British Sikh group loses High Court challenge for census ethnicity tick-box

TSA321

Tape Ball Captain
Joined
Oct 18, 2013
Runs
1,214
Justice Akhlaq Choudhury handed down his judgment on Friday to conclude that the census, as currently designed, will not prevent people from identifying as ethnically as Sikh as a write-in option.
The High Court in London has dismissed a challenge brought by a British Sikh group against the UK Cabinet Office for its failure to incorporate a separate Sikh ethnicity tick-box in the next census in 2021.

Justice Akhlaq Choudhury handed down his judgment on Friday to conclude that the census, as currently designed, will not prevent people from identifying as ethnically as Sikh as a write-in option.

“In coming to that view, I do not underestimate the importance to the Claimant of having a specific Sikh tick-box under the ethnic group question.

“However, the census, as currently designed, will not prevent any respondent who wishes to do so from identifying as ethnically Sikh. The write-in option, with the auto-fill function in the online version, will enable the respondent to do so,” the ruling notes.

“It cannot be right that any challenge to executive decision-making should require the decision maker to cease ongoing work, particularly in respect of a project of the scale of a national census,” it reads.

Sikh Federation UK, represented by the law firm Leigh Day at the Royal Courts of Justice, had earlier claimed that it would be unlawful for the Cabinet Office to lay before Parliament a Census Order based on the proposals set out by the UK’s Office for National Statistics (ONS) in its December 2018 White Paper, which had rejected the need for a separate tick-box.

Justice Beverley Lang had earlier dismissed a previous High Court challenge to that on the ground that it is “premature”, leading to an appeal against the Cabinet Office’s Census Order as being unlawful.

The judge points out that his ruling this week is not concerned with whether or not there should be a Sikh tick-box in the census form or with the respective merits of the arguments for and against such a tick-box.

“Such matters are not for the court to determine. This judgment is concerned solely with the question whether, as alleged by the Claimant [Sikh Federation], the Cabinet Office, which has responsibility for laying the necessary legislation for the 2021 Census, has acted unlawfully in the process leading to the making of the Census Order,” the judge said.

Sikh Federation UK said that although the High Court has rejected its claim, refusing to quash the census legislation, its battle for a separate tick-box continues.

“While we are disappointed with the court’s decision, we look forward to working closely with MPs and government bodies to find another solution to ensure the specific needs of the Sikh community are not overlooked in the allocation of public resources and policymaking,” it said in a statement.

Sikhs are recognised as a separate religion in the optional religious question introduced in the 2001 Census.

The UK’s Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000 placed an obligatory duty on the country’s public authorities to monitor and positively promote race equality in the provision of public services.

According to Sikh Federation UK, which claims the backing of hundreds of UK gurdwaras, public bodies tend to only reference the ethnic groups used in the census and demand a separate Sikh ethnic tick-box to ensure Sikhs have fair access to all public services.

The issue has triggered a war of words between different British Sikh groups, with the Network of Sikh Organisations saying that: Sikhs are adequately recorded in the census under religion, and the Office for National Statistics (ONS) made the right decision in rejecting the Sikh Federation UK’s calls for a Sikh ‘ethnic’ tick box.

Meanwhile, the ONS, which conducted a consultation ahead of the next UK census, stresses that as the religion question will have a specific Sikh tick box response option, everyone who wishes to identify as Sikh in response to the ethnicity question will be able to do so through a write-in option in the next 10-year census.

No group will be missed out in the digital-first 2021 Census, the ONS said.

https://www.thehindu.com/news/inter...census-ethnicity-tick-box/article33048090.ece
 
Why has this not been done yet? Indians in UK can benefit if British Sikhs are removed from their statistics. Aren't they a race in UK, it should be compulsory for British Sikhs to not tick Indian ethnic statistic and choose Sikh one(which should be included) and later they can claim they are marginalized.
 
Why has this not been done yet? Indians in UK can benefit if British Sikhs are removed from their statistics. Aren't they a race in UK, it should be compulsory for British Sikhs to not tick Indian ethnic statistic and choose Sikh one(which should be included) and later they can claim they are marginalized.

