Usual suspects failing to address the topic and attacking posters instead.
If you back Naqvi, just tell us why. If you don't then likewise. If you don't have an opinion on Naqvi then just don't post.
I supported Imran Khan in 2013 because he promised to create
Riyasat-e-Madina and
Naya Pakistan within 100 days. His vision seemed inspiring at the time, offering hope for a new and improved Pakistan. However, after spending more than three years as Prime Minister, it’s clear that those promises never materialized.
1) Where is Naya Pakistan?
Imran Khan had more than enough time in office to bring real change, yet the results were deeply disappointing. Instead of focusing on economic growth, infrastructure development, and public welfare, he prioritized political theatrics and confrontational politics. Rather than building roads, hospitals, and schools, he encouraged his followers to engage in acts of destruction. His party members and supporters were seen petrol-bombing government buildings, burning buses, and vandalizing public property. Instead of progress, he left behind a trail of chaos and division.
Under his leadership, Pakistan’s economy suffered significantly. Inflation skyrocketed, unemployment increased, and businesses faced severe challenges. The cost of living became unbearable for the common citizen, yet his focus remained on rhetoric rather than real governance. The dream of
Naya Pakistan turned out to be nothing more than empty slogans, as the country saw no substantial improvements in governance, infrastructure, or public services.
2) Where is Riyasat-e-Madina?
Imran Khan frequently invoked the concept of
Riyasat-e-Madina, portraying himself as a leader who would bring Islamic values into governance. However, his actions and the culture he promoted were far from those ideals. Instead of fostering respect, unity, and morality, he and his party encouraged a toxic political environment.
His followers have been notorious for spreading hatred, abusing women, and using obscene language on social media. Women who opposed his views were subjected to relentless online harassment, and instead of condemning such behavior, he allowed it to flourish. The younger generation, which looked up to him, was influenced by this negativity, learning to disrespect elders and engage in crude, offensive discourse. Is this the kind of behavior that represents
Riyasat-e-Madina?
Moreover, his political rallies (jalsas) were marked by inappropriate performances, including vulgar dance acts. Instead of setting a moral example, he allowed an environment where such displays were encouraged, contradicting the very principles he claimed to stand for.
Comparison with Maryam Nawaz & Real Leadership
In contrast, Maryam Nawaz, despite having a much shorter time in power, delivered more for Punjab in under a year than Imran Khan did in his entire tenure. Infrastructure projects were completed, public welfare programs were launched, and governance was more structured.
The real issue here is not about blind loyalty to a political party—it’s not like supporting Liverpool or Manchester United, where fans stay faithful no matter what. Politics is about progress, development, and improving people’s lives. Imran Khan failed to deliver on all fronts. His tenure was defined by chaos, destruction, and empty promises rather than tangible progress. People deserve leadership that brings real change, not just catchy slogans and divisive politics.
is the only one, who can make P.A.kistan G.reat A.nd L.iberated (PAGAL) 
