Pakistan has struggled to establish a truly explosive T20 team. With three years to go until the next major tournament, who should Pakistan back as the core of their squad?
In a landscape filled with misinformation and opinions often presented as facts, I decided to rely on data to conduct an objective analysis of where the real potential lies. Here's a breakdown of performances to identify the players who could form the backbone of Pakistan's T20 side.
Pakistan's T20 Core: A Data-Driven Approach
National T20 Performances
2023/24
- S. Farhan: Avg 44, SR 178 (highest run-getter)
- Kamran Ghulam: Avg 40, SR 140
- Omair Yousuf: Avg 36, SR 128
- Tayyab Tahir: Avg 31, SR 111
- Mohammad Haris: Avg 28, SR 148
2022/23
- S. Farhan: Avg 35, SR 132 (highest run-getter)
- Tayyab Tahir: Avg 41, SR 138
- Omair Yousuf: Avg 51, SR 137
- Kamran Ghulam: Avg 22, SR 118
- Haseebullah: Avg 22, SR 112
- Irfan Khan: Avg 28, SR 152
- Amir Jamal: Avg 42, SR 192
- Agha Salman: Avg 6, SR 78
- Mohd Haris avg 18, SR 126
2021
- S. Farhan: Avg 40, SR 132 (highest run-getter)
- Kamran Ghulam: Avg 75, SR 145
- Tayyab Tahir: Avg 48, SR 148
- Agha Salman: Avg 29, SR 129
- Mohd Haris: Avg 9, SR 109
---
PSL Performances Since 2022
- Mohammad Rizwan: Avg 50, SR 130 (highest run-getter)
- Babar Azam: Avg 50, SR 136
- Fakhar Zaman: Avg 34, SR 149
- Saim Ayub: Avg 30, SR 160
- Shadab Khan: Avg 28, SR 150
- Mohammad Haris: Avg 26, SR 170
- Usman Khan: Avg 74, SR 172
- Kamran Ghulam: Avg 22, SR 117
- Saud Shakeel: Avg 35, SR 142
- S. Farhan: Avg 28, SR 127
- Agha Salman: Avg 30, SR 137
- Sharjeel Khan: Avg 20, SR 127
- Tayyab Tahir: Avg 32, SR 147
- Haseebullah: Avg 16, SR 143
- Omair Yousuf: Avg 34, SR 147
- Irfan Khan: Avg 38, SR 138
- Amir Jamal: Avg 20, SR 150
- Jahandad Khan: Avg 20, SR 187
---
#### Insights
1. Sahibzada Farhan
- Dominates domestic cricket as the highest run-getter for three consecutive seasons, with a SR of 178 in 2023/24 showing he’s improved his pace.
- Despite consistent performances, he remains underutilized at the PSL and international levels.
2. Kamran Ghulam
- Impressive in domestic T20s (Avg 40, SR 140 in 2023/24) but inconsistent in the PSL (Avg 22, SR 117).
3. Tayyab Tahir
- A consistent domestic performer with solid PSL numbers (Avg 32, SR 147). A strong candidate for the national team.
4. Saim Ayub and Usman Khan
- Among the most impactful PSL batters.
- Usman Khan boasts stellar stats (Avg 74, SR 172), while Saim Ayub is an explosive opener (Avg 30, SR 160).
5. Mohammad Haris
- Known for his aggressive style and high strike rate (170 in PSL). Despite modest averages, he offers a unique x-factor.
6. Omair Yousuf and Irfan Khan
- Emerging talents with encouraging numbers. They could develop into reliable options.
7. Agha Salman
- Struggles in T20 cricket. Players like Tayyab Tahir and Saud Shakeel have shown more promise in this format for the same role.
8. Haseebullah
- A prolific List A performer but unsuited for T20s based on current stats.
---
Recommended T20 Core
1. Saim Ayub
2. Mohammad Haris
3. Fakhar Zaman
4. Usman Khan
5. Tayyab Tahir
6. Irfan Khan
7. Jahandad Khan or Amir Jamal
What do you guys think?
