cric_4life
Debutant
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2019
- Runs
- 161
Any sport will never get popularized unless locals play in it. US cricket team will go down same way Canadian team. Only desis will play and no one will care.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In my opinion they are targeting mainly immigrants and expats only in the long term aswell. They have huge desi expats so they want them to stay hooked to cricket, say guys like Usman Khuwaja or Adil Rashid who were either born there or came as little kids and I see nothing wrong with that. They have huge population so even if 50% expats pick up cricket as their favourite sport then they will have a reasonable team in 10-15 years and so on.England don't explicitly import players though to my knowledge. The counties take on players who qualify as domestic and if the ECB like them, they take them. Morgan, Rankin, Joyce and the others all played for England as they played county cricket for the requisite period and in some cases even have British passports anyway.
The example of the UAE is also poor as that country is like 90% expats, therefore the UAE cricket team also being mostly expats is perfectly acceptable and representative of the country the work in. The USE is not the same.
The USA are literally approaching and essentially buying leftover players from SA, Pakistan, SL etc. Its a big difference to the UAE playing expats who work there who happen to be decent, or the ECB calling up foreigners playing county who qualify. The USA don't have a cricket infrastructure to develop a quality national side, see the u19 results, nor do they have the ability to tap into the domestic audience, so they're basically just buying their way in as US Cricket will always have wealthy desi backers who want to see big teams play there, or the US to qualify for events.
The USA are entitled to do this of course, its within the rules, but hypothetically, if some random Mongolian billionaire started paying tens of thousands to get random former or domestic players over there and start playing in intl tourneys, whats the difference? There is none. I want Associate teams who are genuinely developing a sustainable future qualifying i.e Namibia, Nepal, Malaysia, Scotland, Netherlands etc. Even the UAE, Oman , HK, all sides people wrongly chastise for being foreign XI's, have all done xcellent development work. The US lost to the Cayman Islands two years ago in comparison.
I don't want to see a haphazard US cricket community that's used its brute financial force to buy Patel, Aslam, loads of Saffers etc qualifying on that logic. In none of those cases that I'm aware of, bar Anderson and Plunkett, do any of them have even an iota of a US background, no passport etc. Its akin imo to KKR entering a national side in ICC qualifying. They can do it if they want but I don't like it and long term it aids US cricket in no way whatsoever.
USA Cricket has hailed the news yesterday from the International Cricket Council (ICC) that there will be an expanded set of events that involve an increased number of Associate Members within the next ICC Rights Cycle from 2023 - 2031.
The announcement about the expansion in the number of participating teams at future editions of the Men’s Cricket World Cup and the Men’s T20 World Cup, as well as the scheduling of a Men’s T20 World Cup every two years, appears to reflect the ICC’s desire to grow the game in the coming decade outside of the non-traditional markets and aligns with USA Cricket’s long-term vision and strategic objectives.
This decision follows previous ICC announcements about the expansion in the number of Women’s and Youth events over the 8-year period as well.
Iain Higgins, Chief Executive of USA Cricket, expressed strong support for the ICC’s announcement, “Everybody within USA Cricket and across the US cricket community is delighted that the ICC has chosen to expand the number of participating teams in both the Men’s Cricket World Cup and Men’s T20 World Cup, following similar decisions in respect of the women’s game. These decisions help to provide additional opportunities for the best Associate Members to compete on a global stage on a more regular basis, and they therefore provide extra incentive to the USA’s national teams and players as we strive to develop an integrated domestic structure and environment that helps to drive high performance outcomes. The standard and quality of Associate Member cricket has never been stronger and we look forward to being able to demonstrate that on the global stage through these new opportunities.”
“In addition, the decision to schedule a Men’s T20 World Cup every other year, which follows a similar decision in respect of the Women’s T20 World Cup, also provides USA Cricket with additional opportunities to continue to seek the right to host part of these major events in line with the strategic objectives set out in our Foundational Plan. To that end, USA Cricket has already formally expressed to the ICC its interest in staging various major events in partnership with Cricket West Indies, and we look forward to working with CWI and the ICC over the next few months with a view to putting forward the best possible case to secure for the USA the hosting rights to some of the most exciting global cricket competitions, which would be extremely exciting and help us to achieve our long-term vision of making cricket a mainstream sport in the USA.”
Higgins concluded, “Our continued strategic focus on Women, Girls and Youth has also received a huge boost - not just the expansion of the number of teams in the Women’s Cricket World Cup and Women’s T20 World Cup, but also the introduction of the Women’s U19 T20 World Cup every two years. It is so pleasing to see these decisions align with our own strategic initiatives, including the establishment of a women’s pathway and the recent investment into the Men’s and Women’s U19 Training Groups, U19 National Coaches, U19 National Championships and broader support structures.”
United States batsman Jaskaran Malhotra has become the ninth man to hit six sixes in an over in top-level cricket.
The 31-year-old hit the runs off Papua New Guinea pace bowler Gaudi Toka in a one-day international in Oman.
He is just the second player to achieve the feat in ODI cricket after South Africa's Herschelle Gibbs in 2007.
It also ensured Malhotra, whose previous highest score was 18, finished unbeaten on 173 - the highest one-day score by a US batsman.
The previous highest was 95 by Aaron Jones against United Arab Emirates in 2019.
Malhotra has also broken the record for the highest score by a number five in ODI cricket, eclipsing the 162 by South Africa's AB de Villiers against West Indies at the 2015 World Cup.
It is also the third-highest ODI score by a player from one of the International Cricket Council's associate nations.
The remarkable innings, which included 16 sixes and four fours, helped the US recover from 29-3 to reach 271-9 from their 50 overs, with the next highest score just 22.