Does the Indian constitution club Sikhs and Buddhists with hindus?
 
I hope not but they were clubbed in Hindu marriage act before Anand Marriage act 2012

"It is therefore a cause of great heartburn for Buddhists, Jains and Sikhs that Explanation II of Article 25 (freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation of religion) of the Indian Constitution classifies them as ‘Hindus’, subject to Hindu personal laws. The explanation has been challenged legally many times, but still has not been altered."

https://www.google.com/amp/s/wap.bu...-by-dharma-divided-by-law-114012100308_1.html

Can you explain this?
 
Cornish people want their tick box too but were told there is no room on the form.
 
Sikh, although majority of them are of punjabi ethnicity, should be categorized as a separate religion, not a race/ethnicity, as it goes against the fundamental teachings of Sikhism.
 
Sikhs are a religious group not an ethnicity, while the vast majority of Sikhs are Punjabis ethinically but that doesn't make them a separate ethnicity.
 
How can someone be ethnically Sikh ?

I think they're trying to classify themselves as a unique ethno-religious group like Jews, trying to distinguish themselves from other Punjabis who are usually Pakistani-Muslims.
 
I think they're trying to classify themselves as a unique ethno-religious group like Jews, trying to distinguish themselves from other Punjabis who are usually Pakistani-Muslims.

They are and are very prominent in promoting their ethnicity... Absurd
 
I think they're trying to classify themselves as a unique ethno-religious group like Jews, trying to distinguish themselves from other Punjabis who are usually Pakistani-Muslims.

Nah it's them trying to be labelled separately to other Indians. Currently they're grouped together with them under the British Indian label.
 
I think they're trying to classify themselves as a unique ethno-religious group like Jews, trying to distinguish themselves from other Punjabis who are usually Pakistani-Muslims.

You'd have a Punjabi Indian or Punjabi Pakistani for that. But I think they use Asian/Asian British with sub grouping of Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, other Asian etc.
 
You'd have a Punjabi Indian or Punjabi Pakistani for that. But I think they use Asian/Asian British with sub grouping of Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, other Asian etc.

There's also a substantial number of Punjabi Hindus ...
 
Seems silly to me. Can't they just be classed as Indian? There are many Indian Muslims, Jains, Buddhists, Christians, etc which will tick the Indian box, so why are Sikhs any different?
 
How deep the nested tree should go? There will be always one or multiple groups which will believe that they need a separate identity.
 
"It is therefore a cause of great heartburn for Buddhists, Jains and Sikhs that Explanation II of Article 25 (freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation of religion) of the Indian Constitution classifies them as ‘Hindus’, subject to Hindu personal laws. The explanation has been challenged legally many times, but still has not been altered."

https://www.google.com/amp/s/wap.bu...-by-dharma-divided-by-law-114012100308_1.html

Can you explain this?

I remember asking the question once before " are sikhs just hindus in disguise?". I read it previously on a hindutva message board, now I am seeing it is actually enshrined in constitution I feel vindicated. Thanks.
 
"It is therefore a cause of great heartburn for Buddhists, Jains and Sikhs that Explanation II of Article 25 (freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation of religion) of the Indian Constitution classifies them as ‘Hindus’, subject to Hindu personal laws. The explanation has been challenged legally many times, but still has not been altered."

https://www.google.com/amp/s/wap.bu...-by-dharma-divided-by-law-114012100308_1.html

Can you explain this?

What is the explanation you are looking for? This has nothing to do with ethnicity census.. this is for legal laws I guess [MENTION=136588]CricketCartoons[/MENTION].

Hindu laws my assumption here is made for Dharmic religions.. esp after they were modified , other being Sharia?

Not having one country one law probably causes this heart burn a curse that Congress has left us with.
 
There's also a substantial number of Punjabi Hindus ...

True but like I said, its moot point as I don't think these specific religious classifications are used. Guess, that's why the case was lost in the high court.
 
Back
Top