What's new

Has Steven Smith damaged his legacy as a player?

giri26

T20I Debutant
Joined
Apr 1, 2009
Runs
8,468
Post of the Week
1
The Australian cricket team has been one of the top sides for a long time, have always been extremely competitive on the field, and played the game hard.

However, over the last few years they haven’t been able to replicate their enormous success, struggling especially outside Australia.

Howver, they looked settled in the Test format over the last few months. The demolition of a good English side, who themselves went through a difficult phase with disciplinary issues, meant the Aussies were moving in the right direction under captain Steve Smith.

The skipper himself was in tremendous form and the bowling was one of the best attacks Australia has ever had.

The South African sojourn couldn’t have started better for the Aussies, with a crushing win in the first Test. The Proteas were under the pump, having just lost two Tests in a row at home. The second Test disaster though, which left the vice-captain David Warner with demerit points and resulted in the ban of Kagiso Rabada, seems to have affected the visitors more than the hosts.

The fact that the ban on the genial South African bowler was reversed also seems to have not gone well with the Aussie camp.

It is hard to imagine a national cricket team captain orchestrating an act of cheating, fully aware of the cameras around the ground, and making a young team member perform the blatant act.

The coach and the entire Australian camp should have been aware of what was going on in the field, which makes this act even more ridiculous. We have seen some weird ball tampering in the past, like Shahid Afridi’s attempt to bite the ball, the English team rubbing sweets during the 2005 Ashes, and the South African captain himself trying to damage the ball using the zipper.

This, though, has probably got the most attention and it does not look good for the Aussie captain.

James Sutherland flying to South Africa to sort out the issue makes us believe that Smith might have more serious issues than the one-Test ban handed out by the ICC.

The fact that he is the captain of the side makes this even worse than it would have normally been. Smith also needs to take responsibility for dragging a young player into this mess, with Cameron Bancroft still trying to establish himself at this level.

The coaching staff are also under the hammer at this point.

Smith the captain has never been able to match Smith the batsman in terms of achievement and now it does seem like the former has brought the latter down to the ground.

It’s difficult to see Australia bouncing back on this tour and with both captain and vice-captain resigning, the selectors have a huge task on their hands. Whatever the result of this investigation, the Australian Test team needs to make a fresh start.

Steven Smith the player will come back with his reputation damaged and looking to win back his fans. His actions will display his true mental fortitude and ability to fight back.

Article by Giri Subramanian
 
If it true that it was Warners idea and that Smith choose to be ignorant of it ( as reported by Jim Maxwell) then perhaps history will remember him as as coward/idiot rather than a cheat
 
Last edited:
Considering how Sachin has spoiled his legacy on PP for "cleaning the seam", we already know the answer to this question.
 
Considering how Sachin has spoiled his legacy on PP for "cleaning the seam", we already know the answer to this question.

There is a difference. Teenda never admitted his guilt in public and the whole thing was treated as Mike Dennis with an axe to grind. Steve Smith has admitted it.
 
They haven't been the same since ABD registered that 126*(146) at PE when the ball was reversing.
 
On topic, yes.

People will always remember that Smith lost his leadership because he was a cheat and his antics led to people questioning the spirit and integrity of Cricket Australia. He was the captain of CA cricket team and the captain of CA cricket team is regarded as the second most valuable person in the country and this incident hasn't gone well with the Australian public.

A ban of 6 months or 1 year will further damage his legacy and it is very much possible that post ban, he may not remain the same player he used to be.

If he won't have lost his leadership and get banned for 1-2 test, it wont have hurt him.
 
There is a difference. Teenda never admitted his guilt in public and the whole thing was treated as Mike Dennis with an axe to grind. Steve Smith has admitted it.

because after seeing the video, with the grass stuck in the seam, it was clear to everyone but a blind man what actually happened
 
His batting would only have gone down as the law of averages would have taken over with time: we have seen the same thing occur with Ponting, Dravid, etc.

How much this has further affected him mentally remains to be seen on his return. If you thought the Stokes incident was bad, at least that was off the field and he acted in self-defence. This, however...
 
His batting would only have gone down as the law of averages would have taken over with time: we have seen the same thing occur with Ponting, Dravid, etc.

How much this has further affected him mentally remains to be seen on his return. If you thought the Stokes incident was bad, at least that was off the field and he acted in self-defence. This, however...

I remember Pontings avg was 60 after 100+ tests during the 2006-07 Ashes.
 
No he hasn't damaged his legacy at all, especially if he continues to face the problem head on.

I remember these same arguments back when Warne was suspended for the the drugs business, when Wasim and Waqar had to face innuendos on their bowling, when Harbhajan was (rightly IMO) hauled over the teri maaki business.

Who remembers these incidents today? No, we recall the 'whole player'.

End result - your legacy depends on your performance on the field. everything else is fluff.
 
His batting would only have gone down as the law of averages would have taken over with time: we have seen the same thing occur with Ponting, Dravid, etc.

How much this has further affected him mentally remains to be seen on his return. If you thought the Stokes incident was bad, at least that was off the field and he acted in self-defence. This, however...

I remember Pontings avg was 60 after 100+ tests during the 2006-07 Ashes.

Steve Smith was in the midst of his peak which would have gone for a few years more minimum

Ponting's average dropped when he was 30+ and past his best
 
No he hasn't damaged his legacy at all, especially if he continues to face the problem head on.

I remember these same arguments back when Warne was suspended for the the drugs business, when Wasim and Waqar had to face innuendos on their bowling, when Harbhajan was (rightly IMO) hauled over the teri maaki business.

Who remembers these incidents today? No, we recall the 'whole player'.

End result - your legacy depends on your performance on the field. everything else is fluff.

This! Only those banned for life have their legacy tarnished. Rest fix it if they play on again
 
Of course he has damaged his reputation, cheating ,especially premeditated or done so belligerently is bad in my book. Some are stating Warne's past discretions mean nothing but for true fans they do. I do not hold him in the same light as some other great cricketers and the say will be the case with Smith, especially as someone worthy of the captaincy.
 
For poor leadership, perhaps. Throwing a youngster under the bus like that is unacceptable.
IMO had he done it himself I would not have fussed at all. Joked about it and egg the Aussies, maybe, but nothing to fuss about.

I'm completely against these sanctions though. Maybe I'm a bit biased and nonobjective, but I will always stick out for hardcore cricketers and match winners irrespective of nationality. I absolutely love match winners, Smith has shaped many games for his country as such cricket is in a poor state without him, that's the bottom line. Yes, he did annoy me for trying to get Rabada suspended, however if this is the universe balancing itself out then I rebel.

This has no baring on his growing legacy as far as I'm concerned. If anything it shows how competitive he is, and will do anything to win games for his country. I'd rather my players go too far than not go far enough. Don't just lay over and play dead, it's competitive sport. CA have made a complete fuss, used a sledgehammer to crack a nut.
 
Last edited:
Put it this way, all those comparisons with Bradman - finished!

Doesn't matter if he redeems himself, he will NEVER be compared with Bradman.
 
Put it this way, all those comparisons with Bradman - finished!

Doesn't matter if he redeems himself, he will NEVER be compared with Bradman.

Comparison with Bradman is anyway not on. Smith hasn't been setting world on fire when playing outside of Aus.

-------------

His legacy as a leader will be impacted. His legacy as batsman is not going to have any impact here.
 
On his comeback, it remains to be seen if he will be greeted by cheers or boos by the home crowd in Australia.
 
Back
Top