There was more than one paragraph in my post. She seems to be innocent of what she was tried for which was an attempted murder of the US soldiers. The particular paragraph of my post which you have highlighted was answering your allegation that the catalyst for her support is a desire to get one up on the USA. My argument is that the feelings were sparked by something other than that.
My criticism is not for those supporting her for the mistrial. I am talking about the feeling people have about her in general in Pakistan, with the media going with the general public mood where she is portrayed as a victim who was kidnapped from Pakistan while she was going on about her usual business and being blamed wrongly for Al Qaeda links. The common words used for her is that she was 'trapped' into this by the Americans, their 'stooge' Musharraf, and the Zionists of Israel.
You are talking about a sentence that was passed barely a month ago. But her story, and the Pakistani public's reaction to it, is not a month old. It's been a few years and people have been making these tall claims of her innocence regarding her Al Qaeda links since the news first appeared while she was still allegedly missing. The anger for America and the alleged American stooge Musharraf was translated into a conviction in our public that she is an innocent and has been trapped. As her story unfolded, and more and more stories came out that started making some people, including me, doubt the stories of her innocence, the mood of the general public persisted unchanged, calling the stories false and a conspiracy of the Americans, their stooge Musharraf, and the Zionist media around the world. The various political parties with agendas in their own favor and against Musharraf's dictatorship milked this issue and the public supported them. This is the same attitude of putting unreasonable emotions ahead of critical thinking that has resulted in the election into power of the current government and Zardari as the country's head.
It is this unreasonable emotionalism that made our people accept without question the story given by her family that she one day took her three very young kids and decided to go to Islamabad ALONE from Karachi, and that too at a time when she and her family was allegedly scared for her safety. Some even claim she was going by road! They don't question why if they killed her youngest son, did they leave her elder two when it is America we are talking about, a country that doesn't think twice before bombing a madrassah full of children. But they spared her eldest son who was later to be found with her in 2008, and her daughter who, according to Aafia's mom and sis, just turned up one day recently outside their house. Both safe, sound and healthy? So ISI/CIA killed her youngest son and spared two children so they can later create all sorts of problems for them.
Her innocence supporters also ignore everything said by her first husband that contradicts her story told by her family - his claims of seeing her in Karachi during this time, and people claiming seeing her children at her mother's house during these years of her disappearance. No, no, he is lying, they say. They also ignore the fact that even though her husband's name was given at the same time as hers by Khalid Sheikh Muhammad, he was traced down and questioned in Karachi and then let go and removed from the FBI list, where he continued leading a normal life. But USA, for some strange reason, had a special grudge against her where they kidnapped her and tortured and raped her for years in an Afghanistani prison and now flew her all the way to USA for trial. They dont question why, after 9/11 happened, she came back with her family to Pakistan, citing fears for her life and family, when thousands of Muslims stayed back in USA, including myself and I was even a member of MSA at Michigan State University and regularly visited one of the largest Islamic Centers in USA. Everyone was worried of a backlash but hardly anyone left the country, even those on student visas. But she did, in an emergency, along with her family when she as well as her husband were working full time and she really didn't have anything to worry about if she was innocent.
They also believe that she really had gone back to USA to look for a job after her divorce and returned back in a week, which apparently happened at the same time a post box was opened in the name of Majid Khan who later turned out to be an Al Qaeda member and was arrested. And even more suspiciously, she decided to go look for jobs in universities on 25th of December and came back a week later, a duration where all campuses in USA are closed for winter holidays. Everyone who has spent some time in USA knows that, and would expect a former student and then a professor to know this from first hand experience.
But then again, maybe I am giving too much credibility to her supporters. They usually don't even listen to anything contradicting her stories of innocence. So how can I blame them for disregarding it?
And yes, there have been some suspicious claims against her which, if one uses common sense, are easy to separate from those that sound more convincing. For example, the claim that she was involved in a diamond deal in Liberia doesn't add up because her lawyer has proven she was present in USA at that time, a claim backed up by credit card receipts and eye witnesses.
But her supporters in Pakistan who claim she is innocent do so by disregarding EVERYTHING that contradicts their stand and claim it is a zionist/american conspiracy.
However, my initial intentions in this thread were not intended to discuss my convictions about her case but was instead directed at the people who show their hypocrisy by claiming she is innocent and was trapped by USA/Zionists, an innocent sold by Musharraf for money. And that everything implicating her is a conspiracy.