What's new

Government itself allowed Nawaz Sharif to travel abroad, CJP Khosa says

uberkoen

ODI Debutant
Joined
Nov 2, 2011
Runs
9,985
Chief Justice of Pakistan Asif Saeed Khosa on Wednesday responded to recent remarks by Prime Minister Imran Khan regarding the judiciary, saying it was the government that allowed former prime minister Nawaz Sharif to travel abroad for medical treatment.

“Do not taunt us regarding the powerful,” the chief justice said, adding that everyone is equal before the law. He was speaking at the inauguration ceremony of a mobile app, call centre, complete video link facility in five courtrooms of the Supreme Court, research centre and an enhanced website to facilitate litigants and lawyers.

He said the permission to go abroad was granted to Nawaz by the prime minister and the Lahore High Court (LHC) had only set the modalities.

While speaking at a ceremony in Havelian on Monday, Prime Minister Imran had asked Chief Justice Khosa and puisne judge of the Supreme Court Justice Gulzar Ahmed to come forward and restore public confidence in the judiciary.

In his address, the premier had also said that speedy and quick justice for all would lay the foundation of the country’s new system based on the principles of ‘Riasat-i-Madina’. He said there was a perceived disparity in how the powerful and common people were treated in the country’s judicial system. He said he was ready to support the judiciary to change the perception and restore public confidence in the institutions.

"Whatever social segments criticise our judges should be a little cautious because they (judges) are working hard day and night," Chief Justice Khosa said. "Encourage them rather than criticising them."

He said the only powerful element in the eyes of the judiciary is the law and not any individual. "I don't want to comment on the particular case the respected prime minister referred to, but he would know that he himself gave the permission for someone to go abroad. The debate in the high court was on the modalities," the top judge said, referring to the one-time permission granted to Nawaz to travel abroad.

"A silent revolution has come in our judiciary," Justice Khosa said, while acknowledging that no institution is "perfect".

He added: "Do not compare us to the judiciary that existed before 2009; the judiciary after that year is different, independent. For us, no one is big, small or powerful.

"Do you not remember that we convicted a prime minister (Nawaz Sharif) and disqualified another prime minister (Yousuf Raza Gilani)?" Chief Justice Khosa said, and while raising both his fists in a similar fashion as done by former president retired Gen Pervez Musharraf on May 12, 2007, added: "The case concerning a chief of army staff is going to be decided soon."

The chief justice welcomed Prime Minister Imran's announcement that he would divert resources from other departments to the judiciary to improve its functioning. He said the judiciary was now feeling a dearth of resources and so the premier's announcement is "very timely".

He highlighted that a total of 3,100 judges and magistrates had decided 3.6 million cases last year. And except for one or two, all of the litigants who were given relief by the judiciary belonged to the weak and downtrodden classes, he added.

Justice Khosa said if a certain individual gets a lot of projection in the media, it should not be taken to mean that the 3.6m other people whose cases were decided by the judiciary should be forgotten.

"To say that there is some imbalance [in how the powerful and the weak are treated by the judiciary] ... it should be reconsidered," he stressed.

He said using its current resources, the judiciary has ended the 25-year backlog of criminal appeals in the Supreme Court while, thanks to model courts, no murder trial is pending in 17 districts of the country.

"[The judges] are burning their midnight oil with no extra expense. We did not ask the government for a penny. [...] We did not ask the parliament for any amendment to laws or additional budgetary allocation."

LHC order
After much deliberation and meetings, the government had agreed to allow Nawaz to travel abroad, with the condition that indemnity bonds amounting to Rs7-7.5 billion be furnished. The PML-N had rejected the condition and had taken the matter to the LHC, which — in a blow to the Centre — ordered the federal government to remove his name from the ECL without any conditions. The verdict was issued after Nawaz signed a court-approved undertaking, saying that he would return to the country within four weeks.

PML-N president Shehbaz Sharif too signed an undertaking, which stated that he would "ensure return" of his brother "within four weeks or on certification by doctors that he has regained his health and is fit to return back to Pakistan". Nawaz was allowed to leave the country for a period of four weeks, extendable on the basis of medical reports.

The government had hailed the LHC's interim order and decided not to file an appeal against it, with Special Assistant to the PM on Accountability Shah*zad Akbar saying: “We believe that LHC has reinforced our stance and bound not only Shehbaz Sharif but also Nawaz Sharif under strong commitments.”