In a landscape filled with misinformation and opinions often presented as facts, I decided to rely on data to conduct an objective analysis of where the real potential lies. Here's a breakdown of performances to identify the players who could form the backbone of Pakistan's T20 side.
Pakistan's T20 Core: A Data-Driven Approach
National T20 Performances
2023/24
- S. Farhan: Avg 44, SR 178 (highest run-getter)
- Kamran Ghulam: Avg 40, SR 140
- Omair Yousuf: Avg 36, SR 128
- Tayyab Tahir: Avg 31, SR 111
- Mohammad Haris: Avg 28, SR 148
2022/23
- S. Farhan: Avg 35, SR 132 (highest run-getter)
- Tayyab Tahir: Avg 41, SR 138
- Omair Yousuf: Avg 51, SR 137
- Kamran Ghulam: Avg 22, SR 118
- Haseebullah: Avg 22, SR 112
- Irfan Khan: Avg 28, SR 152
- Amir Jamal: Avg 42, SR 192
- Agha Salman: Avg 6, SR 78
- Mohd Haris avg 18, SR 126
2021
- S. Farhan: Avg 40, SR 132 (highest run-getter)
- Kamran Ghulam: Avg 75, SR 145
- Tayyab Tahir: Avg 48, SR 148
- Agha Salman: Avg 29, SR 129
- Mohd Haris: Avg 9, SR 109
---
PSL Performances Since 2022
- Mohammad Rizwan: Avg 50, SR 130 (highest run-getter)
- Babar Azam: Avg 50, SR 136
- Fakhar Zaman: Avg 34, SR 149
- Saim Ayub: Avg 30, SR 160
- Shadab Khan: Avg 28, SR 150
- Mohammad Haris: Avg 26, SR 170
- Usman Khan: Avg 74, SR 172
- Kamran Ghulam: Avg 22, SR 117
- Saud Shakeel: Avg 35, SR 142
- S. Farhan: Avg 28, SR 127
- Agha Salman: Avg 30, SR 137
- Sharjeel Khan: Avg 20, SR 127
- Tayyab Tahir: Avg 32, SR 147
- Haseebullah: Avg 16, SR 143
- Omair Yousuf: Avg 34, SR 147
- Irfan Khan: Avg 38, SR 138
- Amir Jamal: Avg 20, SR 150
- Jahandad Khan: Avg 20, SR 187
---
#### Insights
1. Sahibzada Farhan
- Dominates domestic cricket as the highest run-getter for three consecutive seasons, with a SR of 178 in 2023/24 showing he’s improved his pace.
- Despite consistent performances, he remains underutilized at the PSL and international levels.
2. Kamran Ghulam
- Impressive in domestic T20s (Avg 40, SR 140 in 2023/24) but inconsistent in the PSL (Avg 22, SR 117).
3. Tayyab Tahir
- A consistent domestic performer with solid PSL numbers (Avg 32, SR 147). A strong candidate for the national team.
4. Saim Ayub and Usman Khan
- Among the most impactful PSL batters.
- Usman Khan boasts stellar stats (Avg 74, SR 172), while Saim Ayub is an explosive opener (Avg 30, SR 160).
5. Mohammad Haris
- Known for his aggressive style and high strike rate (170 in PSL). Despite modest averages, he offers a unique x-factor.
6. Omair Yousuf and Irfan Khan
- Emerging talents with encouraging numbers. They could develop into reliable options.
7. Agha Salman
- Struggles in T20 cricket. Players like Tayyab Tahir and Saud Shakeel have shown more promise in this format for the same role.
8. Haseebullah
- A prolific List A performer but unsuited for T20s based on current stats.
---
Recommended T20 Core
1. Saim Ayub
2. Mohammad Haris
3. Fakhar Zaman
4. Usman Khan
5. Tayyab Tahir
6. Irfan Khan
7. Jahandad Khan or Amir Jamal
What do you guys think?