Gasherbrum
First Class Captain
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2004
- Runs
- 5,764
wow! impressive stuff from taylor. surely thats the game.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Amjid Javed said:I expect Aussies to hand out a severe trashing to the W.I.
Easa said:Did you see the emotion on Gayle's face when they won? Means alot to them.
Amjid Javed said:Intresting to see R morton finally fire as a batsmen, he looked like another ganga a batsmen with no real shots and i wondered why he was in the team. He seems like he likes to stand and deliver and play on tracks with no movement, having lara at other end helped him but maybe this is a knock which will establish him in W.I side.
Rob H said:Superb innings by Gilchrist, he's single handedly kept Australia in this match (haha i told you Zahir). I think Hussey and Pup will guide them home.
Noman said:Why wassmt chanderpul not playin`g`?
Whippy said:Injured
Whippy said:England to beat Australia by 4 wickets. You heard it here first.
Easa said:Did you see the emotion on Gayle's face when they won? Means alot to them.
Amjid Javed said:well its good to see W.I bounce back from sri lankan thrashing!
if aussies lose on saturday it could be tourney over![/QUOTE]
Well, they need other results going their way, but yes if they lose agaisnt England it could be all over for them.
Playa said:He was really pumped up, the win means a lot to them, well played WI, I'm really happy for them.
"We can't blame the wicket or the conditions, we have to blame ourselves for some ill-disciplined batting and some ill-disciplined bowling at times as well," Australia captain Ricky Ponting said.
OZGOD said:There you go. Missed the match as I had to go to work, but that's the beauty of this competition, you really need to win pretty much all your games. The experiment with Watson hasn't worked well so far. I still think they need to get someone like Jaques or Hayden in there and play Watson down the order.
Well played to the Windies! After a hammering from SL they came good today.
garbage_can2003 said:Can I ask what is the rationale for bringing Hussey so low down the order?
garbage_can2003 said:Can I ask what is the rationale for bringing Hussey so low down the order?
garbage_can2003 said:Can I ask what is the rationale for bringing Hussey so low down the order?
garbage_can2003 said:Can I ask what is the rationale for bringing Hussey so low down the order?
OZGOD said:I'd suggest that the muppets in charge think that he can play the Bevan on nitrous role in the lower order in case our fragile top order collapses, which it has been doing for a while. I posted a thread here a few weeks ago suggesting that I think he'd be useful at the top of the order - sure he may fail now and then, but you'd want the bloke to be facing as many balls as possible.
And since the muppets in charge only brought Katich as the "specialist" (joke) opener to partner an inconsistent Gilly, the only alternative to Katich is Watson, who is very clearly a cowlasher and not an opener. Watson has some marginal value in the lower order where his cowlashing might buy a few runs and as poor a bowler he is, he's still better than Symmo in terms of using up overs. I'd like to see Watson batting at 6 or 7 instead of opening the innings where he will always be hit and miss.
Whippy said:I don't rate Warson. However I would still play him in this side in the role you suggested, because I can't really think of a better replacement in the 14 you've picked! I admire Australia's commitment to blooding a genuine all-rounder but it does feel a bit forced - it has conveniently been happening a lot since the Ashes were taken from Australia by an all-rounder - and maybe the candidates aren't quite good enough anyway.
OZGOD said:I'd suggest that the muppets in charge think that he can play the Bevan on nitrous role in the lower order in case our fragile top order collapses, which it has been doing for a while. I posted a thread here a few weeks ago suggesting that I think he'd be useful at the top of the order - sure he may fail now and then, but you'd want the bloke to be facing as many balls as possible.
And since the muppets in charge only brought Katich as the "specialist" (joke) opener to partner an inconsistent Gilly, the only alternative to Katich is Watson, who is very clearly a cowlasher and not an opener. Watson has some marginal value in the lower order where his cowlashing might buy a few runs and as poor a bowler he is, he's still better than Symmo in terms of using up overs. I'd like to see Watson batting at 6 or 7 instead of opening the innings where he will always be hit and miss.