Nawaz, who has been diagnosed with an immune system disorder, was recommended by doctors to go abroad as his condition continued to deteriorate despite treatment. He was rushed to Services hospital from the Kot Lakhpat jail — where he was serving a prison sentence handed by an accountability court that found him guilty of corruption in the Al Azizia Steel Mills case — after his personal physician raised an alarm over the former prime minister's deteriorating health.

Nawaz was granted bail by the Islamabad High Court on humanitarian grounds in the Al Azizia case earlier this month. He also obtained bail in the ongoing Chaudhry Sugar Mills case, in which he is a suspect, from the LHC.
 
More humiliation for cult-followers. They were comfortably dumping all the blame on the LHC.

Imran’s unbridled tongue got him in trouble. He has picked up a fight with everyone except the military, and if he does it will be curtains for him.
 
Govt allowed it with a condition of 'bond' but LHC removed it.
 
Govt allowed it with a condition of 'bond' but LHC removed it.

Thats true. Thats what the article says.

The govt allowed travel. The court set the conditions.

But here it was made to look like that the govt had refused permission for travel and that the court still sent him.
 
The condition of a bond has no precedent how can court just agree with anything that is proposed to them.

There is also no precedent that the one giving the guarantee (Shahbaz Sharif) is also traveling out of the country with his brother and is also under investigation in different cases while his son, son in law and nephews are not returning to face the courts. The bail of Maryam is also unprecedented. Let's not talk about precedents here when everything happening here is unique.
 
Thats true. Thats what the article says.

The govt allowed travel. The court set the conditions.

But here it was made to look like that the govt had refused permission for travel and that the court still sent him.

Nothing to do with you, keep your nose out of it.
 
Nothing to do with you, keep your nose out of it.

Don't understand the need to be rude. There's countless posts here on India and the things that are happening there and there are more Pakistani's commenting on these topics than Indians. This is a forum where everyone is allowed to express their opinion in a respectable manner. Not sure why you are getting so worked up.
 
More humiliation for cult-followers. They were comfortably dumping all the blame on the LHC.

Imran’s unbridled tongue got him in trouble. He has picked up a fight with everyone except the military, and if he does it will be curtains for him.

Another uturn from you as sual mamoon? What happened to the "excellent decision by lhc" :))
 
I think IK has already stated that he permitted NS to travel for humanitarian reasons even when some of his cabinet members were emotionally blackmailing him against the idea. He however demanded the bond which the courts refused
 
The condition of a bond has no precedent how can court just agree with anything that is proposed to them.

Sorry to say but Nawaz did the same in 2000s and gave his property to Pakistan Govt, later on when he returned the took his property again via court. So it's wrong to say NO PRECEDENT.

Also, SS is on bail, he is facing charges and on HIS assurance, LHC allowed Nawaz to go abroad.

Precedent?
 
You have conveniently ignored [MENTION=133397]WebGuru[/MENTION] reply :) Post#6

I did miss out on that post but I replied on something similar later:

With regards to the indemnity bonds. You do understand that the government would have to go to civil court to enforce the bonds whereas the undertaking means the LHC can act on its own in a contempt of court offence.

The decision was accepted by the government appointed attorney who even stated that the decision is in favor of the government.
 
Sorry to say but Nawaz did the same in 2000s and gave his property to Pakistan Govt, later on when he returned the took his property again via court. So it's wrong to say NO PRECEDENT.

Also, SS is on bail, he is facing charges and on HIS assurance, LHC allowed Nawaz to go abroad.

Precedent?

You're talking about the time he went to Saudi on exile. Not sure if that was done through courts.
 
Okay, first of all I will not go into discussions regarding his health because apparently all PTI cult members are amazing doctors who can just look at a picture or a video and give an expert opinion about someone's health. Unfortunately, I do not have this ability and hence I will stick with what the medical boards and doctors have concluded after testing him.

With regards to the indemnity bonds. You do understand that the government would have to go to civil court to enforce the bonds whereas the undertaking means the LHC can act on its own in a contempt of court offence.

The decision was accepted by the government appointed attorney who even stated that the decision is in favor of the government.