The India-born wicketkeeper batsman made his List A USA debut in 2017 before the US gained ODI status in 2019. He has since gone on to make six T20 and seven ODI appearances.
The United States won the first match of the two-match series on Monday by seven wickets.
Nine batsmen have hit six sixes in an over in top-level cricket:
1968 - Sir Garfield Sobers (for Nottinghamshire v Glamorgan)*
1984 - Ravi Shastri (Bombay v Baroda)*
2007 - Herschelle Gibbs (South Africa v Netherlands, World Cup)
2007 - Yuvraj Singh (India v England, T20)
2017 - Ross Whiteley (Worcestershire v Yorkshire, T20)
2018 - Hazratullah Zazai (Kabul Zwanan v Balkh Legends, T20)
2020 - Leo Carter (Canterbury v Northern Districts, T20)
2021 - Kieron Pollard (West Indies v Sri Lanka, T20)
2021 - Jaskaran Malhotra (United States v Papua New Guinea, ODI)
*first-class cricket
In 2013 Jordan Clark became the first Englishman to hit six sixes in an over in a second XI game against Yorkshire at Scarborough, off the bowling of left-arm spinner Gurham Randhawa.
United States may emerge as a potential host for the 2024 T20 World Cup as a stepping stone to help cricket be included in the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics.
As per a report in Sydney Morning Herald, the International Cricket Council (ICC) is expected to award a joint bid by USA Cricket and Cricket West Indies (CWI) to host the 2024 T20 World Cup.
If this indeed happens, then it would be the first global tournament that will not be hosted by either India, England or Australia since the 2014 T20 World Cup in Bangladesh.
The decision to give US a right to host 2024 T20 World Cup will also help the game's efforts to be included in the Olympic Games, starting with Los Angeles in 2028 and following up with Brisbane in 2032.
India's Olympic Association (IOA) has also indicated it will try to put forward a bid to host the 2036 Games. So, if cricket is included in 2028 LA Olympics, then the longevity of the sport in the mega event will be ensured.
https://www.timesnownews.com/sports...k-us-to-host-2024-t20-world-cup-report/831850
It would certainly be the best way to give cricket a chance of launching in the US. Host a tournament there and see what happens.
Kind of like the '94 football world cup.
I don’t think anyone in USA is targeting cricket for any audience other than the desi expats. The desi expats are in huge numbers now so it makes sense to target them and hopefully get a decent team.I think (going back to my OP 4 years ago), nothing has changed. Cricket in America is all about money….. locals are not that target. Globalization is not the target, but investing in rich markets is. USA is a financially thriving country, the expats here are the most well off cricket fans in the world. That’s that target market; the West Indians, Pakistanis, Indians, Bangladeshis, etc.
They want their kids to play the sport and they want local leagues so they can watch the games, etc. How financially lucrative it is at the end of the day remains to be seen.
But anybody who thinks the target audience is white/black/Latino first/second…n generation Americans is absolutely misguided. I have been involved in cricket here for over 30 years and I have seen that demographic get involved seriously at the local club level NOT EVEN ONCE!
I don’t think anyone in USA is targeting cricket for any audience other than the desi expats. The desi expats are in huge numbers now so it makes sense to target them and hopefully get a decent team.
As a USA fan since 2015, this is exciting for me. 6 years ago we couldn't beat Canada at home. But the ICC saw something. They saw that there are people who want to see cricket in America thanks to the all stars series. They saw that CPL matches in Florida were well attended, demonstrating support beyond a few matches here and there. They saw that we have international caliber players like Steven Taylor and Ali khan.
When the USA hosts the T20 world cup there are two matches I absolutely must get tickets for. Pakistan vs India, for that will most certainly be held in the United States and will be a once in a lifetime opportunity. The second is USA vs Pakistan, for my country of birth (USA) will face the country I still love so much (Pakistan). And while any other day I would have worn a Pakistan kit at a Pakistan match, I always promised myself I will support American cricket first if they ever play Pakistan. I don't think I will be the only one to do so.
Looking forward to watching USA go for the series win tonight!
If ICC play smart, they can bring a drop in wicket at a big stadium like Metlife stadium for India-Pakistan match for T20 WC , 82,000 tickets will be sold out in a minutes.
It won't work due to pitch dimensions. You would be looking at 45 meters long on if you stuck it right in the middle of the field.
If they are smart they could find a way to enormously expand the stadium in Lauderhill to 30-40k seats. USA cricket could get return on investment by playing quad series yearly against ECB or WI in February and March when the weather is perfect and getting a USA based cpl franchise. There need to be 20-30 matches per year including league cricket to make it work.
Did they seriously name a team San Francisco Unicorns? LOL
Unicorns is such a feminine name.
Not sure who came up with it. Blunder.
Goes with the SF vibe lol
Goes with the SF vibe lol
USA becoming a viable source of income for cricketers now - another source of competition for PSL at some point?
What’s the source of money. Not even desi Americans know about this
$174 million dollars are being invested in this league. Can they recover this money? I doubt whether the North American and Canadian Desi's will be hooked on to this for much longer especially given how busy life is in this part of the world. There was only one Canadian T-20 league in 2019 and it was not held again.
Very few care about cricket in North America. Cricket is not even among top 3 sports.
It is likely that this league will not generate profit (not anytime soon at least).
IPL owners are in there so the prospects look good.
USA cricket needs the locals to buy into cricket or it will be an uphill battle.
There games will be very well attended.
In order for the local population to take an interest, these guys need to do a lot of investing in educating the people on cricket and spend a lot of money on advertising.
Even the 2nd or 3rd generation desi population doesn't care about cricket. It has the stigma of a "fob sport" attached to it.