

Ben Foakes, Jonny Bairstow, James Anderson and Ollie Robinson have been on the wrong end of this ruthless edge. Sam Curran and Reece Topley, previous stalwarts of the England white-ball side, have been left out of the squads for India and the Champions Trophy.

Already McCullum has said Buttler has a "smile" on his face and the captain could have his "best years ahead of him".

Together, they could bring the good times back for England's white-ball teams.

 
Despite all the star studded line up, and over a dozen of players who could walk into their LOI team at any time, England has been underachieving a lot since last 5-6 years. What's the reason?
 
England have never been an elite team in cricket full stop.

They invented the game, but the rest of the world have taken it forward.
 
England have never been an elite team in cricket full stop.

They invented the game, but the rest of the world have taken it forward.

Edit: Applies to football as well. Am I right in saying that no English manager has won their league? And they have won the WC only once half a century ago.
 
England have never been an elite team in cricket full stop.

They invented the game, but the rest of the world have taken it forward.
Their 2015-2019 ODI team was pretty elite, and had a big hand in taking ODI cricket forward.

They just haven't been able to transition from that era to this one.
 
Despite all the star studded line up, and over a dozen of players who could walk into their LOI team at any time, England has been underachieving a lot since last 5-6 years. What's the reason?

They don't have a dozen players to walk in and improve or even maintain a high standard.

What they are playing in India is their best batting lineup by far.
 
They don't have a dozen players to walk in and improve or even maintain a high standard.

What they are playing in India is their best batting lineup by far.
Will Jacks is probably a better replacement for Salt as an opener. There's Bairstow sitting out as well as opener. Jordan Cox, James Vince, Sam Billings, Ben Stokes are an alternate group for the middle order and so on.
It's just that they don't look cohesive enough in LOIs and Buttler doesn't seem like a good tactician.
 
Will Jacks is probably a better replacement for Salt as an opener. There's Bairstow sitting out as well as opener. Jordan Cox, James Vince, Sam Billings, Ben Stokes are an alternate group for the middle order and so on.
It's just that they don't look cohesive enough in LOIs and Buttler doesn't seem like a good tactician.

Will Jacks averages 18 and strikes at 136 . Also doesn't keep wickets like Salt.

Bairstow is finished . He has been poor even in all the leagues over the last year or so.

Ben Stokes has a strike rate of 128 in T20Is.

Jordan Cox was good in the Hundred but has been terrible in BBL/PSL/ILT20.

James Vince is nearly 34 years old. Had s good Hundred but nothing to suggest that he has s future better than the incumbents in the English side.

Sam Billings was utter rubbish at The Hundred and the CPL. Had just an OK BBL at 130 strike rate.
 
Will Jacks averages 18 and strikes at 136 . Also doesn't keep wickets like Salt.

Bairstow is finished . He has been poor even in all the leagues over the last year or so.

Ben Stokes has a strike rate of 128 in T20Is.

Jordan Cox was good in the Hundred but has been terrible in BBL/PSL/ILT20.

James Vince is nearly 34 years old. Had s good Hundred but nothing to suggest that he has s future better than the incumbents in the English side.

Sam Billings was utter rubbish at The Hundred and the CPL. Had just an OK BBL at 130 strike rate.
Will Jacks is doing pretty well currently. And he bowls canny offies. Buttler is there who can keep. Jacks domestic t20 SR is 160 something
For some guys you're using international Avg and SR and others BBL/PSL/ILt20/100 as exclusion criteria.
Why can't you be uniform?

The thing is all of the names I mentioned have the potential to outscore the ones playing right now.
 
Back
Top