Not going to bother with your firing squad statement. That's beyond immature.

first of all , i am not PTI fan...

second, tell me mr. law expert, after 4/8 weeks if SC/HC asked govt to present the NS in court thn what govt will use to bring him back ? did HC judges ever thought about it ? or they are here only to ask govt to give the guarantee of his life ? knowing he wont come back again, wont it be contempt of court if govt didnt present him in court ? as i said, damn if you and damn if you dont.

and about immaturity, tell this to chinese, they know better how to deal with corruption more thn anyone ....
 
Govt allowed it with a condition of 'bond' but LHC removed it.

Your statement is correct. But remember LHC never ordered Imran Khan to send Nawaz Sharif abroad. It was still Imran Khan's decision to send Nawaz Sharif abroad. He has to man up and accept the responsibility and dont pass the blame around.
 
I did miss out on that post but I replied on something similar later:

With regards to the indemnity bonds. You do understand that the government would have to go to civil court to enforce the bonds whereas the undertaking means the LHC can act on its own in a contempt of court offence.

The decision was accepted by the government appointed attorney who even stated that the decision is in favor of the government.

And you think the LHC will act against the Sharifs? They cant even go to the toilet without permission, just look at how they stopped the Model Town Massacre enquiry, even though it was the SC that wanted a new enquiry with a NEW JIT. And who did the JIT investigate, yes you guessed it, SS.
 
Your statement is correct. But remember LHC never ordered Imran Khan to send Nawaz Sharif abroad. It was still Imran Khan's decision to send Nawaz Sharif abroad. He has to man up and accept the responsibility and dont pass the blame around.

I take your point about IK and his mistake, but who asked for guarantees on his life? Which law allows a criminal to give a promissory note to say they will be back? Why didnt the LHC stay out of it totally? The Judiciary always favours the corrupt
 
Even Hitler would have gotten relief from rubber stamp LHC.

ANF laws are too strict i will be surprised if he is given bail because i personally know someone who was arrested by ANF and spent 9-10 years in jail with countless number of bail requests getting refused from High Courts he wasn't even allowed to attend janaza of his siblings. In the end it was proved he wasn't even guilty and thn he had to spend 3-4 more years in courts just to get his govt job back that's the nizaam e insaf of Pakistan for you.
 
I am sorry but you can't let the Judiciary get away with Murder. There has to be a check and balance on the judiciary which is controlled by the PPP and PML -N
 
I take your point about IK and his mistake, but who asked for guarantees on his life? Which law allows a criminal to give a promissory note to say they will be back? Why didnt the LHC stay out of it totally? The Judiciary always favours the corrupt

LHC do favour Sharif family. But Imran Khan could have play it smart and not allow Nawaz Sharif to go abroad until some court (LHC or SC) order him to do so. Then he would have a valid excuse. Right now it looks like a NRO.
 
LHC do favour Sharif family. But Imran Khan could have play it smart and not allow Nawaz Sharif to go abroad until some court (LHC or SC) order him to do so. Then he would have a valid excuse. Right now it looks like a NRO.

Can't disagree. Either it was bad judgement( trying to show people that he didn't want to kill the duffer) or badly advised. Either way it was IK that has to take responsibility. But it's not NRO because he hasn't been given a clean chit and the convictions are still there. The reality is the Judiciary would have found a reason to let him go "can the PM give a guarantee that NS will survive for 3 days". Which after seeing him 2 days ago makes the question even more funnier than it originally appeared.
Btw
You were always pro NS, so what's changed?
 
Last edited:
ANF laws are too strict i will be surprised if he is given bail because i personally know someone who was arrested by ANF and spent 9-10 years in jail with countless number of bail requests getting refused from High Courts he wasn't even allowed to attend janaza of his siblings. In the end it was proved he wasn't even guilty and thn he had to spend 3-4 more years in courts just to get his govt job back that's the nizaam e insaf of Pakistan for you.

Could he not show any relationship to the Sharifs.
 
Thank you, CJP, for nipping the ruling party's absurd victim-mentality, coverups and sob stories in the bud.
Imran Khan, for all his boastful claims of punishing the corrupts, can not exempt himself from letting Nawaz leave--a phenomenon that will behave like a ticking bomb with his supporters, ready to go off at some point during the ruling party's steep descent into the depths of utter economical ruination.
 
There is some member who will cover for main establishment never mind Imran Khan even thought both are equally guilty for begging Nawaz Sharif to leave as if he was guest, not jailed civilian.
 
Back
Top